< Back to IRS

Keisha Taylor

Can someone explain Partnership Loss Limitations on K-1s - Basis, At-Risk, Passive Activity rules in simple terms?

I got Schedule K-1s from two partnerships (we'll call them "Alpha" and "Beta") and I'm a bit confused about the loss limitations. Both K-1s show small amounts of interest income in box 5, some ordinary dividends in 6a, and investment income in 20a - nothing major there. But they're also showing some pretty substantial losses in box 11c for section 1256 contracts. Combined, those losses add up to about $16k. The regular box instructions seem straightforward enough - I know these 11c losses go on Form 6781, with 40% treated as short-term and 60% as long-term losses that flow to Schedule D. That part makes sense. What's confusing me is all this stuff in the Partner's Instructions about limitations on losses based on "basis," "at-risk," and "passive activity" rules. I've read those sections about 15 times and they might as well be written in ancient Greek. I have no idea if these limitations apply to my situation or if I'm missing some crucial step. Can anyone break down these loss limitation rules in plain English? Do I need to worry about them given my K-1 situation with primarily 1256 contract losses? I'd really appreciate some clarity before I file!

The partnership loss limitation rules can definitely be confusing! There are three main hurdles your losses need to clear before you can claim them: 1. Basis limitation: You can't deduct losses that exceed your "basis" in the partnership. Your basis is essentially your investment in the partnership (your contributions plus your share of partnership income minus distributions and previous losses). 2. At-risk limitation: You can only deduct losses to the extent you're financially "at risk" - basically money you've invested or amounts you're personally liable for. 3. Passive activity rules: If the partnership is a "passive activity" for you (meaning you don't materially participate in operations), losses can only offset other passive income. For your situation with section 1256 contract losses, these are generally considered investment/trading losses, not passive activity losses. The bigger question is whether you have sufficient basis to claim them. Your K-1 should have come with a supplemental statement showing your ending basis. If your basis is higher than the losses, and you haven't received distributions that would reduce it, you're probably fine. Would you happen to know if the partnerships sent any supplemental statements about your basis or capital account?

0 coins

Thanks for the clear explanation! I appreciate you breaking it down like that. The partnerships did include supplemental statements, but they're not super detailed. They show my capital account increasing by the small amount of interest/dividend income and decreasing by the 1256 losses. My ending capital account balance is still positive (about $45k combined across both partnerships). Do these capital account figures relate directly to my "basis" for tax purposes? And since I'm not personally involved in managing these partnerships at all (they're investment partnerships), I assume these would be considered passive activities for me?

0 coins

Capital account balances and tax basis are related but not always the same thing. The good news is that if your capital account is still significantly positive ($45k) after taking the losses, you almost certainly have enough basis to claim the full losses. Regarding passive activity treatment, investment partnerships are special. Even though you don't manage them day-to-day, income and losses from section 1256 contracts aren't considered passive activity income or losses - they're treated as investment income/losses. This is actually good news because it means the passive activity loss limitations don't apply to these particular losses. Based on what you've shared, it sounds like you're on the right track by reporting the losses on Form 6781 with the 60/40 split flowing to Schedule D. The basis limitation isn't an issue with your positive capital account, and the passive activity rules don't apply to these types of losses. Just make sure you haven't received distributions that would have reduced your basis below what's shown in the capital account.

0 coins

I went through similar headaches with partnership K-1s last year. After countless hours researching, I discovered a tool that really helped me understand my basis limitations and exactly how to handle complicated K-1 entries. It's called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it can analyze your specific K-1 situation. What I liked is that it breaks down exactly what your basis is in plain English and tells you if you're limited in claiming losses. You can upload your K-1s and it flags specific issues like basis problems, at-risk concerns, and passive activity limitations. It was eye-opening for me because I was about to claim losses I wasn't entitled to until the tool caught it! The reports explained exactly why certain losses were limited and which weren't. For section 1256 contract losses like yours, it should tell you directly whether you need to complete any additional forms beyond Form 6781.

0 coins

Does it work with all partnership types? I have some weird MLPs and it's always a nightmare figuring out my basis with those distributions.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these tax tools. How accurate is it really? The last thing I need is to rely on something that gives me wrong info and then get a nasty letter from the IRS.

0 coins

It works with all partnership types including MLPs. I had two MLPs last year and it correctly handled the distributions that were return of capital vs. taxable. It even flagged when I was getting close to zero basis which would have made future distributions taxable. The accuracy has been solid in my experience. It's not making up rules - it's applying the actual IRS regulations but explaining them clearly. I still had my accountant review everything, but he was impressed with how it broke down all the basis calculations. The best part was I understood WHY certain limitations applied rather than just taking someone's word for it.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up and say I tried taxr.ai after reading about it here. Really impressed! I uploaded my K-1s and within minutes had a clear explanation of my partnership basis. Turns out I've been calculating it wrong for years - no wonder I was confused. For my situation, it showed me that what I thought were passive losses were actually investment losses that weren't subject to the passive activity rules. It explained exactly where each K-1 item needed to go on my return and highlighted the few items that had limitations. Wish I'd found this years ago. Would have saved me so much stress and probably prevented some mistakes on my past returns.

