IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Owen Devar

•

Just a heads-up - I got my penalty abated through FTA but it took almost 3 months for the refund to actually show up! The IRS approved it pretty quickly when I called, but then the refund processing seemed to take forever. Don't panic if it takes a while.

0 coins

Did you get any kind of confirmation number or anything when they approved it? I just submitted my request and realized I forgot to ask for some kind of reference number.

0 coins

Let me save you all some trouble as someone who used to prepare taxes professionally. The FTA is one of the best-kept secrets at the IRS. Almost no one knows about it until after they've paid penalties. Pro tip: When you call or write to request the abatement, use these exact words: "I'm requesting a penalty abatement under the First Time Abatement administrative waiver, Internal Revenue Manual 20.1.1.3.3.2.1." Citing the specific IRM number shows you've done your homework and helps ensure the agent or processor knows exactly what you're asking for.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thanks! Is there a difference in success rates between calling vs writing a letter for the FTA request?

0 coins

In my experience, calling is generally faster if you can actually get through to someone. You'll often get an immediate decision during the call. The agent can check your compliance history on the spot and approve the FTA right then. Letters take much longer due to IRS processing backlogs - sometimes 8-12 weeks or more. However, the success rate is probably about the same either way. The FTA criteria are pretty straightforward, and if you qualify, you should get approved regardless of which method you use. One advantage of writing is that you have documentation of exactly what you requested. If you call, make sure to take detailed notes of who you spoke with, when, and what they said.

0 coins

Just adding another option - you could file Form 8889 as mentioned above, but you might also consider filing an amended 2023 return (Form 1040-X) to report the excess contribution on Form 5329 for that year. Then you can properly account for the distribution in 2024. Though honestly, since you withdrew the excess before the deadline, you might be overthinking this. The important thing is that you didn't claim a deduction for the excess $270 on your 2023 return and you withdrew it before the deadline. The distribution code is less important than these two facts.

0 coins

Nia Harris

•

Would filing an amended return for 2023 be easier than trying to explain the situation on my 2024 return? I'm worried about triggering an audit if things don't match up properly.

0 coins

Filing an amended return would create a cleaner paper trail, but it's probably more work than necessary in your situation. Since you already withdrew the excess before the deadline and didn't take a deduction for the excess amount on your 2023 return, the main issue is just documenting the nature of the distribution on your 2024 return. Attaching an explanation statement to your 2024 return is likely sufficient and much simpler than amending your 2023 return. The risk of audit is actually quite low for this situation. The IRS is primarily concerned that you didn't deduct more than you were entitled to (which you didn't) and that you properly report distributions (which you will with the explanation). This type of corrective action happens frequently with HSAs and isn't a red flag as long as you document it properly.

0 coins

Does anyone know if the HSA excess contribution rules are different if you're self-employed? I contributed $3900 to my HSA last year but just realized my HDHP coverage didn't start until February, so I might have an excess contribution too.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

The excess contribution rules are the same whether you're self-employed or not. What matters is your HDHP coverage. Since your coverage didn't start until February, you'd need to prorate your contribution limit. For 2024, if you have individual coverage, you'd be limited to 11/12 of the $4150 limit, which is about $3804. So your $3900 would include about $96 in excess contributions that you should withdraw before the filing deadline.

0 coins

Don't overlook the redemption rules with Section 1202! My business acquisition got disqualified because the target company had redeemed shares from a departing founder just 12 months before I invested. The "2-year look-back" rule meant my stock didn't qualify. Make sure there haven't been any redemptions within 2 years before your purchase, and don't plan any redemptions within 2 years after. Also, if you're buying from existing shareholders rather than getting new shares issued directly from the company, that's generally not going to qualify as QSBS.

0 coins

Thanks for bringing this up - I hadn't even considered redemption timing issues. Is there any exception if the redemption is very small compared to the total outstanding shares? For example, if they bought back 2% of shares from a departing employee?

0 coins

There is a de minimis exception for redemptions, but it's very limited. The exception only applies if the total value of stock redeemed within the relevant period doesn't exceed $10,000 OR 2% of the value of all outstanding stock at the beginning of the period. So for most businesses of meaningful size, that 2% threshold is really tiny. The safest approach is to ensure no redemptions have occurred in the look-back period. If there have been redemptions, you'll need to carefully analyze whether they fall within the de minimis exception or whether there's a qualifying exception for death, disability, or divorce (there are specific carve-outs for these situations).

