


Ask the community...
Uggh this is confusing... so if I get a $50 face cream to review on my shop account, I have to pay taxes on that $50 even if I would never buy that cream myself? What if I hate it and give it away to a friend? Still taxable?
Yes, it's still taxable even if you give it away. The IRS considers it compensation for your content creation services the moment you receive it. Think of it like this: if someone paid you $50 cash to review a product, then you spent that $50 on a face cream and gave it to a friend, you'd still have to pay taxes on that $50 income, right? The IRS sees this the same way.
This is exactly why I started keeping a detailed spreadsheet at the beginning of this tax year! I track every single item I receive - date, brand, product description, retail price (I screenshot the current selling price online), and whether I kept/used it or gave it away. The $1,800-2,000 you mentioned could result in a pretty significant tax bill if you're not prepared for it. At a 22% tax bracket, that's potentially $400-440 in additional taxes owed. I learned this the hard way last year when I got hit with a surprise bill because I hadn't set aside money for taxes on the "free" products. One tip that's helped me: I now set aside about 25-30% of the estimated value of products I receive into a separate savings account specifically for taxes. That way I'm not scrambling come tax time. Also consider making quarterly estimated payments if this income is substantial - the IRS doesn't like it when you owe too much at the end of the year without having paid throughout.
Just curious - does anyone know if there's a difference in how the IRS treats excess contributions if they were made because you were over the income limit versus if you just contributed more than the annual maximum? I made both mistakes in different years and wonder if the correction process is the same.
I'm wondering this too! My situation was being over the income limit, but I've stayed within the annual contribution caps.
The correction process is essentially the same regardless of why the contribution was considered excessive. Whether you exceeded the annual dollar limit or were over the income threshold, the IRS treats it as an excess contribution. The 6% excise tax applies to both situations, and the options for correcting it are identical: remove the excess (plus earnings) or recharacterize to a Traditional IRA if you're still within the timeframe to do so. The only practical difference might be in calculating exactly how much was excessive - if you're over the income limit, the entire contribution is excessive, whereas if you exceeded the annual cap, only the amount above the limit is considered excess.
You might want to check if you qualified for any partial Roth contribution during those years instead of assuming you couldn't contribute anything. The income limits have a phaseout range where you can make reduced contributions. For 2017, the phaseout for single filers was between $118,000-$133,000. Unless you were completely above the upper threshold, you might have been eligible to contribute something.
Omg thank you for pointing this out! I just checked my 2017 tax return and my MAGI was around $129,000 which means I was in the phaseout range. So I would have been eligible for a partial contribution. Does that change how I handle this situation? Do I only need to remove part of each year's contribution?
Yes, this changes everything for those years! If you were in the phaseout range, you need to calculate your maximum allowable contribution for each year based on your specific MAGI. The formula is a bit complex, but basically you take the maximum contribution limit minus a reduction based on how far into the phaseout range you were. For 2017 with a $129,000 MAGI, you'd calculate: $5,500 - (($129,000 - $118,000) / ($133,000 - $118,000)) Ć $5,500. That works out to about $1,433 you were allowed to contribute. So you'd only need to remove the excess amount above that ($4,067) rather than the full $5,500. You'll need to do this calculation for each year you were in the phaseout range. This could save you significant penalties and taxes on the removal of contributions that were actually legitimate!
This is a really common situation, and the good news is you can potentially deduct a portion of your gaming PC! Since you're using it for both work and personal purposes, you'll need to calculate the business use percentage - so if you work 20 hours a week and game 20 hours a week, that's roughly 50% business use. The key things to remember: keep detailed records of your work vs. personal usage (a simple log works), save all your receipts, and since your PC cost $2,200, you'll need to depreciate it over 5 years rather than deduct it all at once. Also, this only works if you're self-employed or a contractor - if you're a W-2 employee, unfortunately those deductions aren't allowed right now due to tax law changes. One tip: before going the tax deduction route, check if your employer offers any home office stipends or equipment reimbursement programs. Many companies have started offering these for remote workers, and getting reimbursed directly is often simpler than dealing with tax deductions!
This is really helpful! I'm in a similar situation where I built a PC for gaming but now need it for my new remote job. Quick question - when you say "depreciate it over 5 years," does that mean I can only deduct 1/5 of the business percentage each year? So if it's 50% business use of a $2,200 PC, I'd deduct $220 per year for 5 years instead of $1,100 all at once? Also, do I need to start the depreciation from when I first bought the PC, or from when I started using it for work? I bought mine in February but didn't start the job until recently.