0 coins

After spending HOURS on hold with the IRS trying to get someone to explain these partnership basis rules to me last year, I finally found a service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that got me through to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was shocked it actually worked because I'd been trying for weeks to get through on my own. The agent walked me through how to calculate my basis and explained that for section 1256 contract losses, I didn't need to worry about the passive activity limitations since they're considered investment losses, not passive losses. The IRS person also confirmed that as long as my capital account was positive and I hadn't received distributions beyond my basis, I could claim the full losses on Form 6781. Saved me from filing an overly complicated return!

0 coins

How does Claimyr actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you or what? I'm really confused about the service.

0 coins

Yeah right. The IRS doesn't answer phones. I've spent DAYS trying to get through. There's no magical way to skip their queue. This sounds like a scam to me.

0 coins

They use a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line. When an agent becomes available, it calls you and connects you with the agent. It's not skipping the queue - you're still waiting your turn, but their system is doing the waiting instead of you sitting on hold for hours. The service just handles the holding part so you can go about your day. When I got connected, I was talking to a regular IRS agent - the exact same person I would have reached if I'd stayed on hold myself for 3+ hours. Was definitely worth it for me because I needed specific answers about reporting my K-1 losses and couldn't find clear information online.

0 coins

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself because I was desperate for answers about my partnership K-1s. It actually worked! I got a call back in about 35 minutes and was connected to an IRS agent who explained exactly how to handle my section 1256 losses from my partnerships. The agent confirmed that these aren't subject to passive activity limitations and walked me through a basis calculation to make sure I could claim the full loss. Never been so happy to be proven wrong. Saved me from filing an amended return after I realized I'd been handling these K-1 items incorrectly for years.

0 coins

Another thing to understand about basis is that it changes every year. Your initial basis is what you invested, but it increases with: - Additional capital contributions - Your share of partnership income - Your share of partnership debt And decreases with: - Distributions you receive - Your share of partnership losses - Decreases in your share of partnership debt Many tax programs don't track this automatically, so you need to keep your own records. For 1256 contract losses, the at-risk rules usually aren't an issue unless you have some unusual arrangement where you're protected from loss.

0 coins

Do distributions during the year always reduce basis? My partnership makes quarterly distributions but they're just passing through income that's already been allocated to me. Seems like double-counting to reduce basis for that?

0 coins

You're right that it can seem like double-counting. Here's how it works: When the partnership earns income, your basis increases by your share of that income (because you're taxed on it). When the partnership distributes that same income to you, your basis decreases by the amount of the distribution. It's not really double-counting because the net effect on basis from income that's immediately distributed is zero (basis up for income, then basis down for distribution). Where people get in trouble is when distributions exceed their share of income - that's when you start to reduce basis below your original investment. For your quarterly distributions, if they're just distributing exactly what you're being allocated in income, your year-end basis won't be affected by those specific transactions.

0 coins

Does anyone know if trading losses from section 1256 contracts are considered investment income for the Net Investment Income Tax (3.8% tax)? My CPA says I can use these losses to offset other investment income subject to NIIT, but I'm not sure.

0 coins

Yes, section 1256 contract losses are considered investment losses for NIIT purposes. They can offset other investment income subject to the 3.8% NIIT. These losses flow through to your Schedule D with the 60/40 long-term/short-term split, and then Schedule D flows to Form 8960 for the NIIT calculation. So your CPA is correct - these partnership trading losses can reduce your overall net investment income and potentially reduce or eliminate the 3.8% tax.

0 coins

I went through a very similar situation last year with K-1s showing section 1256 losses, and I can share what I learned after consulting with a tax professional. The good news is that section 1256 contract losses from partnerships are generally NOT subject to the passive activity loss limitations, even if you're not actively involved in managing the partnership. This is because they're treated as investment/trading losses rather than passive business losses. For the basis limitation, if your combined capital accounts show $45k positive after the losses, you almost certainly have sufficient basis to claim the full $16k in losses. The key thing to watch for is whether you received any distributions during the year that might have reduced your basis below what's shown in the capital account. Here's what I'd recommend: 1. Report the 1256 losses on Form 6781 as you mentioned (60% long-term, 40% short-term) 2. Check if either partnership sent supplemental statements about distributions or basis adjustments 3. If you're still unsure about your exact basis calculation, consider keeping detailed records going forward since basis carries over year to year The partnership loss limitation rules are definitely confusing when you first encounter them, but for your specific situation with investment partnerships and 1256 contract losses, they're likely not going to be a major obstacle.

0 coins

This is really helpful, Grace! I'm dealing with a similar situation but have a follow-up question. You mentioned watching for distributions that might reduce basis below the capital account balance. How do I figure out if distributions were "return of capital" versus just regular income distributions? My K-1s don't seem to clearly distinguish between the two types, and I'm worried I might be missing something important for the basis calculation. Also, when you say to keep detailed records going forward - what specific items should I be tracking each year to make sure I have accurate basis calculations for future K-1s?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today