0 coins

Javier Cruz

•

Has anyone else run into issues with the "active business" requirement? I bought a manufacturing business that qualified initially, but we started generating significant interest income from our cash reserves (about 15% of our income), and our accountant warned this might jeopardize our Section 1202 qualification.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Yes, this is a real concern! One way around this is to establish a separate entity for your excess cash/investments. The "active business" test requires that at least 80% of assets be used in the active conduct of a qualified business. If your cash reserves are getting too large, you could dividend out excess cash to yourself and then invest personally, or create a separate investment entity that wouldn't affect your QSBS-eligible company.

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

•

I'm a tax preparer and see this problem with education credits all the time. Here's a simplified explanation: 1) Fellowships are tax-free ONLY for amounts used for qualified education expenses 2) Any fellowship money used for living expenses is taxable 3) For the Lifetime Learning Credit, you can only use expenses not already covered by tax-free education assistance So if you have $30,000 fellowship and $13,500 in qualified expenses, $13,500 of your fellowship is tax-free and the remaining $16,500 is taxable. But here's the catch - those same $13,500 expenses used to make part of your fellowship tax-free CAN'T also be used for the LLC. If you had additional qualified expenses beyond what you used for the tax-free fellowship portion, those could potentially be used for the LLC.

0 coins

Drake

•

This finally makes sense! So basically I can't get both benefits on the same dollars - either the money is tax-free OR I can use it for LLC but not both. Would it be possible to split my qualified expenses? Like use $8,000 for tax-free fellowship treatment and the remaining $5,500 for the LLC calculation?

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

•

Exactly! You can absolutely split your qualified expenses to optimize your tax situation. You could allocate $8,000 of your qualified expenses to make that portion of your fellowship tax-free, and then use the remaining $5,500 toward calculating your Lifetime Learning Credit. With the LLC giving you a credit of 20% of your qualified expenses, that $5,500 would generate a $1,100 tax credit. You'd need to calculate whether this approach saves you more than making all $13,500 of your fellowship tax-free. It depends on your tax bracket, but credits are generally more valuable than exclusions from income.

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

Has anyone used TaxSlayer for this situation? I'm in almost the identical situation with fellowship and education credits but don't want to pay for TurboTax.

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

I used TaxSlayer last year with a research fellowship and Lifetime Learning Credit. It worked fine but you have to be careful about how you enter the fellowship income. If you received a W-2, enter it as wages. If no W-2, you need to report it as "Other Income" and then separately indicate how much was for qualified expenses. For the LLC, make sure you're only claiming expenses that weren't already covered by tax-free scholarship/fellowship funds. TaxSlayer has a decent education credits section but doesn't always make this distinction super clear.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

I'd contact your state's bar association and ask for a referral to a tax attorney. This is a pretty big screw-up by TurboTax and might fall under "professional negligence" since you paid for their Full Service option. Most attorneys offer free consultations. Save all communications from TurboTax about this error. Also, not sure if this helps, but did you itemize deductions? If you did, some of those gambling losses might offset the winnings for AGI calculation purposes. Tax law around gambling can be complicated.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

Thanks for the advice! I didn't itemize - I took the standard deduction. Would that have made a difference with how the gambling income was handled? I'm definitely saving everything from TurboTax, including recording our phone conversations (with their knowledge).

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Yes, that makes a significant difference. Gambling losses can only be deducted if you itemize deductions, and even then, they're limited to the amount of your gambling winnings. Since you took the standard deduction, you couldn't deduct those losses at all, which means your AGI should definitely have included all the gambling winnings. This actually makes TurboTax's error even more clear-cut. They should have included all gambling winnings in your AGI calculation regardless of your losses or deduction choice. Definitely consult with a tax attorney - this is a textbook case of preparer error.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Something similar happened to me with H&R Block last year. They completely missed reporting my crypto trading as income, and I got hit with a huge bill later. I ended up having to set up a payment plan with the IRS. Definitely call TurboTax customer service and ask to escalate to a supervisor. They may offer to cover penalties and interest. Also, start setting aside money now because the IRS won't care that it was TurboTax's mistake - they'll still expect you to pay what you owe.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

Did H&R Block end up covering any of your penalties or offering any compensation for their mistake? I'm dealing with something similar right now.

0 coins

Prev1...38833884388538863887...5643Next