


Ask the community...
Hey Lauren! As a newcomer to this community, I just wanted to reach out because I literally went through this exact same situation with my small business just a few months ago - the embarrassment, the lost paperwork, the avoidance of calling the accountant... all of it! First, please don't beat yourself up about this. The first year of running a business is like trying to drink from a fire hose, and getting overwhelmed with paperwork is honestly more of a rite of passage than an exception. Here's what I wish someone had told me when I was in your shoes: **Quick wins to try first:** - Search your email for "CP575" - that's the actual form number for the EIN assignment letter - Check your business bank account opening paperwork one more time, specifically looking for any "business profile" or "account application" documents - If you filed any annual reports or business renewals with your state, sometimes those reference your federal EIN **The IRS call strategy that worked for me:** Call 800-829-4933 at exactly 7:00 AM on a Tuesday or Wednesday. I know everyone says this, but it really does make a difference. Have your SSN, LLC legal name, and formation date ready. Even if you're fuzzy on the address details, they can work with you. **About your accountant:** I totally get the embarrassment factor, but here's the thing - they've probably been wondering how you're doing and would likely be relieved to hear from you! A simple "Hey, I got overwhelmed with everything but I'm ready to get back on track. Could you help me locate my EIN?" is probably all you need. You've got this! This is just a speed bump, not a roadblock. 🙂
Malik's advice is really spot-on! As someone who's also new to this community, I wanted to add that the "CP575" search tip is gold - I wish I had known that specific form number when I was searching through my emails for my EIN last year. One thing that helped me when I finally worked up the courage to call the IRS was writing down all my information beforehand (SSN, business name, formation date) so I wouldn't get flustered during the call. The agents are actually pretty patient and helpful once you get through - they deal with this situation all the time. Lauren, I know it feels like you're the only one who's ever lost important business documents, but honestly, reading through this thread shows just how common this experience is! The fact that you're actively trying to solve this problem shows you're being responsible about your business. Don't let the embarrassment hold you back from getting the help you need - whether that's from the IRS or from reaching back out to your accountant. You're going to get through this, and a year from now you'll probably be giving advice to someone else in the same situation! 💪
Hey Lauren! As a newcomer to this community, I just wanted to say that your situation resonates with me so much - I went through almost the exact same thing with my consulting business earlier this year, including the whole "ghosting the accountant out of embarrassment" part! One approach that hasn't been mentioned yet: if you remember roughly when you applied for your EIN (you mentioned November), try checking your browser's download history from that time period. If you applied online through the IRS website, the confirmation PDF might still be sitting in your Downloads folder even if you forgot you saved it. Also, if you used any business formation services or legal document providers when setting up your LLC, they sometimes send follow-up emails weeks or months later with "next steps" information that might reference your EIN. I found mine in an unexpected email from my business registration service that was titled something like "Don't forget these important tax steps" - definitely not where I expected to find it! The IRS phone line advice everyone's giving is solid, but if you want to avoid that wait time, honestly consider just reaching back out to your accountant. I was dreading that conversation for months, but when I finally did it, they were actually relieved to hear from me and had my EIN within 5 minutes. Sometimes the anticipation of awkwardness is way worse than the actual conversation. You're definitely going to figure this out - this thread shows how supportive this community is and how common your experience really is! 😊
Don't forget to consider state tax implications too! I went through something similar last year and discovered that while federal treatment was straightforward, our state had different rules for trust distributions. In our case, California treated the distribution differently than the feds did, and we ended up with an unexpected state tax bill because the trustee didn't withhold for state taxes. Make sure to check your state's treatment of trust distributions, especially if the trust and beneficiaries are in different states.
This is such an important point. We ran into issues with NY state taxes when our family trust in Florida distributed stocks to beneficiaries living in New York. The basis calculation was the same, but NY wanted to tax the accumulated gains in the trust differently than the feds did.
Thanks for bringing this up! Our trust is actually in Illinois but most beneficiaries are in Wisconsin. I'll definitely need to look into how both states handle this type of distribution. Any suggestions on where to look for state-specific rules?
For Illinois to Wisconsin situations, you'll want to check both states' tax codes on trust distributions. Illinois generally follows federal treatment for basis calculations, but Wisconsin has some quirks around accumulated trust income. I'd recommend starting with Illinois Department of Revenue Publication 101 (Income Tax) and Wisconsin's Publication 102 for trust and estate taxation. Both states have specific sections on distributions to non-resident beneficiaries. The key thing to watch for is whether either state treats the distribution as carrying out accumulated income differently than the federal rules. Wisconsin in particular sometimes requires beneficiaries to pay state tax on trust distributions even when the trust paid Illinois tax on the same income. Your trustee should be able to help coordinate the state filings, but definitely get clarity on this before making the distributions. State tax surprises on large stock distributions can be really expensive!
