IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

401k Rollover Error with Pre-tax, After-tax, and Roth Conversion - Need Advice!

Title: 401k Rollover Error with Pre-tax, After-tax, and Roth Conversion - Need Advice! 1 Back in February this year, I ran into a mess with my 401k rollover from Fidelity (my old employer's provider) to Vanguard. I opened both a traditional IRA and Roth IRA at Vanguard, expecting to properly distribute my pre-tax and after-tax contributions. The Fidelity site only allowed rolling over the entire amount to one destination account (couldn't split it up). I called Fidelity beforehand since I had both pre-tax and after-tax contributions, and it didn't make sense to dump everything into just a traditional IRA. The rep told me their system limitation meant they'd need to send two separate checks - one to Vanguard for the pre-tax portion, and they'd mail the after-tax (non-taxable portion) check directly to me. What actually happened? They sent ONE check with EVERYTHING to Vanguard, completely ignoring what we discussed. Before I could intervene, Vanguard deposited the entire amount into my traditional IRA. I've spent the last several months going back and forth with both companies. Eventually, I gave up on getting Vanguard to fix it on their end despite showing them documentation that it should've been two separate checks. Instead, I did a Roth conversion to move the non-taxable amount (shown on my Fidelity statement) to my Roth IRA. I even contacted the IRS directly, though that was frustrating - the agent was really hard to understand and quite rude. From what I gathered, he said I should note on my tax form that part of the conversion is non-taxable and include supporting documentation. This whole situation has me so anxious that I haven't invested any of this money yet - it's just sitting in both accounts because I'm worried investments would complicate things further with gains/losses. My questions: 1) Vanguard likely won't properly code my Roth conversion to show it was moving non-taxable money to a Roth IRA. Despite ongoing conversations, they're not being helpful. If they don't code it correctly by year-end, I'm concerned about explaining to the IRS that this conversion should be tax-free since I already paid taxes on that portion. I normally file digitally myself, but should I find an accountant for this mess? 2) Vanguard added a 4% match to my conversion. Since everything initially went into my traditional IRA, that match is there too. If they had done this correctly from the start, would there have been a 4% match to my Roth IRA as well? Would I pay taxes on this match regardless of which account it's in? Or would I pay taxes on the match now if in Roth vs. later in retirement if in traditional? 3) I spoke with someone at PricewaterhouseCoopers (not a tax expert but knowledgeable) who suggested I should also convert the gains from my after-tax contributions. Currently, the non-taxable amount rolled over is just my contribution. I always thought these were Roth contributions but recently learned they're after-tax but not Roth. He thinks I should calculate the proportional gains from my after-tax contributions and convert those to Roth too. I'd pay taxes on the gains now, but they could grow tax-free. Is this advisable? I'm looking to hire a tax professional for this. I called one firm whose representative thought I need to get Vanguard to code this correctly before year-end. I'm trying to discuss this with Vanguard again but don't have much hope. They don't even have a phone number, so I'm limited to email and chat. Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

21 One important thing nobody's mentioned yet - you need to be VERY careful about timing with these rollover corrections. IRS rules give you 60 days from when funds are distributed to get them into the right account type before it counts as a taxable event. It sounds like you're well past that window now. The good news is that your Roth conversion of the after-tax amount is probably the right move given the circumstances. Just make sure you keep meticulous records showing: 1. The original 401k statement showing pre-tax vs. after-tax balances 2. The rollover documentation 3. The Roth conversion paperwork 4. Any communications with Fidelity or Vanguard about the error Also, consider asking Vanguard for a "corrected" 1099-R at tax time if they code it wrong initially. They may not do it, but it's worth requesting.

0 coins

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

1 That's a great point about the 60-day window! I'm definitely past that now since this all started in February. Would this affect how I need to handle the taxes differently? And have you ever successfully gotten a company to issue a corrected 1099-R? Vanguard has been so unhelpful so far that I'm not optimistic.

0 coins

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

21 Since you're past the 60-day window, your approach of doing the Roth conversion was exactly right - it's essentially a "fix" that works within the current tax rules. The 60-day rule would have applied if you were trying to get the money physically returned and then redeposited correctly. I have successfully received a corrected 1099-R, but it took persistence. The key is to talk specifically to their tax reporting department (not general customer service) and clearly explain that the current coding is factually incorrect. Reference specific IRS publications like Publication 590-A regarding rollovers with after-tax contributions. It's definitely worth trying, but prepare your Form 8606 correctly regardless of whether they fix their 1099-R.

0 coins

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

4 Has anyone here dealt with the pro-rata rule calculation for partial Roth conversions? I've got a similar situation where I need to determine how much of my after-tax 401k earnings should be converted vs. kept in traditional. Is it better to convert all at once or spread it out over multiple tax years?

0 coins

Gabriel Graham

โ€ข

8 The pro-rata rule only applies when you have a mix of pre-tax and after-tax money in IRAs. The basic calculation is: (after-tax amounts รท total IRA balance) ร— conversion amount = non-taxable portion. Generally, if you're in a lower tax bracket now than you expect to be later, converting more at once makes sense. If you expect to be in a lower bracket in future years, spreading conversions out could save on taxes. For after-tax 401k earnings specifically, you'll pay taxes now if you convert them to Roth, or later if you keep them traditional. The main advantage of converting is that all future growth becomes tax-free, not just the original earnings.

