IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Julia Hall

•

As a newcomer to this community, I want to express how incredibly helpful this entire discussion has been! I've been wrestling with these exact questions about joint accounts and gift taxes with my partner for weeks, and this thread has provided more practical clarity than all the generic tax websites I've been reading combined. What really made everything click for me was understanding the "donative intent" principle that several people explained. The IRS isn't looking to trap unmarried couples who are simply sharing normal living expenses - they're focused on actual attempts to avoid taxes through disguised gifts. When my partner and I contribute to our joint account for shared costs like rent, groceries, utilities, or vacations we both enjoy, that's clearly mutual benefit rather than one-sided generosity. I'm definitely going to start implementing the tracking suggestions mentioned here, particularly the approach of documenting larger transfers ($1000+) and maintaining simple monthly summaries showing how joint funds are allocated to shared expenses. The fact that multiple people mentioned this only takes 10-15 minutes per month makes it feel completely manageable rather than burdensome. Kelsey's firsthand audit experience was especially valuable - knowing that IRS agents approach these situations reasonably and focus on whether your financial arrangements align with your actual living situation rather than trying to create technical violations gives me so much confidence about moving forward with proper joint finances. This community has been an incredible resource for cutting through the confusion and providing real-world guidance that you simply can't find elsewhere. Thank you to everyone who shared their experiences and practical advice!

0 coins

Noah Lee

•

Welcome to the community, Julia! Your summary really captures how transformative this discussion has been for so many of us dealing with joint finance questions. I'm also new here and was completely overwhelmed by the gift tax implications until reading through everyone's experiences. What I found most reassuring is how this thread shows that the IRS approaches these situations with practical common sense rather than trying to create traps for normal couples. The "donative intent" framework you mentioned really is the key insight - it's about understanding the difference between efficiently managing shared household expenses versus actually trying to make gifts to your partner. The tracking system recommendations are so practical too. I love that it's focused on documenting larger amounts and demonstrating mutual benefit rather than trying to account for every single transaction. The monthly summary approach several people described seems like the perfect balance between having adequate records and not making this overly complicated. This community has been incredible for providing real-world guidance based on actual lived experiences. Hearing from people who've been through audits, implemented these systems, and successfully navigated joint finances gives you confidence that these approaches actually work in practice. Looking forward to hearing how your joint account journey goes!

0 coins

As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly grateful for this comprehensive discussion! I've been dealing with almost identical concerns about joint accounts and potential gift tax issues with my partner, and this thread has been more enlightening than months of trying to decipher IRS publications on my own. What really helped clarify everything for me was the "donative intent" concept that multiple people explained. It makes perfect sense that the IRS distinguishes between actual gift-giving versus normal expense-sharing arrangements between domestic partners. When we contribute to our joint account for shared living costs, we're both benefiting from those expenses - that's fundamentally different from making one-sided transfers. I'm definitely going to implement the tracking system that's been discussed throughout this thread. The approach of documenting larger deposits ($1000+) while maintaining simple monthly breakdowns showing mutual benefit seems like exactly the right balance between adequate documentation and not overcomplicating things. Kelsey's audit experience was particularly reassuring - hearing that IRS agents understand normal domestic partnerships and evaluate whether your financial arrangements make practical sense for your living situation. That perspective completely changed how I think about this whole issue from something scary to something totally manageable with basic record-keeping. For anyone else who's been hesitant about joint finances due to these concerns, this discussion shows that reasonable shared financial arrangements with simple documentation should be perfectly fine. Thank you to everyone who shared such valuable, practical guidance based on real-world experience!

0 coins

I'm a tax preparer and I see this issue constantly with TurboTax Desktop. The software has a specific bug with Section 199A calculations for limited partners in real estate when only UBIA is provided on the K-1. Quick fix: In TurboTax, after entering your K-1, go to: 1. Forms mode (Ctrl+H) 2. Search for Form 8995 or 8995-A (depending on your income level) 3. Manually enter your QBI information and UBIA amount directly on this form TurboTax's interview mode often fails to properly handle this specific scenario, but entering it directly on the form works every time. This is especially important for real estate partnerships where the UBIA can significantly impact your QBI deduction limits.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

This is exactly the issue! I had the same problem and switching to forms mode was the only way I could get it to work. TurboTax's normal interview process just doesn't handle the UBIA for limited partners correctly. One additional tip: if your K-1 doesn't specifically list a QBI amount (Code V), you generally can use the ordinary business income amount from Box 1 as your starting point for QBI, unless your partnership has specified otherwise.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I was having the exact same issue with TurboTax Desktop not recognizing my UBIA from my real estate partnership K-1. After reading through all the suggestions here, I tried the forms mode approach that Eleanor mentioned and it worked perfectly. For anyone else struggling with this: go to Forms mode (Ctrl+H), find Form 8995, and manually enter your QBI and UBIA amounts directly. The interview mode in TurboTax just doesn't handle this scenario properly for limited partners. I also want to echo what others have said about the income thresholds - even if you're below the $191K/$382K limits where UBIA limitations don't apply, it's still worth entering the information to ensure TurboTax is calculating everything correctly. In my case, it added back about $3,200 in deductions that the software was missing. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences and solutions!

