IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Salim Nasir

•

Has anyone used TurboTax Self-Employed for estimated taxes? Their website says it can help calculate quarterly payments but I'm not sure if it's worth paying for the full year just to figure out my AGI for estimated taxes.

0 coins

Hazel Garcia

•

I've used it for the past two years. It's decent for the annual return but not great for quarterly estimates with variable income. It basically just divides your annual estimate by four, which doesn't help when your income fluctuates a lot. I ended up building my own spreadsheet anyway.

0 coins

Great thread! As someone who made the same transition from W-2 to freelance last year, I can share what worked for me. The key thing I learned is that AGI calculation for estimated taxes is actually pretty straightforward once you break it down: Your AGI = Total Income - Business Expenses - Self-Employment Tax Deduction - Other Above-the-Line Deductions For variable income, I use what I call the "true-up method" each quarter: 1. Calculate my actual year-to-date AGI based on real numbers 2. Project what my full-year AGI will be based on current trends 3. Calculate the tax on that projection 4. Subtract what I've already paid in estimates 5. Pay 25% of the remaining balance (since there are 4 quarters) This keeps me from overpaying early in the year when income is low or underpaying when I have a good month. The IRS doesn't care if your payments are uneven as long as you hit the safe harbor amounts by year-end. Also, don't forget that as a freelancer, you can deduct things like your home office, business phone, professional development, and even some meals if they're business-related. These all reduce your AGI and lower your estimated tax burden.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where we have a client who changed their plan year mid-stream, resulting in both a short plan year (5 months) and a full plan year that need to be reported on the same Form 720. One thing I wanted to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure you're also keeping detailed records of which calculation method you used for each period and why. We had an audit a few years back where the IRS wanted to see our justification for choosing the snapshot method versus actual count method, especially for the shorter period. Also, if you're using different methods for each period (which is allowed), document that clearly. For example, we used actual count for our short plan year because we had complete monthly data, but snapshot for the full year due to some data gaps. The IRS was fine with this approach as long as we could show our reasoning. The documentation suggestion from ApolloJackson about attaching an explanation sheet is spot on - it saved us a lot of back-and-forth when questions came up later.

0 coins

This is really valuable advice about documentation! I'm new to handling PCORI fees and hadn't thought about justifying the calculation method choices. Quick question - when you say you used different methods for each period, did you have to explain why the data limitations were different between the short and full plan years? I'm wondering if the IRS expects consistency in methodology or if they're okay with using whatever works best for each specific period.

0 coins

Great question! The IRS is actually quite flexible about using different calculation methods for different periods, as long as you can justify why each method was most appropriate for that specific situation. In our case, we explained that for the short plan year, we had complete monthly enrollment records from our new system, making the actual count method straightforward and accurate. However, for the full plan year, we had some months where the data was incomplete due to a system transition, so the snapshot method was more reliable. The key is documenting your reasoning clearly. We included a brief explanation like "Short plan year: Used actual count method due to complete monthly enrollment data availability. Full plan year: Used snapshot method due to data gaps in months 3-5 caused by system migration." The auditor appreciated the transparency and had no issues with the mixed approach. The IRS guidance actually encourages using whichever method gives you the most accurate count for each period, so don't feel locked into one approach across all periods if your data situation varies.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar scenario where our client has both a 6-month short plan year and a full 12-month plan year that need to be reported together. One additional consideration I wanted to mention - if you're working with a self-funded client like the original poster, make sure they understand the payment timing. Even though you're filing both periods on the same Form 720, the payment is still due by July 31st for both periods. I've seen clients get confused thinking they have separate due dates for each plan year period. Also, for anyone using the snapshot method for their calculations, remember that you need to pick consistent dates within each plan year period. So if you're taking snapshots on the 15th of each month for your full plan year, stick with the 15th for all months in that period, and then you can choose different snapshot dates for the short plan year if that works better with your data. The advice about detailed documentation is spot on - I always create a simple spreadsheet showing the calculation for each period separately, then attach it to the Form 720. It makes everything much clearer if questions arise later.

0 coins

Tax strategist vs. CPA - which is better for high net worth tax planning?

I'm handling the books for a business owner with a complex financial setup, and we've been on a CPA merry-go-round for years that's driving me nuts. We've cycled through 4 different CPAs in about 7 years. The first change happened when annual tax prep costs shot above $80k and the owner wanted someone new. Then we had a highly recommended CPA go on maternity leave, only for her firm to get acquired. Her replacement had zero experience with high net worth individuals or equity investments, resulting in amended returns. Then we got assigned someone with more experience, but they jacked up our fees by $25k out of nowhere. This was all before COVID hit. Next we found this amazing local partner who specialized in high net worth clients with equity investments, but of course, one of her clients poached her. Go figure! 😭 Our current CPA is... fine. They can enter data correctly, but when it comes to proactive tax strategy? Total dud. Meanwhile, our effective tax rate keeps climbing: 20% (2020), 25% (2021), 30% (2022), and we're looking at 32% for 2023. The boss wants yet another CPA, but our organization structure is so complicated that it takes new CPAs 1-2 years just to understand how all our entities connect and how revenue flows through. When I asked our current CPA about strategic planning, they basically said "that's not our job" - they'll evaluate strategies if we bring them, but won't proactively suggest "You should do X to save money." Our tax bill is now in the 7 figures, and even though it's not MY money, it's painful to see it go out the door without optimization. I DO NOT want to switch CPA firms again. Every transition means a year of me explaining everything, catching them up, and figuring out why they're making adjusting entries for credit cards that don't even exist! 🤬 Has anyone worked with a dedicated tax strategist? Will they collaborate with our existing CPA rather than replacing them? Is the expense worth it?

