IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone here actually tried claiming the childcare credit for a babysitter rather than a daycare? My tax guy told me last year I couldn't claim it unless the childcare provider had a tax ID number or something?

0 coins

Sofia Peña

•

Your tax guy is wrong. You absolutely CAN claim the Child and Dependent Care Credit for a babysitter or nanny. They just need to provide their Social Security Number, and you need to report it on Form 2441 when you file your taxes. The provider doesn't need to have a business tax ID.

0 coins

Luca Romano

•

I just went through this exact situation last year with my regular babysitter! At $250/week, you're looking at about $13,000 annually, which means you'll definitely need to handle the household employer responsibilities that others have mentioned. One thing I wish I'd known earlier - you can actually start withholding the employee portion of Social Security and Medicare taxes from your babysitter's pay (if they agree), which makes things easier at tax time for both of you. Otherwise, you're responsible for paying both the employer AND employee portions yourself. For the Child and Dependent Care Credit, I was able to claim the full amount I paid my babysitter. Just make sure to get their SSN early on and keep detailed records of all payments with dates. I used a simple spreadsheet to track everything. The credit was worth about $1,050 for me, which definitely helped offset some of those employer tax costs! Also, don't forget you might need to pay state unemployment insurance depending on where you live. Each state has different thresholds, so check your state's requirements too.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to all this tax stuff and feeling pretty overwhelmed. Just to make sure I understand - when you say I need to withhold Social Security and Medicare taxes, does that mean I need to calculate those percentages myself and send them to the IRS quarterly? Or is there some kind of system that helps with this? Also, did you have any issues getting your babysitter to agree to the withholding versus you just paying the full amount yourself?

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

Great question! I went through this exact same confusion when I started my rental property business. The de minimis safe harbor is definitely a game-changer for small landlords dealing with furniture and equipment purchases. One thing I learned the hard way: make sure you're consistent with your election each year. I forgot to include the election statement one year and had to amend my return because I'd already deducted items as expenses instead of depreciating them. The IRS wants to see that formal election language even though it seems like just a formality. Also, keep in mind that if you have a particularly good year and think you might benefit more from spreading deductions over time, you can choose NOT to make the election. It's not required - it's just an option that's usually beneficial for most small landlords. For your specific furniture purchases, document everything well. I use a simple spreadsheet with columns for date, item, cost, and which unit it's for. Makes tax time much easier and gives you solid backup if there are ever questions.

0 coins

Olivia Harris

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm new to rental property investing and had no idea about the election statement requirement. When you say "formal election language," do you mean I need to use the exact wording that Beth mentioned earlier ("de minimis safe harbor election under Reg. 1.263(a)-1(f)") or is there other specific language the IRS expects to see? Also, I'm curious about your point on choosing not to make the election in good years - wouldn't you always want to deduct expenses immediately rather than depreciate over time? Are there situations where depreciation actually works out better tax-wise?

0 coins

Yes, you'll want to use the exact language Beth mentioned: "de minimis safe harbor election under Reg. 1.263(a)-1(f)" - the IRS is pretty specific about this wording. I usually include it as a statement attached to my return that says something like "Taxpayer elects to apply the de minimis safe harbor under Treasury Regulation 1.263(a)-1(f) for the tax year." As for when you might NOT want immediate deduction - it's rare, but there are scenarios. For example, if you're in a very high tax bracket this year but expect to be in a lower bracket next year, spreading depreciation might work better. Or if you're already showing a big loss on your rental activities and additional deductions won't provide immediate tax benefit due to passive activity loss limitations. But honestly, for most small landlords, immediate expensing through de minimis is almost always the better choice since it simplifies bookkeeping and gives you the cash flow benefit right away.

0 coins

Amara Okafor

•

I just wanted to add something that might help other newcomers like me - make sure you understand the difference between "per item" and "per invoice" when applying the $2,500 threshold. I almost made a mistake on this! I bought a dining set for my rental that was listed as one "item" on the receipt for $3,200, but it was actually a table ($1,800) and 4 chairs ($350 each). Initially I thought the whole thing was over the limit, but my accountant explained that each physically separate piece counts as its own item for de minimis purposes. So the table at $1,800 qualified, and each chair at $350 qualified separately. This saved me from having to depreciate the entire dining set over 7 years! Just thought this might help someone else avoid the same confusion. Also, for anyone wondering about the election statement - I used the exact wording mentioned earlier and included it as a separate attachment to my Schedule E. Worked perfectly and no issues from the IRS.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for all the detailed explanations! This has been super helpful. I was definitely mixing up the self-employment tax with regular income tax, and I had no idea about the form changes either. Just to make sure I understand correctly: my Box 3 income from the 1099-MISC will just be added to my other income and taxed at whatever bracket I end up in based on my total income for the year, right? So if I'm in the 22% bracket, that's what I'll pay on this income too? And @Cameron Black, thanks for mentioning the AGI impact - I hadn't thought about that at all. I should probably look into increasing my IRA contribution this year to help offset some of it. This community is amazing for breaking down confusing tax stuff!

