My firm uses ProSystem fx Tax and it's been decent for multi-entity work. Not perfect but gets the job done. The K1 import/export feature alone has saved us hundreds of hours.

Just wanted to chime in here as someone who's been through this exact nightmare! We had 12 entities last year and I was literally losing sleep during tax season trying to keep everything straight. I ended up going with Thomson Reuters UltraTax CS and it's been a lifesaver. The entity management dashboard is incredible - you can see the status of all related returns at a glance and it flags any missing information or inconsistencies between entities. The K-1 flow-through functionality is seamless, and when you update source data, it automatically updates all dependent returns. One thing I don't see mentioned much is their client organizer feature - it sends customized requests to each entity based on their specific needs, which cuts down on the back-and-forth emails trying to get missing documents. For our real estate clients especially, this has been huge. The learning curve isn't too bad if you're already familiar with tax software, and their support team actually knows what they're talking about when you call with multi-entity questions. Worth every penny for the sanity it's given me back!

I might be in the minority here but I actually just pay my overseas contractors through Paypal or Wise and I've never collected W-8BEN forms. Been doing this for like 3 years with no issues. I just categorize it as "contract labor" on my Schedule C. My accountant said its fine as long as I'm keeping detailed records of who I paid and what for. Maybe I'm doing it wrong but no problems so far!

I'm dealing with a very similar situation! I have contractors in Vietnam and Thailand for my e-commerce product photography business. After reading through all these responses, I'm realizing I need to get those W-8BEN forms ASAP. One thing I wanted to add - make sure you're clear about what services your contractors are actually providing. The IRS distinguishes between services performed outside the US versus services that benefit a US business. Since your contractors are doing the actual editing work overseas, you should be good, but it's worth documenting that the work is being performed entirely outside the US. Also, I've found it helpful to include a clause in my contractor agreements that specifically states they're responsible for their own tax obligations in their home country and that they're not US tax residents. Not required, but it adds another layer of documentation if questions ever come up. Thanks for posting this question - it's made me realize I need to get more organized with my international contractor documentation too!

No one's mentioned the Streamlined Sales Tax Agreement! 24 states participate in this program to simplify sales tax compliance for remote sellers. It standardizes definitions, provides centralized registration, and offers amnesty options. If you register through the SSUTA, you can collect for all member states through one simplified system. Still need to deal with non-member states separately though.

This is such a timely discussion! I've been dealing with similar issues with my print-on-demand business. One thing that helped me was understanding that you need to look at your sales volume in each state first before panicking about conflicting rules. Most states have economic nexus thresholds around $100,000 in sales OR 200 transactions per year. If you're not hitting these numbers in a particular state, you likely don't have nexus there and don't need to collect their sales tax at all - regardless of whether they're origin or destination based. For Texas sellers specifically, you only need to apply Texas origin-based rules to sales within Texas. For out-of-state sales, you follow the destination state's rules IF you have nexus there. If you don't have nexus in the destination state, you typically don't collect any sales tax on that transaction. I'd recommend doing a nexus analysis first to see which states you actually need to worry about. It's probably fewer than you think! Then you can focus your energy on getting compliant in just those states rather than trying to figure out rules for everywhere.

Has anyone else noticed that TurboTax seems to handle the basis calculation differently than H&R Block software? When I had almost this exact same situation last year (contribution then loss before conversion), TurboTax carried forward the basis correctly, but when my brother used H&R Block, it seemed to miscalculate the basis after the loss. Just wondering if others have seen this?

I went through this exact same situation two years ago and it was so confusing at first! Your tax software is correct - that $200 on line 14 of Form 8606 represents your remaining basis in Traditional IRAs that carries forward to future years. Think of it this way: you put $7,000 of after-tax money into the Traditional IRA, but only converted $6,800 worth of value. The IRS recognizes that you still have $200 of "basis" (money you already paid taxes on) that wasn't converted yet. This $200 doesn't disappear - it's like a credit that reduces the taxable portion of any future Traditional IRA distributions or conversions. So if you do another backdoor Roth next year, that $200 will be added to your new contribution for basis calculation purposes. It's actually a small silver lining to the investment loss since it means less taxable income on future conversions. Just make sure to keep good records of your Form 8606 each year so you can track this basis properly!

My situation was a little different but might be helpful. My 2017 divorce had both alimony and child support. In 2022, we modified BOTH the child support and alimony amounts because my income changed dramatically. My accountant warned me that because we modified the actual alimony amount after 2018, I lost the grandfather status and can no longer deduct it! So based on my experience, if your modification only touched child support and left alimony completely alone, you should be fine. But if you modified the alimony amount or terms at all, even in the same document as the child support changes, you might have lost the deduction.

This is exactly the kind of complex tax situation where the details really matter. Based on what you've described, since your 2023 modification was specifically for child support (due to your oldest graduating college and youngest changing schools) and your divorce was finalized in 2018, you should still be able to deduct your alimony payments. The key question is whether your modification document touched the alimony terms at all. If it only addressed the child support calculation and left the $2,250 monthly alimony amount and terms completely unchanged, then you maintain your grandfathered status under the pre-2019 rules. However, I'd strongly recommend getting a definitive answer before your quarterly payment deadline. You might want to review your modification paperwork carefully to see if it mentions alimony at all, or consider reaching out to the IRS directly for clarification on your specific situation. The peace of mind of knowing for certain is worth it when you're dealing with $27,000+ annually in deductions.