


Ask the community...
use a free filing service like cash app taxes if ur income under 73k
This is exactly the kind of confusion that trips up so many divorced parents! Your tax software is actually correct - you CAN claim the Earned Income Credit even though your ex will be claiming the Child Tax Credit for your daughter. The key thing to understand is that the IRS treats these as completely different types of benefits. The EIC is what's called a "custodial benefit" - it goes to the parent the child actually lived with for more than half the year, regardless of any custody agreements about who claims the child as a dependent. Since your daughter lived with you for more than 6 months, you qualify for EIC based on your income. Your ex can still claim the Child Tax Credit because your custody agreement gives him the right to claim her as a dependent, but that doesn't affect your EIC eligibility at all. Make sure you keep good records showing your daughter lived with you for more than half the year (school records, medical records, etc.) in case the IRS ever questions it. But you're absolutely entitled to that EIC - don't leave money on the table because of bad advice!
Thank you for breaking this down so clearly! I'm dealing with a similar situation and was worried I might be doing something wrong. One question - when you mention keeping records that show the child lived with you for more than half the year, what specific documents does the IRS typically look for? I have school enrollment records showing my address, but I'm wondering if there are other types of documentation I should be collecting just in case.
Great question! The IRS typically looks for records that show where the child actually lived day-to-day. School enrollment records with your address are excellent evidence. Other good documentation includes: - Medical/dental records showing your address as the primary contact - Daycare or after-school program records - Records of extracurricular activities (sports teams, music lessons, etc.) - Library card or other municipal records showing the child's address - Any correspondence from schools, doctors, or other institutions addressed to the child at your home The key is having multiple sources that consistently show the child's primary residence was with you for more than half the year. Even things like photos with timestamps showing the child at your home throughout the year can help establish the pattern of residence. One thing many people don't realize - you don't need to prove exact days. The IRS understands that life isn't always perfectly documented. As long as you can show the child's primary residence was clearly with you for the majority of the year, that's typically sufficient.
I've been following this thread and want to add something that might help clarify the situation even further. As someone who went through a messy divorce with complicated custody arrangements, I learned the hard way that there's a big difference between what divorce agreements say and what the IRS actually recognizes. Your custody agreement can legally transfer the right to claim your daughter as a dependent to your ex (which allows him to get the Child Tax Credit), but it absolutely cannot transfer away your right to the Earned Income Credit if she lived with you for more than half the year. The IRS considers EIC a benefit that belongs to the custodial parent, period. I made the mistake of not claiming EIC for two years because I thought our custody agreement prevented it. When I finally figured out I was wrong, I had to file amended returns to get that money back. Don't make the same mistake I did - if your daughter lived with you for more than 6 months, claim that EIC! The IRS has been very clear that custody agreements between parents don't override their rules about who qualifies for custodial benefits. Just make sure you can document where your daughter actually lived throughout the year, because that's what really matters to the IRS, not what your paperwork says about who claims her as a dependent.
10 Have you tried using tax software that lets you do tax planning? I use TurboTax and they have a feature where you can estimate next year's taxes and it tells you if you're withholding enough. Saved me from owing $3k this year because I caught the underwithholding in October and adjusted my W-4 for the last few months.
16 I second this! I use H&R Block and their tax planning tool caught that I was going to owe about $4,500. I immediately updated my W-4 to take out an extra $375 per month for the rest of the year. Still owed a little but WAY less than I would have otherwise.
One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is to check if your employer is calculating withholding correctly based on your pay frequency. I discovered my biweekly paycheck withholding was being calculated as if I got paid weekly, which significantly under-withheld throughout the year. Also, if you get annual raises or bonuses, your withholding might not adjust proportionally. I learned to update my W-4 every January and again mid-year if I get a significant raise. The IRS withholding calculator is definitely your friend here - run it quarterly to stay on track. Another quick fix while you sort out the W-4: you can make estimated quarterly tax payments directly to the IRS to cover any shortfall. Form 1040ES has vouchers you can mail with a check, or you can pay online. This prevents that massive April surprise and potential underpayment penalties.
This is really helpful! I never thought about the pay frequency calculation being wrong - that could definitely explain a lot. How would I check if my employer is doing this correctly? Should I just ask HR directly, or is there a way to verify this on my own by looking at my pay stubs? Also, the quarterly payments idea is smart. I'd rather pay a little extra throughout the year than get slammed with a huge bill. Do you know if there's a minimum amount for those estimated payments, or can I just send whatever I think might help cover the gap?
I'm dealing with a very similar situation right now! My business partner and I have been filing our 2-member LLC income on Schedule C for the past three years, and I just found out we should have been doing partnership returns. One thing I learned from my research is that the IRS has a "de minimis" approach for small partnerships - they're less likely to pursue penalties aggressively when the income is low and all taxes were actually paid (just reported on the wrong forms). Since your first LLC only had $15K total income and the other had zero, you're probably in a lower risk category. I'm also curious about the dissolution aspect you mentioned. If you're shutting down one of the LLCs in 2022, you might want to file a final partnership return for that entity showing the dissolution. That could actually help close the books cleanly rather than leaving things hanging. Have you considered reaching out to the IRS directly through their business line? I know it's hard to get through, but they sometimes give more practical guidance than accountants who tend to be overly cautious about every technical requirement.
