


Ask the community...
11 Just want to point out that different types of retirement accounts might have different rules. For IRAs, the rule about turning 72 in 2023 and starting RMDs in 2024 is correct. But for 401(k)s, if your mother is already retired, she might have different requirements. Some employer plans require distributions to begin earlier. Worth checking the specific plan documents or having her HR department confirm if she's still working.
5 What about for someone who's still working past 72? My dad is 73 and still working full-time at the same company where he has his 401(k). Does he need to take RMDs from that 401(k) while still employed there?
11 For someone still working past RMD age, they generally don't have to take RMDs from their current employer's 401(k) plan while still employed there. This is known as the "still working exception." However, this exception only applies to the 401(k) at their current employer. They would still need to take RMDs from any IRAs they own and from 401(k)s from previous employers. Also, if your dad is a 5% or greater owner of the company, the still working exception doesn't apply, and he'd need to take RMDs regardless.
4 I've been managing my in-laws' finances for years and can confirm the RMD age is now 72 (soon to be 73 for younger folks). For someone turning 72 this year, their first RMD year is 2024, not 2023. One important thing to note: the first RMD can be delayed until April 1 of the year following the year you turn 72 (so April 1, 2025), but that means you'd have to take two distributions in 2025 (the delayed 2024 RMD plus the regular 2025 RMD). Usually better tax-wise to take that first distribution in the actual year it's for.
2 This is really helpful. Do you know if QCDs (Qualified Charitable Distributions) count toward satisfying the RMD requirement? My mom is turning 72 and wants to donate to her church directly from her IRA.
Yes, QCDs absolutely count toward satisfying RMD requirements! Your mom can make qualified charitable distributions directly from her IRA to eligible charities (like her church) starting at age 70Β½, even before RMDs begin. The QCD amount counts dollar-for-dollar toward her RMD requirement for that year. The maximum annual QCD amount is $100,000 per person, and the distribution goes directly from the IRA custodian to the charity - she never receives the money personally. This is often a great tax strategy since the QCD isn't included in her taxable income, unlike regular RMDs. Just make sure her church is a qualified 501(c)(3) organization and get proper documentation for tax purposes.
Something everyone seems to be missing here - if these are ISOs and you're trying to qualify for LONG-TERM capital gains treatment, you need to hold the shares for BOTH: 1) At least 1 year after exercise 2) At least 2 years after the option grant date If you don't meet BOTH holding periods, your gain gets taxed as ordinary income even if they're ISOs. This is called a disqualifying disposition. With pre-IPO companies, people often exercise close to IPO, then get caught by the 6-month lockup period after IPO, and end up selling before they meet the holding requirements. Then they're shocked when the gain is taxed as ordinary income instead of getting favorable LTCG rates.
Wouldn't the 1 year holding period start from the exercise date though? So if they exercise now and the company doesn't IPO for another year or more (which is likely given current market conditions), they'd meet both conditions as long as it's been 2+ years since grant?
Yes, the 1-year period starts from exercise date. I was just pointing out that many people mess this up around IPOs specifically. They exercise right before IPO thinking they'll qualify for LTCG rates, but then the combination of lockup periods and stock price volatility after lockup expires often leads them to sell before hitting that 1-year post-exercise mark. You're right that if OP exercises now and the company doesn't IPO for at least a year (and the grant was at least a year ago already), they'd likely meet both conditions. I just wanted to highlight this because it's a very common and expensive mistake I've seen multiple colleagues make.
Former startup finance person here. One thing that's often overlooked: your company might offer an early exercise option where you can exercise unvested shares. If that's available, you might want to consider it NOW while FMV is BELOW strike price. This has two huge advantages: 1. No AMT issues since there's no spread (actually a paper loss) 2. Your long-term capital gains holding period starts immediately You'd file an 83(b) election within 30 days of exercise. When you eventually sell after IPO, the entire gain from your $3.20 cost basis would be long-term capital gains (assuming held >1yr). The downside is you're putting cash at risk on unvested shares, but if you're bullish on the company and can afford it, this is often the most tax-efficient approach.
Wow, I hadn't considered this! Our company does offer early exercise. So if I'm understanding right - I could exercise everything now (even unvested shares), file the 83(b), and basically avoid the whole AMT nightmare scenario if the FMV jumps later? What about if I leave the company before shares vest though? I'm guessing the company would repurchase the unvested shares at my original purchase price?
Exactly right! By exercising early while FMV is below strike price and filing the 83(b) election, you'd lock in your cost basis at $3.20/share with no immediate tax consequences. If the 409A valuation later jumps to $11.20, there's no additional tax event for you since you already own the shares. Yes, typically if you leave before vesting, the company has a right (sometimes obligation) to repurchase unvested shares at your original exercise price. So your downside risk is essentially limited to the cash you put in. The exact terms should be in your stock purchase agreement. Just make sure you understand the vesting acceleration terms in case of acquisition or IPO - some companies accelerate vesting in those scenarios, which could work in your favor. Also double-check that early exercise is still available and what the process looks like. Some companies restrict it during certain periods or require board approval above certain amounts.
Don't forget about education credits too! Since he's in college and you're claiming him as a dependent, YOU would be the one eligible to claim any education credits for his expenses (like the American Opportunity Credit) on your return, not him. Could be worth up to $2,500 if he has qualified education expenses.
