IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Lourdes Fox

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - make sure you're actually looking at the right IRS publication. You need Publication 502 (Medical and Dental Expenses), not just the HSA-specific publications. It gives the full list of what the IRS considers deductible medical expenses. The key language is on page 5: "Medical expenses are the costs of diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, and for the treatments affecting any part or function of the body." Surgery to repair muscles separated during weight loss would seem to fit under "treatments affecting any function of the body." Just make sure your documentation emphasizes functional improvement, not aesthetic benefits.

0 coins

Just be careful with this advice. Publication 502 is specifically for medical expense deductions on Schedule A, not HSA withdrawals. While there's significant overlap, they're technically governed by different sections of the tax code. For HSA withdrawals, Publication 969 is the primary source, though it does reference the definition in 502.

0 coins

Lourdes Fox

•

You're right about the different publications, but the definition of qualified medical expenses is the same for both purposes. Publication 969 specifically states: "A qualified medical expense for HSA purposes is generally one that would qualify for the medical and dental expenses deduction" and then directs you to Publication 502. So while they are different tax benefits, they use the same definition of qualified medical expenses. The IRS website confirms this: qualified medical expenses for HSA purposes are defined by the same section 213(d) that applies to itemized deductions. That's why Publication 502 is still the right place to look for the detailed list of what qualifies.

0 coins

I went through something very similar with my husband's hernia repair that insurance initially denied as "elective." What ultimately worked for us was getting both his primary care doctor and the surgeon to write detailed letters explaining how the condition was affecting his daily activities and long-term health risks. The key was having them document specific functional limitations - like difficulty lifting our toddler, discomfort during exercise, and the surgeon's assessment that without repair, the condition would likely worsen and potentially lead to more serious complications. We avoided any mention of cosmetic concerns and focused entirely on the medical necessity. We used our HSA funds for the $6,200 procedure and kept all documentation. It's been over a year now with no issues from the IRS. The most important thing I learned is that insurance denial doesn't automatically disqualify something from HSA use - they're using completely different standards for what's considered "medically necessary." I'd definitely recommend getting that Letter of Medical Necessity from both doctors before proceeding. Make sure they emphasize how the diastasis recti is affecting your husband's physical function and what risks exist if left untreated. That documentation will be your protection if any questions arise later.

0 coins

Zara Mirza

•

To get help from TAS, follow these exact steps: 1. Prepare documentation of ALL previous contact with the IRS (dates, times, who you spoke with, what was said) 2. Gather evidence of financial hardship (shut-off notices, eviction warnings, medical bills, etc.) 3. When you call, clearly state: "I need TAS assistance because I've exhausted normal IRS channels and am facing imminent financial hardship" 4. Be specific about what will happen if your tax issue isn't resolved (exact dates and consequences) 5. If initially rejected, ask: "What specific criteria am I not meeting for TAS assistance?" 6. Request the agent document your contact in case you need to escalate later Have you already tried contacting the specific IRS department that handles your tax issue directly?

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm wondering though - if I've only called the main IRS line twice, is that enough to show I've "exhausted normal channels"? Or should I be trying something else before attempting TAS? I'm worried about being rejected for not trying hard enough through regular channels.

0 coins

Luca Russo

•

Has anyone confirmed whether TAS is accepting cases for processing delays that don't involve hardship? I've heard conflicting information about whether standard processing delays (even extreme ones) qualify without financial hardship documentation.

0 coins

Malik Thomas

•

I went through this exact process about 6 weeks ago and want to share what actually worked for me. The key is being very specific about your hardship and having documentation ready BEFORE you call. When I called TAS, I had: - Screenshots of my bank account showing insufficient funds - A notice from my mortgage company about missed payments - Documentation of 5+ failed attempts to reach the right IRS department - Exact dates and reference numbers from previous calls The intake specialist asked me three main questions: 1. "What specific financial hardship will occur and when?" 2. "What attempts have you made to resolve this through normal IRS channels?" 3. "Do you have documentation to support both your hardship and your previous attempts?" I was honest and said I'd miss my mortgage payment in 12 days if my refund didn't come through, and I had the bank statements to prove it. They accepted my case that same day. The biggest mistake I see people make is being vague about their situation. Don't just say "I need my refund" - explain exactly what will happen and when. Good luck! šŸ¤ž

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

One thing nobody's mentioned yet - if you do qualify for trader tax status, consider making the mark-to-market election on your taxes. This lets you deduct net losses against ordinary income without the $3,000 capital loss limitation. But be careful! The mark-to-market election is irrevocable without IRS permission. And you have to make it by the tax filing deadline of the previous year (so for 2025, you'd need to elect by April 15, 2025). Many crypto traders miss this deadline and lose the opportunity. Also worth noting: wash sale rules don't apply with mark-to-market, which is huge for crypto traders who frequently trade the same coins.

0 coins

Does the mark-to-market election affect how your gains are taxed? I'm currently paying short-term capital gains rates on my crypto trades (basically ordinary income), but would that change with MTM?

