
IRS
CommunityGovernment Services


Ask the community...
I'm in a bit of a financial mess right now with both federal and state tax debts. I've accumulated a pretty significant amount that I can't pay as a lump sum, so I know I need payment plans for both. The state tax department already sent me a notice about my outstanding balance (around $8,200), and I called them yesterday to set up a payment plan. They were actually pretty reasonable about it, which was a relief. But here's the thing - I haven't received any notices from the IRS yet about my federal tax debt (approximately $14,500), but I know it's coming. I'm worried about having to make payments to both agencies simultaneously because my budget is already super tight. I vaguely remember reading somewhere that you might be able to work with the IRS to defer federal tax payments until after your state tax debt is completely paid off. Is this actually a real option? Has anyone done this successfully? I'm trying to figure out the best approach before the IRS notices start arriving in my mailbox.
First time dealing with this situation and feeling a bit overwhelmed. My mom is planning to sell her land that she's owned for about 15 years, and we're getting different opinions about the capital gains tax implications. The realtor is saying one thing, but then we talked to a family friend who does accounting and they gave us completely different information! Who actually has the final authority on determining capital gains tax when selling property like this? Is it the realtor handling the sale? A separate tax professional we should hire? The IRS directly? The property is worth around $320,000 now but she purchased it for approximately $125,000 back then. We're trying to figure out how much to set aside for taxes and don't want to make a costly mistake. Thanks for any guidance you can provide!
The one thing nobody's mentioned yet is that you should gather ALL documentation about improvements made to the property over the years. Every upgrade, renovation, or major repair can potentially increase the cost basis and reduce the taxable gain. Your mom should look for receipts, contracts, bank statements, credit card statements, etc. that show money spent improving the property. Things like utility upgrades, fencing, grading, any structures built, surveys, legal fees related to the property, etc. all potentially count toward increasing the basis. The difference between the selling price and the adjusted basis (purchase price plus improvements minus depreciation taken) is what determines the capital gain. Documentation is key!
What about property taxes paid over the years? Do those count as part of the basis? And if she doesn't have receipts for improvements made a long time ago, is there any way to still claim them?
Property taxes paid over the years unfortunately don't increase your basis - they're either deducted as an expense in the year paid (for investment property) or taken as an itemized deduction on Schedule A (for personal property). For improvements without receipts, you're not completely out of luck. You can create a reconstruction of costs using reasonable estimates. Take photos of the improvements, get statements from contractors who did the work if possible, or find comparable costs for similar improvements during the same time period. The IRS prefers documentation, but they recognize that records from many years ago might not be available. Just be reasonable with your estimates and be prepared to explain your methodology if questioned.
Does anyone know if there's a difference in capital gains tax rates for vacant land versus a house on land? My parents are in a similar situation but they're selling just undeveloped acreage.
The capital gains tax rates are the same for vacant land vs. houses - it's based on your income and how long you've owned it, not the type of property. The big difference is you can't claim the primary residence exclusion ($250k/$500k) on vacant land since nobody lived there. Also, undeveloped land typically has fewer improvements you can add to the basis compared to a house where you might have done renovations, replaced a roof, etc. But things like clearing, grading, utility connections, surveys, and access roads still count!
Can someone walk me through this gift tax situation? I'm trying to understand the basics... So from what I understand, we have this lifetime gift tax limit that's in the millions of dollars, and there's an annual gift tax exclusion of $18k before we have to report it to the IRS. What I don't get is why wouldn't everyone just transfer most of their assets to their kids or family before they die to avoid the estate tax completely? Why go through all the hassle with trusts and other complicated legal structures if you could just gift everything away gradually? Is there something I'm missing about how the gift tax and estate tax work together? It seems like there must be a catch or everyone would be doing this instead of complicated estate planning.
