IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

I went through something very similar when I returned from working in Canada for 4 years. The key thing to understand is that the FINCEN 105 is purely a customs/border security requirement - it has nothing to do with your taxes directly. Since you've been filing US tax returns all along while abroad, you've likely already reported the income that became these savings in previous years (either as foreign earned income or after applying foreign tax credits). The physical act of bringing the money into the US doesn't create a new taxable event. However, don't forget about the ongoing FBAR requirement if you still have foreign accounts. Even after moving back, if you had signature authority over foreign accounts totaling $10,000+ at any point during the tax year, you still need to file the FBAR by April 15th (with automatic extension to October 15th). One practical tip: when you deposit that $16K into your US bank account, consider doing it in smaller amounts over a few weeks rather than all at once. While there's nothing illegal about depositing the full amount, banks are required to report cash deposits over $10K, and spreading it out can avoid unnecessary paperwork and potential delays in accessing your funds.

0 coins

Great practical advice about depositing the funds gradually! I hadn't thought about the bank reporting requirements on the receiving end. Quick question though - when you say "spreading it out can avoid unnecessary paperwork," are you suggesting this to avoid triggering Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs), or is there another reason? I want to make sure I'm not inadvertently doing anything that could be seen as structuring, which I know can be problematic. Also, did you have any issues with your Canadian bank accounts after moving back to the US? I'm wondering if I should close my foreign accounts or keep them open for future travel.

0 coins

You raise an excellent point about structuring - I should clarify that suggestion. You're absolutely right to be cautious about anything that could appear as intentional structuring to avoid reporting requirements, which is illegal even if the underlying funds are legitimate. What I meant was more about practical banking convenience rather than avoiding CTRs. Large cash deposits can sometimes trigger additional verification procedures or temporary holds while the bank processes the transaction, which can be inconvenient if you need immediate access to the funds. But you're correct that deliberately staying under $10K to avoid reporting would be problematic. The safest approach is honestly just to deposit it all at once with documentation of your FINCEN 105 filing if the bank has questions. Most banks are familiar with returning residents who have legitimately declared funds at customs. Regarding Canadian accounts, I kept one account open initially for convenience during the transition, but ended up closing it after about 18 months. The ongoing FBAR reporting requirements and the hassle of managing foreign exchange for small balances wasn't worth it for me. However, if you travel frequently to Canada or have ongoing financial ties there, keeping an account might make sense. Just remember that even dormant foreign accounts count toward your FBAR thresholds.

0 coins

As someone who works in international tax compliance, I want to emphasize that you've already handled the most important step correctly by filing the FINCEN 105 at entry. This is exactly what you're supposed to do when bringing $10K+ in cash across the border. Since these are personal savings from income you've already reported on previous tax returns while abroad, you're right that this isn't "new income" to report. The key things to remember going forward: 1. Keep records of your FINCEN 105 filing (date, port of entry, amount declared) with your tax documents 2. Continue filing FBAR if you still have foreign accounts totaling $10K+ at any point during the year 3. Don't forget about Form 8938 if your foreign assets exceed the reporting thresholds 4. Make sure you're claiming all eligible foreign tax credits from taxes paid abroad The complexity you're dealing with is very common for returning expats. The IRS actually has Publication 54 (Tax Guide for U.S. Citizens and Resident Aliens Abroad) which covers many of these scenarios. Consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in international taxation if your situation involves significant amounts or multiple countries - the rules can be intricate and the penalties for mistakes can be substantial.

0 coins

Liam Brown

•

This is exactly the kind of comprehensive guidance I wish I had when I was dealing with my return to the US! I have a follow-up question about Publication 54 - does it specifically address the situation where you've been consistently filing US returns while abroad but then physically relocate back? I've been living in Australia for the past 8 years, filing every year, and I'm planning to move back next year with similar savings. I want to make sure I understand all the requirements before I make the move. Also, when you mention consulting with an international tax professional, do you have recommendations for finding someone reputable? I've had mixed experiences with tax preparers who claim to handle international situations but clearly don't have deep expertise.

0 coins

Taylor Chen

•

Is there any way to find out if your employer's 401k plan supports the mega-backdoor option without having to call them? Mine has a website but its terribly designed and the FAQs don't mention anything about after-tax contributions or in-plan conversions.

0 coins

Check your Summary Plan Description (SPD) document - employers are required to provide this to all participants. It should list all contribution types allowed, including after-tax if available. Also look for terms like "in-plan Roth conversion" or "in-plan Roth rollover" in the document.

0 coins

Great question about the mega-backdoor Roth! To address your specific situation - since your employer contributions are already bringing you close to the $69k limit, you likely don't have much room for the after-tax contributions that make the mega-backdoor strategy possible. Regarding your $22.5k traditional 401k contributions, you generally can't go back and convert those to Roth within the 401k after they've already been made. However, you might be able to roll them to a traditional IRA and then do a Roth conversion (though this would trigger taxes on the converted amount). For previous years, unfortunately you can't retroactively make mega-backdoor Roth conversions. The contribution limits and tax years are fixed once they've passed. But going forward, if you have any room between your total contributions and the annual limit, you could potentially start using the strategy. I'd recommend checking with your plan administrator to see exactly how much contribution space you have after employer matching, and whether your plan allows after-tax contributions and in-plan Roth conversions. Even a small amount of extra Roth space could be beneficial over time.

0 coins

GamerGirl99

•

This is really helpful context! I'm in a similar situation where I think my employer contributions might be eating up most of the available space for after-tax contributions. One follow-up question - when you mention rolling traditional 401k contributions to a traditional IRA and then doing a Roth conversion, would that be subject to the pro-rata rule if I have other traditional IRA balances? And would there be any advantage to doing that versus just changing future contributions to Roth within the 401k (assuming my plan allows it)? Also, is there a typical timeline for when employers make their matching contributions? Like if they do it at year-end, would I potentially have more room for after-tax contributions earlier in the year?