This is really valuable information! I'm new to dealing with trust distributions and had no idea that state rules could be so different from federal treatment. The Wisconsin quirk about accumulated income sounds particularly tricky - do you know if there's a way to estimate what the additional Wisconsin tax might be before we make the distribution? I'd hate to surprise the beneficiaries with unexpected state tax bills after the fact.
I've been dealing with these MCFT TREAS 310 deposits for years as both a service member and now working with other military families, and I can tell you they're always legitimate Treasury payments - no need to panic! Given that it's scheduled for January 15th and you're active duty, here are a few additional possibilities that haven't been covered yet: **Military-specific scenarios:** - **Clothing/uniform allowance adjustments** - These sometimes get recalculated and paid separately, especially if there were rate changes - **Imminent Danger Pay (IDP) or Hardship Duty Pay (HDP)** - If you served in qualifying locations, retroactive payments sometimes process months later - **Move-related per diem corrections** - PCS moves often have travel expense adjustments that get sorted out through Treasury rather than regular finance **Pro tip while you wait:** Check your myPay account under the "Correspondence" section - there are sometimes notifications about pending Treasury payments that explain what's coming before it actually hits your bank. The January timing is actually perfect for these types of military pay adjustments. DFAS typically processes year-end corrections in the first few weeks of January, so your deposit fits right into that normal cycle. Once it posts, the transaction details will include specific military pay codes that will make everything crystal clear. In my experience, service members are always pleasantly surprised to discover it's legitimate back-pay they'd forgotten about or didn't even know they qualified for!
This is such comprehensive advice - thank you! The suggestion to check the "Correspondence" section in myPay is brilliant. I had no idea there might be notifications about pending Treasury payments there. I usually just check my pay statements but never really explore all the other sections of the site. The Imminent Danger Pay possibility is actually really relevant for my situation. I was in a location that definitely qualified for IDP during my deployment, and now that you mention it, there were some questions about whether all the dates and rates were calculated correctly. It would make perfect sense if this is a retroactive IDP adjustment that's finally getting processed. Your point about January being the normal cycle for DFAS year-end corrections is so reassuring. I was worried this was some kind of unusual situation, but it sounds like the timing actually fits exactly with how these things normally work. Thanks for sharing your expertise - it's incredibly helpful to get perspective from someone who's dealt with these situations from both sides!
I'm going through the exact same thing right now! Got a TREAS 310 deposit scheduled for next week and have been losing sleep over what it could be. This thread has been incredibly helpful - I had no idea there were so many legitimate reasons for these unexpected Treasury payments. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like these mystery deposits almost always turn out to be money we're actually owed but either forgot about or didn't realize was coming. The military-specific possibilities mentioned here are eye-opening - I never would have thought about things like retroactive BAH adjustments, combat pay corrections, or TSP-related issues. I'm definitely going to check my LES statements more carefully and look at the myPay correspondence section like some folks suggested. It's such a relief to know that the January timing actually fits the normal pattern for year-end military pay adjustments rather than being something to worry about. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and expertise - this community is amazing for helping navigate these confusing government payment situations! I'll update once my deposit posts and I figure out what it was for.
As someone who just finished their second tax season, I can offer some perspective on starting out. I went with Drake after agonizing over the same decision and it was the right choice for me. The key thing is that Drake's automation really shines when you're handling the volume you're expecting (50-200 clients). Yes, there's a learning curve, but honestly it's not that steep if you take advantage of their training resources. They have webinars specifically for new users and the documentation is solid. For your assistants, I'd recommend having them focus on one type of return at first (like basic 1040s) until they get comfortable with the interface. Drake's consistency across different return types actually makes training easier once they understand the basic workflow. One tip - definitely take advantage of Drake's free trial period to test it out with some practice returns before committing. That way you and your team can get a feel for the interface before tax season hits. The time you invest in learning it upfront will pay dividends when you're in the thick of filing season. Budget-wise, when you factor in the time savings from automation, Drake usually comes out ahead even if the upfront cost is slightly higher.
This is really helpful advice! How long was the trial period when you used it? I'm hoping to get both my assistants trained on whichever system we choose before we start taking on clients in January. Also, did you find Drake's training webinars covered the business return aspects well, or were they mostly focused on individual returns?
I've been using Drake for about 5 years now and can definitely vouch for it being a solid choice for new practices. One thing I'd add to the conversation is that Drake's diagnostic system is incredibly helpful when you're starting out - it catches errors and missing information that might slip by when you're still learning the ins and outs of tax preparation. For your business returns (1120s and LLCs), Drake handles depreciation schedules and multi-state filings really well, which could be important as your practice grows. The built-in calculators for things like Section 199A deductions are also a huge time-saver. Regarding training your assistants, I'd suggest starting them on the data entry for simple 1040s first, then gradually introducing more complex returns. Drake's interview-style input makes it pretty intuitive - it asks the right questions in the right order, which helps prevent mistakes. One cost consideration that hasn't been mentioned yet is that Drake includes unlimited amendments in their pricing, while some other software charges extra for each amended return. As a new preparer, you might find yourself filing a few more amendments than expected in your first year, so this could save you money. The customer portal feature is also great for client communication - clients can securely upload documents and review their returns online, which reduces back-and-forth emails and phone calls.
