IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone used TurboTax to handle this kind of situation? I'm in a similar boat with surprise side income and their interface is confusing me on how to properly categorize everything.

0 coins

I use FreeTaxUSA instead of TurboTax - it's WAY cheaper and actually does a better job with self-employment stuff imo. It walks you through all the possible deductions for freelance work and explains everything in plain English. TurboTax always tries to upsell me on stuff I don't need.

0 coins

This exact same thing happened to me two years ago! The freelance income really throws everything off because of the self-employment tax that people don't expect. One thing that might help immediately - if your husband kept ANY receipts or records from his freelance work, make sure you're deducting every possible business expense. Even things like phone bills (business percentage), internet, supplies, software subscriptions, etc. can add up quickly. Also, don't panic about the payment! The IRS offers several options: - Payment plans (usually pretty reasonable interest rates) - You might qualify for an offer in compromise if you truly can't pay - They're surprisingly flexible if you call and explain your situation For next year, definitely set up quarterly estimated payments for any freelance income. I learned this the hard way but now I just automatically put 25-30% of any side income into a separate savings account for taxes. Makes April much less stressful!

0 coins

Don't overthink this - I was in your exact situation last year. The gift tax annual exclusion is $17,000 for 2023 and now $18,000 for 2024, so unless her contribution to the joint account exceeds that amount in a single year, you're fine anyway. Plus, like others mentioned, it's not even a gift since you're both going on the title. My girlfriend and I just kept careful records of who contributed what to our down payment so we could properly document our respective equity if we ever need to (hoping we don't!). We actually drew up a simple agreement showing our initial contributions even though we're both on the mortgage and deed. Might be worth doing.

0 coins

NebulaNomad

•

The annual exclusion limits are actually $17,000 for 2023 and $18,000 for 2024, not $15,000. That limit was from a few years ago.

0 coins

You're absolutely right, my mistake! The annual exclusion is $17,000 for 2023 and $18,000 for 2024. I was thinking of the older limit from when we first started saving. I'll edit my comment to fix that. Thanks for the correction!

0 coins

Something to consider that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're both clear on how you'll handle the mortgage interest deduction when you file your taxes next year. Since you're unmarried but both on the mortgage, you'll need to decide how to split the deduction between your separate tax returns. The IRS allows unmarried co-owners to each deduct their proportional share of mortgage interest based on their ownership percentage. So if you're 60/40 contributors as you mentioned, you might want to document that split for tax purposes too. Your tax preparer will ask about this when filing season comes around. Also, just a practical tip - if you do end up consolidating the funds, make sure to get a cashier's check or wire transfer for closing rather than a personal check. Most title companies won't accept personal checks for amounts that large, and it avoids any last-minute surprises at the closing table.

0 coins

I'm still confused about something...if safe harbor only applies to estimated payments, what's even the point? If I follow safe harbor rules for my quarterlies but still end up owing a lot more at tax time, I still get penalized?? That seems really unfair!

0 coins

Natalie Chen

•

The point of safe harbor is to give you a clear, predictable way to avoid penalties for underpaying your quarterly estimated taxes. Without it, you'd have to predict your exact annual income and tax liability perfectly each quarter, which is basically impossible for self-employed people or those with variable income.

0 coins

Paolo Marino

•

I think there's some confusion here about what the substantial underpayment penalty actually is. It's not a penalty for owing more tax than expected - it's specifically for accuracy-related issues on your return. The substantial underpayment penalty under IRC Section 6662 applies when you understate your tax by the greater of $5,000 OR 10% of the correct tax. But this penalty is for things like negligence, disregard of rules, or substantial understatement - not just for owing more than you thought you would. So @Maria, if you follow safe harbor rules and end up owing more at tax time simply because your income was higher than expected, you won't face the substantial underpayment penalty as long as your return is accurate and you didn't negligently understate your tax liability. You'd only face this penalty if there were actual errors or questionable positions on your return that caused you to significantly understate what you truly owed. The safe harbor rules are incredibly valuable - they let you make reasonable estimated payments without having to perfectly predict your income, and you won't get penalized for underpaying quarterlies as long as you meet the safe harbor thresholds.

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Friendly reminder that even if the wrong form number was the issue here, always double-check your actual tax forms against what you're inputting in the software. I made a typo on entering a number from my W-2 last year and ended up having to file an amendment, which was a huge pain.

0 coins

Naila Gordon

•

Great point about double-checking everything! I learned this the hard way too. Another tip for anyone using FreeTaxUSA - they have a really helpful review section before you submit that shows you all the forms that will be included in your e-filing. It's worth taking a few minutes to scan through that list to make sure everything looks right, especially if you're filing forms you haven't used before like the HSA form 8889. Better to catch any issues before hitting submit than dealing with amendments later!

0 coins

That review section is such a lifesaver! I wish I had known about it earlier. I always rush through the final steps because I'm so excited to be done with my taxes, but you're absolutely right that it's worth slowing down there. Last year I almost missed including a 1099-INT because I forgot to enter it, and only caught it when I was reviewing that final forms list. Definitely going to make that review a standard part of my process from now on.

0 coins

Malik Davis

•

Have you considered restructuring the LLC ownership? Maybe you could split it into two classes of membership interests with different distribution rights? That way, the inherited SDIRA could take distributions to satisfy RMDs while the traditional IRA maintains its undisturbed interest.

0 coins

This is actually a great idea but you need to be careful. Restructuring an LLC with different membership classes when IRAs are involved requires expert legal guidance. The IRS scrutinizes these arrangements closely for prohibited transactions. I've seen cases where changing LLC operating agreements for IRAs triggered unexpected tax consequences.

0 coins

I went through a very similar situation with my inherited SDIRA that held commercial real estate through an LLC structure. My custodian initially gave me the same confusing guidance about both accounts needing distributions. What ultimately resolved it for me was getting a second opinion from a fee-only financial advisor who specializes in self-directed IRAs. They explained that custodians often take overly conservative interpretations to avoid liability, but the actual IRS regulations don't require what mine was saying. The key insight was that each IRA maintains its separate tax identity even when they co-own assets through an LLC. The inherited SDIRA has RMD requirements, but that doesn't automatically trigger distribution requirements for your traditional IRA just because they share ownership. I ended up having the LLC make a special distribution to only the inherited SDIRA to satisfy the RMD requirement. This required amending the LLC operating agreement to allow for disproportionate distributions, but it solved the problem without forcing my traditional IRA to take an early distribution. Before making any moves though, I'd strongly recommend getting documentation from a qualified professional about the correct interpretation of the rules. Custodians will often change their position when presented with proper legal authority, but they won't budge on verbal explanations alone.

0 coins

Prev1...37803781378237833784...5643Next