


Ask the community...
Check your transcript again. Look for code 846. That's the actual release date. Sometimes differs from WMR. Might show processing delay. Could also try IRS automated phone system. Press 2-1-3-2 for refund status. Gives more updated info sometimes. Worth a try before stressing.
Langley FCU member here! Filed 2/5 and got the same 2/29 DD date on WMR. Still nothing in my account as of this morning. I called them yesterday and they said the same thing - no pending deposits visible on their end. From what I've seen in other threads, Langley tends to be slower than some of the bigger banks. My sister has USAA and got hers yesterday with the same DD date. Fingers crossed we see movement today or tomorrow! Keep us posted if yours hits - it'll give the rest of us hope! š¤
Thanks for sharing your timeline! It's reassuring to know I'm not the only one in this boat with Langley. Filed around the same time (2/7) and seeing the exact same thing - 2/29 DD date but nothing pending. Really hoping we see some movement soon! The waiting game is always the worst part of tax season. I'll definitely update here if mine hits - keeping my fingers crossed for all of us Langley members! š¤
Has anyone considered whether this transaction might also trigger Form 8865 requirements instead of Form 926? If the foreign business is structured as a partnership rather than a corporation, Form 8865 would be the correct form. OP, what's the legal structure of your foreign business?
Great question about entity classification! You're absolutely right that this is crucial. @Carmen Ortiz - you mentioned it's a "family business overseas" but the specific legal structure matters enormously for US tax purposes. If it's organized as a corporation in the foreign country, you'll likely need Form 926. But if it's a partnership, LLC, or similar pass-through entity, then Form 8865 would be the correct form instead. The tricky part is that some foreign entities can elect how they want to be treated for US tax purposes (called "check-the-box" elections), so even a foreign LLC might be treated as a corporation if an election was made. Do you know what type of entity it is under local law? And more importantly, do you know if any elections have been made for US tax treatment? This will determine which forms you need to file.
This is such an important distinction that I completely overlooked initially! I'm actually not 100% sure about the exact legal structure - I know it's registered as a company in the local jurisdiction, but you're right that the US tax treatment could be different. I should probably dig into the incorporation documents to see exactly what type of entity it is and whether any elections were made for US purposes. Would the wrong form filing be considered a failure to file the correct form, or would the IRS give some credit for attempting to report the transaction? I'm worried I might pick the wrong one!
I'm dealing with something similar right now. My long-time tax preparer retired and the new firm wants me to sign what they call a "client engagement letter" but it's basically the same thing you're describing. From what I've researched, these agreements became more common after some high-profile lawsuits where clients sued preparers for issues that weren't really the preparer's fault. The agreements help clarify who's responsible for what. That said, I'd definitely read it carefully before signing. Make sure it doesn't completely absolve them of responsibility for their own errors or negligence. A fair agreement should protect them from liability when you provide wrong information, but they should still be accountable for their own mistakes. Has your tax guy given you any guidance on what changed since the sale? Might be worth asking him directly about the new policies.
That's really helpful context about the lawsuits driving these agreements. I haven't had a chance to talk to my tax guy yet since he's been swamped with tax season, but I'll definitely ask him when things calm down. You're right about reading it carefully - I've been going through it line by line and most of it seems reasonable. There's one clause about "client acknowledges preparer is not liable for penalties or interest resulting from client-provided information" which makes sense, but then it gets a bit vague about what constitutes "client-provided information." Did your engagement letter have specific language about audit support? That's one thing I want to make sure is covered since my previous preparer always said he'd help if I got audited.
Yes, my engagement letter does include audit support - it specifies that they'll represent me for any issues directly related to their preparation of my return at no additional charge. However, if the audit reveals issues with prior years they didn't prepare, or if I failed to provide complete information, then there are additional fees. Regarding that vague language about "client-provided information" - I'd definitely ask for clarification on that. In my letter, they defined it pretty clearly as any documents, records, or verbal information I give them. The key thing is making sure they're still liable if they misinterpret or incorrectly enter information you provided accurately. One thing I learned is that you can often negotiate these agreements if something seems unreasonable. They're not set in stone, especially if you've been a long-term client. Worth having that conversation with your tax guy when he has more time.