Thanks for mentioning the unlimited amendments feature! I hadn't considered that and you're absolutely right - as someone new to tax prep, I'll probably make more mistakes in my first year. That alone could justify the cost difference if Taxslayer charges per amendment. The diagnostic system sounds really valuable too. Do you know if it flags common beginner mistakes specifically, or is it more general error-checking? I'm worried about missing something important on a business return and having to deal with IRS notices later. Also curious about the client portal - does that come standard with all Drake packages or is it an add-on feature?
Fatima Al-Hashemi
This is such a common situation and you're asking all the right questions! I went through something very similar with my 73-year-old dad last year. The good news is that being added as a joint owner doesn't create any immediate tax liability for you. The money is still considered hers for tax purposes until you actually start using it for your own benefit. As long as you're genuinely helping manage her finances rather than treating the money as your own, you shouldn't have any tax issues. However, I'd strongly recommend starting a detailed record-keeping system right away. I use a simple Excel spreadsheet with columns for date, amount, description, and whose benefit (like "Mom's grocery shopping $85" or "Paid Mom's utility bill $150"). This documentation becomes incredibly valuable if the IRS ever questions whether transfers were gifts to you versus you managing her money. For the high-yield savings account idea - be really careful about whose name goes on it. If it's only in your name but it's her money, you'll receive the 1099-INT forms but she should technically report the interest income. This creates a reporting mismatch that could trigger IRS notices. Keeping it as a joint account might be cleaner even if the interest rates aren't quite as high. Also, since your mom is resistant to formal documents, maybe frame any written agreements as "bank paperwork" rather than legal documents. A simple signed note saying you're helping manage her finances can provide important protection for both of you without sounding too intimidating. The key is maintaining clear intent and documentation that you're acting as her financial helper, not receiving her money as gifts.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•This is really comprehensive advice, thank you! The Excel spreadsheet approach sounds perfect - detailed enough to provide good documentation but not so complicated that it becomes overwhelming to maintain. I like how you include the "whose benefit" column, that makes it crystal clear what each transaction is for. Your point about the 1099-INT reporting mismatch is making me lean heavily toward keeping everything as joint accounts. It sounds like the potential IRS headaches just aren't worth the extra interest income, especially when we're talking about managing someone else's money where clarity is so important. The "bank paperwork" framing is brilliant! My mom definitely gets anxious about anything that sounds too legal or formal, but she's comfortable with routine banking requirements. I think she'd be much more willing to sign something if I present it as a standard bank procedure rather than a legal document. One follow-up question - when you keep records of transactions for your dad, do you have him review or sign off on the log periodically? I'm wondering if having some kind of regular check-in where she confirms the transactions would add another layer of protection and keep her involved in the process.
0 coins
Jace Caspullo
You're definitely on the right track with your thinking! Being added as a joint owner doesn't create any immediate tax consequences - the IRS looks at how the money is actually used, not just the account structure. Since you mentioned your mom wants to avoid probate (which joint ownership does accomplish), just be aware that this approach has some trade-offs compared to proper estate planning. The money will automatically become yours when she passes, which might create a large inheritance tax situation depending on the total value of her estate. For the transfers to accounts in your name - as long as you're clearly acting as her agent and the money is used for her benefit, there's no taxable event for you. The key is maintaining that intent and having documentation to support it. One thing to consider: instead of moving everything to accounts only in your name, you might want to keep some money in joint accounts and only move what's needed for specific purposes (like earning better interest). This keeps the ownership clearer and reduces potential complications. Also, definitely document everything from the start! A simple log showing that transfers are for her benefit, not gifts to you, can save a lot of headaches later. Even something as basic as "Moved $10,000 to high-yield savings to earn better interest for Mom" helps establish the purpose. The high-yield savings idea is smart for growing her money, just make sure the tax reporting stays clean. Joint accounts might be easier than trying to sort out 1099-INT forms later.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•This is really helpful perspective, especially the point about inheritance tax implications! I hadn't fully considered that the joint ownership approach, while avoiding probate, could potentially create a large taxable inheritance situation when she passes away. That's definitely something I need to research more and maybe discuss with a tax professional. Your suggestion about keeping some money in joint accounts and only moving specific amounts for particular purposes (like better interest rates) makes a lot of sense. That approach seems like it would provide clearer documentation of intent while still allowing us to optimize her returns on some portion of the funds. The simple logging approach you described is exactly what I was looking for - specific enough to show intent but not overly complicated. I like how your example entry clearly states it's "for Mom" rather than just describing the transaction itself. One question: when you mention inheritance tax implications, are you referring to federal estate tax or something that would affect me as the recipient? I thought the federal exemption was pretty high, but I want to make sure I understand what I might be looking at down the road.
0 coins