IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Emma Taylor

•

Just so everyone knows, not all second look services are created equal. I paid $400 for one last year and they literally just ran my numbers through a different tax software and found nothing. Make sure you ask exactly what their process involves before paying. Ask if they specialize in your industry and what their success rate is for businesses similar to yours. Also ask if they've worked with businesses in your specific state, as state tax opportunities vary widely.

0 coins

What questions would you recommend asking before hiring someone for a second look? I'm getting overwhelmed by all the options.

0 coins

Emma Taylor

•

Ask them to be specific about their process - will they just run your info through software or do a manual review? Do they have experience in your specific industry? What's their success rate with businesses in your revenue range? I'd also request sample findings from anonymous clients (redacted of course) to see what kind of deductions they typically find. Ask if they provide a written analysis beyond just pointing out potential missed deductions. A good second look should include strategic recommendations for future tax years too, not just quick fixes.

0 coins

Speaking as someone who handles small business accounting, there's another benefit to second looks that nobody's mentioned yet - they sometimes catch ERRORS that could lead to audits. Last year I had 3 clients get second looks and for one of them, we actually discovered their previous accountant had improperly classified some expenses that could have raised red flags with the IRS. The second look saved them from potential audit headaches, not just money.

0 coins

Is there a "best time" to get a second look done? Like right after filing or midyear?

0 coins

Rajiv Kumar

•

From my experience, the best timing is actually within 90-120 days after filing your original return. This gives you enough time to gather any documents you might have missed during tax season, but you're still within the statute of limitations for easy amendments. Plus, if errors are found, you have plenty of time to file corrections before any potential IRS reviews begin. I wouldn't wait too long though - the fresher everything is in your memory, the better you can provide context about business decisions and expenses.

0 coins

This is a really common confusion for gig workers! The key thing to remember is that when you choose the standard mileage deduction, you're essentially trading off the ability to claim vehicle depreciation or losses for the simplicity of just tracking miles. The IRS considers that depreciation component already "built into" those standard mileage deductions you've been taking over the past 3 years. Since you mentioned keeping good records of business vs personal miles, that's great practice to continue! Even though you can't claim the loss on this sale, those records will be valuable if you get audited or when you start using your next vehicle for business purposes. One thing to keep in mind - if you do replace this car with another vehicle for your delivery work, you'll need to decide again between standard mileage or actual expenses for the new car. Just remember that whichever method you choose in the first year of business use for that new vehicle, you'll be locked into for the life of that car.

0 coins

This is super helpful, thanks! I'm actually in a similar boat - been doing Uber Eats for about 2 years with standard mileage and my car is starting to cost more to maintain than it's worth. Quick follow-up question: when you say we're "locked into" the method for the life of the car, does that apply to brand new cars too? Like if I buy a completely different car next month, can I choose actual expenses for that one even though I used standard mileage on this current car?

0 coins

Yes, exactly! The method you choose is locked in per vehicle, not per taxpayer. So when you get a completely different car, you get a fresh choice between standard mileage or actual expenses for that new vehicle, regardless of what method you used on your previous car. Just make sure to keep the decision consistent for that new vehicle once you make it. If you choose standard mileage in the first year you use the new car for business, you'll need to stick with standard mileage for as long as you use that specific car for business purposes. Same goes if you choose actual expenses - you'd be committed to tracking all the actual costs (gas, maintenance, insurance, depreciation) for that vehicle's business use. This is actually a good opportunity to evaluate which method might work better for your situation with the new car!

0 coins

Xan Dae

•

I went through this exact same situation last year with my delivery car! Used standard mileage for 2+ years, then sold at a loss. I was so frustrated thinking I was missing out on a tax deduction, but after doing a lot of research (and talking to a tax pro), I learned that the standard mileage rate actually works out pretty well overall when you factor in all the wear and tear costs it covers. Think about it this way - over those 3 years of deliveries, you've been deducting around 65+ cents per business mile (the rates have gone up each year). That adds up to thousands in deductions that already account for your car's depreciation. While you can't claim the loss now, you've likely saved more in taxes over the years through those mileage deductions than you would have with the actual expense method. For your next car, definitely consider whether actual expenses might work better if you expect to put a lot of business miles on it quickly. But honestly, for most delivery drivers, standard mileage is still the simpler and often more beneficial choice!

0 coins

That's a really good point about the math working out over time! I never thought about adding up all those mileage deductions over the years. You're probably right that it comes out ahead in the long run. I'm curious though - for someone just starting out with gig work, is there a rule of thumb for deciding between standard mileage vs actual expenses? Like if you expect to drive more than X miles per year, go with actual expenses?

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

Has anyone used the Form 11 on ROS for partnership income? I found it super confusing how to report my share vs my husbands share and ended up ringing a chartered accountant.