Yara Sayegh

•

With a 7-figure tax bill, have you considered family office services? Several wealth management firms offer comprehensive tax strategy as part of their family office packages. They coordinate everything including working with your existing CPA. We made the switch two years ago and our tax rate dropped by 6% the first year. They implemented strategies around timing of income recognition, charitable remainder trusts, and opportunity zone investments that our CPA had never suggested.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Family office services usually require $100M+ in assets though, right? Or are there more accessible options for the mere $10-50M crowd?

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

Based on your situation, I'd strongly recommend going the tax strategist route rather than switching CPAs again. You're absolutely right that the constant CPA churn is counterproductive - it takes them forever to understand complex structures, and you lose all that institutional knowledge each time. A good tax strategist will work collaboratively with your current CPA. Think of it as division of labor: the strategist identifies opportunities and creates the roadmap, your CPA handles the compliance and execution. This way you keep the relationship that already understands your entity structure while adding the proactive planning piece that's missing. With your effective rate climbing from 20% to 32% and a 7-figure tax bill, even a modest improvement could easily justify the strategist's fees. Look for someone who specializes in equity investments and multi-entity structures specifically - they should be able to show you concrete examples of strategies they've implemented for similar clients. The key is finding someone who provides detailed implementation guidance with IRS code citations, not just vague suggestions. Your CPA will be much more receptive to executing strategies when they have clear legal backing and step-by-step instructions.

0 coins

Chloe Harris

•

has anyone ever had their wfh stipend audited? i'm getting $200/mo but honestly my internet is only $65 and i don't really spend much on supplies. kinda worried im going to get in trouble someday but also my company doesn't ask for receipts?

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

If your company doesn't ask for receipts and just adds the stipend to your paycheck, it's almost certainly being treated as taxable income. In that case, you don't need to worry about an audit related to those expenses - the money is already being taxed as regular income. It would be like worrying about getting audited for how you spend your salary.

0 coins

Emma Morales

•

This is such a timely question! I'm dealing with something similar and want to share what I've learned through research and talking to my HR department. The key thing to understand is that there are really two different approaches companies can take with WFH stipends, and they have very different tax implications: 1. **Taxable stipend/allowance**: The company just adds the money to your paycheck. This gets taxed as regular income, and since most of us are W-2 employees, we can't deduct the home office expenses to offset it (thanks to the TCJA changes through 2025). 2. **Accountable plan reimbursement**: You submit receipts/documentation for actual expenses, and the company reimburses you. This isn't considered taxable income. To figure out which one you have, look at your paystub. If you see the $250 listed in your gross wages, it's option 1. If it doesn't appear there at all, your company likely has an accountable plan set up. One thing I'd recommend is keeping detailed records of your actual home office expenses regardless of how your company handles it. Even if you can't deduct them now as a W-2 employee, it's good documentation to have, and tax laws could change in the future. Plus, if you ever transition to freelance/contract work, you'll want that history!

0 coins

I'm SO ANGRY right now! I finally got through to SBTPG yesterday after calling 800-901-6663 and waiting for 1 hour and 22 minutes. The agent confirmed my refund had been sitting in their system since April 2nd, but there was a "verification hold" they never notified me about! They released it immediately after I called and my bank showed the deposit this morning. Don't give up - keep calling until you get answers!

0 coins

Evelyn Xu

•

I feel your frustration - went through the same nightmare last month! After reading through all these suggestions, here's what finally worked for me: I called 800-901-6663 at 7:58 AM Eastern (right before they opened) and selected option 1. The key was having ALL my information ready - SSN, exact refund amount, filing date, and the dates from my IRS transcript showing when they sent the refund to SBTPG. When I got through after about 45 minutes, I calmly explained that my refund had been with them for over a week and I needed to know the specific reason for the delay. Turns out there was a "manual review flag" that required a supervisor to clear. The rep escalated it immediately and I had my money 2 days later. Don't let them give you vague answers - ask for specifics about what's holding up YOUR money. You've got this!

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of detailed advice I needed! I'm definitely going to try calling right at 7:58 AM tomorrow with all my documentation ready. Quick question - when you mentioned the IRS transcript showing dates, did you get that from the IRS website or did you have to request it separately? I want to make sure I have everything they might ask for before I call. Thanks for sharing your success story - it gives me hope that I can get this resolved!

0 coins

Prev1...29042905290629072908...5643Next