


Ask the community...
Don't forget to consider whether either of you has income-based student loan payments! My husband and I discovered that filing jointly significantly increased his income-based repayment amount because they factored in my income too. We ended up filing separately even though we paid more in taxes because the student loan payment savings more than made up for it.
This! My spouse and I actually calculated both ways - the tax savings from filing jointly versus the student loan payment increase from combining our incomes. We saved about $1,400 in taxes by filing jointly, but her income-based repayment would have gone up by $230/month, so filing separately made more sense for us.
I hadn't even thought about student loans! My husband is on an income-based repayment plan for his federal loans. I'll definitely need to calculate if the tax benefits of filing jointly would be offset by higher student loan payments. Thank you for bringing this up!
One more thing to consider - if either of you has past-due child support, back taxes, or defaulted federal student loans, filing jointly could put your refund at risk of being seized. My friend learned this the hard way when their entire joint refund was taken for the spouse's defaulted loans. Just something to keep in mind if that might apply to your situation.
There's also a historical reason for these different tax treatments. The Johnson Amendment (which prohibits 501(c)(3) organizations from endorsing political candidates) was actually introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson in 1954 when he was a senator. The story goes that he was facing opposition from certain nonprofit organizations in Texas that were campaigning against him, so he introduced this amendment to silence them. This wasn't specifically targeted at churches initially, but rather at all 501(c)(3) organizations. Over time, it's become particularly contentious with religious organizations.
That's fascinating! I had no idea the prohibition had such a political origin. Has there ever been any serious attempt to repeal the Johnson Amendment? I've heard some politicians talk about it, but nothing seems to happen.
There have been several attempts to repeal or modify the Johnson Amendment, most notably during the Trump administration. In 2017, President Trump signed an executive order that he claimed would reduce enforcement of the Johnson Amendment against religious organizations, but legal experts generally agreed it didn't actually change anything substantive in how the law is applied. There were also provisions in early drafts of the 2017 tax bill that would have repealed the Johnson Amendment for churches, but these were ultimately removed from the final version of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act due to procedural rules in the Senate. The debate continues, with strong advocates on both sides - those who see it as a free speech issue and those who believe tax-exempt status shouldn't subsidize political speech.
The whole system is ridiculous. Churches should be taxed like any other business. They rake in billions tax-free and then have massive political influence anyway through their members. The pastor just tells everyone "I can't explicitly endorse candidate X, but as Christians we should consider issues A, B, and C" which is basically the same thing as an endorsement.
Not all churches are mega-churches with huge incomes. Most religious organizations are small community churches, synagogues, mosques and temples that barely keep the lights on. Taxing them would literally shut many of them down and harm the community services they provide like food banks, homeless shelters, and counseling services.
Important thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure the insurance payout actually covers your transportation needs! When my car was stolen, I had to buy a replacement before the insurance check came through, and I ended up spending way more than what insurance gave me. The tax stuff is important, but also make sure you're getting a fair settlement that actually covers a comparable replacement in today's market. My insurance company tried to lowball me based on "comparable vehicles" that were actually in much worse condition than mine.
Did you negotiate with the insurance company or just accept their first offer? I've heard you can push back if their valuation seems low.
I absolutely negotiated! Their first offer was almost $3,200 below what comparable vehicles were selling for in my area. I collected screenshots of similar listings, documentation of recent maintenance and upgrades I'd done, and sent it all to the adjuster. After about a week of back-and-forth, they increased their offer by about $2,700. Still not perfect, but much closer to reality. Definitely don't just accept the first number they throw at you - most insurance companies expect some negotiation.
Something else to consider - if you had a loan on the car, the insurance payout might go directly to the lender first to pay off the loan. If there's anything left over after that, you'll get the remainder. If you were "underwater" on the loan (owed more than the car was worth), you might still owe money to the lender even after the insurance payout is applied. That's where gap insurance comes in, if you had it.
Has anyone had experience with amending a Sprintax return for an F-1 student? I just realized I forgot to include some scholarship income on my 1040-NR.
I had to amend my F-1 tax return last year. You'll need to use Form 1040-X for federal amendments. Unfortunately, Sprintax charges another fee to prepare an amended return. If it's a simple change, you might be able to do it yourself. For scholarship income specifically, check if it should be reported as taxable first. Qualified education expenses covered by scholarships are usually tax-exempt for F-1 students, but money for living expenses is typically taxable.
For anyone confused about the Sprintax process - here's a simple checklist I made after going through this last year: 1) Prepare taxes on Sprintax 2) Download and print all the forms (1040-NR, 8843, state forms) 3) Physically sign where indicated (even if you e-signed) 4) Attach any required documents (W-2, 1042-S, etc.) 5) Mail each return to the correct address (federal and state are separate) 6) Use tracking for peace of mind 7) Keep copies of EVERYTHING And as others mentioned, almost all F-1 students will need to mail federal returns. Some states allow e-filing, but it depends on your specific state. Hope this helps!
Alicia Stern
To answer your specific question: Technically yes, you CAN file before receiving your 1099 from Robinhood IF you have perfect records of all your transactions (dates, prices, fees, etc). But should you? Probably not. Here's why - if the 1099 numbers end up different from what you reported (which happens often with crypto because of wash sales or other factors), you'll need to file an amended return which is a huge pain. Just wanted to give a direct answer since others covered the details already.
0 coins
Ethan Anderson
β’Thank you so much for the straight answer! Just to make sure I understand completely - if I file without the 1099 and I'm off by like $100 on my calculated gains, will I definitely get flagged for an audit? Or is there some margin of error the IRS is ok with?
0 coins
Alicia Stern
β’The IRS doesn't have a specific "margin of error" they officially accept. Any discrepancy between what's reported on the 1099 forms and what you report on your return could potentially trigger an automated notice. It doesn't necessarily mean a full audit, but you would receive a letter asking for clarification or additional tax payment. Even small differences can cause issues because the IRS's automated matching system flags returns where the numbers don't match the forms they've received from financial institutions. This is especially true with crypto transactions where the IRS has been increasing scrutiny in recent years.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
Has anyone experienced Robinhood being late with their 1099s? Last year they said mid-February but I didn't get mine until almost March 1st!
0 coins
Drake
β’Yep, happened to me too. They claimed "mid-February" but it was February 27th when I finally got mine. I ended up filing in early March and still got my refund in reasonable time. Better to file correctly than deal with amendments.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
β’Thanks for confirming I wasn't the only one! That makes me feel better about potentially waiting. Did your 1099 end up having any surprises compared to what you were expecting based on your own records?
0 coins