A couple points that haven't been mentioned yet about gift taxes: 1) Making gifts during your lifetime can also save on overall taxes if the assets are likely to appreciate significantly. Once you gift it, any future appreciation happens in your kid's estate, not yours. 2) Some states have their own estate/inheritance taxes with much lower exemptions than the federal limits. Gifting strategies can help with these too. 3) Gifts of certain types of property (like family businesses) can sometimes qualify for discounts that effectively let you transfer more value while using less of your exemption. Just something to think about if you're doing planning beyond just the basic gift/estate tax rules.
For point #1, doesn't the recipient keep your basis though? So they might get hit with bigger capital gains tax when they sell? I thought that was one reason people wait to transfer at death - the step-up in basis.
You're absolutely right about the basis issue. When you gift assets during your lifetime, the recipient keeps your original basis (with some adjustments for gifts that have decreased in value). In contrast, assets transferred at death get a "step-up" in basis to fair market value, which can eliminate capital gains tax on all the appreciation that occurred during your lifetime. This is a critical consideration when deciding between lifetime gifts versus transfers at death. The best strategy often involves a mix - gifting some assets (especially those with minimal appreciation or those expected to grow significantly in the future) while holding other highly-appreciated assets until death to get the basis step-up. This gets pretty complex and is definitely one reason why people use estate planning professionals instead of just making outright gifts.
One thing nobody's mentioned is that trusts aren't just about tax avoidance - they also protect assets for beneficiaries who might not be good with money. My uncle gifted money directly to my cousin who has addiction issues and it was gone in months. A trust would have prevented that disaster. Also sometimes it's about protecting assets from a beneficiary's potential divorce or creditors. Not all estate planning is tax-motivated!
This is so true. My sister's ex-husband would have gotten half of her inheritance if my parents hadn't used a trust. The trust protected it as separate property that wasn't divided in the divorce.
So here's my situation - I own a couple of older cars that I use to test products I developed for the automotive market. My small business sells around 950 units annually and the vehicles are essential for testing and validation. While they don't rack up tons of miles (which is why I'm not too concerned about mileage deductions), both of these test cars have been absolute money pits when it comes to maintenance and repairs. I've spent close to $3,800 this year alone keeping them running. I'm wondering if I can legitimately deduct these vehicle maintenance expenses on my taxes? Since I'm using these vehicles specifically as testing platforms for my product development and demonstration, it seems like these should qualify as business expenses. The maintenance is necessary to keep my test platforms operational for ongoing product improvement and validation. Anyone have experience with this kind of vehicle expense deduction?
Don't forget about depreciation too! If you're using actual expenses, you can depreciate the business portion of your vehicles. I track all my expenses in a spreadsheet including maintenance, gas, insurance, registration fees, etc. Then I apply my business use percentage (based on mileage log) to get my deduction amount. One important note: if your vehicles are used 100% for business and never for personal use, you can deduct 100% of the expenses. But the IRS tends to be suspicious of 100% business use for vehicles, so make sure you have solid documentation.
What kind of documentation would be considered solid proof for 100% business use? I have a personal vehicle too, so these test cars really are just for product development and demos.
For 100% business use, you'll want a detailed mileage log showing every trip was business-related. This should include dates, starting/ending locations, purpose of trips, and odometer readings. Having a separate personal vehicle helps your case significantly. Keep all maintenance receipts with notes about how they relate to business use. Take photos of the vehicles showing any business branding or modifications specific to your product testing. Also maintain a written business policy stating these vehicles are designated solely for product testing and not authorized for personal use.
Quick question - how old are these vehicles? If they're fully depreciated already, does that affect how the maintenance expenses are handled on taxes?
Even if the vehicles are fully depreciated, you can still deduct maintenance expenses based on business use percentage. Depreciation is separate from ongoing operating expenses. I have a 12-year-old truck that's fully depreciated but still deduct all the maintenance costs for the business portion of its use.