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is such a relief to read! I've been pulling my hair out trying to figure out why TurboTax wasn't picking up my UBIA for the QBI calculation. I'm also a limited partner in a real estate LLC and have been going in circles with this for weeks. I tried the forms mode approach you mentioned (Ctrl+H to get to Form 8995) and it finally worked! For anyone else following along, make sure you're looking at the right form - if your income is above the threshold limits, you'll need Form 8995-A instead of the regular 8995. One question though - when you manually entered the QBI amount on the form, did you just use the ordinary business income from Box 1 of your K-1? My partnership didn't provide a separate Code V entry either, so I'm assuming that's the right approach based on what Lucas mentioned earlier. Thanks again to everyone who shared their solutions. This community is a lifesaver when TurboTax support falls short!

0 coins

Sofia Gomez

•

Has anyone else noticed that the tax rules for Life Estates seem unnecessarily complicated? I inherited a property last year as a remainderman and the amount of conflicting info I got from different tax preparers was insane.

0 coins

StormChaser

•

Completely agree. I think it's because Life Estates aren't as common as regular inheritances, so most tax preparers don't deal with them often. I ended up going to three different CPAs before finding one who actually understood the rules and could explain them clearly.

0 coins

This is such a complex area of tax law! I went through something similar when my aunt passed and left me as remainderman on her property. One thing that really helped me was getting a professional appraisal of the property at the time of your grandmother's death - this becomes crucial for the partial step-up calculation. Also, make sure you keep detailed records of any improvements your mom makes to the property during her lifetime tenancy, as these can affect your basis when you eventually inherit. The IRS allows you to add the cost of permanent improvements to your basis, which can help reduce capital gains if you sell later. It's frustrating how complicated these rules are, but getting it right upfront will save you a lot of headaches (and potentially money) down the road. Definitely worth investing in professional help for the initial calculation like others have mentioned.

0 coins

AaliyahAli

•

This is really helpful advice about keeping records of improvements! I hadn't thought about that aspect. Quick question - when you say "permanent improvements," does that include things like a new roof or HVAC system that my mom might install while she's the life tenant? Or are we talking about more substantial renovations like adding a room or renovating a kitchen? I want to make sure I'm tracking the right expenses that could help with my basis later on.

0 coins

As someone who's been helping elderly family members navigate retirement decisions, I really appreciate how thorough this discussion has been! The tax implications of large 401k withdrawals can be quite complex. One additional consideration that might help convince your uncle to reconsider the lump sum approach: the "tax torpedo" effect that several people mentioned can be even more severe than it initially appears. When that $83,000 withdrawal makes more of their Social Security taxable, the effective marginal tax rate can actually exceed the nominal tax bracket rate. This means each additional dollar withdrawn could be taxed at what feels like 27-30% instead of the stated 22% bracket rate. I'd also suggest having your uncle consider what happens if there's a family emergency or unexpected expense in future years. If he withdraws everything now and pays the hefty tax bill, that money won't be available to grow tax-deferred for future needs. The RMD amounts are specifically calculated to preserve the account balance for as long as possible while still requiring distributions. Given that he doesn't need the money immediately, even a two-year withdrawal plan (perhaps $40k this year and $43k next year) would likely save several thousand dollars in taxes while still giving him relatively quick access to his funds. Sometimes patience really does pay - literally!

0 coins

This is such valuable insight about the "tax torpedo" effect, Benjamin! As someone just learning about retirement planning, I hadn't fully grasped how the interaction between 401k withdrawals and Social Security taxation could create those higher effective marginal rates. The 27-30% effective rate you mentioned really puts the true cost in perspective. Your point about preserving funds for future emergencies is particularly compelling. At 70, your uncle likely has many years ahead where unexpected medical expenses or other needs could arise. Having that money continue to grow tax-deferred while only taking required minimums gives him much more flexibility and financial security. I'm curious - do you know if there are any online calculators that can help model these complex interactions between 401k withdrawals, Social Security taxation, and effective tax rates? It seems like seeing the numbers laid out in different scenarios might help convince someone who's determined to take a lump sum that the phased approach really is worth the wait. The two-year plan you suggested ($40k/$43k split) sounds like a reasonable compromise for someone who's anxious to access their money but could still benefit significantly from tax planning.

