TurboTax won't always let you e-file a 1040-X even if it's just Schedule D changes. It depends on the specific situation and tax year. I tried to e-file an amendment for my 2019 taxes (in 2022) and the system forced me to paper file because of some limitation with Schedule D amendments for that specific tax year. But when I did a 2020 amendment with Schedule D changes, it let me e-file with no problem.

I just went through this exact situation last month! Had to amend my 2023 return for some incorrect cost basis reporting on Schedule D. TurboTax handled it perfectly through their amendment workflow. The key thing is to make sure you use TurboTax's "Amend a Return" feature rather than trying to create a new return. It will pull up your original return, let you make the Schedule D corrections, and then generate a proper 1040-X that only includes the changed information. When I e-filed mine, the IRS only received the 1040-X form and the corrected Schedule D - no other unnecessary forms. The whole process took about 10 weeks to get processed, which seems pretty standard based on what others have mentioned here. One heads up though - TurboTax will charge you an additional fee for the amendment (I think it was around $40-50), but honestly it was worth it for the peace of mind knowing everything was filed correctly electronically.

Something no one's mentioned yet - as a full-time student with self-employment income, you might qualify for the American Opportunity Tax Credit or Lifetime Learning Credit. These education credits can significantly reduce your tax bill!

As someone who's been tutoring for a few years now, I can confirm everything others have said about this being self-employment income. One thing I wish I'd known earlier - keep a simple spreadsheet tracking each tutoring session with date, student name (or initials for privacy), hours worked, and amount paid. This makes tax filing SO much easier. Also, since you're making good money from tutoring, consider setting aside about 25-30% of each payment in a separate savings account for taxes. Between federal income tax and self-employment tax, you'll owe a decent chunk. Having it already saved prevents the shock at tax time! The Roth IRA opportunity is huge - definitely take advantage of that. Starting retirement savings in college puts you way ahead of most people. You can contribute for 2023 until the tax filing deadline (usually April 15th), so you still have time to make that contribution if you want.

Has anyone considered that this might actually be intentional by the IRS? By sending refunds instead of applying them as requested, they create situations where people either have to scramble to make estimated payments or potentially face penalties later. Just saying...

I went through this exact same situation last year and it was incredibly frustrating! The IRS processed my return incorrectly despite me clearly marking the box to apply my overpayment to estimated taxes. Here's what I learned: Don't cash the check yet. Call the IRS directly (yes, the wait times are awful, but it's worth it) and explain that they sent you a refund check when you specifically requested the overpayment be applied to your 2024 estimated taxes. Have your Social Security number and the exact amount ready. When I called, the representative was able to see my original election on the return and confirmed it was their processing error. They had me write "VOID" across the check and mail it back with a letter explaining the situation. About 6 weeks later, I received confirmation that the amount had been properly applied to my estimated tax account. The key thing is that they noted in my file that this was their error, so there were no penalties for the "late" estimated payment. Keep detailed records of everything - your original return, the refund check, any correspondence with the IRS, and notes from phone calls including dates and representative names if possible. It's definitely their mistake, not yours, so don't let them try to penalize you for it later!

Ugh this is so frustrating! I filed on 1/20 too and got accepted the same day but still no advance. The whole "minutes after acceptance" thing feels like false advertising at this point. Really considering switching to a different service next year if they can't get their act together 😤

Been dealing with the exact same thing! Filed 1/19, accepted 1/21, and still waiting on my advance. Called CK support twice and got different answers each time - first they said "technical issues" then "additional verification needed." Really wish they'd be more transparent about what's actually causing these delays instead of keeping us in the dark. At this point I'm just hoping it shows up before the weekend 🤞

This thread is super interesting. I'm doing a taxation course and we just covered this topic. One thing not mentioned yet is that some businesses have tried to work around 280E by separating their business into multiple entities - one that "trafficks" and another that provides other services. For example, a dispensary might create one business that only buys/sells product (subject to 280E but can deduct COGS) and a separate consulting/education business that provides advice to customers (not subject to 280E, so can deduct all ordinary business expenses). The IRS has challenged these arrangements with mixed results. Has anyone looked into the success rate of these types of structures?

This is such a great breakdown of a really confusing area of tax law! I'm actually a CPA and I still have clients ask me about this all the time, especially with the growth of state-legal cannabis businesses. One thing I'd add is that the COGS vs. other expenses distinction can get really murky in practice. For example, trimming labor for cannabis can sometimes be considered part of COGS (as it's part of preparing the product for sale) but sometimes it's treated as a non-deductible operating expense. The IRS has been inconsistent on where exactly to draw these lines. I've seen businesses spend thousands on tax attorneys just to figure out how to properly categorize expenses under 280E. It's one of those areas where the law is clear in theory but gets incredibly complex when you try to apply it to real-world business operations. The constitutional reasoning behind allowing COGS deductions is solid, but the practical implementation creates a lot of gray areas that businesses have to navigate very carefully.