So I'm at my wits end with this tax situation. Back in 2021, I exercised some stock options from my employer - about $23,500 worth. When I filed my 2021 taxes, I thought I included everything correctly - submitted all the forms, reported the income, etc. Fast forward to December 2023, I get this CP2000 notice saying I underreported income by like $12,700! They're saying I owe an additional $4,300 in taxes plus some penalties. I immediately called a tax professional who looked over my return and said I did make a mistake - I didn't include one of the stock transactions properly. We sent a response agreeing to the assessment and thought it was handled. Now in March 2024, I get this CP3219A Notice of Deficiency in the mail talking about a "statutory notice of deficiency" and "90-day letter" and saying I need to petition the tax court if I disagree!? I don't disagree with owing the money, I already acknowledged the mistake. But now I'm totally confused about what I'm supposed to do. Do I need to respond to this? Pay something again? I thought we already sorted this out with the CP2000 response. The IRS phone lines are absolutely impossible to get through. I've tried calling 8 times and never get a human. Has anyone dealt with this before? I'm losing sleep over this whole mess.
One thing nobody mentioned yet - you need to make sure you actually pay the amount you agreed to on the CP2000. Even if you responded agreeing to the assessment, if you didn't send the payment, they'll continue with collections. The CP3219A is basically saying "last chance before we really escalate this." Call the IRS (use one of the methods suggested above since getting through is a nightmare) and make sure: 1) your response was received, and 2) verify if your payment was received. If not, pay it ASAP. For future reference - stock sales are one of the biggest triggers for CP2000 notices because the basis reporting is so complicated. Always double check your 1099-B against the actual transactions.
Thanks for bringing this up - it's possible I didn't actually pay after responding. I sent back the response form agreeing to the amount, but now that I think about it, I don't remember if I included a check or if I was supposed to wait for a payment instruction. That could definitely be the issue. Has anyone here paid after responding to a CP2000? Did you include payment with your response or wait for them to send payment instructions?
You generally have two options: you can include payment with your CP2000 response, or you can wait for the IRS to send you a bill after processing your response. If you chose the second option and they haven't processed your response yet, that's likely why you received the CP3219A. I'd recommend calling the IRS (using one of the methods others suggested to get through) and ask about the status of your case. Tell them you agreed to the CP2000 and want to pay the amount due immediately. They should be able to take your payment over the phone or give you instructions for paying online. Make sure to get a confirmation number for any payment you make.
Make sure you're calculating the correct cost basis for your stock sales. This is the #1 reason people get these notices for stock transactions. The IRS gets the sale price reported from brokerages but often doesn't get the correct purchase price, especially for employee stock options or RSUs. For the future, keep detailed records of all stock purchases, grants, and vesting schedules. The default basis reporting is frequently wrong for company stock plans and can trigger these kinds of notices.
Lydia Santiago
One option nobody's mentioned is an Offer in Compromise. If your financial situation is really bad, you might qualify to settle your tax debt for less than you owe. The IRS will consider your ability to pay, income, expenses, and asset equity. Check out Form 656-B.
0 coins
Ezra Beard
AuthorWould an Offer in Compromise work if I've already set up a state payment plan? Also, does this affect your credit score the same way a payment plan would?
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
Yes, you can still pursue an Offer in Compromise with the IRS even if you already have a state payment plan in place. The IRS will take your state tax obligations into account when evaluating your offer. In fact, having a state payment plan might strengthen your case by demonstrating your limited ability to pay. Regarding credit scores, an accepted Offer in Compromise can actually be better for your credit in the long run than a payment plan. While the tax lien itself may impact your credit, resolving the debt through an OIC shows resolution. In contrast, a long-term payment plan means you'll have outstanding debt for a much longer period. Just be aware that the OIC process can take 6-12 months, and you'll need to be compliant with all filing and payment requirements during that time.
0 coins
Romeo Quest
Have you considered borrowing money to pay off the state tax debt completely? Personal loan, 401k loan, or even a credit card? Sometimes the interest rate is lower than the penalties and interest that keep accumulating on tax debt.
0 coins
Val Rossi
This is terrible advice. Credit card interest rates are way higher than IRS interest rates. The IRS rate is like 7-8% right now while credit cards are 18-29%. A 401k loan is slightly better but you lose all that potential investment growth.
0 coins