


Ask the community...
Check the master list of transcript codes on the IRS website. They explain what each one means
That "verification of non-filing" notice is actually pretty common when there's a processing delay or system glitch. It doesn't necessarily mean your return is lost - sometimes it just means it hasn't been fully processed into their system yet. The January 2022 date suggests this might be related to the massive backlog they had that year. I'd definitely try calling that number even though it's a pain, or you could try the online "Get My Payment" tool to see if there's any update on your refund status. Don't panic yet - this happens more often than you'd think!
Thanks for the reassurance! That makes me feel a bit better about it. The timing does line up with all the chaos from that year. I'll try calling but honestly might just use that taxr.ai thing everyone's mentioning - seems way easier than sitting on hold forever š
One thing that really helped me understand AGI was realizing that it's basically your "adjusted" income that the IRS uses as a baseline for everything else. Once you have your AGI, that's when you can take either the standard deduction ($13,850 for single filers in 2024) or itemized deductions to get to your taxable income. So in your example with $235k gross income, let's say you have $15k in traditional 401k contributions and $3k in HSA contributions. Your AGI would be $235k - $15k - $3k = $217k. Then you'd subtract either the standard deduction or itemized deductions from that $217k to get your actual taxable income. The taxes withheld from your paycheck ($80k in your case) don't affect AGI at all - those are just prepayments that get compared to your final tax liability to determine if you owe more or get a refund.
This breakdown really helps clarify the process! I was getting confused because I kept thinking the taxes withheld should somehow factor into AGI, but you're right - they're completely separate. So basically AGI is just about specific types of deductions that happen "above the line" before you even get to the standard vs itemized deduction decision. Thanks for walking through the actual numbers, it makes way more sense now!
Another common source of confusion I see is with educator expenses and moving expenses. If you're a teacher, you can deduct up to $300 in classroom supplies as an above-the-line deduction that reduces your AGI. But moving expenses are tricky - they only qualify as AGI adjustments if you're active duty military. Also worth noting that if you have student loan interest, you can deduct up to $2,500 per year as an AGI adjustment, but this phases out at higher income levels. For 2024, it starts phasing out at $75,000 AGI for single filers and completely phases out at $90,000. One last tip: if you're self-employed or have 1099 income, you can deduct half of your self-employment tax as an adjustment to income. This often gets overlooked but can be a significant AGI reduction for freelancers and contractors.
This is really helpful information about the lesser-known deductions! I had no idea about the educator expense deduction. As someone who's been freelancing part-time, I definitely need to look into that self-employment tax deduction - I've been missing out on that. Do you know if there are any other commonly overlooked above-the-line deductions that people miss? I want to make sure I'm not leaving money on the table when calculating my AGI.
Something to consider - you don't HAVE to cash them all out at once! You could spread the redemption over multiple tax years to potentially reduce the tax impact. Maybe cash half this year and half next year?
Good strategy! Spreading out the income might help stay under certain tax thresholds. But wouldn't you lose out on the interest once they mature? Is it better to take the tax hit or lose the potential earnings?
@Isabella Tucker raises a great point about spreading redemptions across tax years. However, with Series HH bonds, once they reach final maturity (typically 20 years from issue date), they stop earning interest entirely. So if these bonds are "about to stop earning interest this month" as the original poster mentioned, there's no benefit to delaying redemption beyond the maturity date - you'd just be holding non-interest-bearing paper. The key is to redeem them before or right at final maturity to avoid losing any potential interest earnings. The tax planning strategy would need to be implemented before they reach that final maturity date.
Just wanted to add another perspective based on my experience with my son's bonds last year. The key thing that helped me was getting copies of all the original paperwork from when the bonds were first purchased or exchanged. If your parents originally bought Series E or EE bonds and then exchanged them for the HH bonds, there should be documentation showing the deferred interest amount from the original bonds. This is crucial because that deferred interest becomes taxable when you redeem the HH bonds, even though you never received it as cash. I found old records in my parents' files that showed exactly how much deferred interest was involved. Without those records, I would have had no idea there was additional taxable income beyond just the regular HH bond interest payments we'd been receiving. Treasury Direct might have some of this information on file if you can't locate the original paperwork, but having the physical documentation made the whole process much clearer when filing taxes.
