IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Harper Hill

•

Has anyone had issues with property taxes being reported incorrectly on these 1098 forms after a loan transfer? My new servicer didn't report any of the property taxes paid through escrow, but the old one did. Trying to figure out if I need to get a corrected form.

0 coins

Caden Nguyen

•

Yes! This happened to me last year. The new servicer didn't report property taxes because they claimed they didn't make the actual property tax payment - the old servicer did it just before the transfer. Check your escrow statements from both servicers. You can deduct the property taxes you paid regardless of whether they're reported correctly on the 1098 forms, but you'll need documentation.

0 coins

Harper Hill

•

Thanks for the confirmation - I'll pull my escrow statements and see what they show. My closing was in October so most of the property taxes should have been paid by the previous owner, but there was a small prorated amount I paid. Guessing that's what's causing the confusion between servicers.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

This is exactly the situation I found myself in last year! The stress of trying to figure out which numbers to use was keeping me up at night. What really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet where I listed every mortgage payment I made throughout the year with the dates and amounts, then compared that to what each 1098 form was reporting. I discovered that my original lender was including some fees in their interest calculation that weren't actually deductible interest, while my new servicer had the cleaner numbers. The key is to focus on what you actually paid in mortgage interest, not necessarily what the forms say if there are discrepancies. Also, don't stress too much about triggering an audit - mortgage interest reporting issues are super common and the IRS sees this all the time. As long as you're being honest about what you actually paid and can document it, you'll be fine. Keep copies of all your payment records and mortgage statements just in case you need them later!

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

This spreadsheet approach is brilliant! I'm definitely going to try this. Just to clarify - when you say your original lender was including fees that weren't deductible interest, what kind of fees were those? I want to make sure I'm not accidentally claiming something I shouldn't on my return. Also, how did you figure out which fees were legitimate interest versus other charges?

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

Does anyone know if this credit phases out completely at certain income levels? My wife and I both contribute to Roth IRAs but our combined income is around $70k.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Yes, the Saver's Credit does phase out completely at certain income levels. For 2024, if you're married filing jointly, the credit phases out completely if your AGI is above $73,000. With your combined income of around $70k, you should still qualify for the 10% credit rate. For married filing jointly in 2024, the brackets are: - 50% credit if AGI is $43,500 or less - 20% credit if AGI is $43,501-$47,500 - 10% credit if AGI is $47,501-$73,000 - No credit if AGI is above $73,000 So at $70k income, you'd get a 10% credit on up to $4,000 in combined retirement contributions, meaning a maximum credit of $400. Definitely worth claiming!

0 coins

Isaiah Cross

•

Just want to add that you should also make sure you have your Form 5498 from Vanguard when you file. This form shows your IRA contributions for the year and the IRS uses it to verify your eligibility for the Saver's Credit. Vanguard usually mails these out by May 31st for the previous tax year, but you don't need to wait for it to file your return since you know how much you contributed. Also, keep in mind that only the contributions you made during the 2024 tax year count toward the 2024 credit. So if you contributed $5,700 in 2024, that's what you'd use for Form 8880. The $3,100 you contributed back in 2022 would have been eligible for the 2022 credit if your income qualified that year. It's really great that FreeTaxUSA caught this for you - a lot of people miss out on this credit simply because they don't know it exists!

0 coins

Zainab Omar

•

This is really helpful information! I'm new to this community and just learning about all these tax credits I never knew existed. Quick question - do I need to wait for the Form 5498 to arrive before I can file, or is it okay to file based on my own records of contributions? I keep pretty good track of my deposits to my Roth IRA but I'm worried about getting the numbers wrong and having issues with the IRS later. Also, does anyone know if there are other retirement-related credits or deductions that commonly get missed? I'm starting to realize I might have been leaving money on the table for years!

0 coins

I'd recommend filing a report with your state's Department of Labor too. If they're reporting wages they didn't pay you, that's a serious issue. The DOL might light a fire under the company to fix this faster than you can on your own.

