


Ask the community...
Have you checked if you entered your expenses exactly the same way in both programs? I had a similar issue last year and realized I had categorized an expense differently in one program which affected my net self-employment income slightly, causing ripple effects in the tax calculations.
Thanks for this suggestion. I double-checked and I'm pretty sure I entered everything identically, but I might have missed something. Is there a specific expense category that tends to cause this kind of calculation difference? I'm going to go through line by line again to make sure.
The most common categories that can cause differences are home office deductions and vehicle expenses. Some programs calculate these differently based on how you enter the information. Also check if you're using actual expenses versus standard mileage rate for vehicle costs in both programs the same way. Another thing to look at is retirement plan contributions. If you have a SEP IRA or Solo 401(k), the way these are entered can affect your SE tax calculations differently across programs.
I'm actually a tax prep volunteer and see this all the time. The most likely explanation is that the two programs are using different calculation orders: 1. Program 1 might be calculating your QBI deduction based on your SE income BEFORE deducting the employer portion of SE tax 2. Program 2 might be calculating QBI AFTER deducting the employer portion The IRS guidance suggests the second approach is more accurate, which would explain why your second program shows a higher QBI deduction. Check both returns on Form 8995 (QBI deduction) and Schedule SE to see exactly how they're calculating these amounts.
Is there actually an official IRS position on which order to do these calculations? I always thought the tax code was super specific about calculation order.
I think everyone's missing a simpler solution. Since the $100 is such a small amount, couldn't you just ignore it and start fresh next time you do a backdoor Roth? I mean, it's only $100 of basis, and the tax impact would be minimal if you just didn't carry it forward. That's what I did in a similar situation a few years ago and I haven't had any issues.
No, that's not a good idea. The IRS computers automatically track your 8606 history, and discrepancies can trigger notices or audits. A friend of mine tried to "start fresh" instead of carrying forward their basis and got a CP2000 notice. Had to file an amended return and pay interest. The IRS is surprisingly efficient at tracking these specific forms.
I appreciate the heads up about this! I hadn't realized the IRS specifically tracks the 8606 history so closely. I guess I've just been lucky so far not to get flagged. Sounds like I should probably go back and amend my returns to properly carry forward that basis. Better to fix it myself than wait for them to find it and potentially pay penalties and interest.
Has anyone considered that this might actually be a reporting error? I've been doing backdoor Roth conversions for years, and I think there's confusion about how to report a loss on Form 8606. Line 14 should only have a value if you have remaining basis in IRAs that still have funds in them. Since the account was completely emptied, I think the software might be calculating this incorrectly. When I had a similar situation with a loss before conversion, my accountant reported the full contribution amount ($6000) on line 4, then reported the actual converted amount ($5900) on line 8, and ended up with $0 on line 14.
That's actually incorrect. The Form 8606 instructions specifically address this situation. When you convert less than your basis (whether due to investment losses or partial conversion), the difference remains as basis to be tracked on future Form 8606s. Line 14 is literally defined as "your basis in traditional IRAs" - not just for accounts with money still in them. The basis exists separate from the account balance. This is why Form 8606 needs to be filed even in years you don't make new contributions but still have basis. Your accountant may have made an error in your situation. I'd recommend checking your prior returns.
Another thing worth mentioning is that overtime might push you into a higher Medicare Additional Tax bracket if you're getting close to $200k income. I hit this last year and was shocked when filing taxes. Any income over $200k gets an additional 0.9% Medicare tax on top of everything else. So if your regular job pays $190k and you do $15k in overtime, the extra $5k over the threshold gets that additional tax. Not a huge percentage but still something to be aware of if you're in that income range.
Is this something that employers automatically withhold or is it something you have to pay at tax time? I'm getting close to that range with all my overtime this year.
Employers are supposed to automatically withhold the Additional Medicare Tax once your wages exceed $200k for the year. However, there's a quirk: if you have multiple jobs or your spouse works and you file jointly, your combined income might exceed the threshold even if no single employer pays you over $200k. In that case, your employers won't withhold the extra 0.9%, and you'll need to either make estimated tax payments or be prepared to pay it when you file. You can also request additional withholding on your W-4 to cover it. It caught me by surprise because I had two jobs last year that together put me over the threshold.
Something nobody has mentioned yet - check if your overtime is pushing you into a higher state tax bracket too! Federal isn't the only concern. In my state, the jump from 6% to 9% state tax hit me hard when I was working tons of OT last summer.
This is really important. I live in California and the state brackets have even more dramatic jumps than federal. My overtime last year pushed me from 8% to 9.3% state tax bracket and it definitely took a bite out of those extra earnings.
For self-employment income, I actually recommend checking out FreeTaxUSA. I've used it for the past 4 years with my consulting business and it handles Schedule C perfectly well. The federal return is free and state is only like $15. TurboTax wanted to charge me $170 for basically the same thing! The interface isn't quite as slick as TurboTax, but it's totally functional and asks all the right questions about business expenses, home office, etc. Plus they have decent customer support if you get stuck on something.
Does FreeTaxUSA handle multiple 1099s well? I have like 8 different clients who sent me 1099-NECs this year.
Absolutely! I had 12 different 1099-NECs last year and FreeTaxUSA handled them with no problem. You can enter them all individually or combine them on your Schedule C - it gives you both options. The software also lets you categorize different types of income if you have multiple business activities, which was really helpful for me since I do both consulting and some product sales.
has anyone compared the accuracy between different software options? i did a test last year where i input identical info into turbotax and hr block and got different refund amounts which freaked me out!!! eventually figured out hr block missed a self employment deduction that turbotax caught.
Elliott luviBorBatman
I went through a similar situation last year with rotating work sites around Chicago. Here's what I learned after consulting with a tax professional: you might qualify for a deduction if your home is your "principal place of business" and you're traveling TO these temporary work sites FROM your home office. Do you do any work from home? If so, and if that home office is used exclusively and regularly for business, you might have a case for deducting travel from there to your temporary work locations. This is different from normal commuting expenses which aren't deductible.
0 coins
Manny Lark
ā¢I do occasional work from home (maybe 1-2 days a month when projects need extra attention). Would that be enough to qualify my home as a "principal place of business"? And if it did qualify, would the deduction be worth the risk of triggering an audit?
0 coins
Elliott luviBorBatman
ā¢Working from home only 1-2 days a month likely wouldn't be enough to qualify your home as a "principal place of business." For this approach to work, your home office would need to be: 1) Used exclusively and regularly for business (a dedicated space), and 2) The primary place where you conduct your business activities, or where you conduct administrative/management activities if you have no other fixed location for those tasks. Regarding audit risk, it's not worth claiming something questionable. The IRS has been increasing scrutiny on home office and travel deductions, especially when the amounts are substantial. Instead, focus on maximizing other legitimate deductions like retirement contributions, health savings accounts, or educational expenses if applicable to your situation.
0 coins
Demi Hall
Have you asked your employer about any reimbursement programs? My company offers transit benefits for employees who commute into NYC from out of state. Might be worth checking if your employer has something similar before trying to find tax deductions that might not apply.
0 coins
Mateusius Townsend
ā¢This is the actual answer. Tax deductions for commuting rarely work out, but employer programs can save you thousands. My company gives us pre-tax transit cards that save me about 30% on subway costs. Ask your HR department!
0 coins