Exactly right! If your PC costs $2,200 and you use it 50% for business, you'd depreciate $1,100 over 5 years, which works out to $220 per year (using straight-line depreciation). The IRS requires this for equipment over $2,500, though some argue it applies to lower amounts too. For the timing, you'd start depreciation from when you first began using it for work purposes, not when you originally bought it. So if you bought it in February but started your job last week, the depreciation would begin from when you started working. This is called "placed in service" date for business use. Just make sure to keep good records of when you started using it for work and track your usage percentages going forward. A simple log showing work hours vs. gaming time will help support your deduction if the IRS ever asks questions.
Great question! Since you built the PC before starting your job, you can still potentially deduct the business portion, but there are some important things to keep in mind. First, you'll need to determine what percentage of time you use the computer for work versus gaming. If you're working part-time and also gaming regularly, you might be looking at something like 30-40% business use. Whatever percentage you claim, make sure you can document it with actual usage tracking. Since your PC cost $2,200, you'll likely need to depreciate it over 5 years rather than taking the full deduction at once. So if you determine 40% business use, that's $880 depreciated over 5 years, or about $176 per year. The depreciation would start from when you began using it for work (last week), not when you originally purchased it. This is called the "placed in service" date for business purposes. One important caveat: if you're a W-2 employee, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated most unreimbursed employee expense deductions through 2025. These deductions are only available if you're self-employed or an independent contractor filing Schedule C. Before going the deduction route, I'd suggest checking with your employer about any home office stipends or equipment reimbursement programs - many companies offer these now for remote workers and it's often simpler than tax deductions!
Has anyone actually calculated if the annualized income method is better than just paying the penalty? I spent like 6 hours doing all that Schedule AI paperwork last year just to save about $120 in penalties. Sometimes I wonder if all that effort is worth it vs just paying the penalty.
The penalty calculation really depends on your specific situation. For larger Roth conversions, the penalties can be substantial - I've seen cases where people owed $1,000+ in penalties for conversions over $100k. A quick way to estimate if it's worth the effort: the penalty is generally calculated at about 8% annually (varies by quarter) on the underpayment amount. So if you converted $50k and should have made a $12,500 estimated payment in Q4, you might owe around $300-500 in penalties depending on timing. The annualized income method on Form 2210 Schedule AI isn't actually that complicated once you understand it - you're just showing the IRS that your income came in December only, so you shouldn't owe penalties for earlier quarters when you had zero income. If the penalty is more than $200-300, it's usually worth the 2-3 hours to complete the form properly. Pro tip: You can also request first-time penalty abatement if you've had clean compliance history for the past 3 years, which might be easier than the paperwork route.
This is really helpful context! I'm dealing with a $75k Roth conversion from December 2023, so the penalties could definitely be significant. Your breakdown of the 8% penalty calculation helps me understand why I'm looking at potentially $800+ in penalties. I think I'll try the annualized income method first since it seems like the most straightforward approach for my situation - literally zero income until December. If that doesn't work out, I can always fall back on the first-time penalty abatement option you mentioned. Quick question though - when you say "clean compliance history for the past 3 years," does that mean no penalties at all, or just no major issues? I had a small late filing penalty two years ago but paid it immediately when I got the notice.
Austin Leonard
I found another key difference - timing. Bank account bonuses typically require you to keep money deposited for a certain period (like 90 days), which is why it's considered interest - you're being paid for the use of your money over time. Credit card rewards are instant - you make a purchase and get the reward immediately as a percentage back. Makes it clearer why the IRS views them differently.
0 coins
Anita George
ā¢That actually makes a lot of sense! I never thought about the time factor. So the bank is basically renting my money for 3 months and paying me for it, while credit card rewards are just immediate discounts. Finally an explanation that clicks for me lol
0 coins
GalaxyGuardian
This is such a common confusion and you're definitely not alone in being surprised by those 1099-INT forms! I went through the same thing last year with a Bank of America bonus. The key thing to understand is that the IRS looks at the underlying economic substance of these transactions. When you get a bank account bonus, you're essentially being paid interest for allowing the bank to use your deposited funds - even if it's just the minimum amount to keep the account open. That's why it's reported as interest income on Form 1099-INT. Credit card rewards are fundamentally different because they're tied to your spending activity. When you get 2% cash back on groceries, the IRS views this as you effectively paying 98% of the original price, not as you receiving separate income. It's a price adjustment, not compensation. For your $700 in bank bonuses, yes, you'll need to report this as taxable income on your return. The good news is that if you're in a lower tax bracket, the actual tax owed might not be too painful. Just make sure to keep those 1099-INT forms for your records!
0 coins
Cedric Chung
ā¢This is really helpful, thank you! I'm still wrapping my head around the "economic substance" concept. So even though both the bank bonus and credit card rewards are technically money coming back to me, the IRS cares more about WHY I'm getting the money rather than just the fact that I'm getting it? One follow-up question - what if I immediately withdrew the bank bonus after getting it and closed the account? Would that still be considered "allowing the bank to use my funds" if I only kept the minimum balance for like a week?
0 coins