0 coins

This is good advice. I work in HR, and I can tell you companies take DOL inquiries VERY seriously. We respond to those immediately because the penalties can be significant. Just mentioning that you're considering filing a DOL complaint might be enough to get someone's attention.

0 coins

Kendrick Webb

•

This is definitely a frustrating situation, but you have several good options to resolve it. Based on what you've described, it sounds like a clear payroll error since you have documentation that you stopped working in November. Here's what I'd recommend doing immediately: 1. **Document everything** - Keep all your communication attempts with the company, your final paystub from November, and any employment termination paperwork you have. 2. **Don't wait indefinitely** - You can file your taxes on time using Form 4852 (Substitute for Form W-2) if the company won't respond. Since you know you didn't work during that period, you can accurately report zero income for those dates. 3. **Try the certified letter approach** mentioned earlier, but also consider escalating to their corporate office if it's a larger company. 4. **Contact the IRS directly** - Call their business and specialty tax line at 800-829-4933 to report the incorrect W-2. They can guide you through the process and may contact the employer on your behalf. The key thing is not to let this delay your tax filing. You have legitimate recourse options, and the IRS deals with these situations regularly. If you end up needing to file an amended return later, that's totally manageable - it's better than missing the deadline while waiting for an unresponsive employer.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I'm dealing with something similar where my former employer is just completely ignoring me. Quick question - when you call that IRS business line, do you need to have specific information ready? Like should I have my W2 and paystubs in front of me when I call, or do they just need basic details about the situation? Also, has anyone actually used Form 4852 before? I'm worried about doing it wrong and getting in trouble with the IRS later if it turns out I made a mistake on the form.

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

Just a heads-up based on personal experience: be VERY careful with your record keeping if you're doing Roth corrections or backdoor contributions. I messed up my basis tracking over multiple years and got hit with a CP2000 notice claiming I owed taxes on conversions that should have been tax-free. It took me months to untangle everything because I didn't have proper documentation for which contributions had been withdrawn as excess vs. which ones were converted properly. Make sure you keep ALL your 5498 and 1099-R forms indefinitely!

0 coins

Thank you for that warning. I'll definitely keep better records going forward. Should I be requesting any specific forms from my IRA provider to help document the excess contribution removal? And how many years of these documents should I be keeping?

0 coins

Diego Flores

•

You should specifically request a statement or letter confirming the excess contribution removal and make sure they code the 1099-R properly. The code should indicate it was a "return of excess contributions" - usually code P or JP in box 7 of the 1099-R. As for how long to keep the documents, I personally now keep ALL retirement account documentation indefinitely. The technical requirement is 3 years from filing, but since IRA contributions and conversions can affect your basis for decades, it's safer to keep everything. I learned this the hard way when the IRS questioned transactions from 5 years prior. Just create a digital folder system and save everything - Form 5498 (showing contributions), 1099-R (showing distributions), account statements showing the removal of excess, and any correspondence with your provider about corrections.

0 coins

Based on your description, it sounds like you handled the excess contribution removal correctly by withdrawing before the filing deadline, which should have avoided the 6% penalty. However, there are a couple of areas that need attention: Your basis calculation is indeed incorrect. Since you withdrew the entire 2023 contribution of $1,500, that amount should NOT be included in your ongoing basis. Your basis should only reflect contributions that remain in the account - so for 2024, it should just be $7,000 (assuming you're eligible for the 2024 contribution). You should have received a 1099-R for the 2024 withdrawal showing the $1,530 distribution. The $1,500 principal portion isn't taxable since it was a return of excess contributions, but the $30 in earnings should be reported as taxable income on your 2024 return. If you're under 59½, those earnings are also subject to the 10% early withdrawal penalty. Make sure your IRA provider coded the 1099-R correctly - it should show code P or JP in box 7 to indicate "return of excess contributions." This helps the IRS understand the nature of the distribution. For 2024, double-check that your income still qualifies you for the $7,000 Roth contribution. If you're over the limit again, you'll want to address this before the filing deadline to avoid repeating the same issue. You likely don't need to amend your 2023 return if you properly reported the excess on Form 5329, but you should verify that your 2024 return correctly reports the earnings portion of the withdrawal as taxable income.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

This is really helpful - I think I've been making this more complicated than it needs to be. Just to clarify one more thing: when you say the $30 in earnings is subject to the 10% early withdrawal penalty, does that apply even though the withdrawal was to correct an excess contribution? I thought there might be an exception since it wasn't a voluntary distribution but rather a required correction. Also, should I expect to receive an amended 1099-R if my provider initially coded it incorrectly?

