


Ask the community...
I work in retail (not a tax professional) but we deal with this sometimes. The company is probably issuing the 1099-MISC because they're treating this as a settlement payment rather than a simple refund due to the dispute process and attorney general involvement. The W-9 requirement and notary signature make me think they're documenting this carefully for their own legal protection. You definitely shouldn't pay taxes on a refund for something you purchased - that would be double taxation.
Thanks for the insight from the retail perspective. Do you think I should just go ahead and sign their paperwork to get my money back, or try to push back on the 1099-MISC part? I'm worried that signing means I'm agreeing to their classification of this as something other than a simple refund.
I would go ahead and sign to get your money back. Fighting them on the 1099 issue will likely just delay your refund further, and you've already waited almost a year. The important thing is how YOU handle it on your tax return, not how they classify it. When you file your taxes, you can properly categorize it as a refund rather than income regardless of what form they send. Just keep good documentation of the original purchase, the return attempt, and all communications about this being a refund for a returned item. That way, if there's ever a question, you have clear evidence this wasn't income.
Something similar happened to me and I found out the company was reporting it as a 1099-MISC because the refund included extra compensation for the hassle beyond just the item cost. Did they mention if they're giving you any extra money beyond the original purchase price? That portion would actually be taxable.
Something no one has mentioned yet - check if there's a tax treaty between the US and Canada that might affect your situation. Many countries have treaties with the US that can impact how international students are taxed. Some tax treaties have specific provisions for students that might override the regular dependent rules. Your girlfriend should also check if she's required to file Form 8843 (Statement for Exempt Individuals with a Medical Condition) which most international students need to file even if they don't have income.
That's a good point about the tax treaty - I didn't even think about that angle. Do you know if these tax treaties typically address dependents specifically, or are they more focused on the student's own tax obligations? Also, I've never heard of Form 8843 before. Is that something she would file separately from her regular tax return?
Tax treaties typically focus more on the student's own tax obligations rather than their status as someone else's dependent. The US-Canada tax treaty (Article XX) has provisions that may exempt certain scholarship or fellowship income from US taxation for Canadian students, but it doesn't directly address dependent status. Form 8843 is filed separately if she doesn't need to file a tax return, or alongside her tax return if she does need to file one. All F-1 students must file this form regardless of whether they earned any income, as it's essentially telling the IRS "don't count my days in the US for the substantial presence test because I'm exempt as a student.
The other commenters have great points, but I want to add that you might want to look into whether you qualify for the "Other Dependent" credit which is part of the Credit for Other Dependents. Even if she doesn't qualify as a full dependent due to her income, you might still be eligible for a partial credit if you're providing significant support.
Have you looked into a disclaimer? In some cases, you can execute a qualified disclaimer of inheritance, which essentially says "I don't want this money" and it passes to the next eligible recipient. This has to be done within 9 months of death, and you can't have "accepted" the benefit (which might be an issue if you've already rolled it into your 401K). If the rollover is recent, talk to the plan administrator about possibly unwinding it, then execute a disclaimer. This might allow the money to go directly to her brother without passing through you.
I think I've already missed that window since it's been about 11 months since her passing, and as you mentioned, I've already completed the rollover into my 401K. I feel like I should have researched this better before making the initial decision, but I was dealing with a lot emotionally and just followed what the HR person at her company suggested.
That's understandable - these decisions often need to be made during difficult emotional times. Since the disclaimer option is no longer available, your best approach now is probably a combination strategy: First, designate her brother as the beneficiary for that portion of your 401K, ensuring he'll receive it if something happens to you. Then, work out a yearly gifting strategy once you're eligible for qualified distributions without penalties. You might also consult with an attorney about creating a simple agreement documenting your intentions, which could help clarify things for your own estate planning. Don't be too hard on yourself - you're trying to do the right thing in a system that doesn't make it easy.
Check if your 401K plan allows for hardship withdrawals or loans. You could potentially take a loan from your 401K (typically up to 50% of the balance or $50,000, whichever is less), then use those funds to gift to the brother without the early withdrawal penalty. You'd have to repay the loan with interest, but the interest goes back into your account so you're essentially paying yourself.
This is actually not great advice. 401K loans become immediately due if you leave your job, and since OP is living overseas, that could be risky. Plus, if you can't repay the loan, it becomes a distribution with all the taxes and penalties. The gift tax concerns would still apply too.
Friendly reminder that if your girlfriend is expecting a refund, she should file ASAP! I procrastinated on filing my 2022 taxes until last year, and I missed out on almost $2000 in refunds because I crossed the 3-year deadline. Don't make the same mistake!
Oh crap, I had no idea there was a 3-year deadline on refunds! That's really good to know. Do you think we should use a tax service like Jackson Hewitt at this point or just try to do it ourselves with tax software?
For a simple tax situation, tax software should work fine and save you money compared to Jackson Hewitt. Something like TurboTax or FreeTaxUSA can handle late filings easily. If her taxes are more complicated (self-employment, multiple income sources, investments, etc.), then a professional service might be worth the cost. They sometimes catch deductions or credits you might miss on your own. But for basic W-2 income, the software should be more than adequate and much cheaper.
Just want to add - if she's getting a refund, the government has literally been holding her money interest-free this whole time. File now and get that cash back in her pocket!
Andre Dupont
Something nobody's mentioned yet - if your mother-in-law is from Canada, check if there's a tax treaty that might affect this situation. Some treaties have specific provisions about dependents and what counts as "residency" for tax purposes.
0 coins
Zoe Papanikolaou
ā¢Do you know where I can find info about tax treaties? My in-laws are from India and I've wondered about this too.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
ā¢You can find tax treaties on the IRS website - search for "United States Income Tax Treaties A to Z" and you'll find a list of all countries with treaties. For more detailed information, look for IRS Publication 901 (U.S. Tax Treaties). For India specifically, there is a tax treaty, but dependency rules are complex. The treaty mainly covers things like double taxation of income, but personal exemptions and dependent status are usually determined by the regular IRS rules I mentioned earlier.
0 coins
Jamal Wilson
If the mother visits from Canada for 8 months, wouldn't she technically be considered a US resident under the substantial presence test? That might change things completely.
0 coins
Mei Lin
ā¢Good point! I think the substantial presence test is 183 days (about 6 months) in a calendar year, so at 8 months she'd likely meet that. Would that make her ineligible as a dependent?
0 coins