I went through something very similar when my CPA of 15 years sold to a regional chain. The new firm immediately sent me a 4-page "service agreement" that felt more like legal protection than a service contract. After reading through it and doing some research, I learned these agreements became standard practice around 2018-2020, largely due to increased litigation against tax preparers. The COVID-era changes to tax laws also made preparers more cautious about liability. The key things I looked for in mine were: 1) Clear definition of what constitutes "reasonable care" on their part, 2) Specific language about correcting their own errors at no charge, 3) Audit representation clauses, and 4) Data security provisions. My advice? Don't sign anything that makes you uncomfortable, but also recognize that most reputable firms won't work without one nowadays. If the language seems too broad or one-sided, ask for modifications. I successfully negotiated two clauses in mine that were too vague about their responsibilities. The transition from small independent preparers to larger firms definitely changes the dynamic, but it doesn't necessarily mean worse service - just more formalized processes.
One more thing to consider - if your income is under $30k, check if you qualify for any tax credits related to charitable giving. Some states have credits (not deductions) for donations that apply regardless of whether you take standard deduction. The 1098-C might be needed to document eligibility for those. I took standard deduction last year but still got a small credit on my state return for my car donation.
Which states offer this? I'm in Texas and wondering if we have anything like that. Donated a truck last year but didn't bother with the 1098-C because I always take standard.
Unfortunately, Texas doesn't have a state income tax, so there wouldn't be state-level credits for charitable donations there. The states that typically offer some form of charitable tax credits even when taking the standard deduction include Colorado, Arizona, Minnesota, and a few others. For folks in Texas, the main benefit of having the 1098-C would be for federal purposes - either in case your situation changes and itemizing becomes advantageous, or for documentation if you're ever audited. The IRS tends to look more closely at vehicle donations, especially those valued over $5,000.
I'd strongly recommend getting the 1098-C form, even though you're taking the standard deduction. Here's why: The IRS has specific rules for vehicle donations over $500 - they require the 1098-C for proper documentation, regardless of whether you itemize or not. Since your CR-V is worth $6,500, this puts you well into the range where the IRS expects official documentation. Also, consider that your financial situation could change. Maybe you'll have unexpected medical expenses later in the year, or other deductible expenses that could make itemizing worthwhile. Having the 1098-C gives you that option. From an audit protection standpoint, vehicle donations are one of the areas the IRS scrutinizes more closely. Having the official form filed with the IRS creates a paper trail that protects you, even if you don't claim the deduction this year. The only "cost" is sharing your SSN with a legitimate charity, which they're required to keep secure anyway. There's really no downside to getting proper documentation for such a significant donation.
NebulaKnight
The structuring point is really important - that's something you definitely need to discuss with your tax attorney. If you were making regular deposits just under $10k, that could escalate this beyond a simple underreporting issue. But here's what I want you to focus on right now: you're taking all the right steps. You're getting professional help, you're willing to be honest, and you're prepared to make things right. That puts you in a much better position than someone who tries to hide or fight it. I went through something similar a few years back (not as much money involved, but still scary). The anticipation and anxiety were honestly worse than the actual resolution. The IRS worked with me on a payment plan, and while I paid penalties, it wasn't the life-ending disaster I thought it would be. Document everything you can remember about your deposits - dates, amounts, which clients paid you. Your attorney will help you organize this properly. And try to get some sleep - I know it's hard, but you'll need to be clear-headed for your meeting.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
ā¢Thanks for the perspective - it really helps to hear from someone who's been through this. I've been barely sleeping since I got that letter, so you're probably right about needing to be clear-headed. I'm trying to remember my deposit patterns now. I think most of my deposits were between $200-800 from individual jobs, with maybe a few larger ones around $1,500-2,000 when I did bigger projects. Nothing close to $10k, so hopefully that structuring thing isn't an issue for me. I've been going through my phone trying to find old text messages with clients about payments and dates. It's amazing how much you forget when you're not keeping proper records. Definitely learned my lesson about organization the hard way. Meeting with the attorney tomorrow morning. Hoping once I have a professional game plan, some of this anxiety will calm down.
0 coins
Dana Doyle
You're in a tough spot, but try not to spiral into worst-case scenarios. Based on what you've described - deposit amounts between $200-2,000 from legitimate work - this doesn't sound like the kind of case that leads to criminal prosecution. The fact that you had a regular W-2 job and were doing honest work (just underreporting) works in your favor. The IRS sees a big difference between someone running an illegal business versus someone who did legitimate work but messed up their taxes. Your attorney meeting tomorrow is crucial. Come prepared with whatever documentation you can gather - even text messages with clients can help establish the legitimate nature of your work. Be completely honest about everything, including how disorganized you were with record-keeping. One thing that might help your case: if you can demonstrate that some of those bank deposits were business expenses being reimbursed (materials, gas, etc.) rather than pure profit, that reduces your actual unreported income. Your attorney can help you figure out what's reasonable to claim. The waiting and uncertainty are brutal, but you're handling this the right way. Most people in your situation end up with payment plans and penalties, not prison time.
0 coins