IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Is it legal for me to rent a table at a dog grooming salon as a self-employed groomer?

I'm currently self-employed as a dog groomer and I rent a table at a local salon. Everyone here operates as their own separate business and just pays rent to the owner (who also grooms dogs herself) for using the space and facilities. I'm about to leave the salon, so the owner posted an ad for my table, but she's getting a lot of pushback from people saying this arrangement is completely illegal and that she'll be in serious trouble if she gets audited. The weird thing is, the previous owner ran the shop exactly the same way, actually got audited, and passed without any issues. I've been researching like crazy trying to understand what's going on. I know the IRS is concerned about businesses misclassifying employees as independent contractors to avoid taxes, but that's definitely NOT what's happening here. I'm truly independent - my clients call my personal number, I handle all payments through my own processing system, set my own rates, create my own schedule, buy all my supplies and equipment, carry my own business insurance, and file Schedule C for self-employment income. My relationship with the salon owner is purely a rental agreement. I don't even think of myself as an "independent contractor" since I'm not contracted to do any work for her - I literally just signed a lease agreeing to pay a monthly fee to use the space. People keep telling us that because the owner also works at the salon as a groomer herself, it's somehow illegal for her to rent space to other groomers. From what I've found, this doesn't seem accurate, but information is really scarce. I did find Form SS-8 "Determination of Worker Status" - would it help if the owner filled this out to get an official ruling from the IRS? Is there something we're missing about the legality of this setup?

LilMama23

•

I had almost the exact same situation at a pet salon in Texas. Make sure your contract specifically states you're renting SPACE, not working for a percentage. Also, double check your state's regulations too - some states have additional rules beyond the IRS requirements. In my case, we all had to get our own business licenses, display our own price lists, and maintain separate appointment books to clearly show we were independent. Our shop owner actually got sued by someone who claimed they were misclassified, but the case was dismissed because we had all the proper documentation.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience. I didn't even think about checking state-specific regulations. I'll definitely look into that. Did your salon owner do anything special with the rental agreements or business structure after going through that lawsuit?

0 coins

LilMama23

•

After the lawsuit scare, our owner got much more formal with everything. She had a lawyer create a standardized booth rental agreement that explicitly stated we were not employees and had no expectation of benefits or protection under employment laws. She also required all of us to provide proof of our business registration and insurance policies annually. One smart thing she did was create a separate LLC that owned the building, and then her grooming business just rented space there like the rest of us. That extra layer of separation made it super clear that the relationship was landlord/tenant rather than employer/worker. The owner also stopped providing any supplies at all - even things like shampoo and cleaning products had to be purchased individually or through a cost-sharing agreement between groomers. It was slightly less convenient but much cleaner from a business separation standpoint.

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

This is such a helpful thread! I'm a new groomer considering a similar arrangement and was worried about the legality. It sounds like the key is having proper documentation and true independence in your operations. One thing I'm curious about - for those of you who have been through audits or dealt with the IRS directly, do they actually ask to see your rental agreements and business records? I want to make sure I'm keeping the right paperwork from day one. Also, has anyone dealt with workers' comp issues? I assume since we're independent contractors we need our own coverage, but I want to make sure I'm not missing anything that could come back to bite me later.

0 coins

TurboTax and their fees are such a scam tbh

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

fr fr they be charging like $40 just to take the money from your refund like???

0 coins

highway robbery frfr 🤮

0 coins

Same situation here! Filed 2 weeks ago with TurboTax and chose refund payment option. Got the "payment complete" status yesterday and was hoping it meant good news. Sounds like from what everyone's saying I shouldn't get my hopes up too much yet šŸ˜… Going to check my transcript like Amara suggested

0 coins

Smart move checking your transcript! That's really the only way to know what's actually happening. The TurboTax payment status is basically meaningless for tracking your actual refund unfortunately. If you need help reading the transcript, that taxr.ai tool people mentioned above actually sounds pretty helpful - might be worth the buck if the transcript is too confusing to decode yourself!

0 coins

I see so many people having problems with backdoor Roths. Is it even worth it anymore? I've been thinking about doing one but these issues make me nervous.

0 coins

It's definitely worth it if you're over the income limit for direct Roth contributions. The paperwork isn't that bad once you understand it. The key is making sure you report both steps: 1. Non-deductible Traditional IRA contribution (Form 8606) 2. Conversion to Roth IRA (also on Form 8606) Most issues happen because people miss reporting step 1. As long as you document everything properly, backdoor Roths are still a great strategy for high earners.

0 coins

Thanks, that's helpful. I make just over the limit for direct Roth contributions, so it sounds like it might be worth the extra paperwork. Do you use special software to make sure you're reporting everything correctly?

