


Ask the community...
Just wanna point out that TurboTax DOES actually have a way to handle this situation properly, but it's not obvious. Instead of just entering what's in box 10, you need to go to the property tax section and choose "I want to enter my property taxes manually" option. Then it gives you a field to enter your prorated amount with an explanation box where you can note why your number differs from the lender's form.
This is such a common issue that trips up so many new homeowners! I went through the exact same confusion when I bought my first house mid-year. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet to track all the numbers - the full year's tax bill, the exact closing date, days of ownership, seller credits, and what my lender reported. Having it all laid out visually made it much clearer that I needed to use the prorated amount based on actual ownership days. Also, don't forget to save your closing statement (HUD-1 or CD) forever - the IRS might want to see how the taxes were allocated at closing if they ever question your deduction amount. I keep mine in the same file as my tax returns for easy reference. The key thing to remember is that tax law is based on actual ownership, not what comes out of your pocket or what your lender reports. You owned the house for X days, so you can deduct X/365 of the annual property tax bill - period. Everything else is just accounting between you and the seller/lender.
This spreadsheet approach is brilliant! I'm definitely going to set something like this up. Quick question though - when you calculate the days of ownership, do you count the closing day itself as day 1 of ownership, or start counting from the day after closing? I know it sounds nitpicky but with property taxes being so high in some areas, even a day or two could make a difference in the calculation. Also, totally agree about keeping that closing statement forever. I learned the hard way that you need documentation for everything when it comes to real estate transactions and taxes!
Make sure u keep REALLY good records of how u calculated everything!!! I got audited last year for my amazon biz and they questioned my currency conversion methods. Had to provide proof of every conversion rate I used. Without good records I woulda been screwed.
What kind of documentation did the IRS accept as proof for your conversion calculations? Were screenshots of the exchange rates from a reputable source good enough?
This is really helpful information everyone! I'm dealing with a similar situation but also have sales through Amazon's European marketplaces (UK, Germany, France). