


Ask the community...
My wife is also retired clergy and we've used TurboTax to e-file with the clergy housing exclusion for the past 3 years. You can absolutely e-file and include the statement! In TurboTax, after entering the 1099-R information, there's a section where you can indicate the amount that's excludable from income. Then look for "Forms" or "Other tax situations" and find where you can add an explanation or documentation. You'll want to include all the details about code 107, the three-part test, etc. just like you've been doing. E-filing made a huge difference for us - refunds in weeks instead of months!
Thanks for this! I've been using H&R Block online but might switch to TurboTax if they handle this better. Do you know if you have to use a specific version? And does it specifically have clergy options or do you have to find a general "add explanation" function?
You'll need at least TurboTax Deluxe to handle this situation properly. There isn't a specific clergy module that I've found, but the "Form 1099-R Not Taxable" section works well when you indicate the amount is for housing allowance. For the explanation, I use the general "Miscellaneous Forms" section and select "Statement" where you can type in a detailed explanation. I basically copy the same statement I used to mail in, with the reference to Section 107, the three values compared (amount received, actual housing expenses, and fair rental value), and which one is lowest/being excluded.
I just wanted to add that I'm a tax preparer and we see clients with clergy housing allowances fairly regularly. The supporting statement is actually quite important - when we've e-filed without it, about half get flagged for review which delays refunds. One important note: make sure your documentation clearly distinguishes between active vs. retired clergy housing allowances, as they're treated differently. For retired clergy receiving pension distributions designated as housing allowance, specifically cite Revenue Ruling 75-22 along with Code Section 107.
Have you considered offering a payment plan as a service with a small fee? I'm a tax preparer too and I started charging a 10% convenience fee for split payments. Most clients either decide to pay in full or they accept the additional fee. It turns the conversation from "No, I don't accept split payments" to "Yes, I can offer that service for a small additional fee." Psychologically, it works better because you're not rejecting their request outright. I also make it clear that I don't file or release any completed returns until payment is received in full. That policy is stated on my intake forms that clients sign before I start work.
I like this approach - it flips the script from rejection to accommodation with conditions. That might work much better with my client base. Do you have clients sign anything specific for the split payment arrangement? And have you had any issues with people not paying the second portion?
I have a simple one-page addendum they sign that outlines the payment schedule and the consequences of non-payment (which include me not filing their return and potentially taking them to small claims court for unpaid services if necessary). I've only had one person not pay their second installment in three years of offering this. I called them, reminded them firmly but professionally about our agreement, and they paid within 48 hours. Having the signed document is key - it turns a verbal agreement into a legal contract they've committed to.
Maybe I'm old school, but I think you're overthinking this. Just say "I'm sorry, but I require payment in full at the time of service." End of story. You don't need to explain or justify your business policies. If a client doesn't like it, they can find another preparer. There are plenty of clients out there who will respect your boundaries and pay properly. I've been doing taxes for 15 years and have never had an issue with being direct about my payment requirements.
Exactly this. Why is everyone making this so complicated? It's YOUR business. YOU set the terms. If clients don't like it, they can go to H&R Block or do their taxes themselves on TurboTax. Stand your ground or people will walk all over you forever.
I appreciate the straightforward approach, but I'm also conscious about maintaining relationships with long-term clients during tough economic times. Some of these people have been with me for years, so I'm trying to find a balance between good business practices and accommodating loyal customers. That said, you're right that clear boundaries are important. I think I need to be more direct and confident when explaining my policies instead of feeling apologetic about it.
Have you checked the "Where's My Amended Return" tool on the IRS website? It's separate from the regular refund status checker. It takes about 3 weeks for amendments to show up there after you submit them. Also, if your disability payments were from a private insurer and you paid the premiums yourself with after-tax money, those benefits should be TAX-FREE. That could explain the huge discrepancy you're seeing.
I tried that tool but it shows "no information available" for my amended return. It's been about 5 weeks now since I submitted the second amendment. I'm almost certain I paid those premiums with after-tax money when I was working, but I don't have any documentation from that far back to prove it. Is there any way to verify this? My former employer's HR department is basically impossible to reach.
The "no information available" message is frustratingly common with amended returns. The IRS systems for amendments are notoriously slow to update. As for verifying your premium payments, you have a few options. First, check your last paystub of each year when you were working - it should show year-to-date deductions. Look for "Post-tax deductions" or something similar that might list disability insurance. Alternatively, contact the insurance company directly rather than your former employer. They should have records showing whether the policy was employer-paid or employee-paid. Ask them for a "premium payment verification letter" - they're used to providing these for tax purposes.
Quick tip from a former tax preparer: Make sure you're reporting your SSDI and private disability correctly on separate lines. SSDI goes on one line of your tax return and private disability insurance payments go elsewhere depending on taxability. Also, amendments take FOREVER right now - the IRS is still processing some from 2021! One trick is to call early morning (right when they open) or try the "local taxpayer advocate" office in your area. They can often access more detailed information than what shows online.