0 coins

Lena Schultz

•

Just went through this exact same nightmare with my 2022-2023 backdoor Roth situation. The cascade effect is real and super frustrating! What helped me was creating a timeline of exactly what happened each year: - 2022: What contributions were made, what conversions happened, what forms were filed - 2023: What excess showed up, what penalties were assessed - Current year: What's carrying forward Once I mapped it out, I could see that I had properly made the non-deductible contribution in 2022 but my tax software didn't generate the Form 8606 correctly. The IRS saw the Roth conversion but not the underlying traditional IRA contribution basis, so they treated the whole conversion as taxable income PLUS flagged it as an excess contribution. The good news is that once you fix the original year (sounds like 2022 for you), the excess contribution issue should resolve. You'll need to amend both 2022 and 2023, but after that you should be clear. Don't let this scare you away from backdoor Roths - they're still worth it, just need to be extra careful with the paperwork!

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

This is such a helpful way to approach it! Creating a timeline really makes sense - I'm going to do exactly this to map out what happened in my situation. It sounds like the tax software issue you had might be similar to what I experienced. I've been using TurboTax and I wonder if it didn't properly generate my Form 8606 either. Did you end up having to pay any penalties while waiting for the amendments to be processed, or were you able to get those waived once you showed it was a reporting error rather than an actual excess contribution?

0 coins

Zara Shah

•

Am I the only one who thinks it's weird that we penalize people who donate to charity by only giving tax benefits to those who donate a lot or have expensive homes? Like, someone who donates $500 while earning $40k a year is probably making a bigger sacrifice than someone donating $14k while making $500k, but only the rich person gets a tax break. The system is messed up.

0 coins

Luca Bianchi

•

You're not wrong, but there are other tax benefits designed for lower/middle income folks that high-income people don't get. The tax code is complicated. Also, the standard deduction is basically a "freebie" deduction whether you donate or not, so at least there's that.

0 coins

I completely agree with your sentiment about the fairness issue. The current system does seem to favor those who can afford larger donations or have mortgages. However, there's actually some logic behind it - the standard deduction is meant to be a simplified benefit that everyone gets without having to track receipts or meet thresholds. It's like the government saying "here's a guaranteed $13,850 deduction, no questions asked." The itemized deduction system is more of an "opt-in" for people who have higher expenses. But you're right that it creates an odd situation where modest charitable giving gets no recognition while large donations do. One thing to remember is that there are other tax benefits that phase out at higher incomes (like the Earned Income Tax Credit, Child Tax Credit, education credits, etc.) that help balance things out somewhat. But I get your point - it would be nice if there was some recognition for charitable giving regardless of how much you donate.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

Just to add another perspective - I've been using TurboTax for 7 years now. The regular version (not Live) is usually enough if your tax situation is straightforward. But last year I had some questions about deducting my home office since I started freelancing, so I upgraded to Live. The upgrade cost me about $70 extra at the time, but having an expert review my return and confirm I was doing the home office deduction correctly gave me peace of mind. They even found a deduction I missed related to my business expenses. So while it does cost more, sometimes it's worth it if you're uncertain about parts of your return.

0 coins

Did you have to schedule the Live help in advance or could you just click and get someone right away? I'm trying to finish my taxes tonight and wondering if I can get help immediately if I upgrade.

0 coins

NebulaNova

•

When I used it, I didn't need to schedule in advance. I just clicked the "Get expert help" button that appears throughout the TurboTax interface, and I was connected with someone within about 5-10 minutes. They do show you the current wait time before you connect, and I imagine it might be longer during peak filing times (like early April). But generally the experience was pretty seamless - once connected, the tax expert could see my screen and walk me through exactly what I needed to do.

0 coins

Paolo Conti

•

Am I the only one who thinks all these tax preparation services are a racket? The government already has all our W-2 and 1099 information. In other countries, they just send you a completed form and you verify it. Here we have to pay companies like TurboTax to "help" us do something that should be simple and free. And then they nickel and dime you for every little "premium" feature. Sorry for the rant, but it's frustrating.

0 coins

Amina Diallo

•

You're definitely not alone! I've been saying this for years. TurboTax and H&R Block actually lobby against tax simplification so they can keep charging us. It's ridiculous that we have to pay to comply with laws that are mandatory.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

You're absolutely right about this being frustrating! I remember reading that the IRS actually had a pilot program years ago called "Return Free Filing" where they would send pre-filled forms to taxpayers, but it got shut down partly due to lobbying pressure from tax prep companies. What's even more annoying is that the "Free File" program they offer now has so many restrictions and confusing eligibility requirements that most people end up paying anyway. And then once you're in their system, they keep trying to upsell you on features that should honestly be included in the basic service. At least some states are starting to offer their own free filing options, but we're still stuck with this unnecessarily complicated federal system.

0 coins

Prev1...24242425242624272428...5644Next