


Ask the community...
Just want to add something that nobody mentioned yet - make sure your invoice or W9 form matches EXACTLY how your name appears on your tax registration. I had this issue because my FEIN was registered under "John Q Smith Consulting" but my invoices just said "John Smith Consulting" - that tiny difference caused payment rejections. For a sole prop, the safest approach is to use your SSN and your exact personal name as it appears on your Social Security card, then "doing business as" your business name. That's worked for me with all clients for the past 5 years without any kickbacks from payment systems.
That's really helpful. So for my invoices, should I format it as "My Full Name dba Business Name" and then just use my SSN on the W9 form? Or should I include both the SSN and FEIN on different parts of the form?
You should format it exactly as "Your Full Legal Name dba Business Name" on your invoices, and then on your W9, check the "Individual/sole proprietor" box, use your personal name on the "Name" line, your business name on the "Business name/disregarded entity" line, and your SSN in part I. You can include your EIN in Part II if you want, but it's cleaner to just use your SSN for everything unless you specifically need the EIN for something like business banking. This way, everything matches what the IRS has on file for you personally, which prevents these verification hiccups.
quick question - does anyone know if having this kind of EIN/SSN mismatch trigger any kind of audit flags with the IRS? I'm dealing with the same issue and now I'm worried this might cause bigger problems down the road
One thing nobody's mentioned yet about your brokerage account - if you're going to be transferring money from your inherited IRAs to invest, consider the tax efficiency of what investments you put where. Generally, you want to keep tax-inefficient investments (like bonds, REITs, or anything that pays a lot of regular income) in tax-advantaged accounts like your SEP IRA. Use your brokerage account for more tax-efficient investments like growth stocks that don't pay dividends, or long-term buy-and-hold index funds. This strategy is called "asset location" and can save you thousands in taxes over time without changing your overall investment allocation.
Can you expand a bit on this? I'm in a similar situation and don't fully understand what makes something "tax-efficient" vs "tax-inefficient" for brokerage accounts.
Tax-efficient investments are those that minimize the amount of taxable events while you hold them. For example, growth stocks that don't pay dividends only create a taxable event when you sell them, which you can control. You might hold them for many years, allowing your money to grow tax-deferred (even though it's in a taxable account). Tax-inefficient investments create regular taxable events that you can't control. Bonds pay regular interest that's taxed at your ordinary income rate. REITs are required to distribute 90% of their taxable income to shareholders, creating regular dividend payments. High-dividend stocks similarly create regular tax obligations. When these are held in taxable accounts, you're paying taxes every year on these distributions, even if you reinvest them.
Can anyone recommend decent investment options for inherited IRAs? I'm in a similar situation and wondering if I should stick with target date funds or try something different since I have this 10-year timeframe.
Since you have a defined 10-year period, target date funds might not be ideal as they're designed for retirement dates. Instead, consider a balanced portfolio matching your risk tolerance. For a 10-year timeframe, maybe 60-70% stocks and 30-40% bonds could work. Just remember that as you get closer to the 10-year deadline, you might want to get more conservative to avoid market drops right when you need to withdraw everything.
Former tax preparer here. Most independent CPAs and smaller firms don't offer refund transfers because: 1) They need a special bank relationship to set up temporary accounts 2) There are compliance and banking regulations to follow 3) It costs the preparer money to offer this service That's why you usually only see this at big chains like H&R Block or with software like TurboTax. Also, be aware that when you DO use a refund transfer service, you're usually paying an extra fee ($30-40 typically) on top of the preparation fee for that convenience. If cash flow is tight, ask your CPA if they'll accept a credit card or if they offer payment plans. Some might also be willing to prepare everything and just hold off on e-filing until you pay them, but most won't file without payment.
Do you think it's better to just bite the bullet and pay a CPA upfront? I'm worried TurboTax might miss some deductions for my small business but the refund transfer feature is so convenient.
If you have a small business, paying for a qualified CPA is often worth it, especially in your first year or two of operation. A good CPA doesn't just fill out forms - they provide tax planning advice that might save you significantly more than their fee. Think of it this way: TurboTax might be $100 cheaper upfront, but a CPA might find $500+ in legitimate deductions you'd miss. The software only knows what you tell it, while a CPA knows what questions to ask based on your specific situation. Plus, having a professional relationship with a CPA means you have someone to call when you have questions throughout the year, not just at tax time.
Has anyone used a bank product like Republic Bank Tax Refund Solutions? My tax guy said he can offer a refund transfer through them, but I'm not sure if it's worth the extra fee ($39.95 in my case). Also slightly worried about delaying my refund by adding another party to the transaction.
I used a refund transfer through my tax preparer last year. It added about 5-7 days to my refund timeline, and cost me $35. Honestly wasn't worth it for me, but if you're really tight on cash and absolutely need the tax prep done, it might make sense. Just be aware you're basically paying $40 for a very short-term loan.
Quick question - did you have any ongoing service contracts or warranties with the vending machine that you also sold? That might need to be handled separately.
Not OP but I had a similar situation with equipment I sold. The service contract portion gets allocated separately as ordinary income, not as part of the capital transaction. At least that's how my accountant handled it.
Yeah actually I did have a service contract that transferred to the new owner with about 8 months left on it. I hadn't even thought about that part. I paid $3200 for a 3-year service plan originally.
Side note but I'm curious why ice vending machines aren't profitable? I always thought those things were cash cows with minimal maintenance. What went wrong if you don't mind sharing?
Location, location, location. I put it in what I thought was a great spot near a lake where people go fishing and boating, but it turns out most people just bring their own ice in coolers. The property lease was expensive, electricity costs were higher than projected, and I had several expensive repairs in the first year. Competition from nearby gas stations with cheaper ice didn't help either. The ROI calculations from the manufacturer were... let's just say optimistic.
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
For your governmental accounting paper, I'd recommend exploring the challenges of infrastructure asset reporting under GASB 34. My thesis focused on how different municipalities handle reporting and depreciating infrastructure assets like roads, bridges, and water systems. The modified approach versus depreciation approach comparison makes for a fascinating analysis with real budget implications. Or you could look at GASB Statement No. 84 regarding fiduciary activities - that's created significant reporting changes for many government entities.
0 coins
Andre Dupont
ā¢Thanks for these specific suggestions! I hadn't even considered infrastructure asset reporting. Do you know of any good case studies or examples of municipalities that have interesting approaches to this? I feel like having a real-world example would really strengthen my paper.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Suwaidi
ā¢The city of Portland, Oregon has an excellent comprehensive annual financial report that details their modified approach to infrastructure assets. They provide condition assessments and demonstrate how they've maintained service potential without traditional depreciation methods. For a contrasting example, look at Cincinnati's reporting which uses the more traditional depreciation approach for most assets. Comparing these two methodologies side-by-side creates a compelling analysis of how accounting choices impact financial position representation and budgeting priorities.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
For the non-profit paper, consider exploring the accounting challenges of international NGOs that operate across multiple countries with different accounting standards. I worked for an international humanitarian organization, and reconciling donor restrictions across different legal jurisdictions was a nightmare. Some countries require fund accounting while others use completely different models. Plus there's the forex issues when donations come in one currency but are spent in another. Super interesting from an accounting perspective!
0 coins
Sofia Morales
ā¢That's such a unique angle! How do these organizations typically handle the currency conversion issues in their financial statements? I imagine that could lead to some significant reporting challenges.
0 coins