0 coins

Diego Mendoza

•

The partnership section of Form 11 is a nightmare! What helped me was realizing you need to file a separate Form 1 (Partnership Return) first, then each partner files their own Form 11 showing their allocation of the partnership profit. The partnership itself doesn't pay tax - that flows through to each partner's personal tax return.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

As someone who went through this exact same situation 18 months ago with my spouse, I can definitely relate to the confusion! One thing that really helped us was understanding that as a married couple in a partnership, you have more flexibility than you might think. First, don't panic about your business structure choice - partnerships can actually work well for married couples, especially in the early stages. The key is understanding your assessment options. You can choose joint assessment (where one spouse is the assessable spouse and includes both incomes) or separate assessment (where you each file individually). Joint assessment often works better for partnerships because it lets you pool your tax credits and rate bands. Also, make sure you're both claiming the Earned Income Tax Credit - it's €1,650 each for 2024, so that's €3,300 total you don't want to miss out on. And definitely look into income splitting strategies once you get established - being able to allocate profits based on actual contribution rather than strict 50/50 can save serious money. The threshold for considering incorporation is typically around €40-50k profit, so you have time to see how your first year goes before making any major structure changes. Focus on getting your partnership documentation sorted first - a simple partnership agreement outlining roles and profit sharing will make everything cleaner come tax time.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive advice I was hoping for! Thank you for breaking down the assessment options so clearly. I had no idea about the Earned Income Tax Credit - that's €3,300 we definitely don't want to miss. Quick question about the partnership agreement - do we need to get it legally drafted or is a simple document we write ourselves sufficient for Revenue purposes? We're trying to keep startup costs reasonable but don't want to cut corners on something important. Also, when you mention income splitting based on "actual contribution," how detailed does that documentation need to be? We both work in the business but in different capacities - I handle most of the client work while my husband manages the admin and finances.

0 coins

StarSailor}

•

As someone who works in medical billing and has dealt with countless HSA qualification questions, I wanted to add a few practical points that might help: First, when you get those Letters of Medical Necessity, make sure the doctors use specific medical terminology rather than general descriptions. Words like "functional impairment," "structural defect," and "anatomical abnormality" carry more weight with the IRS than vague terms like "discomfort" or "appearance issues." Second, if your husband has any documented symptoms beyond just the visible separation - back pain, difficulty with certain movements, core weakness affecting daily activities - make sure those are included in the documentation. The more functional impact you can demonstrate, the stronger your case becomes. Third, consider asking your surgeon about getting before/after photos for medical records (not for cosmetic purposes, but to document the structural repair). Some tax professionals recommend this as additional evidence that the procedure addressed a genuine anatomical problem. Finally, don't let the insurance denial discourage you. I see this disconnect all the time - insurance companies are focused on cost containment while the IRS is focused on whether something meets their definition of medical care under the tax code. They're completely separate determinations using different criteria. The fact that your husband lost 85 pounds actually strengthens your case, as it shows this is a medical consequence of significant body changes rather than a purely cosmetic concern.

0 coins

Amara Eze

•

This is incredibly detailed and practical advice - thank you! As someone new to navigating HSA rules, the specific terminology recommendations are really valuable. I wouldn't have thought about the importance of using precise medical language like "functional impairment" versus more general descriptions. Your point about the 85-pound weight loss actually strengthening the case is reassuring. It helps frame this as a medical consequence of significant body changes rather than an elective procedure, which seems important for IRS purposes. I'm curious about the before/after photos suggestion - would those need to be taken by the medical provider, or could we document the condition ourselves? And should we be asking our surgeon specifically about this during our consultation, or is it something most surgeons automatically include in their records for these types of procedures? Also, since you work in medical billing, do you have any insights on timing? Should we get all this documentation lined up before scheduling the surgery, or is it typical to get the Letters of Medical Necessity after the procedure is already planned but before it's performed?

0 coins

The photos should definitely be taken by medical staff as part of your official medical records - patient-taken photos won't carry the same weight with the IRS. Most surgeons who regularly do diastasis recti repairs are familiar with this documentation requirement, but it's worth specifically asking during your consultation. Regarding timing, I always recommend getting the Letters of Medical Necessity before scheduling surgery. Here's why: if for some reason the documentation doesn't support HSA qualification as strongly as you hoped, you'll want to know that before committing to the procedure date and potentially scrambling to find alternative funding. The ideal timeline is: 1) Get letters from both your PCP and surgeon stating medical necessity, 2) Review those letters to ensure they use the right terminology and address functional impacts, 3) Schedule the surgery with confidence that your HSA withdrawal will be justified. Also, make sure both letters specifically mention that this is repair of muscle separation resulting from significant weight loss. That medical context is crucial - it shows this isn't cosmetic enhancement but correction of a structural problem caused by dramatic body changes. The IRS tends to view procedures more favorably when there's a clear medical cause like pregnancy, weight loss, or injury rather than general aging or appearance preferences. One last tip: keep copies of everything related to your husband's weight loss journey too - medical records showing his starting weight, any physician-supervised weight loss programs, documentation of the timeline. This creates a complete medical narrative that supports the necessity of the repair.

