


Ask the community...
Don't forget to check if the K-1s have any Section 199A(g) deductions as well, which is different from the regular QBI deduction. Some agricultural or horticultural partnerships include this, though it's less common with trading partnerships.
Good point, though Section 199A(g) deductions are specifically for specified agricultural or horticultural cooperatives, not trading partnerships. The OP mentioned these are trading partnerships, so they wouldn't have the 199A(g) deduction. It's important not to confuse the two types of deductions when reviewing K-1s. Trading partnerships would only have the regular QBI deduction information if they qualify.
I just went through this exact situation with my brother's estate - he was also heavily into day trading through partnerships. After reading through all these responses, I want to add that you should also check if FreeTaxUSA is properly handling the QBI limitations for estates. Estates have different QBI rules than individual returns. The QBI deduction for estates is limited to the lesser of 20% of the qualified business income OR 20% of the estate's taxable income above the deduction for distributions to beneficiaries. This calculation can be tricky when you have multiple K-1s. Also, since your uncle passed in October, you're dealing with a short tax year which could affect how the QBI deduction is calculated. The software might not automatically adjust for this, so you may want to double-check the calculations manually or consult a tax professional who specializes in estate returns with partnership interests.
Just wanted to add - be very careful with what your friend is proposing. This sounds a lot like what's called "money muling" where someone uses your legitimate account to move potentially suspicious funds. Even if your friend is trustworthy, you don't know who these "people buying cryptocurrency" are. I worked at a bank previously and we would flag and sometimes freeze accounts showing this exact pattern - money coming in and immediately going out to another account, especially when it's repeatedly happening. This could not only create tax headaches but potentially more serious legal problems.
Do banks actually report this stuff to immigration too? Could this affect visa status?
While banks don't directly report to immigration, they do file Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) with FinCEN (Financial Crimes Enforcement Network) when they detect unusual patterns. These reports can potentially be accessed by various government agencies. If a pattern of suspicious financial activity is established, it could eventually impact immigration status, especially during visa renewal processes. Immigration officials can consider whether you've been complying with all US laws, including financial regulations. Being associated with suspicious money movement could raise questions about your activities while in the US. For F1 students specifically, maintaining your status depends on following all US laws, not just education-related requirements, so it's definitely not worth the risk.
As someone who's been through the F1 visa tax maze myself, I want to emphasize something that hasn't been mentioned yet - the arrangement your friend is proposing could potentially violate your F1 visa work authorization restrictions. F1 students are only allowed to work on-campus or with specific authorization (OPT/CPT). Even if you're not getting paid directly, facilitating business transactions through your personal account could be interpreted as unauthorized work activity. USCIS takes this very seriously during status reviews and visa renewals. Beyond the tax implications everyone has covered, this could jeopardize your ability to maintain your student status or transition to other visa categories later. I've seen classmates face serious complications during their green card applications years later because of questionable financial activities during their student years. For your parents' support money, definitely stick with well-documented transfers - whether traditional banking or crypto with proper records. The key is having clear documentation showing the family relationship and the educational purpose of the funds. I keep screenshots of all transfers along with bank statements and a simple spreadsheet noting the source and purpose of each transfer. Trust me, the extra fees for legitimate transfer methods are nothing compared to the potential costs of visa complications or legal issues down the road.
Does anyone know if state tax laws have similar patterns? My state keeps changing their tax code almost yearly and it's driving me crazy trying to keep up with planning.
This is such a helpful discussion! I've been confused about the same thing - seeing all these articles about 2025 changes but not understanding the actual mechanics of how tax laws can be modified. The explanation about budget reconciliation rules really clarifies why we're seeing this specific timeline. I had no idea that the 2017 tax cuts were designed to expire to comply with Senate procedures rather than because there was some legal requirement for how long tax laws can stay in effect. It's actually somewhat reassuring to know that while Congress *could* theoretically change tax laws constantly, the political reality creates more stability than the legal framework would suggest. I was worried we might see constant changes that would make financial planning impossible. Does anyone know if there are any proposals to change how this process works, or if we'll likely see the same pattern of temporary provisions in future tax legislation?
I dunno what these other folks are talking about with the 25% thing. I'm self-employed too and my accountant told me it's 20% not 25%. Been doing it that way for 3 years now.
The confusion happens because the actual calculation is approximately 20% of your NET self-employment income (Schedule C profit), but it's technically defined as 25% of your net earnings after deducting the SEP contribution and half of self-employment tax. The math works out to roughly 20% of your Schedule C profit in most cases. So both of you are right in a way, just looking at different reference points.
Just to add some clarity on the 20% vs 25% confusion - you're both right! The IRS rule states 25% of "compensation," but for self-employed individuals, compensation is defined as net earnings from self-employment MINUS the SEP contribution itself and MINUS half of your self-employment tax. This creates a circular calculation that effectively works out to about 20% of your net Schedule C profit. So when people say "25%," they're quoting the official IRS language, but when your accountant calculates it, it comes out to roughly 20% of your business profit. The easiest way I've found to calculate it is using the IRS worksheet in Publication 560, or just multiply your net Schedule C profit by 0.20 as a rough estimate (assuming you're not hitting the $69,000 annual limit). Your tax software should handle the precise calculation automatically.
Giovanni Colombo
Has anyone actually been audited by the IRS over a family loan with the wrong interest rate? I'm loaning my sister $30k and don't want to deal with all this AFR stuff but also don't want to get in trouble.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
ā¢YES! My parents got caught in an audit 3 years ago because they loaned me $45k interest-free for my first house. The IRS determined the "missing interest" was actually a gift and made them file a gift tax return. They didn't owe gift tax because it was under the lifetime exemption, but they had to pay income tax on the imputed interest they never actually received! The audit was a nightmare - just charge the minimum AFR rate and save yourself the headache.
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
I went through this exact situation last year when I loaned my daughter $50,000 for her business. Here's what I learned from my tax attorney: For a 6-month loan, you definitely need the short-term AFR rate. Since you're getting paid back in one lump sum at the end, use the semi-annual compounding rate from the IRS Revenue Ruling published for the month you make the loan. The key thing everyone misses is that you MUST actually charge and collect the interest, not just put it on paper. I made the mistake of "forgiving" the interest at the end, and my CPA told me that could still trigger gift tax issues since I was essentially giving her the interest amount. Also, make sure your loan agreement includes a specific maturity date, not just "about 6 months." The IRS wants to see definite terms. I used a simple promissory note template but had it notarized just to be extra safe. One more tip: if your brother can't pay the full amount back at 6 months, don't just verbally extend it. You'll need to formally modify the loan agreement or it could look like you're just gifting money with extra steps.
0 coins