


Ask the community...
One approach that really worked for me was focusing on cost segregation studies. It's a specialized niche within real estate taxation that many accounting graduates don't know about. I took a course on it during my senior year, did my capstone project on it, and highlighted this specialty knowledge in interviews. Got hired by a regional firm specifically for their real estate team, skipping over the general tax preparation role. Cost seg studies are technical enough that firms are often looking for specialists, but accessible enough that you can learn the fundamentals before graduating.
That's fascinating! Do you need an engineering background to be credible in cost segregation, or can an accounting major learn enough to be valuable in that specific area?
You absolutely don't need an engineering background! While engineers are often involved in cost segregation studies, accountants play a crucial role in translating the physical components into tax classifications and depreciation calculations. What helped me was taking a specialized course through ASCSP (American Society of Cost Segregation Professionals) during my final semester. I combined that with reading every IRS ruling on the topic and creating sample studies for hypothetical properties. In interviews, I brought a portfolio showing how I would approach different property types. That practical demonstration of skills is what convinced the firm to place me directly in their real estate tax group instead of the general tax pool.
Has anyone considered starting with a Big 4 firm? They often have dedicated real estate groups and while you'll still do returns, you'll be specifically focused on real estate clients from day 1. That's the route I took.
I'm at PwC in their real estate practice. Yes, you'll do grunt work, but it's ALL real estate-focused grunt work. Huge difference in learning curve compared to my friends doing general tax. After 2 years, I'm already sitting in on advisory meetings because I've seen so many different real estate structures.
Another reason people go to local tax preparers - audit support! I used TurboTax for years but got audited on my 2023 return. The online "audit support" was just a bunch of articles and a very unhelpful chat agent. Ended up going to a local CPA who not only helped me respond to the audit but found mistakes in my previous returns that the software never caught. He amended two years of returns and got me back an additional $1,740. Sometimes having a professional in your corner is worth every penny.
Do you think you would have been audited if you'd used a local preparer from the start? I've heard the IRS is less likely to audit returns done by professionals.
I don't think using a local preparer would have prevented the audit because it was triggered by a specific issue with a 1099-K from my side gig that didn't match what I reported. The preparer told me these "document matching" audits happen regardless of who prepares the return. What would have been different is catching the error before filing. The software didn't flag the discrepancy, but a human preparer likely would have questioned me about it during the preparation process. So while it wouldn't have prevented the audit trigger, it might have prevented the error that caused it.
I think there's also a demographic element the other comments haven't mentioned. Local tax offices are often busiest in early February when people expecting refunds (especially with Earned Income Credit) want to file as early as possible. Many of these folks: 1) May not have reliable internet or computers at home 2) Might not have all the documentation organized to do it themselves 3) Often want refund advance loans that some local preparers offer The predatory part is some local preparers charge outrageous fees (often taken directly from refunds) to people who could qualify for free filing. I volunteered with VITA (Volunteer Income Tax Assistance) and saw people who'd paid $300+ for very simple returns that we prepared for free.
This is absolutely true. I worked at a tax prep chain in college and was disgusted by how we targeted low-income people with "instant refunds" that were just high-interest loans. The fees would eat up a significant portion of their refund, but they needed money immediately and couldn't wait for the IRS processing time.
Something nobody has mentioned yet - consider going in-house at a tech company, especially ones dealing with digital goods and SaaS products. I made this move 4 years ago and it's been incredible for my career. The sales tax issues for digital products are incredibly complex and constantly evolving, which means your expertise becomes extremely valuable. Plus the compensation is usually better than traditional accounting firms, at least in my experience. My total comp went up by about 40% when I moved from a regional accounting firm to a mid-size software company, and the work-life balance improved dramatically too. Just something to consider as you map out your career path!
What kind of background did you need to get hired at a tech company? Did you need technology experience or just strong sales tax knowledge? I'm interested in making a similar move.
Strong sales tax knowledge was definitely the priority, but familiarity with how software and digital goods are taxed across different jurisdictions was key. I had worked with several SaaS clients at my previous firm, which gave me relevant experience. Having some understanding of how technology companies operate is helpful, but they're mainly looking for someone who can navigate the extremely complicated tax treatment of digital products. Each state has different rules for how they tax software, subscription services, implementation fees, etc. If you can become an expert in that niche, tech companies will be very interested. Start by researching the specific tax rules for digital products in major states like California, New York, and Texas to build your knowledge base.
Don't overlook the option of specializing in tax technology! I started in sales tax compliance but moved into implementing tax engines (Vertex, Avalara, etc.) and it's been the best career move I ever made. The demand for tax technology specialists is growing like crazy because so many companies are automating their sales tax processes. You get to combine your tax knowledge with technical skills, which commands a premium in the market. Most people in sales tax stay on the compliance or consulting track, but the technology integration path is less crowded and often better compensated. Just my two cents!
This is really interesting! What kind of technical skills would I need to develop to go down this path? I have basic SQL knowledge but haven't done much beyond that. Is there a particular certification or training program you'd recommend?
You don't need to be a programmer, but understanding how ERP systems work is essential. Focus on learning the basics of major platforms like SAP, Oracle, or NetSuite. SQL is definitely useful for data manipulation and reporting. Avalara and Vertex both offer certification programs for their solutions, which are a good place to start. Try to get involved in any tax technology projects at your current company, even if it's just helping with requirements gathering or testing. The key is to demonstrate that you understand both the tax implications and how they translate to system requirements. Most of the specific technical skills can be learned on the job, but showing interest and basic aptitude will get your foot in the door.
Check if your employer coverage was considered "affordable" under ACA rules. Even if you had access to employer insurance, if it cost more than 9.61% of your household income for self-only coverage, you might still qualify for premium tax credits through the marketplace. Also, look at the specific months on both forms. If there's overlap, that's when you might have an issue. But if they cover different periods (like marketplace for Jan-June, employer for July-Dec), then having both forms would be correct.
Thank you for this info! I'll definitely check the affordability calculation. My 1095-C shows coverage was offered starting in April, but my 1095-A covers January through December. So it sounds like I might need to repay premium tax credits just for April-December? The numbers on my tax return seem higher than that though.
You've got it right - you would only need to repay premium tax credits for the months when affordable employer coverage was available (potentially April through December in your case). If your tax software or calculation is showing a higher repayment amount, it might be incorrectly assuming you were ineligible for the entire year. Form 8962 (Premium Tax Credit form) allows you to do a month-by-month calculation. Make sure you're completing Part IV of that form correctly to allocate by month rather than using the annual calculation. This is a common area where tax software can get things wrong if the information isn't entered precisely.
Has anyone dealt with this by filing Form 8965 for a hardship exemption? I had a similar situation last year.
Form 8965 isn't used anymore for tax years after 2019. The individual mandate penalty is $0 now at the federal level (though some states still have their own penalties). You're thinking of the old system. The issue here isn't about avoiding a penalty but about whether they have to repay premium tax credits they received.
Ella Lewis
Don't forget about parking fees and tolls! These are often overlooked but can add up significantly depending on where you operate. You can deduct these regardless of whether you use the standard mileage rate or actual expenses method. Also, if you finance the vehicle, you can deduct the interest portion of your payments based on business use percentage. Since you're at 100%, that's all deductible. Oh and one more thing - if you have specialized equipment installed in the vehicle specifically for business use (like a ladder rack, toolbox system, refrigeration unit, etc.), those can be deducted separately even if you're using standard mileage.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
ā¢What about vehicle advertising? I have my business logo and info on my vehicle. Is that deductible separately or is it considered part of the vehicle expense?
0 coins
Ella Lewis
ā¢Vehicle advertising is absolutely deductible as a separate marketing expense, not as part of your vehicle costs. This includes permanent signage, vehicle wraps, magnetic signs, or even custom paint jobs with your business info. Save all receipts from the sign company or wrap installer. This is a great strategy because these advertising costs are separate from your vehicle deduction method. So even if you choose the standard mileage rate (which bundles most vehicle expenses together), you can still deduct the advertising separately as a marketing expense.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
A word of caution from someone who got audited over vehicle deductions: Make sure you keep DETAILED records! The IRS is really picky about vehicle deductions. I claimed 100% business use for my truck but didn't have proper documentation. Ended up owing back taxes plus penalties. Now I use a mileage tracking app that logs every trip automatically and categorizes business vs personal. Also, be careful claiming 100% business use unless you have another personal vehicle. The IRS tends to be suspicious of sole-proprietors claiming 100% business use on a single vehicle.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
ā¢What mileage tracking app do you recommend? I've tried a couple but they drain my battery or forget to track sometimes.
0 coins