IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Diez Ellis

•

Quick tip for anyone with capital loss carryforward - remember that you need to use short-term losses first against short-term gains, and long-term losses first against long-term gains. Only after that can you use remaining losses of either type to offset the other type of gain. Then use up to $3,000 against ordinary income. The ordering matters for tax optimization.

0 coins

Is it better to use short-term or long-term losses against ordinary income if you have the choice? I've got both kinds carrying forward.

0 coins

Diez Ellis

•

Short-term losses should generally be used first against ordinary income if you have the choice, as short-term gains (had you realized them instead of losses) would have been taxed at your higher ordinary income rate. Long-term losses are typically better saved to offset future long-term gains when possible, since long-term gains are taxed at preferential capital gains rates. By preserving long-term losses for future long-term gains, you're potentially getting more tax benefit in the long run.

0 coins

One thing that's really important to understand is that capital loss carryforwards don't expire - they can be carried forward indefinitely until fully used up. This is different from some other tax provisions that have time limits. Also, if you're married and file jointly, both spouses' capital losses get combined on the joint return. But if you switch from married filing jointly to married filing separately (or vice versa), the carryforward rules get more complicated. The unused losses stay with whoever originally realized them. For record keeping, I'd recommend creating a simple spreadsheet to track your carryforward amounts by year and type (short-term vs long-term). This makes it much easier when you're doing your taxes each year, especially if you switch tax software or preparers.

0 coins

Andre Dupont

•

This is really helpful advice about the indefinite carryforward period! I didn't realize there was no expiration date on capital losses. That's a relief since I have a pretty substantial loss that will take me years to fully utilize. The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I'm definitely going to set that up. Quick question though: when tracking short-term vs long-term losses in the spreadsheet, should I also note the original transaction dates? Or is it enough to just categorize them as ST/LT based on the holding period when the loss was realized? Also, does the carryforward amount ever get adjusted for inflation or does it stay at the nominal dollar amount from when the loss occurred?

0 coins

Serene Snow

•

I want to emphasize something crucial that others have touched on but bears repeating: you absolutely need to fix this excess contribution issue before your tax filing deadline to avoid the 6% excise tax penalty. Here's what you need to do immediately: 1. Calculate your actual eligible contribution: Since you had HDHP coverage for only 3 months out of 12, you're eligible for 3/12 of the annual maximum contribution limit. 2. Contact your HSA administrator to request removal of the excess contribution PLUS any earnings attributed to that excess. This is called a "return of excess contribution." 3. The earnings portion will need to be reported as income on your tax return for the year you receive the distribution. 4. Make sure your HSA provider sends you a corrected Form 5498-SA showing the adjusted contribution amount. The IRS does track this information through Forms 5498-SA from HSA providers and Forms 1095-B/C from insurance companies, so they will eventually catch discrepancies if you don't correct them voluntarily. Don't wait on this - the penalty compounds each year the excess remains in your account, and it's much easier to fix proactively than during an audit.

0 coins

Mary Bates

•

This is exactly the kind of clear, actionable advice I was looking for! I had no idea about the earnings portion needing to be reported as income - that could have been a nasty surprise at tax time. Quick question: when you say "earnings attributed to the excess," how do HSA providers typically calculate that? Is it based on the performance of my entire HSA account or do they somehow track gains/losses specifically on the excess amount? Also, do you know if there's any wiggle room on the timeline if I've already filed my taxes but just realized this issue? Or am I stuck with the penalty at that point?

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

Great questions! HSA providers typically calculate earnings on excess contributions using what's called the "net income attributable" (NIA) method. They look at the overall performance of your HSA account from the date of the excess contribution to the date of removal, then calculate what portion of those gains/losses should be attributed to the excess amount. So if your account gained 5% during that period, they'd apply that same percentage to your excess contribution. Regarding the timeline - you actually have some options even after filing! You can file an amended return (Form 1040X) to correct the issue, as long as you remove the excess contribution by the extended deadline (October 15th if you filed an extension, otherwise April 15th). The key is getting that excess out of your account before the deadline, even if you've already filed your original return. If you miss that deadline entirely, you'll owe the 6% excise tax for that year, but you should still remove the excess to avoid owing 6% again next year and every year thereafter until it's corrected.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

This is a really comprehensive thread with excellent advice! I just wanted to add one more resource that might be helpful for anyone dealing with HSA contribution issues. The IRS has Publication 969 which covers Health Savings Accounts in detail, including the month-by-month eligibility rules and excess contribution procedures. It's available for free on the IRS website and explains exactly how the proration works when you switch between HDHP and non-HDHP coverage mid-year. What's particularly useful in Pub 969 is the worksheet for calculating your maximum annual contribution when you have partial-year HDHP coverage. It also has examples of different scenarios (like switching from individual to family coverage, or changing plans mid-year) that might apply to your situation. For anyone who's more of a visual learner, the publication includes step-by-step examples that walk through the math for prorating contributions based on eligible months. It also explains the difference between the contribution deadline (tax filing deadline) and the deadline for removing excess contributions to avoid penalties. While the other suggestions for professional help are great, starting with Pub 969 can give you a solid understanding of the rules before you contact your HSA provider or file any corrected forms.