This is super important! My sister claimed my niece who was in college and completely missed out on the American Opportunity Credit because she didn't know about it. Left like $2000 on the table!
Based on what you've described, you should definitely be able to claim your brother as a dependent! Since he's 19 and a full-time college student, he can qualify as a "qualifying child" rather than just a "qualifying relative" - which is actually better for you because there's no gross income limit for qualifying children under 24 who are students. The key tests you need to meet are: 1. Relationship - β (he's your brother) 2. Age - β (under 24 and full-time student) 3. Residency - β (lived with you more than half the year since February) 4. Support - β (sounds like you're covering all his major expenses) His $9k income won't disqualify him since he's a student under 24. Just make sure when he files his own return that he checks the box indicating someone else can claim him as a dependent. And definitely keep good records of all the support you're providing - rent, utilities, food, etc. - in case you ever need to prove you're covering more than half his total support for the year. You're being really generous helping him get started in life!
This is really helpful, thanks! I'm new to all this tax stuff and wasn't sure about the difference between "qualifying child" vs "qualifying relative." So since he's under 24 and in school, the qualifying child rules are actually more favorable? One quick question - when you say "full-time student," does that mean he has to be enrolled full-time for the entire year, or just for part of it? He was finishing high school when he moved in with me in February, then started college full-time in the fall. Does that gap between high school and college affect anything?
Has anyone had experience with getting a refund of the withholding later? I've heard the Canadian seller can file for a refund if the actual tax liability is less than what was withheld, but curious how complicated that process is.
Yes, the seller can file Form 8288-B (Application for Withholding Certificate) before closing OR file a US tax return after the sale to claim a refund for any excess withholding. But it can take 6+ months to get the money back, so most foreign sellers I've worked with prefer to apply for the withholding certificate beforehand if possible.
Thanks for the info! I'll pass this along to the seller. Since we're closing next week, sounds like they'd have to go the tax return route at this point. I'll make sure they know about the long wait time for the refund too.
I just went through this exact situation 6 months ago when buying from a Canadian seller! The stress is real, but you'll get through it. A few things that might help: First, definitely confirm with your title company what their role is here. In my case, they handled the actual withholding and filing - I just had to provide the buyer information and sign off on the calculations. They should NOT be dumping all of this on you at the last minute. Second, double-check if you qualify for the primary residence exemption. If this will be your main home and the purchase price is under $1 million, you should only need to withhold 10% (or 0% if under $300k). That could save you thousands. The form itself isn't as scary as it looks once you understand what goes where. The key boxes are pretty straightforward - your info, seller info, property address, purchase price, and withholding amount. Don't let them rush you into making mistakes because of their poor planning. You have every right to push back on the timeline if they're not providing proper support. This is a standard part of foreign seller transactions and they should have processes in place to handle it smoothly. Hang in there - you're almost at the finish line!
This is such helpful advice! I'm actually going through something similar right now - my title company just informed me about FIRPTA requirements for my purchase from a German seller. It's so frustrating when they wait until the last minute to mention these major requirements. Did you end up having any issues with the IRS processing your Form 8288-A? I'm worried about potential delays or rejections that could mess up my closing timeline. Also, when you say the title company handled the "actual withholding" - does that mean they held the funds in escrow until the form was filed, or did they send the payment directly to the IRS?
Victoria Jones
Actually I think I'm in a similar situation but my side gig is through Venmo. Will I also get a 1099-K? And can I deduct Venmo fees the same way?
0 coins
Maria Gonzalez
β’Yes, Venmo operates under the same rules as PayPal for 1099-K reporting (they're actually owned by the same company). If you exceed the threshold, you'll receive a 1099-K from Venmo. And absolutely, Venmo fees are deductible business expenses just like PayPal fees. Treat them exactly the same way - report your gross income and deduct the fees as a business expense on Schedule C. Just make sure you're using a business profile on Venmo for your side gig transactions to keep everything clean and properly documented!
0 coins
Anna Xian
Great question about the 1099-K! I just went through this exact situation with my photography side business last year. You're absolutely right to report the full $7,800 as income and then deduct the $350 in PayPal fees as a business expense on Schedule C. One tip that really helped me - make sure to download your PayPal annual statement that shows all your fees broken down by month. This makes it super easy to total up for your tax return and gives you solid documentation if the IRS ever asks questions. Also, don't forget about other potential business deductions for your Etsy shop! Things like design software subscriptions (Canva Pro, Adobe, etc.), any office supplies, and even a portion of your internet bill if you use it for business. These can add up to significant savings. I was surprised how many legitimate deductions I had once I really looked into it. TurboTax handles Schedule C pretty well - it will walk you through where to enter your gross receipts and business expenses. Just make sure to keep good records of everything throughout the year going forward!
0 coins
Harper Hill
β’This is really helpful advice! I'm just getting started with understanding all this tax stuff for side businesses. Quick question - when you mention deducting a portion of internet bill, how do you actually calculate what percentage you can claim? Is it based on time spent working vs personal use, or square footage if you have a dedicated workspace, or something else? I want to make sure I'm doing this correctly and not overstepping any boundaries with the IRS.
0 coins