0 coins

Sophia Long

•

I'm dealing with a very similar situation and this thread has been incredibly helpful! My husband is also considering diastasis recti surgery after significant weight loss (about 70 pounds), and we're getting the same "cosmetic" classification from insurance despite clear functional issues. Reading through everyone's experiences, I'm now much more confident about moving forward with HSA funds. The key takeaway seems to be that proper medical documentation is everything - getting those Letters of Medical Necessity that specifically address functional impairment rather than cosmetic concerns. One question I haven't seen addressed: has anyone had experience with the IRS actually reviewing these types of HSA withdrawals? I know we should be prepared with documentation, but I'm curious about the practical likelihood of being questioned about it. Are medical expense HSA withdrawals commonly audited, or is it more of a "prepare for the worst case scenario" situation? Also, for those who've successfully used HSA funds for similar procedures - did you withdraw the money before the surgery date, or wait until after you received the final bills? I'm wondering about the timing logistics of actually accessing the funds when we need them. Thanks to everyone who's shared their experiences and expertise. This community has been invaluable for navigating what felt like an impossible situation with our insurance denial!

0 coins

Great question about audit likelihood! From what I've researched and heard from others, HSA withdrawals for medical expenses aren't automatically flagged for review unless they're unusually large or frequent. The IRS mainly seems to audit HSA withdrawals when they suspect non-medical use. That said, it's always better to be prepared. The documentation everyone's mentioned here - Letters of Medical Necessity, medical records, receipts - is really your insurance policy against any questions that might arise. Regarding timing, I'd recommend waiting until you have the final bills before making the HSA withdrawal. This way you know exactly how much to withdraw and you'll have the complete paper trail showing the expense, payment, and withdrawal all align. Plus, some HSA administrators are more accommodating when you can show them the exact medical bills you're paying for. I'm also planning to use HSA funds for a similar procedure after reading through this thread. The advice about focusing on functional impairment in the medical documentation has been a game-changer for how I'm approaching this with my doctors. It's reassuring to see so many people successfully navigate this situation!

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I tried claiming trader tax status for my crypto trading in 2023 (was doing 50+ trades daily) and got audited. The IRS initially rejected my TTS claim, but I appealed with documentation showing: 1. My trading schedule (8+ hours daily) 2. Analysis software I purchased 3. Separate business accounts for trading 4. Trading journal with strategies They eventually accepted my TTS claim! Key points from my experience: - Documentation is EVERYTHING - They scrutinized my holding periods (anything held >30 days counted against me) - Having a formal business structure helped (I had an LLC) - They wanted to see I was trying to profit from short-term market movements, not just buying dips Hope this helps someone! The tax savings were substantial, but be prepared to defend your position.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

This is super helpful! Did you use a tax attorney during the audit or handle it yourself? I'm worried about the cost of defending a TTS claim if I get audited.

0 coins

I handled most of it myself initially, but when the IRS pushed back hard on my TTS claim, I hired a tax attorney who specializes in trader tax issues. Cost me about $3,500 total, but considering I saved over $8,000 in taxes that year, it was absolutely worth it. The attorney was crucial for the appeal - they knew exactly what documentation the IRS needed to see and how to present my case. They also helped me understand that having some longer-term holdings wasn't automatically disqualifying as long as the majority of my activity was clearly short-term trading. My advice: if you're claiming TTS and making significant money from trading, budget for potential audit defense costs. The peace of mind is worth it, and a good tax attorney can often negotiate a better outcome than you could on your own.

0 coins

As someone who's been through the TTS qualification process for crypto trading, I want to add a few important points that might help clarify things for you: First, the IRS has been increasingly scrutinizing crypto TTS claims, so documentation is absolutely critical. You'll want to track not just your trades, but also the time you spend on market analysis, research, and strategy development. I keep a detailed log showing 4+ hours daily spent on trading-related activities. Regarding your specific questions: 1. Yes, Schedule C deductions are one of the biggest benefits of TTS - you can deduct trading software, data feeds, home office expenses, computer equipment, and even educational courses related to trading. 2. The self-employment tax is the trade-off - your trading profits will be subject to SE tax (15.3%), which can be significant. You'll need to calculate whether the deductions outweigh this additional tax burden. 3. Crypto traders can qualify, but the bar seems higher than for traditional securities. The IRS looks more closely at crypto TTS claims, so your documentation needs to be bulletproof. One tip: consider keeping separate crypto wallets/accounts exclusively for day trading versus any long-term holdings. This helps clearly demonstrate your trading versus investment activities if you're ever audited. Also, don't forget about the mark-to-market election deadline if you're planning to go the TTS route - it can be a game-changer for active traders but must be elected on time.

0 coins

Prev1...32803281328232833284...5643Next