


Ask the community...
I work in payroll for a university system! Here's what's happening behind the scenes: Each college probably has its own payroll department that processes your specific paychecks, but they all report up to the central university system which has a single Employer Identification Number (EIN). That's why you get separate paystubs but one W2. For tax purposes, the entity with the EIN is your employer - not the individual colleges. So definitely treat it as one employer on your W4. The withholding calculations should be based on your total income from all sources within that system.
This is so helpful! Quick question - what if the pay schedules are different? I teach at one college that pays monthly and another that pays biweekly in the same system. Does that mess up the withholding calculations?
Different pay schedules shouldn't mess up your annual withholding in the end, but it can cause some variation in how much is taken from each paycheck. The withholding system is designed to estimate your annual tax based on the frequency of your pay periods. When you have different schedules, each payroll system is making its own calculation based on that specific payment. The good news is that it all reconciles at the end of the year on your W2. If you want your withholding to be more consistent, you can use the "extra withholding" line on your W4 to specify an additional amount to withhold from one of your paychecks to make up any difference.
Wait I'm in the exact opposite situation - I teach at campuses in two DIFFERENT university systems. So I get two W2s at the end of the year. Should I be checking the multiple employers box? I've been treating them as one job on my W4 ๐ฌ
I may be missing something here, but I think another option might be to look at the regular home office deduction rather than the Augusta Rule. If you're using a space exclusively and regularly for business storage, you can deduct that percentage of your home expenses (mortgage interest, utilities, etc.). For example, if the storage area is 10% of your home's square footage, you can deduct 10% of those expenses. This might actually be more beneficial than trying to charge your business a "rental fee" under Section 280A(g).
Thanks for this perspective! One question though - does the storage area need to be COMPLETELY exclusive to inventory? Like, I keep most of my supplies in plastic bins that are stacked against one wall of the spare bedroom. The room is maybe 200 sq ft total, but the storage probably only takes up about 40 sq ft. Can I deduct just that portion?
The general rule is that the space needs to be used exclusively for business, but there's a special exception for inventory storage. If you're selling products as your business (which you are), and your home is the only fixed location of that business, you can deduct the space used for inventory storage even if it's part of a room. In your specific case, you could potentially deduct the 40 sq ft used for storage, not the entire 200 sq ft room. You'd calculate what percentage that 40 sq ft is of your entire home's square footage. So if your home is 2,000 sq ft total, you'd be deducting 2% (40 รท 2,000) of your eligible home expenses.
The confusion here seems to be mixing up two different tax concepts. The Augusta Rule (280A(g)) lets you rent your WHOLE home to your business for up to 14 days tax-free. This is great for business meetings, photo shoots, training events, etc. For ONGOING storage, you want the home office deduction specifically for inventory storage (different part of tax code). You can claim the actual space used even if the room isn't exclusively for business. I made this mistake and got flagged for audit! Don't try to use the Augusta Rule for year-round storage - it won't fly with the IRS.
Can you do both in the same year though? Like use regular home office deduction for the storage space, but also use Augusta Rule to rent your living room to your business for a few days for meetings?
My tax return was 52 pages last year because I have income from three states, run two small businesses, and have rental properties. The more financial complexity in your life, the longer your return gets. Nothing wrong with having a short return if your situation is simpler! One tip: keep a printout or PDF of your full return, not just the summary pages. I once needed to reference something from 3 years ago for a mortgage application, and having the complete return saved me a huge headache.
Do you do your own taxes with all that complexity or hire someone? I'm starting to get more income streams and wondering at what point I should stop using TurboTax.
