


Ask the community...
Just FYI - I've been using tax1099.com for the past 3 years and the state filing ALWAYS takes forever. It's not just you and it's not just California. I file for multiple states and some take as long as 6-8 weeks to show as accepted. I asked their customer service about it once and they explained that many states don't have fully automated acceptance systems like the IRS does. Some states literally have people manually reviewing batches of submissions. Wild, right? In 2025 and still doing things manually!
Do you know if this affects the recipients in any way? I'm worried my contractors will be delayed in filing their own taxes because of this.
Not at all - your contractors don't need to wait for the state to accept anything. As long as you provided them with their 1099-NEC copies (either paper or electronic), they have everything they need to file their taxes on time. The state acceptance is just confirmation that you've met your filing obligation as a business. It has zero impact on your contractors' ability to file their own returns. They just report the income amount shown on the 1099 you gave them.
Has anyone compared the processing times between tax1099.com and other services like Track1099 or eFile4Biz? I'm wondering if this is specific to tax1099.com or just how state filing works in general.
I've used both tax1099.com and Track1099 (different businesses), and honestly the state processing times were slow with both. I think it's just the state systems being outdated rather than the service you use to submit.
One thing to consider - if you file Schedule C with just expenses and no income, you're more likely to show a loss. While legitimate losses are allowed, too many consecutive years of losses can trigger the hobby loss rules, as someone mentioned. Make sure you're documenting your "material participation" in the business activity - keep logs of hours worked, business planning activities, etc. This helps establish that it's a real business attempt and not just a tax write-off scheme.
Thanks for this advice! Do I need to file any other forms besides the Schedule C? And what counts as "material participation" if I'm still in the planning/setup phase?
You'll need Schedule C and potentially Schedule SE if your net profit (once you have income) exceeds $400, since you'd owe self-employment tax. You might also need Form 4562 for depreciation and amortization of startup costs over $5,000. For material participation during planning/setup, track time spent on: researching your market, developing business plans, meeting with potential suppliers/partners, setting up your business infrastructure, building a website, creating marketing materials, obtaining necessary permits/licenses, and attending relevant training. The IRS has several tests for material participation, but the most common is the 500-hour test (spending more than 500 hours on business activities during the year). Keep a simple log with dates, hours, and brief descriptions of what you did related to the business.
Just wanted to jump in with something no one's mentioned - make sure you're tracking everything in the RIGHT tax year!! I made the mistake of filing startup expenses from December 2023 on my 2024 return and got a letter from the IRS. You have to claim expenses in the tax year you actually paid them, even if your business hasn't launched yet. You can go back and amend prior year returns if needed.
This isn't entirely accurate. If they're truly "startup" expenses before the business is actually in existence, IRS Publication 535 says they're not deductible until the month when the active business begins. You can elect to deduct up to $5,000 immediately once the business starts, with the rest amortized over 15 years.
I'm a banking compliance officer (not tax advice!) and can shed some light on this from the bank's perspective. The confusion often stems from mixing up two separate requirements: 1) Regulatory reporting - Yes, you personally must be listed as the board member for Fed/FDIC reporting. This is about governance and responsibility. 2) Payment structure - This is separate from regulatory reporting. Many banks do pay board fees to professional entities rather than individuals. The key is proper documentation. The bank needs a service agreement between them and your S-Corp that specifically states you are the individual performing the services. Your bank's CEO might be confused because some banks have policies against this (not because of regulations, but internal policy).
Thank you for this insight! Do you have any suggestions for how I might approach the conversation with the CEO again? Is there specific regulatory guidance I could reference to help clarify the distinction between reporting requirements and payment structure?
I'd suggest approaching the conversation by acknowledging their regulatory concerns first, which shows you understand the importance of compliance. Then, bring up that many financial institutions separate personal board service from compensation arrangements. Ask if their concern is based on a specific regulation or internal policy. For reference materials, the FDIC's "Pocket Guide for Directors" and the OCC's "Director's Book" both discuss board responsibilities but don't prohibit compensation to business entities. You might also want to have your CPA prepare a short memo explaining the tax structure and confirming your personal liability remains unchanged. Having something in writing from a professional often helps overcome institutional resistance.
Has anyone considered the reasonable compensation rules for S-Corps in this scenario? The IRS scrutinizes S-Corps where owners avoid payroll taxes, especially when the income is clearly tied to personal services.
Good point! From my experience as a board member who uses an S-Corp, you'll still need to pay yourself a reasonable salary from the S-Corp for your board service. The tax advantage comes from only a portion of the income being subject to employment taxes, not eliminating them entirely.
One specific thing to check when interviewing CPAs for a small business - ask if THEY own a small business themselves. My CPA runs her own practice and understands the challenges from both sides. She gives me advice not just as an accountant but as a fellow business owner. Makes a huge difference.
That's a brilliant suggestion! Do you find that CPAs who own their own businesses charge more or less than those working for larger firms?
In my experience, solo CPAs or small firms often charge less than the big accounting firms, but it varies widely. Some specialists charge premium rates because of their expertise, while others keep rates lower because they have less overhead. What I've found more important than the base rate is how they structure their fees. My CPA charges a monthly retainer that includes regular check-ins and planning, rather than billing me by the hour every time I have a question. This encourages me to reach out proactively instead of avoiding contact because I'm worried about the clock ticking.
Has anyone used a "virtual" CPA who's not in your local area? I found someone online who seems perfect for my business but they're in another state. Not sure if this is a good idea or if I should stick to local options.
I've been using a virtual CPA for my consulting business for 3 years now. It works great honestly. We do video calls quarterly and email/text the rest of the time. The only downside is no in-person meetings, but the upside is I found someone who specializes in exactly my type of business rather than settling for whoever was local.
Yuki Nakamura
One thing to consider that nobody's mentioned yet - you might want to look at having your PSC elect S corporation status rather than C corporation. With a C corp PSC, you're subject to that flat 21% corporate rate plus personal taxes on distributions (potential double taxation). An S corp PSC still gives you some potential employment tax savings, but income passes through to your personal return so you avoid the double taxation issue. Plus you have more flexibility with loss pass-through if either line of business has a down year.
0 coins
Zara Shah
ā¢That's interesting - I hadn't considered switching to an S corp. Would I lose any benefits by making that change? And would it affect how I handle the two different income streams?
0 coins
Yuki Nakamura
ā¢You wouldn't lose the liability protection benefits, but you would lose the ability to retain earnings at the corporate level at the 21% rate. All income would flow through to your personal return regardless of whether you take it out of the business. For handling the two income streams, there's no difference - both producing and consulting still qualify as personal services. You'd still want to maintain clear records separating the different business activities, but the S corp can absolutely handle both streams. The main benefit is avoiding potential double taxation, especially if you need to take most of the income out as compensation anyway.
0 coins
StarSurfer
Has anyone addressed how to handle the 24 monthly payments part? I'm in a similar situation with my PSC and trying to figure out if there are timing benefits to how these future payments get recognized as income.
0 coins
Carmen Reyes
ā¢There's actually an opportunity there depending on your overall income situation. With a C corp PSC, you could potentially recognize those monthly payments as corporate income when received, then time your salary distributions strategically based on your personal tax situation each year. Gives you more flexibility than if you were receiving those payments directly as an individual.
0 coins
Zara Shah
ā¢That's a great point I hadn't thought about. I'm definitely interested in knowing if there are smart ways to handle the timing of those monthly payments to optimize my tax situation.
0 coins