IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone considered whether your mom could be classified as an independent contractor vs an employee? If she's only playing at events organized by one company, and they direct when and where she performs, she might actually qualify as an employee. In that case, the wedding coordinator should be paying half of her FICA taxes. The IRS has a 20-factor test to determine proper classification. Might be worth looking into if this is ongoing work. The coordinator can't just give someone a 1099 to avoid payroll taxes if the relationship is really employer-employee.

0 coins

Zara Malik

•

That's really interesting - I hadn't even considered that possibility. She does only work through this one coordinator who tells her exactly when to show up, what to wear, and even provides a specific set list for each event. The coordinator also handles all client interactions and payments. Would those factors suggest she should be an employee?

0 coins

Those factors definitely suggest she might be misclassified! When the business controls the when, where, and how of the work, that strongly indicates an employment relationship rather than independent contractor status. Other indicators include if they provide equipment (though you mentioned venues have the pianos), if she can't work for competitors, and if she's economically dependent on this one business. If misclassified, filing Form SS-8 with the IRS would request a determination of worker status. She could also file Form 8919 to report her share of uncollected Social Security and Medicare taxes. This would potentially reduce her tax burden since she'd only be responsible for the employee portion (7.65%) rather than the full self-employment tax (15.3%).

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Guys I'm in a similar situation but with writing gigs. If I made around $5k last year from freelance work, do I HAVE to file Schedule SE? Can't I just pay the income tax and skip the self-employment part? The extra 15% is killing me financially.

0 coins

Luca Greco

•

Unfortunately, you do have to file Schedule SE if your net earnings from self-employment are $400 or more. There's no legal way to "skip" the self-employment tax as it funds your future Social Security and Medicare benefits. However, you can potentially reduce your self-employment income by making sure you're claiming all legitimate business deductions on Schedule C first. Things like your computer, portion of internet/phone, home office, software subscriptions, and professional development can all reduce your net profit subject to SE tax.

0 coins

Carmen Ruiz

•

Thanks for the honest answer. Guess I just needed someone to confirm I can't avoid it. I'll look into those deductions for sure. Do you know if the SE tax is calculated before or after regular income tax? Just trying to understand the full picture of what I'm paying.

0 coins

What would be the best tax system for simplifying complex taxation and addressing income inequality?

I've been thinking a lot about how much better society would function if we simplified our complex tax systems down to primarily income-based taxation. My country's current system (like many others) seems needlessly complicated and often unfair. What advantages might we see with a simplified income-only tax system? First, it would be much easier for legislators to regulate. Politicians could focus on adjusting a single tax rate rather than juggling dozens of different taxes, making it harder to inadvertently damage the economy or government revenue. Second, it would create more equality. One common complaint is how wealthy individuals can navigate complex tax systems to minimize their burden. A single, straightforward income tax would be harder to avoid unless you abandoned the country entirely. Third, it would be more fair across income levels. Currently, consumption taxes on necessities like food affect everyone equally regardless of income. Since income tax is percentage-based, those earning less would pay less, creating true progressivity. Fourth, it might reduce illegal market activity. Without heavy product taxes, legal businesses could potentially compete with criminal enterprises on price. Fifth, transparency would improve dramatically. Most citizens have no idea what percentage of their money goes to taxes overall. A single tax would make this immediately clear and easier to compare internationally. Sixth, it could reduce business bankruptcies. Companies that aren't profitable wouldn't pay taxes, allowing more businesses to survive economic downturns. However, there would definitely be challenges: - Enforcement would be difficult for non-traditional workers - Verifying true income for entrepreneurs and business owners - Wealthy people might relocate to lower-tax countries - "Digital nomads" could potentially avoid taxes altogether How might we address these issues? - Redirect tax enforcement resources from other taxes to focus on income verification - Require tax withholding on all official contracts - Implement stronger penalties for illegal tax avoidance What are your thoughts on simplifying to an income-only tax system? What problems do you see, or how could this idea be improved?

Adding to the discussion on income-only taxation - one major issue not considered is wealth inequality. Income tax only targets active earnings, but much of the wealth held by the ultra-rich isn't in regular income but in appreciating assets like stocks, real estate, etc. This is why many economists argue for some form of wealth taxation alongside income taxes. If we eliminated property taxes, capital gains taxes, etc., we'd basically be giving a permanent tax holiday to those who live primarily off assets rather than wages. Also, consumption taxes can actually be beneficial for economic stability because they provide a more consistent revenue stream during recessions when incomes might fall dramatically. No perfect system exists, but a balanced approach with simplified versions of different tax types probably makes more sense than going all-in on just income taxation.

0 coins

Ruby Garcia

•

Great point about wealth vs income! I never thought about how rich people often have low "income" on paper while their net worth grows by millions. How would you design a wealth tax that's actually effective without hurting regular people who might have a valuable house but not much cash?

0 coins

Designing an effective wealth tax requires careful thresholds to target only significant wealth. For example, setting the threshold at $10 million in net assets would exempt most homeowners completely. You can also create progressive rates that increase with wealth levels and offer deferred payment options for asset-rich but cash-poor situations. The key is exempting primary residences up to a reasonable value, retirement accounts up to certain limits, and small business assets under a threshold. This protects regular people while still addressing the enormous untaxed wealth accumulation at the very top. Annual reporting requirements and strong valuation methods would be essential to prevent avoidance strategies.

