IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I'm currently stuck in the same CAA portal nightmare and this thread has been a lifesaver! After reading through everyone's experiences, I realized I've been making several of the common mistakes - using Chrome during peak hours, scanning at high resolution, and had no idea about the Application Control Number issue. Found my ACN email in my spam folder just like several others mentioned (subject line "IRS CAA Application Reference Number"). The IRS email system clearly has deliverability issues if so many of us are finding these critical emails in spam. I'm going to try the early morning Edge browser approach tomorrow with the proper PDF formatting. It's incredible that in 2025 we need this level of technical wizardry just to submit a professional application, but I'm grateful for this community sharing solutions. One question for those who successfully completed the process - after you got past the upload stage, how long did it take to receive approval? I'm wondering if I should expect more delays given all the systemic issues people are experiencing. Also want to echo the suggestion about documenting these issues for TIGTA. The IRS needs to know how broken their CAA portal is and how it's impacting qualified practitioners trying to serve taxpayers. This level of technical dysfunction is unacceptable for a critical government service.

0 coins

Chloe Davis

•

I'm in the exact same boat with my CAA application! Just went through my spam folder after reading your comment and found the ACN email with that same "IRS CAA Application Reference Number" subject line. It's honestly ridiculous that such a critical piece of information gets filtered as spam by default. I've been struggling with the uploads for about 10 days now, making all the same mistakes everyone else mentioned - Chrome browser, trying during lunch hours, high-res scans. Going to follow the community playbook tomorrow: Edge browser at 6 AM with low-res "Print to PDF" files. To answer your question about timing after uploads - I spoke with someone who completed their application last month and they said it took about 3-4 weeks for approval after successful submission. That seems to be the normal processing time once you actually get past these technical hurdles. Definitely planning to file a TIGTA complaint too. The fact that there's essentially a grassroots troubleshooting guide needed just to use a basic government portal shows how broken this system is. We shouldn't need to become IT specialists to maintain our professional credentials!

0 coins

Ethan Clark

•

This entire thread perfectly captures the CAA portal frustration so many of us are experiencing! I've been stuck at the document upload stage for over two weeks, and reading everyone's solutions has given me a clear action plan. Like several others, I found my Application Control Number email in spam with the subject "IRS CAA Application Reference Number" - the IRS email system clearly has major deliverability problems if this many practitioners are missing these critical notifications. I've been making almost every mistake mentioned here: using Chrome during peak hours, uploading 600 DPI scans, and getting nowhere with the generic error messages. Tomorrow I'm trying the community-tested approach: Edge browser at 6 AM, "Print to PDF" files at 150 DPI, proper file naming convention, and cleared browser cache. It's mind-boggling that we need a crowdsourced technical manual just to submit a basic professional application in 2025. The IRS portal infrastructure is clearly not equipped to handle the volume or complexity of modern document uploads. I'm also planning to document my experience and file a TIGTA complaint as suggested. If enough practitioners report these systemic issues, maybe we can finally get the IRS to prioritize fixing their broken systems instead of forcing qualified professionals to become IT troubleshooters just to serve taxpayers. Thanks to everyone for sharing your hard-won solutions - this community support is more valuable than any official IRS documentation!

0 coins

I'm completely new to the CAA application process and honestly feeling overwhelmed after reading about all these technical issues! I was planning to start my application next week, but now I'm wondering if I should wait until the IRS fixes these portal problems. Is there any indication from anyone who's spoken to IRS support about when these systemic issues might be resolved? Or should I just plan to follow the community workaround checklist that's been developed here? It seems like having Edge installed, knowing about the ACN email spam issue, and understanding the PDF formatting requirements are basically prerequisites at this point. As someone just starting this journey, I really appreciate everyone documenting their experiences - it's clear the official IRS guidance doesn't prepare you for any of these real-world technical hurdles. This thread is going to save me weeks of frustration!

0 coins

StarStrider

•

Just wanted to share my recent experience since I went through this exact situation a few months ago! My company offered a $20k relocation package and I was completely lost on the tax implications. What really helped me was getting everything in writing from HR about how they planned to handle the taxes. Turns out my company's "expense platform" method still resulted in the full amount being added to my W-2 as taxable income - I just didn't have taxes withheld upfront. I ended up owing about $6k more in taxes than I expected because I was in a higher tax bracket that year (the relocation income pushed me up). Definitely recommend setting aside 25-30% of whatever you receive to cover the tax bill, especially if they're not withholding taxes upfront. Also, keep ALL your receipts and documentation even though you can't deduct the expenses anymore. If there are any discrepancies with how your company reports things, you'll want that paper trail when dealing with the IRS later.