0 coins

Gianni Serpent

โ€ข

15 The timing decision really depends on your current vs expected future tax brackets. One strategy I've seen work well is to convert just enough each year to "fill up" your current tax bracket without pushing you into the next one. For your specific situation with after-tax 401k earnings, you might want to run the numbers both ways. Calculate what you'd pay in taxes now on those earnings versus what you might pay in retirement (considering that traditional IRA withdrawals are taxed as ordinary income, not capital gains). Also keep in mind that Roth conversions can affect other tax situations - like IRMAA surcharges for Medicare if you're near retirement age, or impact on financial aid if you have kids in college. The "all at once vs. spread out" decision isn't just about tax rates.

0 coins

Natasha Volkov

โ€ข

ur lucky ur even seeing a blue box mine still says not found ๐Ÿ˜ญ

0 coins

Javier Torres

โ€ข

same boat fam we out here struggling ๐Ÿคก

0 coins

Amara Okafor

โ€ข

I'm in the same situation - blue box since Jan 12th and still waiting! From what I've read on the KY revenue site, they're running about 10-14 business days right now due to higher volume this season. Try not to stress too much, you're definitely still in the normal window. I've been checking daily but trying to be patient ๐Ÿ˜…

0 coins

Lauren Zeb

โ€ข

Anyone recommend a good mileage tracking app for next year? Getting my first 1099K and realizing I should have been tracking miles all along but have no idea where to start. Simple is better for me!

0 coins

I use MileIQ and it's pretty automatic - just swipe drives as business or personal. Around $60/year but worth it for the deduction. Stride is free but more manual. Both export nice reports for your 1099-K related driving work.

0 coins

Alina Rosenthal

โ€ข

Great thread! As someone who went through this exact situation two years ago, I'd add a few things that really helped me. First, don't panic about the 1099-K - it's just documentation of what you already earned. One thing that caught me off guard was that you need to keep really detailed records for mileage deductions. I recommend starting a simple log right now with date, starting/ending locations, miles driven, and purpose (like "drove for rideshare"). You can even use your phone to take photos of your odometer readings. Also, since you mentioned you've been keeping some receipts but not in an organized way - now's a great time to set up a simple system. I use a shoebox method: one folder for gas receipts, one for maintenance, one for other car-related expenses. Makes tax time so much easier! For the quarterly payments, a rough rule of thumb is to set aside about 25-30% of your gig earnings in a separate savings account. Better to overpay slightly than get hit with penalties. The IRS has a safe harbor rule where if you pay 100% of last year's tax liability through quarterly payments, you won't owe penalties even if you end up owing more.

0 coins

Jake Sinclair

โ€ข

Have you considered filing Form 911 (Taxpayer Advocate Service Application)? While you're right that they typically won't accept cases until after the 120-day review period, there are exceptions for documented financial hardship. What constitutes hardship? Potential eviction, utility disconnection, inability to purchase medication, or similar circumstances. You'll need documentation proving the hardship. Another effective approach is requesting a manager when calling the IRS. Ask specifically for a manager review of your case, citing the extended timeframe. They can sometimes expedite reviews that have exceeded normal processing times. What documentation did you submit with your congressman inquiry?

0 coins

Grant Vikers

โ€ข

This is incredibly helpful information - thank you for sharing your detailed timeline! I'm currently on day 78 of my review and was starting to panic that something was seriously wrong. Your experience with the employer reporting error is particularly relevant since I suspect that might be my issue too. My previous employer went through a payroll system change mid-year and I'm wondering if that caused reporting discrepancies. A few questions for you: When you contacted your congressman's office, did you need to provide specific forms or just explain your situation? Also, did the Tax Advocate actually help resolve your case faster, or was it more about getting information about what was happening? I'm trying to decide if I should start the congressman process now at day 78 or wait until I hit the full 120 days. Given that you didn't get your refund until November even after involving your congressman in September, I'm wondering if there's any real advantage to starting earlier. Thanks again for taking the time to document this whole process - it's exactly what people like me need to hear when we're stuck in IRS limbo!

0 coins

Andre Dupont

โ€ข

With 0 exemptions, your still getting hit with a penalty because of the captial gains + 1099 income. When i had a similar situation, i checked the box for "multiple jobs" on my W-4 AND put an extra $100 per paycheck in the additional withholding section (line 4c). haven't had a penalty since. Also you might qualify for first-time penalty abatement if this is your first penalty. Call the IRS and ask. they waived mine completetly!

0 coins

Zoe Papadakis

โ€ข

I did something similar but estimated quarterly payments for my freelance income saved me from the penalty. For the OP - If you expect to owe more than $1,000 when you file, quarterly payments are the way to go.

0 coins

Eleanor Foster

โ€ข

I went through almost the exact same situation last year - multiple W-4 jobs throughout the year plus capital gains from stock sales, and got slammed with an underpayment penalty despite having 0 allowances/exemptions. It's frustrating because you think you're being conservative with your withholding! The issue is that each employer withholds based on annualizing just that job's income, not your total annual income from all sources. So if you made $30k at Job A (worked 4 months), $35k at Job B (worked 5 months), and $25k at Job C (worked 3 months), each employer calculated withholding as if you'd make $90k, $84k, and $100k respectively for the full year. But your actual combined income was much higher, pushing you into higher tax brackets. For this year, I'd recommend: 1) Use the IRS Tax Withholding Estimator whenever you change jobs, 2) Consider making quarterly estimated tax payments for any expected capital gains using Form 1040-ES, and 3) If you anticipate significant investment income again, add extra withholding on line 4(c) of your W-4. I now withhold an extra $75 per paycheck and it's kept me penalty-free. Also definitely look into First Time Penalty Abatement if this was your first underpayment penalty - the IRS will often waive it completely if you have a clean payment history!

0 coins

Prev1...27822783278427852786...5645Next