Has anyone used CCH Axcess for SPVs? My CPA recommended it to me for our angel fund, but the pricing seemed outrageous for what's essentially a passive investment vehicle with 25 investors.

For your situation with multiple investment LLCs and 40-50 K-1s, I'd recommend starting with TaxAct Professional as Isabella mentioned. I've been using it for my real estate investment partnerships for 3 years now, and it handles the member data carryover beautifully. The key advantage for investment vehicles is that once you set up the allocation percentages and member information, subsequent years are mostly just updating income/loss amounts and any membership changes. TaxAct's batch K-1 printing and e-filing capabilities will save you hours compared to manual preparation. One tip: when you first set it up, take the time to carefully enter all the member information including addresses and SSNs. The software will catch common errors like mismatched names/SSNs that could cause IRS notices later. For the price point (around $200-300 per return), it's a solid middle ground between DIY manual work and expensive professional software. The learning curve is pretty gentle if you're already familiar with 1065 forms, and their support is responsive when you run into questions about specific partnership allocations.

22 Just an FYI - I called the EFTPS customer service line (not the IRS) at 1-800-555-4477 and they were able to tell me exactly which form to select for my CP128. Only took about 10 minutes on hold. Sometimes the EFTPS folks are more helpful than the IRS for these specific payment questions.

I've been through this exact situation with a CP128 notice last year. The key thing that finally worked for me was calling the EFTPS helpline directly at 1-800-555-4477 rather than trying to reach the IRS. They walked me through the correct form selection based on what type of tax the penalty was related to. For my situation (employment tax penalty), I had to select Form 941, but the EFTPS rep emphasized that it really depends on the underlying tax type shown on your CP128 notice. They also told me to include three things in the comments: the CP128 notice number, the tax period, and my EIN. The payment posted correctly within a few business days, and I received confirmation that it was applied to the right penalty. Much easier than the hours I spent on hold with the IRS!

This is definitely unemployment fraud and you should absolutely not do this. I work in tax preparation and see the aftermath of these situations regularly. The IRS and state unemployment offices have sophisticated cross-referencing systems that will catch discrepancies between your unemployment claims and tax filings. When you file your 2025 taxes claiming a newborn dependent born in December, but also received unemployment benefits during that same period for being "laid off," that's going to trigger automatic flags in the system. The timeline will be obvious - you can't be actively seeking work while in the hospital giving birth and caring for a newborn. Beyond the fraud issue, there are legitimate options you should explore first. Many people don't realize that short-term disability insurance often covers pregnancy and childbirth recovery. Check your employee benefits package - you might already have this coverage. Also, some states have temporary disability insurance programs that provide partial wage replacement during recovery from childbirth. If your employer is genuinely experiencing financial hardship and can't provide paid leave, they should be honest about that rather than suggesting illegal workarounds. There may be legitimate ways to structure unpaid leave with partial income replacement through proper channels. Document everything about these conversations and consult with an employment attorney if needed. Your employer putting you in this position is problematic on multiple levels.

As someone who's dealt with similar employer pressure in the past, I want to emphasize how important it is to trust your instincts here. You already know this feels wrong, and you're absolutely right to be concerned. What your employer is suggesting isn't just risky - it's a federal crime. Unemployment fraud can result in criminal charges, hefty fines, and having to repay benefits with penalties and interest. The fact that they're explicitly telling you to lie about your pregnancy makes this even more serious. I'd recommend taking these steps immediately: 1. Document everything - follow up any verbal conversations with emails "confirming what we discussed" 2. Review your employee handbook and benefits package for any short-term disability coverage 3. Research your state's pregnancy/disability benefits programs 4. Consider consulting with an employment attorney, especially since your employer is pressuring you to commit fraud Remember, a good employer should be helping you find legitimate solutions, not asking you to break the law. The fact that they've suggested this before shows a pattern of problematic behavior that could put other employees at risk too. Your financial needs during maternity leave are valid and important, but there are legal ways to address them. Don't let your employer's "solution" jeopardize your future financial security and legal standing.

Quick warning about cashing old bonds - the bank teller might not know how to handle them properly! When I cashed my old EE bonds, the first bank I went to reported the ENTIRE amount as interest on my 1099-INT, not just the interest portion. It was a huge headache to fix. Make sure whoever cashes them understands the difference between the principal (what you paid for the bond) and the interest (what you earned). The 1099-INT should only show the interest amount.

Just to add another perspective here - if you're dealing with multiple old bonds from different years, it might be worth keeping detailed records of when you cash each one. I had EE bonds from 1991, 1992, and 1993 that I found all at once, and when I cashed them in 2023, the bank lumped all the interest together on one 1099-INT. This created some confusion because technically each bond had different interest calculation periods and rates. I ended up having to request separate documentation from the Treasury to show the breakdown for my records. Not a huge deal, but something to be aware of if you're in a similar situation with multiple bond years. Also seconding what others said about those 1992 bonds likely being done earning interest - definitely get them cashed sooner rather than later!

Just to add a potentially useful resource - publication 556 "Examination of Returns, Appeal Rights, and Claims for Refund" has detailed information about the limitations on refund claims. The key section for your case would be the "Time for Filing a Claim for Refund" portion. Also look into "protective claims" which are sometimes allowed even after limitations periods have passed if there were special circumstances. Not sure if your situation qualifies, but worth investigating. If you filed during COVID, there were also special extensions to some filing deadlines that might potentially apply to your situation. The IRS issued several notices extending various deadlines.

I'm really sorry you're going through this - $75K is an enormous amount to lose to a technicality. While the statute of limitations rules are unfortunately strict, there might be some avenues worth exploring given the amount involved. One thing that stands out to me is that you consistently elected to keep overpayments with the IRS rather than taking refunds - this shows a clear pattern of intending to maintain credit balances for future tax obligations. Some courts have distinguished between different types of payments and credits in similar cases. Have you looked into whether any of the COVID-related relief provisions might apply to your timeline? The IRS issued numerous deadline extensions and special procedures during 2020-2021 that could potentially affect limitation periods. Also, consider whether there were any IRS processing delays or errors that contributed to this situation. If you can document that the IRS failed to properly process your returns or apply your payments in a timely manner, that might provide grounds for an exception. Given the amount involved, I'd strongly recommend consulting with a tax attorney who specializes in statute of limitations cases before accepting this outcome. Many offer free consultations and could quickly assess whether you have viable options for recovery. Don't give up yet - $75K is worth fighting for, and there are specialized advocates who deal with exactly these types of IRS disputes.