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

As someone who went through this exact situation last year, I want to share what worked for me. I was overthinking it initially, but here's the simple approach I settled on: I tracked my phone usage for just one typical work week - Monday through Sunday. Each evening, I spent 2 minutes estimating what percentage of that day's phone time was business-related. I included calls, texts, emails, GPS for business travel, and any work-related app usage. My daily percentages ranged from about 20% (weekend days) to 65% (busy workdays), and when I averaged it out, I got 42%. I decided to round down to 40% to be conservative, and that's what I've been claiming. The key insight for me was realizing that I don't need scientific precision - I just need a reasonable method I can explain. I keep a simple note in my tax folder that says "Phone deduction: 40% based on one-week usage tracking in March 2024, averaged 42% but rounded down to be conservative." This approach gave me confidence in my deduction without making it a huge project. The one week of tracking was enough to establish a pattern, and being slightly conservative means I'm not worried about defending it if questioned.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

This is such a practical and reassuring approach! I really appreciate you sharing your real-world experience with this. Your one-week tracking method strikes the perfect balance between being thorough enough to be defensible and simple enough to actually complete without burning out. I love how you handled the range of daily percentages (20% to 65%) and the decision to round down from 42% to 40%. That conservative approach is smart - it shows you're not trying to maximize every possible deduction but rather claiming what you can genuinely justify. Your documentation approach is also perfect - clear, concise, and shows your methodology without being overly complicated. "Averaged 42% but rounded down to be conservative" is exactly the kind of reasoning that would satisfy an examiner if questions ever came up. I think I'm going to follow a very similar approach for my own situation. The idea of tracking for just one typical week feels much more manageable than some of the longer tracking periods others have mentioned, and your results show it can still give you solid data to work with. Thanks for sharing such a straightforward and confidence-building example!

0 coins

I've been handling this issue for my freelance graphic design business, and I found a middle-ground approach that works well. Instead of detailed daily tracking, I used my phone's built-in screen time analytics to get objective data about my usage patterns. Most smartphones show weekly breakdowns of app usage time. I looked at my email apps, work messaging (Slack, Teams), business-related browsing, and calling apps during typical work weeks versus personal time. This gave me hard data showing roughly 55% of my phone time was work-related. What I really like about this method is that it's based on actual phone data rather than my potentially biased estimates of usage. The phone is already tracking everything automatically, so it's just a matter of categorizing the apps as business vs personal and doing some simple math. I've been claiming 50% (rounded down from my 55% calculation) for two years now and feel very confident about it. The documentation is just screenshots of my screen time analytics with my calculations, plus a brief note explaining my methodology. Takes maybe 15 minutes once a year to update, and it's all based on objective data the phone collected automatically.

0 coins

Ava Johnson

•

This is a really clever approach I hadn't considered! Using the phone's built-in screen time data is brilliant because it takes the guesswork out of estimating usage patterns. I never thought about categorizing my apps as business vs personal and using that data as the foundation for my deduction percentage. Your method seems much more objective than trying to estimate daily usage, and I like that it's based on actual data the phone is already collecting. The fact that you rounded down from 55% to 50% also shows good conservative judgment. Quick question - do you find that the screen time data accurately reflects your business vs personal usage? I'm wondering if some apps might be hard to categorize (like if you use Safari for both work research and personal browsing), or if calling time gets properly weighted compared to app usage time. This approach definitely appeals to me as someone who likes having concrete data to back up decisions. Thanks for sharing such an innovative solution to this tracking challenge!

0 coins

Prev1...362363364365366...5644Next