


Ask the community...
Have you looked into tax software that lets you prepare everything yourself but then just pay a smaller fee for only the e-filing portion? Some programs let you work through everything for free, then charge $15-20 just for the state and federal transmission rather than the full $50+ for the complete service. Might be a middle ground between completely free paper filing and the more expensive full-service options.
I didn't know that was an option! Most of the ones I looked at wanted the full payment upfront before even starting. Do you have specific ones you'd recommend that let you pay just for the filing part? I've already filled out all my forms so I'm really just looking for the electronic submission part.
FreeTaxUSA is pretty good for this approach. You can complete your federal return for free, then it's just $15 for the state portion. Some others like TaxAct and TaxSlayer have similar options where the federal basic filing is free and you just pay for state. If you've literally already completed the physical forms with a pen, then using the IRS Free File Fillable Forms mentioned above is your best bet. You'll just need to transfer the information from your paper forms to the electronic versions. There's a bit of duplicate work, but it's free and gives you the e-file benefits.
Don't forget to make copies of everything before mailing!!! Learned this the hard way when the IRS claimed they never received my return two years ago and I had no proof. Such a nightmare. Also if ur expecting a refund, paper filing will slow it down by weeks or months compared to e-filing.
If you decide to use tax software instead of a CPA, make sure you compare a few different options. I found TurboTax charges extra for investment forms, while FreeTaxUSA handled our investments and my wife's scholarship with their basic version. Saved us like $70 compared to what TurboTax wanted to charge.
Thanks for the tip about FreeTaxUSA! Did it handle the scholarship question well? That's my biggest concern - making sure we properly categorize what's taxable vs. non-taxable.
FreeTaxUSA handled the scholarship situation really well. It specifically asks whether scholarship money was used for qualified expenses (tuition, books, required fees) versus non-qualified expenses (room and board, living expenses). It also provided clear explanations about which portions of scholarships are taxable and which aren't, something TurboTax didn't explain as clearly in my experience. The program walks you through it step by step and even has a help section specifically addressing graduate student scholarships and fellowships.
I'm a tax preparer (not CPA) and honestly for your situation, good tax software should be fine. The only reason I'd suggest a pro is if either of you has self-employment income, rental property, or complicated investments beyond normal stocks/ETFs. Marriage doesn't change the tax treatment of investments or scholarships, it just combines them on one return.
What about tax credits that weren't available before? I heard the income thresholds change when filing jointly and you might qualify for different credits?
When you do a conversion from traditional to Roth, you're taxed on any untaxed contributions and earnings. If you made a NON-deductible contribution (meaning you already paid tax on it) to your traditional IRA and then converted it, you should only be taxed on any earnings that happened between contribution and conversion. Since you converted just a few days after contributing, there were probably minimal earnings, so most of that conversion should be tax-free. As others have said, Form 8606 is key here - specifically parts I and II.
If there were literally no earnings between the contribution and conversion (like if the market was down those few days), would the taxable amount be zero? And does the 1099-R differentiate this or do you have to calculate it yourself?
If there were no earnings (or even if there was a loss), the taxable amount would indeed be zero. The 1099-R unfortunately doesn't differentiate this for you - it typically shows the full distribution amount in Box 1 and often shows the full amount as taxable in Box 2a as well, even when it's not. You have to calculate the non-taxable portion yourself using Form 8606. This is why it's so important to file this form - it's your documentation that establishes which portion of the conversion was after-tax money that shouldn't be taxed again.
Make sure you're entering everything in the right order in your tax software! I had this exact problem last year and realized I was entering my Roth conversion before establishing that I had made a non-deductible contribution. Try this sequence: 1) Enter the non-deductible Traditional IRA contribution first 2) Tell the software it was non-deductible 3) Then enter the 1099-R for the conversion In TurboTax, there's actually a specific section for IRA conversions that's separate from regular distributions. If you enter it as a regular distribution, it thinks the whole thing is taxable!
Thanks for the sequence tips! I think that's exactly what I did wrong - I just entered the 1099-R directly without establishing the non-deductible contribution first. I'm using TaxAct, not TurboTax, but I bet the principle is the same. I'll try re-doing it in that order and see if it fixes the calculation. Appreciate everyone's help on this!
Make sure you're not confusing 1099-NECs with 1099-MISCs. They split the forms a few years back and now you need to use the 1099-NEC ("Non-Employee Compensation") for freelancers. The MISC form is for other types of payments. I made that mistake my first year with contractors and had to resubmit everything.
Thanks for pointing that out! I didn't know they were different forms now. Is there a penalty if you use the wrong form? Also, do you know if there's a minimum payment threshold before I need to file the 1099-NEC?
Yes, using the wrong form can cause issues and potentially delay your contractors from filing their taxes correctly. The IRS might flag the inconsistency which could trigger correspondence or even an audit in some cases. The threshold for filing a 1099-NEC is $600 in payments to a US contractor during the tax year. If you paid someone less than that, you don't need to file a 1099 for them, though you can still deduct the expense on your Schedule C.
Don't forget about state filing requirements! Even if you get the federal 1099-NECs sorted out, many states require you to file copies with them too. In Georgia, you'll need to submit copies of any 1099s you file to the Department of Revenue. The deadline usually matches the federal one.
Lauren Wood
Don't forget about state taxes too! Some states are really aggressive about claiming you as a resident even after you've moved abroad. Especially California, New York, Virginia, and South Carolina. If you maintained any connections to your home state (driver's license, voter registration, bank accounts), they might consider you still a resident for tax purposes.
0 coins
Jessica Suarez
ā¢This is a good point I hadn't considered! My last US address was in Florida before moving to Germany. I still have my Florida driver's license though it's expired now. Would I still need to worry about state tax issues even though Florida doesn't have state income tax?
0 coins
Lauren Wood
ā¢You're in a good position having your last residence in Florida since they don't have state income tax. States without income tax (like Florida, Texas, Nevada, etc.) don't generally pursue former residents for tax purposes. The bigger concern is for people from high-tax states like California or New York, where state tax authorities sometimes argue that you never truly "left" if you maintain certain connections. In your case with Florida, as long as you're filing your federal returns properly, you shouldn't have to worry about state tax complications.
0 coins
Ellie Lopez
An important note that hasn't been mentioned: if you have any non-US mutual funds or ETFs in Germany, be VERY careful as these are considered PFICs (Passive Foreign Investment Companies) by the IRS and have terrible tax treatment and complex reporting requirements.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
ā¢This is so true! I got absolutely destroyed on taxes because I had UK investment funds that were classified as PFICs. The forms are ridiculously complicated (Form 8621) and the taxation is punitive compared to US-based investments. I ended up selling all my foreign funds and only investing through US brokerages now.
0 coins