0 coins

Micah Trail

•

Yes, you've got it exactly right! Your Box 3 income gets added to all your other income, and then you pay tax based on whatever bracket that total puts you in. So if your total income lands you in the 22% bracket, that Box 3 income will be taxed at 22%. Just remember that tax brackets are progressive though - so you won't pay 22% on ALL your income, just the portion that falls into that bracket. The first chunks of your income still get taxed at the lower rates (10%, 12%, etc.). And definitely smart thinking about the IRA contribution! That's one of the easiest ways to bring down your AGI and potentially keep yourself in a lower bracket or preserve eligibility for credits and deductions.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

This thread has been incredibly educational! As someone who's been filing taxes for years but never really understood the nuances between different 1099 forms, I learned so much here. One thing I want to add for anyone else reading this: if you're unsure about your specific situation, it's worth checking Publication 525 (Taxable and Nontaxable Income) on the IRS website. It has detailed explanations of how different types of income reported in Box 3 should be treated. Also, if you received Box 3 income for something like a legal settlement or insurance payment, there might be additional considerations since some of those can be partially or fully excludable from income. The nature of the payment really matters for tax treatment. @Natalie Chen - sounds like you've got a good handle on it now, but don't hesitate to consult a tax professional if the amount is substantial enough to significantly impact your tax situation. Sometimes the peace of mind is worth the cost!

0 coins

Cass Green

•

Just wanted to add some clarity on the small employer aspect that Lincoln mentioned - this is actually really important for your situation! Since your company has under 50 employees, they're not subject to the ACA employer mandate, which means they're not required to offer coverage that meets the affordability and minimum value standards. This is huge for determining whether you need to repay your premium tax credits. Even if your employer did offer some kind of health insurance during those three months, it likely wouldn't qualify as "affordable coverage" under ACA rules unless it specifically met those strict federal standards (which most small employer plans don't). The fact that your HR person said you "missed enrollment" and had to wait also suggests their plan might not have been continuously available to you anyway. If coverage wasn't actually available during those months when you had ACA insurance, then there's no overlap issue at all. I'd suggest asking your employer two specific questions: 1) Was health insurance coverage available to me during [specific months]? and 2) Did that coverage meet ACA affordability and minimum value standards? Most small employers won't even know what those standards are, which is telling. Without proper documentation showing you had access to qualifying employer coverage during those months, you should be able to keep your premium tax credits.

0 coins

This is really helpful context! I'm dealing with a similar situation at my small company (about 35 employees). When I asked HR about the ACA standards, they had no idea what I was talking about. They just said "we offer health insurance" but couldn't tell me anything about affordability calculations or minimum value requirements. It sounds like for small employers, the burden is really on us to prove that their coverage actually met federal standards, rather than assuming it did just because it existed. That's a pretty important distinction that I don't think most people realize. @Theodore Nelson - given that your company is under 50 employees and seems to have similar HR challenges, this might be the key to your whole situation. The absence of Box 12 DD combined with being a small employer that likely doesn t'understand ACA compliance requirements could work in your favor here.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

This is exactly the kind of situation where having a small employer actually works in your favor! I went through something very similar last year with my company (about 40 employees) and discovered that most small employers have no clue about ACA compliance requirements. The key insight from Lincoln and Cass is spot-on - small employers under 50 employees aren't required to offer ACA-compliant coverage, and most don't even understand what that means. When I asked my HR person about affordability standards (coverage costing less than 9.61% of household income) and minimum value requirements (covering 60% of healthcare costs), they looked at me like I was speaking a foreign language. Here's what I learned: just because your employer offers "health insurance" doesn't automatically make it qualifying coverage under ACA rules. For your premium tax credit repayment calculation, what matters is whether the employer coverage met both the affordability test AND the minimum value standard during those overlap months. Given that your company's HR situation sounds chaotic (missing enrollment deadlines, no plan communications, telling you to wait), it's highly unlikely they were offering properly structured ACA-compliant coverage anyway. The absence of Box 12 DD combined with no 1095-C forms is actually pretty telling. I'd recommend documenting your attempts to get information from your employer and keeping records of their responses (or lack thereof). In my case, their inability to provide basic plan details was evidence that the coverage didn't meet federal standards, and I was able to keep my premium tax credits.

0 coins

Paolo Longo

•

Direct deposit timing has been pretty consistent for me over the past three tax seasons. The deposit hit my account within 24 hours of the date shown on my transcript (the date next to code 846). The WMR tool is usually a day behind the actual transcript information. I'd recommend checking both if possible. If your WMR shows approved today, there's a good chance your transcript already has a specific deposit date listed.

0 coins

Just wanted to share my timeline from this year - I got the "Refund Approved" status on WMR last Tuesday and the money hit my checking account Thursday morning, so exactly 2 business days. I bank with a local credit union and they typically post ACH transfers early in the morning. One thing I learned from previous years is to check your account transcript if you can access it online - it usually shows the actual deposit date (code 846) which is more reliable than the WMR tool. Also, since you mentioned planning for summer activities, I'd personally wait until the money is actually in your account before scheduling any automatic payments, just to be safe. Good luck!

0 coins

Prev1...29532954295529562957...5644Next