


Ask the community...
For anyone prepping for tax interviews, don't forget about the soft skills aspect! Technical knowledge is important, but I've been on hiring committees for senior tax roles, and we often choose candidates who can demonstrate: 1. How they've influenced business decisions through tax planning 2. Times they've managed difficult clients or stakeholders 3. Experience building/mentoring teams 4. Examples of cross-functional collaboration 5. Crisis management (like when a major tax law changes mid-project) Be ready with specific stories for each of these areas, using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result). The candidates who stand out combine technical knowledge with these leadership qualities.
How do you recommend balancing technical preparation vs soft skills prep? I have a final round interview next week and I'm not sure where to focus my limited time.
I suggest allocating about 60% of your prep time to technical aspects and 40% to soft skills if you're interviewing for a senior manager or director level position. For your technical prep, focus on the most relevant areas for the specific role rather than trying to cover everything. Review the job description for clues about what technical areas matter most to them. If it's a final round, they already believe you have the baseline technical skills, so now it's about demonstrating judgment and leadership. Prepare 4-5 strong STAR stories that showcase different aspects of your leadership style and decision-making process.
What about negotiating the offer once you get it? I'm in final rounds for two different tax manager positions and I'm worried about messing up the compensation discussion. Any advice?
Never accept the first offer! I doubled my salary in 4 years by negotiating well. Research typical compensation on Glassdoor and LinkedIn salary insights before your interviews. When you get an offer, always express enthusiasm but ask for 24-48 hours to consider it, even if you love it. When countering, focus on the total package, not just base salary. Sometimes there's more flexibility with signing bonuses, extra PTO, or performance bonuses than with base. And having two offers puts you in an amazing position - just be transparent without playing them against each other in an adversarial way.
Just to add another data point - I was in a similar situation a couple years ago. I supported my girlfriend's teenage sister who lived with us. I could claim her as a dependent under the qualifying relative rules since she lived with me all year and I provided more than half her support. But for Head of Household, the rules are stricter. You need a "qualifying child" OR a qualifying relative who is your parent, sibling, or certain other relatives. A girlfriend's mother unfortunately doesn't meet those relationship tests for HOH purposes. What I ended up doing was looking at other ways to reduce my AGI instead - maxing out 401k, HSA contributions, etc. Got me under the threshold I needed for a different credit.
Thanks for sharing your experience! I hadn't thought about other ways to reduce my AGI like retirement contributions. Did the IRS ever question your dependent claim for your girlfriend's sister even though you were able to claim her?
No, I never got any questions about claiming her as a dependent. The key is that I met all four tests for a qualifying relative: 1) She lived with me the whole year, 2) Her income was under the threshold, 3) I provided over half her support, and 4) She didn't file a joint return. For dependents who live with you, the relationship test is very broad - they just need to be a member of your household all year. The Head of Household relationship test is the one that's much stricter. Definitely look into retirement contributions. If you're eligible for a traditional IRA or have a 401k at work, those contributions can reduce your AGI. HSA contributions too if you have a high-deductible health plan.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet - be careful about the "member of household" rule if you're not legally married to your girlfriend. The IRS publication 501 states that your relationship must not "violate local law" to claim someone as a qualifying relative. In some states, cohabitation laws could technically come into play. California repealed their anti-cohabitation laws, so you should be fine, but it's something to be aware of when claiming non-relatives as dependents.
Wait, are there really still laws against unmarried couples living together?? What century is this??
Another option - call your tax preparer if you use one. I had a similar issue last year with unexpected 1099-B from Prudential, and my accountant knew exactly what it was for and how to handle it. Even if you normally do your own taxes, might be worth paying for an hour of a professional's time just to sort this specific issue.
I've always done my own taxes with TurboTax. Would it be better to just take everything to a CPA this year since I have this complicated form? Or is this something I can still figure out in the software?