0 coins

Having lived in 6 different countries, I've experienced many tax systems firsthand. The simplest wasn't necessarily the best. In Singapore, they have very straightforward taxes, but it created other societal issues. In the Nordic countries, taxes are high but extremely transparent in how they're calculated and spent. The problem with income-only taxation is it misses huge parts of economic activity. For example, tourism: visitors consume resources but would pay zero under income-only systems. One approach I liked was in New Zealand, where they have a fairly simple GST (goods and services tax) applied broadly with very few exemptions, combined with a progressive income tax. The simplicity wasn't from having just one tax, but from having few exemptions and very clear rules.

0 coins

That's really interesting! Can you explain more about how New Zealand's system works? I'm really curious about what makes it clearer than other systems. Also, what did you see in Singapore that created societal issues?

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

Just a heads up, don't forget about state taxes too! Depending on where you live, you might owe state income tax on your babysitting income as well. Most states follow similar rules to the federal government regarding self-employment, but some have different thresholds or requirements.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

Wait I didn't even think about state taxes! Do I need to file a separate form for that or is it all part of the same tax return?

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

It depends on your state. Most states have their own version of Schedule C that you'll fill out along with your state tax return. You'll generally use the same income and expense information that you report on your federal Schedule C. Some states also have a lower threshold for filing requirements than the federal $400 self-employment threshold, so even if you somehow made less than $400, you might still need to file a state return. Check your specific state's tax department website for the exact requirements and forms you'll need.

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

Just wondering, does anyone know if the tax software like TurboTax or H&R Block can handle this kind of situation easily? I'm in a similar boat with some freelance work and not sure if I should try to do it myself or use software.

0 coins

Esteban Tate

•

Most tax software can definitely handle self-employment income. I used TurboTax last year for my tutoring side gig and it walked me through everything step by step. It asked about expenses and calculated all the self-employment tax automatically. Just make sure you get the Self-Employed version, not the basic one.

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

Something nobody mentioned yet - you should really look into getting a proper business license and registering your art business with your state/city! I learned this the hard way. I ran my design business for 2 years just treating it as extra income before finding out I needed a business license in my city. Got hit with back fees and a small penalty. Each place has different requirements, but usually there's a simple business registration you need to file. Also, once you're official, you can get a resale certificate which lets you buy supplies without paying sales tax (since your customers pay the tax when they buy from you). Saved me thousands on materials alone.

0 coins

I hadn't even thought about business licenses! Is that something I need even if I'm just doing occasional art markets and some online sales? How do I find out what my local requirements are?

0 coins

Aidan Hudson

•

Even for occasional sales, most places require some form of business registration. It varies widely by location though. Start by checking your city's website for "business license" or "business registration" - most have simple online forms. Your county may also have requirements, especially if you're in an unincorporated area. The good thing is that for small creative businesses, the fees are usually pretty reasonable - mine was only $85 per year. The sales tax exemption on supplies makes it worth it alone. Also check if your state requires a general business registration or DBA ("doing business as") filing if you're operating under a business name rather than your personal name.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

•

Just wanted to share what worked for me as a glass artist: I use the "profit first" system where I have multiple business accounts that I transfer specific percentages into: - One account for taxes (25-30% of income) - One for business expenses (30-35%) - One for business profit (5-10%) - One for owner compensation (rest) Every time money comes in, I immediately split it into those accounts. This way I'm always setting aside tax money and know exactly how much I can spend on supplies vs take as personal income.

0 coins

This is a really smart approach! How did you decide on those specific percentages though? Are those standard or did you customize based on your business?

0 coins

Former tax preparer here - just want to add that this transaction limit issue is super common with day traders. Besides what others suggested, you might consider filing Form 8949 separately with your summarized transactions. One approach I often used with clients: Group transactions by long-term vs short-term, then by similar securities types. The IRS mainly wants to ensure you're reporting accurate totals and paying the correct tax, not that you're listing every single trade individually.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

Thank you! For the Form 8949 approach, do I still need to mail in paper forms or can I e-file my return with the summarized transactions? And should I include some kind of statement explaining what I did?

0 coins

You can still e-file with summarized transactions - that's not a problem. When you use the summary method, you should include a statement with your return that says something like "Multiple transactions are reported on a single line. Details available upon request." This covers you from an IRS perspective. I'd also suggest keeping a detailed spreadsheet with all your individual transactions that ties to your summary totals. This becomes your supporting documentation if questions ever come up. The most important thing is making sure your total gains/losses are accurate, especially with proper handling of wash sales and correct cost basis.

0 coins

Anyone else feel like the whole tax system is rigged against regular people? Like why TF is there even a transaction limit? The IRS knows exactly what I made from my 1099s already. The whole thing is just designed to make us pay for expensive software or accountants. šŸ™„

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

The transaction limits are actually more about the software companies than the IRS. The consumer versions of tax software have these limits because processing thousands of transactions is computationally expensive. Professional versions don't have these limits but cost a lot more.

0 coins

Prev1...38463847384838493850...5643Next