I'm a tax attorney who's handled numerous S-Corp audits, and I want to reinforce what others have said here - your accountant's suggestion is a red flag that could lead to serious consequences. The IRS has become increasingly aggressive about S-Corp shareholder compensation issues, particularly after the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. They've developed sophisticated data analytics to identify S-Corps with unusual 1099 patterns, and shareholder-employees receiving 1099s from their own corporations is one of their primary targets. Here's what many people don't realize: when the IRS reclassifies 1099 income as wages (which they will in your situation), you're not just paying the additional payroll taxes. You're also facing accuracy-related penalties of 20% of the additional tax owed, plus interest compounded daily. I've seen cases where the total cost was 40-50% more than if they had just structured it properly as W-2 compensation from the beginning. The "outside normal duties" argument your accountant mentioned has been consistently rejected by tax courts. In Watson v. Commissioner and several other cases, courts have held that shareholder-employees are performing services in their capacity as employees regardless of how those services are characterized. My strong recommendation: restructure this as performance-based W-2 compensation immediately. Document the business rationale thoroughly, process everything through payroll with proper withholdings, and ensure your total compensation (including these bonuses) meets reasonable compensation standards for your industry and role. The extra payroll taxes are a small price to pay for compliance and peace of mind.
This legal perspective really puts everything into context - thank you for sharing the specific case citations and penalty details! The Watson v. Commissioner reference is particularly helpful because it directly addresses the argument that many accountants seem to be making about "different duties" somehow creating a separate contractor relationship. The 40-50% total cost figure you mentioned (additional taxes plus penalties plus interest) is a real eye-opener. When you factor in the professional fees to handle an audit and the time spent dealing with it, the original "savings" from avoiding payroll taxes becomes completely illusory. I'm curious about the documentation you mentioned for performance-based W-2 compensation. What specific elements should be included to make this audit-proof? Should there be formal board resolutions, written performance metrics, or amendments to employment agreements? And how detailed should the business rationale be - is a simple board minute sufficient, or do you recommend more comprehensive documentation? Also, given your experience with post-TCJA enforcement, have you noticed the IRS focusing more on certain dollar thresholds or percentages when selecting S-Corps for audit? The data analytics angle you mentioned suggests they're using more sophisticated targeting than just random selection. Your advice about ensuring total compensation meets reasonable standards is spot-on - it seems like many S-Corp owners create multiple compliance issues by trying to minimize W-2 income across the board rather than just structuring everything properly from the start.
As someone who's been through a similar situation with my own S-Corp, I want to add one more important consideration that hasn't been fully addressed - the potential impact on your business relationships and reputation. Beyond all the tax compliance issues everyone has correctly identified, consider what happens if the IRS does audit you and reclassifies these payments. You'll likely need to file amended returns, and depending on your business structure, this could affect other shareholders, create complications with business loans or credit facilities, and potentially require disclosure to clients or partners. I learned this the hard way when we had to unwind a similar arrangement after getting professional advice that contradicted our original accountant. The administrative burden of correcting everything - amended payroll reports, revised K-1s, notifications to our bank about changes in our financial statements - was substantial and created unnecessary complications with stakeholders who had relied on our original filings. The peace of mind of doing things right from the start really can't be overstated. Structure your performance incentives through proper W-2 compensation, document everything thoroughly, and work with a CPA who specializes in S-Corp compliance rather than someone who suggests arrangements that clearly contradict established IRS positions. Your future self will thank you for taking the conservative, compliant approach rather than trying to save a few dollars on payroll taxes only to face much larger costs and headaches later.
Aisha Khan
check your mail carefully! sometimes they send letters requesting more info but they look like junk mail ngl
0 coins
CosmicCommander
Non-filing letter status usually means your return hasn't been fully processed in their system yet. Since you filed in February, definitely call the IRS taxpayer assistance line at 1-800-829-1040. Have your SSN, filing status, and exact refund amount ready. The hold times are brutal but you need to find out if there's an issue with your return or if it's just stuck in their processing backlog.
0 coins
Cassandra Moon
ā¢This is super helpful advice! Just want to add - when you call, try calling right when they open at 7am your local time. The wait times are usually shorter then. Also make sure you have your AGI from last year's return handy since they might ask for that to verify your identity before they can discuss your case.
0 coins