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I was in almost the exact same situation as the original poster - making around $30k and maxing out my 401k, then getting confused about IRA limits. What really clicked for me reading through these responses is the distinction between "earned income" (which includes your 401k contributions) and "taxable wages" (Box 1 on your W-2, which doesn't). I had been looking at Box 1 and thinking that was my limit for IRA contributions. It's also reassuring to see multiple people confirm this with actual experience and even official IRS confirmation. The tax code can be so confusing, especially when you're trying to optimize multiple retirement accounts at once. Thanks to everyone who shared their knowledge and resources - this community is awesome for getting reliable tax advice!

0 coins

Totally agree with you on how confusing this distinction can be! I made the same mistake when I first started contributing to both accounts. It's one of those things where the IRS uses different definitions of "income" depending on what they're calculating, which isn't intuitive at all. What really helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track my gross wages vs. my taxable wages (Box 1) vs. what counts for different retirement account purposes. Once you see it laid out, it becomes much clearer how your 401k contributions affect different parts of your tax situation differently. And you're absolutely right about this community being great for tax advice - getting real-world examples from people who've actually dealt with these situations is so much more helpful than trying to decipher IRS publications on your own!

0 coins

Ethan Scott

•

This is exactly the kind of question that shows how unnecessarily complex the tax code can be! I went through this same confusion when I started maximizing both my 401k and IRA contributions. To add to all the great explanations here: think of it this way - your employer reports your full gross wages to the Social Security Administration and for Medicare purposes regardless of your 401k contributions. That's the same income base the IRS uses for determining IRA contribution eligibility. One thing I didn't see mentioned is that this rule also applies to other pre-tax deductions like health insurance premiums, HSA contributions, and flexible spending accounts. None of these reduce your "earned income" for IRA purposes, even though they all reduce your taxable wages in Box 1 of your W-2. The IRS basically wants to make sure you can't game the system by loading up on pre-tax deductions to artificially lower your earned income and then claim you can't contribute to retirement accounts. It's actually designed to help savers, not hurt them!

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

This is such a helpful way to think about it! I never considered how other pre-tax deductions like health insurance and HSA contributions work the same way. It makes sense that the IRS would want to prevent people from artificially reducing their "earned income" through pre-tax elections just to avoid retirement account limits. Your point about it being designed to help savers rather than hurt them is really insightful. It's almost like the IRS is saying "we want you to save for retirement in as many ways as possible, so we're not going to penalize your IRA contributions just because you're also smart enough to max out your 401k." I'm curious though - does this same logic apply to things like commuter benefits or dependent care FSAs? Are those also ignored when calculating earned income for IRA purposes?

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

Just a heads up - while this strategy works, remember that if your state refund gets delayed for any reason (audits, verification, etc.), you'll still be on the hook for paying federal taxes by the deadline. Might be good to have a backup plan just in case. And definitely e-file both returns for fastest processing!

0 coins

Great advice from everyone here! Just wanted to add that you should also check if your state has any specific timing for refund processing. Some states are faster than others - for example, California typically processes e-filed returns with direct deposit in 7-10 days, while other states might take 2-3 weeks. You can usually find current processing times on your state's tax department website. This will help you plan better for timing your federal payment. Also, if you're really cutting it close to the April 15th deadline and your state refund hasn't arrived yet, remember you can always pay the minimum amount to avoid penalties and then pay the rest when your refund comes in.

0 coins

This is really helpful info about checking state-specific processing times! I didn't realize there could be such a big difference between states. Do you know if there's a reliable website that tracks all the different state processing times, or do I need to check each state's tax department individually? I'm filing in Texas and want to make sure I have realistic expectations for when my refund will arrive.

0 coins

But wait - doesn't the FAA require flight logs anyway? Couldn't you just use those same logs to mark which flights were business vs personal? Seems like aircraft would actually be easier to track than cars since there's already mandatory record keeping.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

Yes and no. FAA required logs track aircraft maintenance and pilot currency/experience, not necessarily the purpose of each flight or all expenses. You need both sets of records for tax purposes - the FAA logs can help establish when flights occurred, but you still need to document business purpose, passengers, locations, etc.

0 coins

Your friend is definitely confused about the GSA vs IRS distinction. As a tax professional, I see this mistake frequently with pilots and boat owners who think there are standard mileage rates for all vehicles. The $1.74/mile GSA rate is specifically for federal employees using personal aircraft on official government business - it's a reimbursement rate, not a tax deduction. The IRS Publication 463 is crystal clear that standard mileage rates only apply to "automobiles, vans, pickups, and panel trucks." For his Cessna, he needs to track actual expenses (fuel, oil, annual inspections, insurance, hangar rent, depreciation) and multiply by his business use percentage. The good news is this often results in larger deductions than any hypothetical standard rate would provide, especially when you factor in depreciation on the aircraft value. Tell your friend to keep detailed logs of business flights with dates, destinations, business purpose, and passengers. The IRS loves documentation when it comes to aircraft deductions since they're frequently audited.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

This is really helpful clarification! I'm new to this community but have been following this thread because I'm considering getting my pilot's license and potentially using a plane for business travel down the road. One quick question - when you mention that aircraft deductions are "frequently audited," how much more likely are you to get audited if you claim aircraft expenses versus just standard car mileage? Is it significant enough that it might not be worth the hassle for smaller amounts? Also, do you have any rough guidelines for what constitutes "detailed logs" that the IRS expects? I'm used to just tracking mileage for my car, so I want to make sure I understand the documentation requirements before I potentially get into aircraft ownership.

0 coins

Prev1...23552356235723582359...5643Next