


Ask the community...
I amended my 2021 tax return last year and here's what to expect: it took about 5 months to process (way longer than they say online), but I did get about $650 back from adding some forgotten business expenses. The key is documentation - keep every receipt and evidence of those business expenses. I scanned everything and kept a spreadsheet detailing what each expense was for, just in case. Never got audited or even questioned!
Did you do it yourself or use a tax professional? I'm trying to figure out if I can handle an amendment myself or if I need to pay someone.
I did it myself using the same tax software I originally filed with. Most of the major tax platforms have an amendment feature that helps walk you through the process. It pre-fills a lot of the information from your original return, so you only need to focus on what's changing. I found it pretty straightforward, especially since I was just adding business expenses to my Schedule C. If your amendment is more complicated (like changing filing status or something more substantial), then getting professional help might make sense. But for adding missed deductions, you can probably handle it yourself.
I'm wondering about the timing - is it better to file an amendment for 2022 now or should I wait until after I file my 2023 taxes? I'm in a similar situation with finding old business receipts.
For startup founder shares and 83(b) elections, there's a critical distinction between "cheap" stock and stock with genuine FMV differentials. Since you bought at formation with the common shares priced at $.001 (above par value of $.0001), you're likely in the clear IF that price represents genuine FMV at formation. The real question is whether $.001 per share was the legitimate FMV at the time of issuance. If you had investor interest or any other indication that the shares were actually worth more, the IRS could argue you received compensation equal to the difference. Also, many founders miss that the 83(b) election must be filed within 30 days of receiving the shares. Did you file within that window? Otherwise, the election might be invalid.
We did file within the 30-day window! Our lawyers were really strict about that deadline. We didn't have any external investors at the exact time we incorporated and issued the initial shares. We did have some friends/family invest about 3 months later at a slightly higher valuation though. Would the IRS look at that later valuation and try to apply it retroactively to our founder share purchases?
Good that you filed within the 30-day window - that's a common mistake that can't be fixed later. The IRS generally wouldn't apply a later valuation retroactively if there was a legitimate basis for the initial valuation. At formation, with no product, revenue, or investment, valuing common shares at just above par value is typically reasonable. The key is whether there were any substantive negotiations or commitments from investors already in place when you incorporated, which might suggest a higher valuation already existed. The 3-month gap before your friends/family round provides decent separation, and startups often see legitimate value creation in those early months that justifies a higher valuation. Just make sure you have documentation of the company's state at incorporation versus 3 months later to show real progress that warranted the increase.
Has anyone actually received an audit focused on 83(b) elections? I'm a founder and trying to understand how much risk there really is. Our lawyer said it's "theoretical" but he's never seen a founder audited specifically for this.
I've seen it happen. Friend was audited last year and the IRS specifically questioned the valuation used for their founder shares. They had purchased at $.001 but had term sheets from investors at $.08 in progress when they did it. IRS argued they'd undervalued by millions and owed taxes on the difference. Huge mess.
Something important that nobody has mentioned yet - even if the TCJA provisions expire and the mortgage interest deduction limit goes back to $1M, many people still won't benefit from it because the standard deduction is so much higher now. My wife and I have a $600k mortgage and we STILL take the standard deduction because our itemized deductions don't exceed $27,700 (2023 married filing jointly standard deduction). So before you get too excited about the potential SALT cap removal or higher mortgage interest limits, do the math to see if you'd actually itemize at all. For many people, it won't matter.
That's a good point, but isn't the higher standard deduction also part of TCJA and set to expire? So wouldn't the standard deduction also go back down in 2026, making itemizing more likely again?
You're absolutely right - I should have mentioned that. The increased standard deduction is indeed part of TCJA and scheduled to expire after 2025. Pre-TCJA, the standard deduction was much lower (around $12,700 for married filing jointly in 2017, adjusted for inflation). If no legislation is passed, the standard deduction would indeed drop significantly in 2026, which would make itemizing deductions beneficial for many more taxpayers. So the combination of lower standard deduction, unlimited SALT deductions, and higher mortgage interest cap could create a substantial change in tax strategy for homeowners in high-tax states.
