Have you verified that your Varo account information on your tax return was entered correctly? In approximately 15% of delayed direct deposit cases, there's a transposition error in the routing or account number. This can cause significant delays if the IRS has to re-issue the payment.

I'm in the exact same boat! Varo with fees deducted and DDD of 4/23. Still waiting too. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the fees definitely add extra processing time that isn't reflected in the IRS timeline. The explanation about the money going to the preparer first, then having fees taken out, then forwarded to our accounts makes total sense. I'm trying not to stress about it since it's only been one business day, but it's hard when you're expecting that money! Hopefully we'll both see our deposits by end of week. Thanks for posting this - at least I know I'm not alone in waiting!

Has anyone tried using those tax choice designation options on some state tax forms? Like in CA we can choose to donate part of our refund to specific causes. I wish the federal return had something similar! Maybe even just like 10% of your taxes could be allocated to departments of your choice?

I completely get your frustration! $42,300 is a huge amount to pay without knowing exactly where it goes. While we can't get personalized receipts, there are actually some good resources to see the bigger picture. The White House Office of Management and Budget publishes a "Taxpayer Receipt" tool that lets you input your tax amount and see approximately how it breaks down across major categories like defense, healthcare, Social Security, etc. It's not perfect, but it gives you a much better sense of where your dollars are going than the complete black box we usually get. What really opened my eyes was learning that a significant chunk goes to mandatory spending (Social Security, Medicare, interest on debt) that Congress can't easily change, versus discretionary spending where there's more annual debate. Understanding that distinction helped me realize why budget fights often focus on a relatively smaller portion of total spending. I also started following my representatives' voting records on budget bills more closely since that's really our main way to influence these decisions. It's not the same as choosing where our money goes directly, but it's something!

Based on what you've described, it sounds like you might actually be in a pretty good position regarding the Section 179 recapture. Since you purchased the car in 2017 and it's now 2025, you've held it for about 8 years, which is well beyond the typical 5-year recovery period for vehicles under MACRS. The Section 179 recapture generally only applies to the remaining undepreciated basis of the business portion of the asset. If you've already fully depreciated the business portion over the recovery period, there may be little to no recapture required. However, you'll want to carefully review your depreciation schedule to see exactly how much business basis remains. The recapture amount would be based on any remaining undepreciated Section 179 deduction, not the full $8,900 you originally claimed. Also, make sure you're getting the proper documentation for your charitable donation. Even though the car had transmission problems, you can still claim a charitable deduction for its fair market value in that condition. This deduction might help offset any recapture taxes you do owe. I'd recommend double-checking your depreciation records or consulting with a tax professional to calculate the exact recapture amount, as the calculation can be tricky with mixed-use assets.

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm dealing with a similar situation where I donated business equipment after taking Section 179 deductions. One thing I wanted to add based on my research is that the timing of when you place assets in service can really impact your recapture calculation. For vehicles specifically, the IRS uses the "half-year convention" which means even if you bought your car in December 2017, it's treated as if you placed it in service in the middle of that tax year for depreciation purposes. This could actually work in your favor for the recapture calculation. Also, since you maintained consistent business use above 50% throughout the entire period, you avoided the "listed property" recapture rules that can be much harsher. If your business use had dropped below 50% at any point, you would have faced recapture of the excess Section 179 deduction above straight-line depreciation. Given that you held the vehicle for 8 years with strong business use, I agree with the others that your recapture should be minimal. The charitable donation deduction will likely offset most or all of any recapture tax liability you do have.

Has your sister-in-law considered the Streamlined OIC option? If her financial situation is relatively straightforward and the tax debt is under $50k, she might qualify for the streamlined process which requires less documentation and tends to be processed faster. My father went through this last year and it was much simpler than the standard OIC.

I'm sorry to hear about your brother's passing and the ongoing tax complications your family is dealing with. This sounds incredibly stressful, especially after thinking the bankruptcy had resolved everything. One thing that might help with your situation - have you requested a transcript from the IRS showing exactly how the $26,000 in interest accrued? Sometimes there are errors in how interest is calculated, especially when bankruptcy is involved. You can request this online through the IRS website or by calling them directly. Having a clear breakdown might reveal if any of that interest was incorrectly applied or if there were any procedural errors during the bankruptcy process. Also, regarding the Currently Not Collectible status - make sure you understand the terms and timeline. CNC status can expire or change if your sister-in-law's financial situation improves, so if you're planning to pursue an OIC, timing could be important. Given the complexity of your situation (shared household, bankruptcy history, CNC status), I'd lean toward getting professional help, at least for a consultation. The acceptance rate for OICs is relatively low, and having someone who understands how to present your case in the most favorable light could make a significant difference in the outcome.

Has anyone tried using the Taxpayer Advocate Service to help with the penalty situation for late 1099-NECs? I'm in a similar boat and wondering if that's worth pursuing or if I should just pay the penalties.

I went through this exact situation two years ago with my consulting business. Here's what I learned: file those 1099-NECs immediately, even though they're late. The penalties are calculated based on how late you are, so every day counts. For the electronic filing requirement with 15 contractors, you can use the IRS FIRE system directly, but honestly it's pretty clunky. I ended up using a third-party service that handled the e-filing for me - much easier and worth the small fee. Don't panic about the penalties too much. As a first-time business owner, you have a decent shot at getting them reduced or waived entirely. The IRS has a "First Time Penalty Abatement" program for taxpayers with good compliance history. When you file, include a letter explaining this was your first year handling contractor payments and you misunderstood the requirements. Also, make sure you send copies to your contractors ASAP - some of them might be waiting on these to file their own returns. A quick email explaining the delay goes a long way in maintaining those relationships. Set up calendar reminders for next year - January 31st for both providing forms to contractors AND filing with the IRS. This mistake teaches you once, but you don't want to repeat it!