I started out doing my own taxes using higher-end software like TurboTax Business, but switched to a CPA about four years ago when I added the rental properties. I think the tipping point is when you have multiple types of income that interact with each other in complex ways. For most people, that transition happens when you have both self-employment and rental income, or when you're operating in multiple states. The software can handle it technically, but a good accountant catches nuances and planning opportunities the software might miss. My accountant fee is around $800 annually, but she's saved me at least triple that amount through better tax strategies.
anyone else notice that the length of tax returns has gotten way longer over the years even for simple situations? my parents old returns from the 90s were like 5 pages max but mine is 15 pages now even tho i just have one job and rent an apartment. feels like the tax code just keeps getting more complicated for no reason lol
This exact thing happened to me! Here's what you need to do - in your tax software, you need to go back and make sure you're indicating that your Traditional IRA contribution is NON-DEDUCTIBLE. Most software has a specific question about this. If you don't mark it as non-deductible, the software assumes it's deductible, and then logically taxes you when you convert to Roth (since you'd be moving pre-tax money to a post-tax account). The key sequence matters too: 1. Enter Traditional IRA contribution 2. Mark it as NON-DEDUCTIBLE 3. Enter the Roth conversion If you do these in the wrong order in some software, it can mess up the 8606. I've been doing Backdoor Roth for 7 years and had this issue once when I switched tax software.
Thank you for the specific steps! This makes a lot of sense. I checked my tax software again and I think I discovered the issue - there's a specific question about "Do you qualify to deduct your IRA contributions?" that I must have answered incorrectly. Previous years I knew to say "No" but this year with the job change and severance, I might have clicked "Yes" by mistake. I'll try redoing those steps in the correct order. Would it also make sense to just delete all my IRA entries and start fresh with these steps in mind?
Yes, I'd recommend deleting all the IRA-related entries and starting fresh. That's the cleanest approach. Some tax software doesn't handle corrections well when it comes to the 8606 form. When you restart, just follow those steps in order. The key is definitely that "Do you qualify to deduct" question - that's the exact one that determines how the software handles everything downstream. Always answer "No" for a backdoor Roth strategy since the whole point is you're over the income limits for deductible contributions. And don't worry about the severance - it's just regular income. It doesn't change how backdoor Roth contributions work. The W-2 Box 13 check is typically for retirement plan participation at that employer, which is separate from your individual IRA strategy.
Has anyone else noticed that Backdoor Roth reporting seems to be getting more scrutiny from the IRS lately? I did mine the same way for years but got a letter asking for clarification on my 2022 return. Make absolutely sure your 8606 is filled out correctly.
I haven't heard about increased scrutiny, but I can tell you that reporting Backdoor Roth incorrectly is definitely a red flag. When your 1099-R shows a distribution (the conversion) but there's no corresponding basis tracking on Form 8606, it creates a mismatch that their systems can easily detect.
Vanessa Chang
One thing to watch out for with the 1042-S - check your tax treaty! I'm from Ireland and we have specific provisions for retirement accounts in our treaty with the US. I was able to get back almost half of what was withheld because the treaty rate was much lower than the standard 30% withholding. The key is making sure you properly claim the treaty benefit on your return. If you were a resident when you contributed to the retirement plan but nonresident when you withdrew, it gets complicated.
0 coins
Madison King
โขDo you happen to know where in the tax forms you claim the treaty benefits? I've been looking through the 1040 instructions and I'm totally lost.
0 coins
Vanessa Chang
โขYou'll need to attach Form 8833 (Treaty-Based Return Position Disclosure) to your tax return if you're claiming treaty benefits. On the form, you'll need to cite the specific treaty article that applies to your situation. For retirement accounts specifically, you'll report the income normally on your return, but then identify the applicable treaty article that modifies how it's taxed. The exact location depends on what type of retirement account it was - for example, 401(k) distributions typically go on line 5 of Form 1040, but you'd need to include Form 8833 explaining why the treaty reduces your tax liability.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
Does anyone know if the 10% early withdrawal penalty applies differently when you're dealing with a 1042-S versus regular 1099-R distribution? I'm in a somewhat similar situation but can't figure out if I still get hit with the penalty as a non-resident.
0 coins
Ella Knight
โขFrom what I understand, the 10% early withdrawal penalty is part of US domestic tax law and applies to US residents/citizens. If you're being treated as a nonresident (getting 1042-S), you're generally subject to flat withholding under Chapter 3 rules, not the additional penalty. But don't take my word for it - check with a tax pro.
0 coins
Julian Paolo
โขThanks for the insight! I did some more research and it looks like you're right - as a nonresident, I'm generally subject to the flat 30% withholding (or lower treaty rate) but not the additional 10% early withdrawal penalty. This is a huge relief since that would have been another $5,400 on my distribution.
0 coins