Does anyone know if the $750k mortgage interest limit is per person or per return? My spouse and I are buying a $1.4M house and wondering if we each get $750k of deductible mortgage or if it's capped at $750k total for our joint return?
The $750k mortgage interest deduction limit is per return, not per person. So on a joint return, your total limit is $750k regardless of how many borrowers are on the mortgage. If you file separately, each spouse gets a $375k limit. This is also true for the pre-TCJA $1M limit that would return after 2025 if no new legislation passes. On a joint return it would be $1M total, or $500k each if filing separately.
Does anyone know if the Basis of Conversion calculation is different when converting a SEP IRA to a Roth? My tax software (TurboTax) seems confused when I enter my information.
The calculation works the same way for SEP IRAs. Your basis is still the total of your non-deductible contributions. The difference is that most SEP IRA contributions are made by employers and are always pre-tax, so they don't create basis. If you made additional non-deductible contributions to your SEP IRA (uncommon but possible), only those would count toward your basis. Most people with only employer-funded SEP IRAs have a basis of $0, meaning the full conversion is taxable.
Thanks for clearing that up! My SEP was entirely funded through my self-employment business, and I always took the deduction for those contributions. Sounds like my basis really is $0 then, which explains why TurboTax is calculating tax on the full conversion amount.
Word of warning about Basis of Conversion: if you have multiple IRAs (Traditional, SEP, SIMPLE, etc.), you can't just calculate the basis for the one you're converting! The IRS makes you aggregate ALL your IRA balances when figuring out how much of your conversion is taxable. Look up the "pro-rata rule" - it bit me hard last year. Even if you're only converting an IRA that has 100% non-deductible contributions (meaning you'd think the basis equals the full amount), if you have other pre-tax IRAs, you have to factor those in too. The formula is basically: (Total Basis in ALL IRAs Γ· Total Value of ALL IRAs) Γ Conversion Amount = Nontaxable Portion. The remaining portion is taxable. This completely messed up my tax planning last year.
Oh no, this sounds complicated! I do have another traditional IRA that I didn't convert. Does this mean I need to include that one in my calculations too? My tax software didn't ask about my other accounts at all!
Yes, you absolutely need to include your other Traditional IRA in the calculation! This is a common mistake that many tax software programs don't properly warn you about. When you complete Form 8606, you'll need to report the December 31st fair market value of ALL your IRA accounts (traditional, SEP, and SIMPLE) on line 6, not just the one you converted. This changes the pro-rata calculation of how much of your conversion is taxable. Definitely go back and check this in your tax software - there should be a place to enter the total value of all your IRAs, even the ones you didn't touch for the conversion.
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Just to add something helpful for the original poster - make sure you're using the correct Article of the US-India tax treaty for dividends. If I remember correctly, Article 10(2)(a) specifies the 25% rate for Indian residents receiving US-source dividends. Also, keep in mind that if you're a student or trainee, there might be different provisions under Article 21 that could apply to your situation. The treaty has different rules depending on your visa status and purpose in the US.
0 coins
QuantumQuester
β’Thank you! I'm here on an H1B, not a student visa. I did look up the treaty and confirmed it's Article 10 that applies to my situation with the 25% rate. Do you know if I need to attach any specific form to my 1040NR to document this treaty claim? Or do I just report the income with the 25% rate applied?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
β’Since you're on an H1B and this is a standard treaty provision for the reduced dividend withholding rate, you typically don't need to attach Form 8833. You'll report the dividend income on your 1040NR and apply the treaty rate directly. In Sprintax, when you enter your dividend income, there should be an option to indicate that it's subject to a treaty rate. Make sure you select "India" as your country of residence for treaty purposes and the system should apply the correct 25% rate. For the period where no withholding was done, you'll need to calculate and pay the 25% tax on those dividends.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
One more thing to check - make sure Fidelity issued you a correct 1042-S form showing your dividend income and withholding. This form is specifically for foreign persons with US-source income. If they didn't issue one or it's incorrect, you should contact them to get it fixed before filing.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
β’Not necessarily. If OP was mistakenly treated as a US person for part of the year, Fidelity might have issued a 1099-DIV instead of a 1042-S for those months with no withholding. They should check both documents.
0 coins