0 coins

StarSeeker

•

With mark-to-market accounting, your gains and losses will still be treated as ordinary income, similar to short-term capital gains, so your tax rate itself wouldn't change from what you're currently paying. The big advantage comes on the loss side, where you can deduct all trading losses against other income without being limited to the $3,000 capital loss cap. Another significant benefit is avoiding the headache of tracking specific identification of lots for each transaction, which can be extremely complicated with frequent crypto trading.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I tried claiming trader tax status for my crypto trading in 2023 (was doing 50+ trades daily) and got audited. The IRS initially rejected my TTS claim, but I appealed with documentation showing: 1. My trading schedule (8+ hours daily) 2. Analysis software I purchased 3. Separate business accounts for trading 4. Trading journal with strategies They eventually accepted my TTS claim! Key points from my experience: - Documentation is EVERYTHING - They scrutinized my holding periods (anything held >30 days counted against me) - Having a formal business structure helped (I had an LLC) - They wanted to see I was trying to profit from short-term market movements, not just buying dips Hope this helps someone! The tax savings were substantial, but be prepared to defend your position.

0 coins

This is super helpful! Did you use a tax attorney during the audit or handle it yourself? I'm worried about the cost of defending a TTS claim if I get audited.

0 coins

I handled most of it myself initially, but when the IRS pushed back hard on my TTS claim, I hired a tax attorney who specializes in trader tax issues. Cost me about $3,500 total, but considering I saved over $8,000 in taxes that year, it was absolutely worth it. The attorney was crucial for the appeal - they knew exactly what documentation the IRS needed to see and how to present my case. They also helped me understand that having some longer-term holdings wasn't automatically disqualifying as long as the majority of my activity was clearly short-term trading. My advice: if you're claiming TTS and making significant money from trading, budget for potential audit defense costs. The peace of mind is worth it, and a good tax attorney can often negotiate a better outcome than you could on your own.

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

I just went through this process myself! One important thing to note - while the SECURE Act 2.0 does extend the ESTABLISHMENT deadline to your tax filing date, there are still some practical considerations about CONTRIBUTIONS. If you're planning to make employee deferrals (the part that comes out of your own compensation), you technically need to have determined those amounts before the end of the calendar year. The employer contribution part (the 25% of net earnings) can be contributed up until your tax filing date. So while you CAN set up the plan in 2025 for 2024, you might be limited to just the employer contribution portion depending on how your plan provider handles this. Different providers have different interpretations of how this all works with the new rules.

0 coins

This gets confusing fast! So if I'm understanding correctly, I can open the account in 2025 for 2024, but I can only do the "employer" part of the contribution, not the "employee" part? How do you even separate those as a sole proprietor when it's just me?

0 coins

Ellie Lopez

•

You're right that it gets confusing! As a sole proprietor, you wear two hats - you're both the employee and the employer. The employee contribution is the elective deferral part (up to $23,000 for 2024, or $30,500 if you're 50+). Technically, these decisions should be made before the end of the calendar year since they're supposed to be prospective. The employer contribution is the profit-sharing part where you can contribute up to 25% of your net self-employment income. This part can definitely be made until your tax filing deadline. Some providers are more flexible than others about how they handle the employee deferral part when the plan is established after year-end. That's why it's important to talk directly with potential providers about how they interpret and implement these rules.

0 coins

Has anyone used Fidelity for their Solo 401k? I'm trying to decide between them and Vanguard for my photography business. Also wondering if anyone knows if these providers are fully updated on the SECURE Act 2.0 changes regarding the setup deadlines?

0 coins

Thanks for the info! That's super helpful. I don't think I need the Roth option right now, so Fidelity might work well. Did you find their customer service helpful with the setup process? And did they have any special requirements for documenting that you were establishing the plan for the previous tax year?

0 coins

I can share my experience with Fidelity's customer service - they were actually quite knowledgeable about the SECURE Act 2.0 changes when I called them. The rep I spoke with walked me through the entire process and confirmed that I could establish a Solo 401k for 2024 even though we were already in 2025. As for documentation, they didn't require anything special beyond the normal Solo 401k application. Just make sure when you're filling out the forms that you clearly indicate the plan year as 2024. The key is being explicit about which tax year you're establishing the plan for. Fidelity's online application has a specific field for this, so it's pretty straightforward. Their customer service was responsive - I didn't have to wait too long to get through, and the rep seemed well-trained on retirement plan rules. Much better experience than I expected!

0 coins

Zara Perez

•

Has anyone used the Section 179 deduction for a heavy SUV/truck (>6000 lbs) through their LLC? I heard there's a special deduction limit that's higher for those vehicles and wondering if that makes it more worthwhile?

0 coins

Yes, with vehicles over 6,000 lbs you can potentially take advantage of a higher Section 179 limit (around $27,000 for 2025) compared to regular passenger vehicles. BUT - and this is a huge but - you still need to satisfy the business use tests, and with only one property under management, that's going to be extremely difficult to justify to the IRS.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

I've been through this exact scenario with my single-property LLC. After consulting with both my CPA and doing extensive research, I ultimately decided against buying a vehicle through the LLC, and here's why: The IRS scrutinizes vehicle deductions for single-property LLCs extremely carefully. You need to demonstrate legitimate business use, and with just one property, it's nearly impossible to justify the high percentage of business use required to make it worthwhile. I tracked my actual property-related driving for six months and found I was only using about 25% for legitimate business purposes (property visits, supply runs, contractor meetings, etc.). Instead, I opted for the standard mileage deduction on my personal vehicle. For 2024, that's 67 cents per mile for business use. I keep a detailed log using a simple smartphone app, and at the end of the year, I multiply my business miles by the standard rate. This approach is much simpler from a record-keeping perspective and eliminates the complications of mixed personal/business use. The administrative burden of LLC vehicle ownership (separate insurance, tracking personal vs. business use, potential imputed income for personal use) just wasn't worth the modest tax savings I would have achieved. Sometimes the simplest approach is the most tax-efficient one.

0 coins

Prev1...32823283328432853286...5645Next