Ugh this is so frustrating! I filed on 1/20 too and got accepted the same day but still no advance. The whole "minutes after acceptance" thing feels like false advertising at this point. Really considering switching to a different service next year if they can't get their act together 😤

Been dealing with the exact same thing! Filed 1/19, accepted 1/21, and still waiting on my advance. Called CK support twice and got different answers each time - first they said "technical issues" then "additional verification needed." Really wish they'd be more transparent about what's actually causing these delays instead of keeping us in the dark. At this point I'm just hoping it shows up before the weekend 🤞

Does anyone know which form you use to report this? Is it just on Schedule D or is there another form for claiming the partial exclusion specifically?

Great question! Based on your timeline, you should definitely qualify for the partial exclusion. The key factors working in your favor: 1. **Work-related move qualifies**: Your job relocation is one of the IRS-recognized "unforeseen circumstances" that allows for partial exclusion even when you haven't met the full 2-year requirement. 2. **9 months of use counts**: You lived in the home as your primary residence from April-December 2021, which gives you 9/24 of the maximum exclusion (37.5% of $500k = $187,500 for married filing jointly). 3. **Rental period doesn't disqualify you**: The fact that you rented it out after moving doesn't affect your eligibility for the partial exclusion on the period when it was your primary residence. However, a few important points to remember: - You'll still owe depreciation recapture taxes on any depreciation claimed during the rental period (taxed at up to 25%) - Make sure you have good documentation of the job change, move dates, and occupancy periods - Consider having a tax professional prepare this return given the complexity of mixed-use property sales Your tax professional's assessment sounds correct. With a $180k gain ($675k - $495k), the partial exclusion should cover most or all of your capital gains tax liability, though you'll still have the depreciation recapture to deal with.

This thread is super interesting. I'm doing a taxation course and we just covered this topic. One thing not mentioned yet is that some businesses have tried to work around 280E by separating their business into multiple entities - one that "trafficks" and another that provides other services. For example, a dispensary might create one business that only buys/sells product (subject to 280E but can deduct COGS) and a separate consulting/education business that provides advice to customers (not subject to 280E, so can deduct all ordinary business expenses). The IRS has challenged these arrangements with mixed results. Has anyone looked into the success rate of these types of structures?

This is such a great breakdown of a really confusing area of tax law! I'm actually a CPA and I still have clients ask me about this all the time, especially with the growth of state-legal cannabis businesses. One thing I'd add is that the COGS vs. other expenses distinction can get really murky in practice. For example, trimming labor for cannabis can sometimes be considered part of COGS (as it's part of preparing the product for sale) but sometimes it's treated as a non-deductible operating expense. The IRS has been inconsistent on where exactly to draw these lines. I've seen businesses spend thousands on tax attorneys just to figure out how to properly categorize expenses under 280E. It's one of those areas where the law is clear in theory but gets incredibly complex when you try to apply it to real-world business operations. The constitutional reasoning behind allowing COGS deductions is solid, but the practical implementation creates a lot of gray areas that businesses have to navigate very carefully.

Just to clarify some confusion I'm seeing in other comments: Cycle code 0505 means your account is on a weekly processing cycle (05) that updates on Thursdays, and the 05 at the end indicates the year (2025 for 2024 tax returns). In my experience working with tax clients, PATH Act returns (with EITC/ACTC) filed in January typically complete processing by mid-March, but this year we're seeing longer delays across the board. The lack of an 846 code simply means your refund hasn't been scheduled yet - it doesn't necessarily indicate a problem.

I'm in a very similar situation! Filed on January 23rd with the same 0505 cycle code and PATH message. What I've learned from researching this is that the IRS is required by law to hold refunds with EITC or ACTC until at least February 15th, but this year they seem to be taking much longer than usual. I've been checking my transcript every Thursday night (that's when 0505 cycles typically update) and finally saw some movement last week - got a 766 credit code but still no 846. From what I understand, once you see the 846 code with a date, your refund should be deposited within 1-5 business days. The waiting is definitely frustrating, especially when you're counting on that money, but it sounds like we're both still within the realm of "normal" processing times for this year, unfortunately.

Thanks everyone for the detailed responses! This is exactly the kind of real-world experience I was looking for. A few follow-up questions: @Zoe Papadakis - When you mention establishing a regular 401k plan instead of Solo 401k, does that mean I'd need to file Form 5500 right away, or only once assets hit $250k? And are there minimum contribution requirements for myself as the employer? @AstroAdventurer - The $7,800 tax savings sounds significant! Can you break down how that worked out? Was that mainly from reducing your self-employment tax by shifting income to employee wages? @NeonNova - The audit documentation point is really important. Did the IRS question the legitimacy of the work itself, or were they more focused on whether the compensation was reasonable? I'm leaning toward using a payroll service like Gusto based on what I'm hearing about the complexity of tax deadlines. Better to pay $40/month than risk penalties! One more question - has anyone dealt with quarterly estimated tax implications? If I'm paying my wife a salary, I assume that reduces my self-employment income and might affect my quarterly payments?

I went through this exact process about 18 months ago for my consulting business and wanted to share some practical insights that might help. The paperwork isn't as overwhelming as it initially seems, but there are definitely some gotchas. Here's what I wish someone had told me upfront: **On the 401k situation:** @Zoe Papadakis is absolutely right - you'll need a regular 401k plan, not a Solo 401k. However, you can still get significant tax benefits. My wife contributes the max ($23,000 for 2025) plus I make employer contributions up to 25% of her compensation. The key is setting her salary at a level that allows the contributions you want while keeping compensation reasonable for the work performed. **Practical setup steps I followed:** 1. Got EIN online (takes 5 minutes) 2. Set up state employer accounts (varies by state, took about a week) 3. Used Gusto for payroll - honestly worth every penny for the peace of mind 4. Established 401k through Fidelity (they walked me through the plan documents) **Real numbers from my experience:** I pay my wife $45,000 annually for legitimate marketing and administrative work (about 25 hours/week). After accounting for payroll taxes, we save roughly $8,500 per year compared to me taking that money as self-employment income. The 401k contributions are just a bonus on top. The documentation aspect that @NeonNova mentioned is crucial. I keep detailed records of her work using Asana for project management and have monthly "employee reviews" that I document. Might seem overkill, but it establishes the legitimate business relationship. One unexpected benefit: having an "employee" actually helped me get better business credit terms with some vendors who prefer working with established companies rather than solo freelancers. The quarterly tax adjustment is real - I had to increase my estimated payments in the first quarter because I miscalculated the payroll tax timing. Definitely recommend working with a CPA for the first year to get everything dialed in correctly.