0 coins

This is really helpful, thank you for sharing your experience! The part about being pushed into a higher tax bracket is something I hadn't even considered. Since you mentioned owing $6k on a $20k package, that's about 30% which is pretty significant. Did you end up having to pay quarterly estimated taxes the following year to avoid penalties? I'm trying to figure out if I should start making estimated payments once I receive the relocation money, especially since my company isn't withholding taxes upfront either.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Great point about the quarterly taxes! Yes, I did have to start making estimated payments the following year since I had underpaid by more than $1,000. The IRS safe harbor rule requires you to pay 110% of last year's tax liability if your AGI was over $150k (which mine was after the relocation income). I'd definitely recommend making a quarterly payment right after you receive the relocation money. Calculate roughly 25-30% of the amount and send it in with Form 1040ES. This way you won't get hit with underpayment penalties. The IRS website has a good estimated tax calculator that can help you figure out exactly how much to send. Also, since your company isn't withholding upfront, you might want to temporarily increase your regular paycheck withholding for the rest of the year if that's easier than making quarterly payments. Just use the IRS W-4 calculator to figure out the right adjustment.

0 coins

I went through a similar situation when my company relocated me from California to Texas last year. The biggest surprise for me was learning that even though relocation expenses used to be deductible (pre-2018), they're now fully taxable income with very few exceptions. One thing I'd strongly recommend is asking your HR department for a detailed breakdown of exactly how they'll report the $25k on your W-2. Some companies lump it all into Box 1 as regular wages, while others might break it out separately. This can affect your withholding strategy. Also, if you're moving from a state with no income tax to one with income tax (or vice versa), factor that into your calculations too. The state tax implications can be significant and might influence which option you choose. The "grossed up" approach is definitely worth negotiating for if possible. Even if they won't do a full gross-up, sometimes companies will meet you halfway or provide a partial tax offset. It never hurts to ask, especially since you're making a big move for the company's benefit!

0 coins

This is such valuable insight, especially the part about asking for a detailed breakdown of how they'll report it on the W-2! I hadn't thought about the difference between lumping it into Box 1 versus breaking it out separately. Could you explain how that might affect withholding strategy? Also, the state tax angle is really important - I'm moving from a no-income-tax state to one with about 6% state tax, so that's definitely going to add to the burden. Did you find any strategies for dealing with the multi-state tax situation, or is it pretty straightforward since the income will be reported where you end up living? Thanks for the tip about negotiating partial gross-up too. I was thinking it was all-or-nothing, but meeting halfway sounds much more realistic to ask for!

0 coins

Understanding M-T-M, Wash-Sales and Day Trading Tax Benefits - Worth It?

I've had trader status for over 10 years now, and each tax season I find myself going down the rabbit hole of potential tax-saving strategies, only to end up at the same conclusion repeatedly. It seems like just paying what I owe might be the simplest approach. First, regarding wash sales - I'm starting to think the focus on them is overblown. Yes, disallowed losses get added to the cost basis of identical/substantially similar securities purchased within that 30-day window before or after selling at a loss. But this just means the benefit is deferred rather than lost completely. The higher cost basis reduces your future tax liability when you eventually have gains. It's just a timing difference. My broker (TD Ameritrade) provides real-time portfolio tracking with wash sales factored in, which makes it straightforward to monitor my actual gains/losses position including any wash sale adjustments. As for Mark-to-Market (MTM), it seems like a gamble. The IRS requires traders to elect this method before knowing how the tax year will play out. What happens if you end up with paper gains and no losses? You'd be forced to recognize those gains at year-end due to MTM. Without the election, you could potentially push those gains into the following year, effectively delaying your tax payment by 12-16 months. This gives you more capital to work with longer, though it carries risk if your positions collapse while you still owe taxes. Without knowing if you'll have losses in the tax year, the two main MTM benefits (losses becoming ordinary rather than capital and fully offsetting gains) might never materialize. From what I've analyzed, trading through a corporation and paying yourself a reasonable salary (with corresponding income tax, Social Security and Medicare taxes) while the corporation pays taxes on its profit/loss might provide some tax advantages. Has anyone gone down these roads and willing to share their experiences?

I've been trading for about 6 years and went through the same analysis paralysis you describe. Here's what I learned the hard way: The S-Corp route can work, but you need to factor in the additional costs beyond just filing fees. You'll need quarterly payroll processing, workers' comp insurance (even as the sole employee), and potentially state franchise taxes. In my case, these costs ate into the self-employment tax savings significantly. One thing that helped me was tracking my trading patterns for a full year before making any MTM decisions. I kept a simple log of when I had open positions at year-end vs when I closed everything out. Turns out I naturally close most positions before December anyway, which made MTM less beneficial since I wasn't carrying many paper gains/losses into the new year. For wash sales, I'd recommend being extra careful with December trading. Even though the loss isn't permanently gone, having it deferred to the next tax year can mess up your quarterly estimated payments if you're not expecting it. I got hit with underpayment penalties one year because of this timing issue. The broker tracking issue others mentioned is real - I use three different platforms and have to manually reconcile everything. It's tedious but necessary if you want accurate reporting.