0 coins

Chris Elmeda

•

Thanks for mentioning Publication 969! I'm new to HSAs and this whole thread has been incredibly educational. I just started an HDHP this year and want to make sure I don't make similar mistakes. One thing I'm still confused about - if I start my HDHP coverage in March, can I contribute for January and February retroactively as long as I do it before the tax deadline? Or am I only eligible to contribute starting from March when my coverage actually began? Also, does anyone know if there are different rules for employer contributions vs. individual contributions when it comes to the monthly eligibility requirements?

0 coins

Mateo Lopez

•

Great question! You're absolutely right that a roof replacement should be depreciated over 39 years, not 15. The qualified improvement property (QIP) designation specifically requires interior improvements to nonresidential buildings, and a roof is clearly exterior. However, I'd recommend looking closely at your project details. If you replaced any skylights, those might qualify for different treatment since they could be considered separate from the roof structure. Also, any insulation upgrades or ventilation improvements might be separable components with their own depreciation schedules. Since you can't use Section 179 this year due to income limitations, make sure you understand that this is an annual election. If your income situation improves in future years, you might be able to elect Section 179 for other qualifying property purchases. One more thought - if this roof replacement was due to storm damage or other casualty, there might be additional considerations for how to handle the tax treatment. But for a standard replacement, you're stuck with the 39-year schedule for the actual roofing components.

0 coins

Khalil Urso

•

Thanks for bringing up the skylights point - that's something I hadn't considered! Our roof project did include replacing two large skylights that were leaking. Would those really be treated differently from the roof itself for depreciation purposes? I'm curious about the reasoning behind that since they seem pretty integrated into the overall roof system. Also, regarding the storm damage angle you mentioned - this was actually a proactive replacement rather than storm-related, but good to know that could affect the tax treatment in other situations.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

I've been following this discussion and wanted to add some clarity on the depreciation question. You're absolutely correct that the roof itself should be depreciated over 39 years as building property, not 15 years as QIP. However, I'd strongly encourage you to review your project invoices more carefully. Even though the overall project is a "roof replacement," there are often components that can legitimately be separated and depreciated under different schedules. For example: - Any new electrical work (lighting, outlets, panels) - typically 7-year property - HVAC equipment or ductwork modifications - usually 5-year property - Security systems or cameras installed during the project - 5-year property - Interior work done to access the roof (drywall repair, paint) - potentially QIP if it's interior improvements The key is having proper documentation. Your contractor should be able to provide a detailed breakdown showing labor and materials for each trade. This isn't about gaming the system - it's about properly classifying legitimate separate assets that happen to be part of a larger project. Given the $87k total cost, even identifying $15-20k worth of components with shorter depreciation lives could provide meaningful tax savings compared to treating everything as 39-year property. Also, don't forget that Section 179 elections can be carried forward to future years when your income situation improves, so keep that option in mind for next year's planning.

0 coins

Ellie Simpson

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to commercial property ownership and honestly didn't realize how detailed the component separation could get. Your point about having the contractor provide a trade-by-trade breakdown makes a lot of sense - I'm going to reach out to them tomorrow to see if they can break down our invoice more specifically. One follow-up question - when you mention interior work like drywall repair potentially qualifying as QIP, does that apply even if it was just incidental to the roof project? We did have to patch some ceiling areas where they accessed the roof structure, but it wasn't really a separate "interior improvement" project. Just want to make sure I understand the boundaries of what can reasonably be separated out. The Section 179 carryforward is definitely something I need to discuss with my accountant. Our income should be much better next year, so that could be a great planning opportunity. Thanks for all the detailed guidance!

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly comprehensive and helpful! As someone who's been dealing with a similar social casino tax situation, I wanted to share one additional perspective that might help with your decision. The systematic approach everyone has outlined is spot-on - getting those detailed CSV transaction histories from the platforms is absolutely the first step. What I found surprising was how willing the customer service teams were to provide comprehensive records when I mentioned it was for tax purposes. They clearly deal with these requests regularly. One thing that really helped me feel confident about the documentation was creating a simple summary spreadsheet that reconciled the platform CSV data with my bank statements. This showed a clear money trail and made it easy to calculate net gambling losses. Having that reconciliation made me feel much more prepared in case of any IRS questions. For your $33k in withdrawals, if you're like most social casino players and deposited more than you withdrew, the potential gambling losses could be substantial. Combined with mortgage interest and other typical itemized deductions, you could be looking at meaningful tax savings - several people here saved $1,400-$2,800 by taking this approach. The documentation requirements really aren't as scary as they initially seem. Platform CSV files + bank statements + withdrawal confirmations appears to be adequate for most situations. Much more manageable than trying to reconstruct detailed session logs from memory. Whatever you decide, you're being smart to think it through carefully and report the income properly. Good luck with whichever approach you choose!