0 coins

As a newcomer to retirement planning, I've found this discussion incredibly helpful! Reading through all these responses has really opened my eyes to how complex the tax implications can be for large 401k withdrawals. What strikes me most is how the immediate desire to access funds can end up costing thousands in unnecessary taxes. The point about the "tax torpedo" effect where Social Security becomes more heavily taxed is something I never would have considered on my own. For someone in your uncle's position, it seems like the math strongly favors patience. Even if he's anxious to have the money "in hand," spreading the withdrawal over just 2-3 years could save him a substantial amount that he could then actually use and enjoy. One thing I'm wondering - has your uncle considered what he plans to do with the money once he withdraws it? If he's just going to put it in a regular savings account earning minimal interest, he's essentially paying a large tax penalty to move money from a higher-earning, tax-deferred account to a lower-earning, taxable one. That seems like it could compound the financial impact of the decision. Maybe helping him think through the actual purpose and timeline for needing these funds could help guide a more strategic withdrawal approach?

0 coins

You've raised such an important question about what he actually plans to do with the money, Zoe! That's often the missing piece of the puzzle when people are focused on withdrawing retirement funds. If your uncle is just planning to park that $83k in a regular savings account earning 1-2% interest after paying $15k-18k in taxes on the withdrawal, he's essentially paying a massive penalty to downgrade his investment situation. Meanwhile, that money could continue growing tax-deferred in his 401k while he takes only what he actually needs through smaller, more tax-efficient withdrawals. This might be a great angle to approach the conversation from - asking him to walk through his specific plans for the money. Sometimes when people think through the actual logistics (where will it go, what will it earn, when will it be used), the downsides of a lump sum withdrawal become much clearer. It could also help identify if there are any underlying concerns driving his urgency - like worries about market volatility or wanting to simplify his finances - that could be addressed through other strategies without triggering such a large tax hit.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

This has been an absolutely fantastic thread to read through! As someone who just started doing 1099 contractor work for a home inspection service (traveling to different properties for inspections), I was completely lost on mileage deductions until I found this discussion. The explanation about reimbursements being separate from mileage deductions is so helpful - my inspection company gives small reimbursements for trips over 30 miles, but I can still deduct the full mileage at the standard rate. That's a huge relief! I'm definitely implementing the documentation strategies everyone has shared: - Setting up a detailed spreadsheet with start/end locations, odometer readings, and timestamps - Monthly odometer photos (planning to do them on the 20th of each month) - Taking photos of property addresses for location verification - Tracking parking fees separately when I have to pay meters in downtown areas - Adding notes about which inspection company each trip is for (I work with two different firms) The real audit stories shared here are incredibly reassuring. It's clear that solid documentation really is the key to confidence in these deductions. I was particularly glad to learn that driving between different inspection sites on the same day counts as deductible business mileage - I often have 3-4 inspections scheduled across different neighborhoods. One question for my specific situation: sometimes I need to stop at a hardware store between inspections to pick up testing equipment or supplies that I forgot. Are those quick supply runs deductible business miles even though they're brief detours from my planned route? Thank you all for such thorough and practical advice! This peer knowledge-sharing makes navigating 1099 requirements so much less intimidating.

0 coins

Yes, those hardware store stops for testing equipment or supplies are absolutely deductible business miles! Since you're picking up items specifically needed for your inspection work, that's clearly business-related travel. The IRS understands that business operations sometimes require unexpected stops for supplies or equipment - it doesn't matter that it's a brief detour from your planned route. Just document these trips clearly in your log - something like "Inspection Site A → Hardware Store (pickup testing supplies) → Inspection Site B" shows the business purpose. Keep receipts for any equipment or supplies purchased as backup documentation. Your home inspection work sounds like it involves exactly the kind of multi-location travel that justifies significant mileage deductions. The fact that you're working with two different inspection firms makes your separate tracking notes even more important - that organization will be really helpful come tax time. The 20th of the month is a great choice for your monthly odometer photos! Having that consistent date shows systematic record-keeping. Welcome to the contractor community, and great job getting your documentation system set up properly from the start!

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

This thread has been absolutely incredible! As someone who just started doing 1099 contractor work for a appliance repair service (traveling to customers' homes to fix washers, dryers, etc.), I was completely overwhelmed by mileage tracking until I discovered this discussion. The clarification about reimbursements vs. deductions has been life-changing - my repair service gives partial reimbursements for trips over 20 miles, but I can still claim the full standard mileage rate. I had no idea these were separate! Based on everyone's advice, I'm implementing these strategies starting today: - Detailed spreadsheet with start/end locations, odometer readings, and timestamps - Monthly odometer photos on the 5th of each month for consistency - Photos of customer addresses/house numbers for location documentation - Separate tracking of parking fees (some customers live in areas with paid parking) - Notes distinguishing between different repair companies I work for The audit experiences shared here are so reassuring - proper documentation really does make all the difference. I'm especially grateful to learn that miles between different customer locations during the same day are fully deductible, since I typically have 5-7 service calls spread across town daily. One specific question: when I have to drive to a parts store between service calls to pick up replacement parts for a specific customer's repair, those miles are deductible business travel, right? Even if the parts store isn't directly on my route? Thank you everyone for creating such a supportive knowledge-sharing community! This practical advice from experienced contractors is invaluable for newcomers like me navigating these tax requirements.

0 coins

Prev1...254255256257258...5643Next