IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I've been through this exact situation! When I started at my current restaurant job, my first paycheck looked completely wrong compared to my previous non-tipped position. Here's what I learned: First, grab your paystub and look for these specific things: 1) Check if they're reporting "allocated tips" - this is when they assume you made a certain percentage of sales as tips even if you didn't actually receive that much in cash. 2) Look for any automatic deductions you weren't told about (uniform fees, meal charges, etc.). 3) Verify your filing status is correct - if they have you as single when you should be married filing jointly, you'll be way over-withheld. The fact that your owner was already sketchy about paying you makes this even more suspicious. I'd recommend taking your paystub to a tax professional or even your local library - many have free tax help programs where someone can review it with you. Also, don't let them brush you off if you ask questions about the withholding calculations. You're entitled to understand exactly how your taxes are being computed. If they can't give you a clear explanation, that's a red flag that something might be wrong.

0 coins

Javier Torres

β€’

This is exactly the kind of detailed breakdown I needed! The "allocated tips" thing is something I hadn't even heard of before reading these comments. I'm definitely going to check my paystub for that. The timing issue with my owner being difficult about payment initially makes me wonder if there are other payroll "shortcuts" they might be taking. I think I'll take your advice about visiting the library - I had no idea they offered free tax help programs. That sounds way less intimidating than trying to figure this out on my own or paying for professional help right now. Thanks for laying out those specific things to look for. Having a checklist makes this feel much more manageable instead of just staring at numbers that don't make sense to me.

0 coins

Dylan, your instincts are spot-on to question this! Given the owner's history of payment issues, it's definitely worth digging deeper. I'd start by requesting a detailed breakdown of all withholdings from your payroll department. Here's what I'd check immediately: Compare your effective tax rate (not just dollar amounts) between jobs, since higher earnings naturally mean higher withholdings. Look for any "tip allocation" or "imputed income" on your stub - restaurants sometimes report assumed tips that inflate your taxable income. Check if they're withholding state taxes for the wrong location, and verify your W-4 filing status is correct. One thing that helped me when I had a similar issue was creating a simple spreadsheet comparing my old and new paystubs line by line. It made the discrepancies much clearer. Also, keep copies of everything - if there is an error, you'll want documentation when you file your taxes. Don't let anyone make you feel like you're being difficult for asking these questions. Understanding your paycheck is a basic right, and with this owner's track record, your skepticism is completely justified.

0 coins

Zainab Ali

β€’

This is such solid advice, Kayla! The spreadsheet idea is brilliant - I never thought about comparing line by line like that. I'm definitely going to do that this weekend. You're absolutely right about not feeling difficult for asking questions. Between all the comments here, I'm realizing there are so many ways restaurant payroll can go wrong, from tip allocation to wrong tax jurisdictions. It's kind of scary how easy it would be to just accept a wrong paycheck and lose money all year. I'm going to start with requesting that detailed breakdown from payroll and then work through everyone's suggestions systematically. At least now I know what specific things to look for instead of just having a gut feeling something was off. Thanks for the encouragement - it helps to know other people have been through this exact situation!

0 coins

Here's a step-by-step approach for handling large tax refunds in Cash App: 1. Verify your identity in Cash App (if not already done) 2. Link a traditional bank account 3. Transfer funds from Cash App to your bank account 4. Withdraw from your bank which typically has higher limits 5. For business purposes, document the transfer as part of your business records 6. Keep withdrawal receipts for your tax documentation 7. Consider setting up a separate business account for future refunds This approach avoids Cash App's lower direct withdrawal limits while maintaining a clear paper trail for business expenses.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

β€’

Just went through this exact scenario last week! Got my $6,800 refund deposited to Cash App and needed it for equipment purchases. Here's what worked for me: First, make sure you're fully verified on Cash App (took about 2 business days). Then link your regular bank account if you haven't already. The transfer from Cash App to my bank was instant and free, then I could withdraw the full amount from my bank. Cash App's daily withdrawal limits are pretty restrictive for large amounts, but once it's in your regular bank, you have much more flexibility. Just keep all your transfer receipts and withdrawal documentation - the IRS doesn't care how you access your refund, but if you're using it for business inventory, those purchase receipts will be important for next year's taxes!

0 coins

Incorporated Independent Contractors vs. Staffing Agencies - Employee Classification Issues in 2025 [USA]

I run a small consulting business where I'm the only employee of my S-corp. Recently I've noticed something frustrating - I seem to be getting shut out of contract opportunities because companies are exclusively going through staffing agencies instead of hiring incorporated independent contractors like me directly. From what I understand, there shouldn't be much difference in terms of worker classification risks between hiring someone through a staffing agency versus hiring an incorporated independent contractor (C-corp or S-corp). In both cases, the company is contracting with a business entity, not an individual. But lately I've lost out on three potential contracts where the client initially seemed interested but then said, "Sorry, company policy - we only work through our approved staffing vendors now." When I tried explaining that my S-corp status essentially provides the same classification protection as going through a staffing agency, they didn't seem to understand. I'm wondering if there's just a knowledge gap here. Since there are way more independent contractors operating as sole proprietors and LLCs rather than incorporated entities, do companies just assume all independent contractors come with the same classification risks? Are they missing the distinction between incorporated vs. unincorporated contractors? Has anyone else faced this issue or found effective ways to overcome this hurdle when marketing your incorporated consulting business?