You can absolutely still handle this in TurboTax or similar software. The 1099-B might seem intimidating, but the tax software walks you through entering the information step by step. Most programs have specific screens for entering 1099-B data that match the boxes on the form. If your situation is otherwise straightforward, paying a CPA would probably be overkill for just one 1099-B. The key information you need to enter is the description of property sold, date acquired (if shown), date sold, proceeds (sales price), and cost basis (if shown). The software will calculate any gain or loss and place it on the proper forms.
Check if the 1099B is for a "surrender" or "lapse" of a life insurance policy. MetLife often issues these when a policy terminates with some cash value. The taxable amount is usually the surrender value minus premiums paid over the life of the policy. The form should indicate if they reported your basis to the IRS.
I've got the same situation but my 1099B doesn't list any cost basis and box 3 isn't checked. What do I do in that case?
Just wanted to offer a different perspective - I went with a Nevada LLC for my online business and regretted it. They have a weird "Commerce Tax" that kicked in once I hit $4 million in revenue (which I didn't expect to happen so fast), and then I had to deal with the complicated registered agent requirements. Ended up converting to Wyoming LLC three years in and wish I'd done more research upfront. Don't just go with what's popular - really analyze your specific business model and growth plans.
Did the conversion process mess up your ability to take the QBI deduction that year? I heard entity changes can disrupt that 20% pass-through benefit.
The conversion actually didn't disrupt my QBI deduction that year. Since I went from one pass-through entity (Nevada LLC) to another pass-through entity (Wyoming LLC), the basic eligibility wasn't affected. However, I did have to carefully document the transition date and maintain separate accounting for the pre and post-conversion periods. The tricky part was that the conversion created a "short year" for tax purposes, which required some additional form filing and proration of certain expenses. I recommend getting a tax pro involved if you're considering a similar move.
Has anyone looked into the new state reporting requirements for LLCs with the Corporate Transparency Act? I just registered my Wyoming LLC and got notified I have to file beneficial ownership info with FinCEN. Seems like one of the advantages of Wyoming privacy is getting eroded.
Yeah, the Corporate Transparency Act is hitting every state. Started in January 2024. Every LLC, corp, etc has to report ownership to FinCEN. Doesn't matter which state anymore - Wyoming, Delaware, wherever - the privacy benefit is mostly gone now.
Miguel Silva
Something nobody has mentioned yet - look into tax-advantaged investing outside of retirement accounts. I've been putting money into municipal bonds which generate interest that's exempt from federal taxes (and sometimes state taxes too if you buy bonds from your home state). Also, if you have any investments that have gone down in value, you can sell them to realize the loss and offset capital gains or up to $3,000 of ordinary income per year (tax-loss harvesting).
0 coins
Zainab Ismail
ā¢Do the municipal bonds actually give decent returns though? I've heard the tax benefits are nice but the actual yield is so low it's not really worth it compared to other investments.
0 coins
Miguel Silva
ā¢Municipal bonds typically have lower yields than comparable taxable investments, but you need to look at the after-tax return to make a fair comparison. For someone in a high tax bracket (32% or above), the tax-free nature often makes the effective yield higher than taxable alternatives. For example, if a taxable bond pays 5% but you lose 32% to taxes (giving you 3.4% after-tax), a municipal bond paying 4% tax-free actually gives you a better return. It really depends on your tax bracket - the higher your income, the more valuable tax-free investments become.
0 coins
Connor O'Neill
Don't forget about timing your income and deductions! If you have control over when you receive income (especially from your freelance work), you can push income into the next tax year if you think you'll be in a lower bracket then. Similarly, you can bunch deductions into a single tax year to exceed the standard deduction threshold. For example, if you make charitable contributions, making two years' worth in December 2025 and then none in 2026 might allow you to itemize deductions in 2025 while taking the standard deduction in 2026.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
ā¢Is income timing really viable for regular W-2 employees though? I thought that only really works for self-employed people or those with investment income?
0 coins