0 coins

CosmicCowboy

•

Thank you for sharing your real-world experience with the S-Corp route - those additional costs like workers' comp and quarterly payroll processing are exactly the hidden expenses that make the paper calculations misleading. Your point about tracking trading patterns before making MTM decisions is brilliant. I'm curious about your December trading observation - do you intentionally avoid opening new positions in December to keep things clean for year-end, or did this pattern just naturally develop? Also, when you say you manually reconcile across three platforms, are you doing this monthly or just at year-end? I'm trying to figure out the most efficient way to stay on top of cross-platform wash sale tracking without it becoming a part-time job.

0 coins

Great discussion everyone! As someone who's been through similar analysis, I want to add a perspective on the psychological aspect of these tax strategies that often gets overlooked. I spent two years obsessing over MTM election and S-Corp structures, running endless scenarios and calculations. What I realized is that the mental bandwidth consumed by complex tax strategies was actually hurting my trading performance. The cognitive load of tracking wash sales across multiple accounts, worrying about year-end positions for MTM, and managing corporate paperwork was distracting me from what actually generates profits - good trading decisions. Sometimes the "suboptimal" tax approach that's simple and automated is actually optimal when you factor in the time and mental energy costs. My trading improved significantly when I simplified to a single broker with good tax reporting and accepted that I might pay a bit more in taxes but gained back focus and trading clarity. That said, for high-volume traders with substantial profits, the complexity can definitely be worth it. The key is being honest about whether the tax savings justify the operational overhead for your specific situation and trading style.

0 coins

Has anyone tried both TurboTax and H&R Block online to compare the results? Sometimes I get different amounts from different software.

0 coins

Yes! I always run my taxes through both TurboTax and FreeTaxUSA before filing. This year they had a $340 difference because TurboTax found an obscure deduction FreeTaxUSA missed. Worth the extra 30 minutes to try more than one service.

0 coins

I'd definitely recommend trying both the taxr.ai suggestion from @Connor Murphy and comparing results across multiple tax software platforms before you finalize anything. A swing from getting $2,800 back to owing federal taxes is a huge red flag that something's not right with your current filing. Also, make sure you're entering ALL your tax documents correctly - sometimes people forget about interest statements from banks, unemployment compensation from earlier in the year, or even small 1099s from freelance work. Even a small missed document can throw off your entire calculation. Before paying any service fees, try the IRS Free File program (https://www.irs.gov/filing/free-file-do-your-federal-taxes-for-free) which gives you access to brand-name software for free if you qualify. At minimum, it'll give you another data point to compare against your current results.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

Has anyone had experience with limitations on consulting services under the Netherlands-US tax treaty? I remember reading somewhere that there's a 183-day rule that might affect withholding rates if you physically perform services in the US.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

Yes, this is an important point. Under many tax treaties including Netherlands-US, if you physically perform the services while in the US for more than 183 days in a 12-month period, different withholding rules may apply. But for remote consulting done entirely from the Netherlands, the 0% withholding typically applies.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

I went through this exact same process with my Belgian consulting firm last year when we started working with a US client. The W-8BEN-E is definitely overwhelming at first, but it's more straightforward than it looks once you know what applies to your situation. For a Belgian V.O.F. (partnership), you'll want to focus on these key sections: **Part I (Identification):** - Your partnership name and Belgian address - Belgian tax ID number (if you have one registered with the Belgian tax authorities) - Leave GIIN blank (only for financial institutions) - Check box 5b for Partnership **Part III (Claim of Tax Treaty Benefits):** - This is crucial! Check box 14a - Enter "Belgium" as the treaty country - For consulting services, you can typically claim 0% withholding under the US-Belgium tax treaty - You may need to specify the treaty article (usually Article 7 for business profits if services performed outside the US) **Part XXX (Signature):** - Don't forget to sign and date Most other parts can be skipped for straightforward consulting arrangements. The key is making sure you qualify for treaty benefits - since you're performing services from Belgium for a US company, you should be eligible for reduced/eliminated withholding. Double-check that your partnership agreement and Belgian tax registration support the claims you're making on the form. Good luck!

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful! As someone new to dealing with US tax forms, I really appreciate the step-by-step breakdown. One quick question - you mentioned specifying the treaty article in Part III. Do I need to write "Article 7" explicitly in one of the fields, or is just checking box 14a and entering "Belgium" sufficient? I want to make sure I'm not missing any required details that could cause issues with withholding.

0 coins

Prev1...324325326327328...5643Next