


Ask the community...
Just wanted to add that if you received a Form 1099-MISC for your settlement, be careful. Sometimes insurance companies will issue a 1099 for the entire settlement amount including the attorney fees, even though part of it may be non-taxable. You'll need to make adjustments on your return to ensure you're not overtaxed. Also, keep in mind that if you deducted any medical expenses related to your injury in previous years and then got reimbursed through this settlement, you may need to include that previously deducted amount as income this year (the "tax benefit rule").
They actually did send me a 1099-MISC for the entire settlement amount of $78,000! I was panicking thinking I'd have to pay taxes on all of it. How do I correct this when the insurance company reported the full amount to the IRS?
Don't worry - this happens all the time with settlement payments. Even though the insurance company reported the full amount on the 1099-MISC, you don't need to report the entire amount as taxable income on your return. You'll need to file Form 8275 (Disclosure Statement) with your tax return to explain the discrepancy. On this form, you'll explain that the 1099-MISC includes non-taxable compensation for physical injuries under Section 104(a)(2) as well as the attorney fees that should be allocated proportionally. This way, the IRS will understand why your reported income doesn't match the 1099-MISC amount. Just be sure to keep all your settlement documentation in case of questions later. Many tax software programs like TurboTax have sections specifically for handling this situation.
Has anyone dealt with a settlement that spanned multiple tax years? I received part of my settlement last year and will get the rest this year, but all the attorney fees came out of last year's payment. Trying to figure out if I can deduct all fees last year or need to split them somehow.
In multi-year settlements, you generally allocate the attorney fees based on when you receive the income. So if the fees were all paid from last year's portion, but they relate to the entire settlement, you should allocate the fees proportionally across the years of payment.
That makes sense, thank you! So I should figure out what percentage of my total settlement I received last year, and then deduct that same percentage of the total attorney fees on last year's return. Then I'll deduct the remaining portion of fees on this year's return when I report the second payment. That's clearer than anything my attorney explained!
Something else to keep in mind - if you're claiming property tax deductions, make sure you're only deducting the actual tax portion and not any fees, penalties, or interest that might be included in your payment. Those other charges aren't deductible as property taxes. I learned this the hard way when I got audited a few years back. My county lumps everything together in the payment, but technically only the tax itself counts toward the property tax deduction.
Is there an easy way to separate these out? My property tax bill has the base amount plus like 4 different "special assessments" for things like schools and flood control. Are those considered part of the deductible property tax?
Generally, special assessments for schools, flood control, and similar public improvements are deductible as property taxes as long as they're based on the assessed value of your property and apply to all properties in the jurisdiction. However, special assessments for local benefits that increase the value of your property (like sidewalks, streets, or water/sewer lines specifically for your neighborhood) are not deductible as taxes. The easiest way to separate these is to look at your property tax statement - it should itemize the different charges. If you're using tax software, it will usually ask you to enter only the deductible portions. Or if you work with a tax professional, they'll know how to properly categorize each item.
Has anyone noticed if property tax deductions are even worth it anymore with the higher standard deduction? I paid about $9,000 in property taxes last year plus maybe $4,000 in state income tax, but my mortgage interest has dropped so much that I'm still better off with the standard deduction ($25,900 for married filing jointly).
It really depends on your total itemized deductions. Remember that itemizing includes property taxes, state/local income taxes (capped together at $10k), mortgage interest, charitable contributions, and some medical expenses. If all those combined exceed your standard deduction, then itemizing is worth it. But you're right that the higher standard deduction has made itemizing less beneficial for many homeowners.
Just wanted to add something important that hasn't been mentioned yet. When you're dealing with after-tax funds in a SEP IRA that were never reported, you need to be careful about the statute of limitations. Generally, the IRS has 3 years to audit your returns, but this can be extended in certain situations. In your case, since these contributions weren't reported at all, you might want to consult with a tax professional about any potential risks before proceeding with the conversion. Also, make sure you have documentation of those original contributions from 7 years ago - bank statements showing the transfers to the SEP, etc. The more documentation you have to support your claim that these were after-tax contributions, the better off you'll be if there are any questions.
Thanks for bringing this up - I hadn't considered the statute of limitations angle. Do you think filing the Form 8606 now for those old contributions might trigger some kind of review of those past tax years?