The "call right when they open" trick hasn't worked for me in years. I've tried calling at 7:01am and still get the "due to high call volume" message. The IRS phone system is completely broken.
Just to add some important info here: for legal settlements, it's crucial to understand that the tax treatment varies depending on what the settlement was compensating you for. According to IRS rules: 1. Compensation for physical injuries or physical sickness is NOT taxable 2. Emotional distress damages ARE taxable (unless they stem directly from physical injury) 3. Punitive damages ARE taxable 4. Lost wages/income ARE taxable OP, you mentioned this was a personal injury case with some emotional distress and punitive damages. You need to check your settlement documents to see if they specify how the money was allocated between these categories. Many settlement agreements don't break this down clearly, which is a major problem when it comes to taxes. If your settlement agreement doesn't specify the allocation, you should work with a tax professional to determine a reasonable allocation based on the facts of your case. This could significantly reduce your tax liability.
Thank you for breaking this down. My settlement documents aren't very clear about the allocation between physical injury, emotional distress, and punitive damages. I'm going to dig them up and review them again. Is there a specific section or wording I should look for that indicates how it's broken down?
Look for sections in your settlement agreement with headings like "allocation of settlement proceeds," "damages," or "consideration." Sometimes it's explicitly laid out, but often it's either vague or completely unaddressed. If there's no clear allocation, look for any language that describes the nature of your claim and what harms you suffered. Even terms like "physical injuries," "bodily harm," "emotional distress," or "punitive" can provide clues about what the settlement was intended to cover. If your documents really don't specify, don't panic. This is a common issue, and tax professionals who specialize in settlements can help establish a reasonable allocation based on the circumstances of your case. You'll want to gather any medical records, therapy bills, documentation of physical injuries, and information about lost wages to support your position on how the settlement should be allocated. Remember that the burden is technically on you to prove what portion was for physical injuries (and thus tax-free), so documentation is key. But don't assume the worst - many settlements are primarily for physical injuries and therefore largely non-taxable.
One thing nobody's mentioned yet - the timing of coming forward matters A LOT with the IRS. If you voluntarily file before they contact you, you're in a much better position than if they find you first. The Voluntary Disclosure Program can sometimes help reduce penalties. Also, since you mentioned having about $150k left, that might actually be enough to cover what you owe depending on how your settlement breaks down. Don't assume you'll owe taxes on the full amount. Lastly, don't panic about "the IRS hunting you down" - they're not the boogeyman. They deal with unfiled returns and late payments constantly. They have structured installment plans, and in some cases where people truly can't pay, they have programs like Currently Not Collectible status or Offer in Compromise to settle for less than you owe. It's a bureaucracy, and while they want their money, they have procedures for handling exactly your situation.
This is spot on. I worked for the IRS for 6 years, and I can tell you that most people's fear of the agency is way overblown. Agents are used to working with people who made mistakes. The worst thing you can do is hide - the best is to come forward voluntarily with a plan. I'd add one thing though: document EVERYTHING. Every call, every letter, every form you submit. Get names of agents you speak with. The IRS is a massive bureaucracy and things do get lost, so keeping your own detailed records is essential.
Sophia Long
I'm a tax accountant and honestly, the idea of a "complete deduction finder" app is the holy grail of tax software that everyone wants to build, but it's incredibly difficult because of how personalized deductions can be. For example - two people with identical incomes and jobs could have completely different deduction profiles based on: where they live, if they have kids, medical expenses, if they own rental properties, if they have student loans, if they donate to charity, if they're paying for education, etc. The best bet is to either use a top-tier tax software AND read the questions carefully, or just hire a tax professional who specializes in your situation (self-employed, investor, rental property owner, etc).
0 coins
Angelica Smith
ā¢So what you're saying is it's basically impossible for an app to do this right? That's pretty depressing considering how advanced AI is getting these days. Shouldn't a good AI be able to parse the tax code?
0 coins
Sophia Long
ā¢It's not impossible, but it's a massive undertaking that would require substantial resources. Current AI systems are getting better at parsing complex documents like the tax code, but the challenge isn't just understanding the code - it's applying it correctly to individual circumstances. The real complexity comes from how the different parts of the tax code interact with each other. Some deductions phase out based on income levels, some can't be combined with others, some require specific documentation or timing. AI systems are making progress in this area, but we're not yet at the point where they can replace the judgment of a tax professional who understands all these nuances.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
Has anyone tried the IRS's own Free File Fillable Forms? It's not exactly what OP is asking for but it's free and at least gives you access to all possible forms and schedules. I've been using it for years and while it doesn't prompt you for deductions, it does have all the official forms with their instructions.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
ā¢Free File is terrible for finding deductions though. It's basically just electronic versions of paper forms. You have to already know which forms to fill out and which deductions you qualify for. It's the opposite of what OP is looking for.
0 coins