0 coins

This entire thread has been absolutely invaluable! As someone completely new to dealing with gambling taxes, I was initially paralyzed by the complexity of reporting social casino winnings properly. Reading through everyone's real experiences has transformed what seemed like an impossible situation into a manageable process. The step-by-step approach is brilliant - request detailed CSV transaction histories from the platforms, calculate actual net losses, then compare itemized vs standard deduction based on real numbers. I had no idea these social casinos maintained such comprehensive records that they could provide in usable formats! What really gives me confidence is seeing the actual tax savings people achieved - $1,400 to $2,800 is substantial money that makes the extra documentation effort completely worthwhile. And hearing from people who've successfully handled IRS interactions with this type of documentation removes so much of the audit anxiety. For the original poster with $33k in withdrawals, following this proven approach seems like the clear path forward. Get those platform transaction histories first, calculate your actual gambling losses (which could be significant if you deposited more than you withdrew), then make an informed decision about itemizing vs standard deduction. Thanks to everyone who shared their real experiences and practical guidance - this community support makes navigating complex tax situations so much less stressful. This thread should be required reading for anyone dealing with social casino taxes!

0 coins

After reading through all these detailed responses, I'm convinced you should definitely follow the systematic approach everyone has outlined. The potential tax savings with $33k in withdrawals could be substantial if you have significant gambling losses to offset those winnings. Here's what I'd recommend based on everyone's experiences: First, immediately contact both Modo and Crown Coins customer service to request complete transaction histories in CSV format for 2024. Be upfront that it's for tax purposes - they're used to these requests and will provide comprehensive records including dates, transaction types, amounts, and reference numbers. Once you have those detailed records, calculate your total deposits versus your $33k in withdrawals. If you're like most players and deposited more than you withdrew, those gambling losses could be significant. Then add up all your other potential itemized deductions (mortgage interest, state/local taxes, charitable contributions) and compare to the standard deduction. Multiple people here saved $1,400-$2,800 by taking this approach, and the documentation requirements are much more manageable than initially feared. The CSV files from platforms combined with your bank statements and withdrawal confirmations provide adequate records for the IRS - you don't need detailed daily gambling logs. Even if you ultimately decide the standard deduction is better for your situation, at least you'll know you made an informed choice based on actual numbers rather than assumptions. Either way, definitely report the full $33k as gambling income on Schedule 1 - that part isn't optional regardless of which deduction method you choose. Good luck with whatever approach you decide on - you're being smart to think this through carefully!

0 coins

This is exactly the comprehensive guidance I was hoping to find! As someone who's been following this entire discussion, I'm amazed at how much practical wisdom has been shared here. The systematic approach you've outlined - get the CSV transaction histories first, then do the actual math - makes perfect sense and takes the guesswork out of what initially seemed like an overwhelming decision. What really stands out to me is how consistently people have achieved meaningful tax savings ($1,400-$2,800) by taking the time to properly document their gambling losses instead of just assuming the standard deduction is better. With $33k in withdrawals, those potential savings could be even more substantial if the losses are significant enough. The documentation process seems much more straightforward than I initially feared. Having the platforms provide detailed CSV files transforms what could be a nightmare of record reconstruction into organizing existing data. Combined with bank statements and withdrawal confirmations, that should provide solid documentation for any potential IRS questions. I'm definitely going to follow this proven approach for my own social casino situation. Even if the numbers don't work out to favor itemizing in my case, at least I'll know I made an informed decision based on real calculations rather than assumptions. Thanks to everyone who shared their actual experiences - this kind of practical guidance from people who've successfully navigated these issues is invaluable!

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Just to clarify, Form 5329 has multiple parts and isn't just for early distributions. It's also used for excess contributions to IRAs, excess accumulations (not taking RMDs), etc. So depending on your situation, you might need different parts filled out.

0 coins

That's a really important point! Last year I had both an early distribution AND I over-contributed to my Roth IRA. Had to fill out different parts of the same form.

0 coins

Aisha Khan

•

I ran into this exact same issue with Credit Karma Tax last year! The software can be really finicky about generating Form 5329. A few things that helped me get it to work: 1. Make sure you answered "Yes" when it asks if you received any retirement plan distributions 2. Double-check that you entered the correct distribution code from your 1099-R (should be code 1 for early distribution) 3. When it asks about the reason for the distribution, be very specific - don't just say "personal use" if that's what happened The form IS required for any early distribution, regardless of whether you qualify for an exception. If you do qualify for an exception, that's where you'd claim it on the form to avoid the 10% penalty. If Credit Karma still won't cooperate, you can always download Form 5329 directly from the IRS website and fill it out manually. Just make sure to include it with your return and transfer the additional tax amount to line 17 of your Form 1040. Sometimes the manual approach is actually easier than fighting with buggy software!

0 coins

Jade Lopez

•

This is super helpful! I've been struggling with the same issue. Quick question - if I download Form 5329 manually and fill it out, do I need to mail my entire return or can I still e-file everything else? Also, when you say "transfer the additional tax amount to line 17," is that the total penalty amount or something else? I'm worried about making a mistake that triggers an audit.

0 coins

Prev1...418419420421422...5643Next