Filing Form 8606 now for old contributions typically doesn't automatically trigger an audit, but it does put those years on the IRS's radar. The good news is that you're trying to comply with the rules by properly documenting your basis in the IRA, which looks better than if they discovered the unreported contributions some other way. The key is documentation - make sure you have records of all those contributions and be prepared to show they were made with after-tax dollars. If you're concerned, working with a tax professional who specializes in IRA issues might be worth the investment to ensure everything is handled properly and to help respond if the IRS does have questions.
Has anybody considered that the OP could potentially benefit from the losses in the SEP IRA? If the original contributions were $60k and current value is $38k, that's a significant loss. While you can't typically deduct IRA losses, if you liquidate ALL your IRAs (of the same type) and the total distribution is less than your basis, you might be able to claim the loss as a miscellaneous itemized deduction subject to the 2% AGI floor. Though I believe this was suspended under the TCJA until 2026.
This is incorrect information. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the deduction for IRA losses completely through 2025. Even before that, claiming such losses was extremely difficult and rarely beneficial due to the AGI limitations. Please don't give tax advice if you're not certain - it could cause serious problems for the OP.
One thing to be careful about with Section 1231 gains is the "look back rule." If you had any 1231 losses in the previous 5 years, your current 1231 gains are treated as ordinary income to the extent of those prior losses. This could affect whether your full gain qualifies for OZ treatment. Also, remember that even though you can defer the tax until 2026, you'll eventually have to pay it. Make sure you'll have the liquidity to pay that tax bill when it comes due, since it's not forgiven - just deferred.
Thanks for bringing up the look-back rule - I hadn't considered that! I do have a small 1231 loss from a property I sold in 2023. So if I understand correctly, a portion of my current gain would be considered ordinary income rather than capital gain? Would that portion not be eligible for OZ investment?
Yes, exactly. If you had a 1231 loss in 2023, a portion of your current 1231 gain would be recaptured as ordinary income to the extent of that previous loss. That recaptured portion would not be eligible for OZ investment, since OZ investments can only be made with capital gains. For example, if you had a $10,000 1231 loss in 2023 and now have a $50,000 1231 gain, $10,000 of your current gain would be treated as ordinary income and only the remaining $40,000 would be treated as capital gain eligible for OZ investment.
Has anyone here actually invested in an OZ fund? I'm considering it but worried about limited options and high fees. Most of the funds I've looked at have 2% management fees plus performance fees, which seems high.
I invested in an OZ fund after selling a small apartment building in 2022. The fees are definitely higher than typical investment funds, but remember you're getting tax benefits that can offset those costs. I went with a fund focused on multifamily development in emerging markets which aligned with my investment goals. Make sure you do due diligence on the fund manager's track record and understand the timeline - you need to hold for 10+ years to get the full tax benefits on appreciation. And be prepared for the tax bill in 2026 on your initial deferred gain.
Tristan Carpenter
My understanding is that there are some rare exceptions to the 90-day deadline for Tax Court petitions. I think they're called "equitable tolling" situations. If you had some extraordinary circumstance like being in the hospital or deployed in the military, it might be worth mentioning that in a follow-up to the Tax Court.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
ā¢That's interesting. I didn't have any extreme circumstances like that though. Just poor planning and procrastination on my part unfortunately. Do you know if the IRS ever just "forgives" these situations if I explain it was an honest mistake?
0 coins
Tristan Carpenter
ā¢The IRS generally doesn't "forgive" missed deadlines just because it was an honest mistake. They hear that all the time. If it was truly just procrastination, you'll need to follow the pay-first-then-claim-refund route the others mentioned. However, there was actually a recent Supreme Court case (Boechler v. Commissioner) that established equitable tolling could apply for certain tax deadlines, though that was for Collection Due Process cases, not deficiency notices. Still, tax law continues to evolve on these issues.
0 coins
Amaya Watson
Has anyone dealt with amended returns being processed during this type of situation? I filed an amended return like OP did and I'm wondering how long it typically takes the IRS to process those compared to regular returns?
0 coins
Grant Vikers
ā¢In my experience, amended returns are taking FOREVER right now - like 6+ months. I filed one in April and it's still "processing" according to Where's My Amended Return tool. But that's separate from the Tax Court deadline issue. The amended return won't stop the deficiency assessment if you missed the petition deadline.
0 coins