Maya, you bring up a great point about the dissolution filing! I hadn't considered that angle. For the LLC we're shutting down, would we need to file partnership returns for all the prior years first, or could we just file a final return showing the dissolution and somehow indicate the prior years had no activity? Also, regarding reaching out to the IRS directly - I've heard mixed things about getting consistent advice from different agents. Did you end up calling them, and if so, were they actually helpful with practical guidance rather than just reading the regulations back to you? I'm worried about getting conflicting information that could make things more confusing.
I'm a tax preparer and see this exact situation frequently with small LLCs. Here's my practical take based on what actually happens versus what the regulations technically require: The IRS Publication 3402 (Tax Issues for Limited Liability Companies) clearly states that multi-member LLCs are partnerships by default, but enforcement for small operations is typically focused on whether taxes were actually paid, not the specific forms used. In your case, since you reported all income and paid appropriate taxes (just on Schedule C instead of via K-1s), the main issue is really about compliance, not tax avoidance. The IRS tends to be more understanding when they can see good faith effort to pay what was owed. My recommendation would be to file the partnership return only for 2020 (the year with actual income) along with amended 1040s for all three members. For 2021 with zero income, you could file a short-form 1065 showing no activity, or potentially skip it entirely since there's no tax impact. Include a reasonable cause statement explaining that tax software allowed the Schedule C filing method and you relied on that guidance. The key is being proactive rather than waiting. The IRS appreciates taxpayers who discover and correct their own mistakes. You'll likely face minimal penalties, and first-time penalty abatement might eliminate them entirely. For the LLC you're dissolving, definitely file a final partnership return showing the dissolution date - this officially closes that entity's tax obligations.
Wesley Hallow
Slightly different perspective - I'd recommend talking to a tax attorney who specializes in partnership taxation, not just your CPA. While IRC 1341 seems like the right approach, there are nuances with carried interest that might affect your specific situation. For example, depending on how your partnership agreement was structured, there might be arguments for treating this as a capital loss rather than a Claim of Right issue, which could have different tax implications. A specialized attorney could also help if the IRS challenges your position.
0 coins
Justin Chang
โขAgreed! I'm a CPA who works with investment professionals, and carried interest taxation is its own beast. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made some changes to carried interest that might impact the analysis. Worth getting specialized advice.
0 coins
Wesley Hallow
โขExactly. The interplay between carried interest rules, partnership taxation, and IRC 1341 creates complexities that require specialized knowledge. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act imposed a three-year holding period requirement for carried interest to qualify for long-term capital gains treatment. This could potentially impact how the original income was characterized and consequently how the repayment should be treated. Additionally, the "substantial risk of forfeiture" rules under Section 83 might also come into play depending on the specific terms of the carried interest arrangement. A tax attorney who specializes in this area can analyze these intersecting issues and potentially identify planning opportunities that a general CPA might miss. The investment in specialized advice is usually well worth it when the amounts involved are this substantial.
0 coins
Keisha Thompson
This is a complex situation that touches on several areas of tax law. Based on your description, IRC 1341 does seem like the appropriate approach, but I'd strongly recommend getting specialized advice given the amounts involved. One thing to keep in mind is timing - make sure you're clear on when exactly the repayment obligation crystallized. For IRC 1341 purposes, it matters whether the repayment obligation arose in 2024 when you left, or if it was always contingent on not meeting the vesting requirements. Also, since you mentioned your accountant is researching this, make sure they're familiar with Revenue Ruling 2019-11, which provides guidance on applying IRC 1341 to partnership distributions. The IRS has been more active in this area recently, so having current guidance is important. The documentation everyone else mentioned is crucial - you'll want everything in writing showing the original allocation, the tax distributions made to cover your liability, and the subsequent repayment requirement. This creates a clear paper trail that supports your position. Given the complexity and dollar amounts, consider getting a second opinion from a tax professional who specializes in partnership taxation and carried interest. The intersection of these rules can create opportunities or pitfalls that aren't immediately obvious.
0 coins
Sofia Gomez
โขThanks for mentioning Revenue Ruling 2019-11 - I hadn't seen that specific guidance yet. Just to clarify on the timing aspect you mentioned, would it make a difference if my partnership agreement explicitly stated that tax distributions were subject to repayment if vesting requirements weren't met? Or does IRC 1341 still apply as long as I had the apparent right to the income when originally reported, regardless of the conditional nature of the tax distributions? I'm trying to understand whether the contingent repayment obligation affects the "claim of right" analysis or if it's more about how the income was treated at the time it was earned and reported.
0 coins