Jason Brewer

β€’

Something no one has mentioned yet is that this issue varies HUGELY by industry. I work in healthcare IT consulting and have found that hospitals and healthcare systems are extremely rigid about only using staffing agencies because of compliance requirements. Meanwhile, my friend who does similar work for retail companies has much better luck contracting directly through his S-corp. What industry are you in, OP? That might be a factor in how difficult this battle is going to be.

0 coins

Kiara Fisherman

β€’

Financial services is another super rigid industry. After Dodd-Frank, most banks won't touch independent contractors directly regardless of how they're incorporated. I had to either go W-2 or work through their approved staffing partners, no exceptions.

0 coins

Wesley Hallow

β€’

I'm in software development, specifically backend systems. It's interesting you mention the industry differences - that makes a lot of sense. I've noticed that smaller tech companies are much more open to direct contracts with my S-corp, while enterprise-level organizations tend to be completely locked into their staffing agency relationships. I wonder if creating some kind of industry-specific approach might be more effective than a one-size-fits-all solution. The documentation from taxr.ai that someone mentioned above sounds promising, but perhaps tailoring it to address the specific compliance concerns in my industry would be even more effective.

0 coins

Liam Cortez

β€’

One thing I learned after 15 years as an incorporated contractor - this whole landscape changes every few years. Back in 2018-2020 companies were much more open to direct contracts with S-corps. Then AB5 happened in California, and similar legislation started popping up elsewhere, and suddenly everyone got super conservative. So just because it's difficult now doesn't mean it will stay that way. Companies tend to overreact initially and then gradually develop more nuanced policies. I suspect by 2026-2027 we'll see more companies creating specific carve-outs for incorporated contractors vs. sole proprietors.

0 coins

Savannah Vin

β€’

This is so true! I remember when the Microsoft permatemp lawsuit happened way back, and suddenly EVERYONE freaked out about contractors. Then things gradually relaxed until the next big case. It's like a pendulum swinging back and forth.

0 coins

Tom Maxon

β€’

To all those having trouble reaching a human at IRS. I just ran across this video that gave me a shortcut to reach a human. Hope it helps! https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c

0 coins

Aiden Chen

β€’

Hey Montana! I totally get your confusion - transcript codes can be really overwhelming. The multiple 290 codes you're seeing are actually pretty normal and usually just indicate routine adjustments the makes while your return. Since switched from PATH to regular processing, that's actually a good sign that things are moving forward. The lack of a tax code right now just means they're still working through verification. I wouldn't stress too much about the rumors - if there were serious issues, you'd typically get official correspondence from the directly. Keep checking every few days, and if you don't see movement in another week or two, then maybe consider calling the for clarification.

0 coins

Thanks for the reassurance Aiden! That makes me feel a lot better about the situation. I've been checking obsessively and it's good to know that the switch from PATH to is actually progress. Do you know roughly how long the verification process usually takes once it moves to that stage?

0 coins

Hunter Edmunds

β€’

Has anyone dealt with the AMT implications of selling QSBS? I've heard the excluded portion might still be subject to AMT which could really reduce the benefit.

0 coins

Carter Holmes

β€’

Yes, that's an important consideration! For pre-2010 QSBS with the 50% exclusion, 7% of the excluded amount is an AMT preference item. This means you add that portion back when calculating AMT income. For example, if you have a $1 million gain on qualifying 1994 QSBS, you'd exclude $500,000 from regular tax. But for AMT purposes, you'd have to add back 7% of that $500,000 (so $35,000) to your AMT income. This can sometimes push you into AMT territory if you have other AMT preference items.

0 coins

Taylor Chen

β€’

Great question about QSBS from 1994! Just want to add a couple of important points that others haven't mentioned yet: 1) Make sure to verify your company never converted from C-Corp to S-Corp during your holding period - even a brief S-Corp election can disqualify the shares entirely for QSBS purposes. 2) If you're considering the gift strategy, remember that your daughter would get a "stepped-up basis" equal to the fair market value at the time of gift for gift tax purposes, but she keeps your original 1994 basis for income tax and QSBS calculations. This could create some complexity in her tax planning. 3) One thing to watch out for - if this tech company went through any major restructuring, mergers, or spin-offs over the past 30 years, the QSBS qualification might have been affected. The "same corporation" requirement is pretty strict. Given the age of these shares and potential complexity, you might want to get a tax professional who specializes in QSBS to review your specific situation before making any moves. The 50% exclusion on 30 years of tech stock appreciation could be substantial!

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

β€’

This is really helpful additional context! The point about corporate restructuring is especially important - I hadn't thought about how mergers or spin-offs could affect QSBS status. For a tech company from 1994, there's a good chance they went through some major changes over 30 years. Quick question about the gift basis rules - when you say the daughter gets "stepped-up basis" for gift tax purposes but keeps the original basis for income tax, does that mean she'd potentially owe gift tax on the full current value even though she can only exclude gains based on the original 1994 basis? That seems like it could create a significant tax burden for large positions.

0 coins

Prev1...29722973297429752976...5643Next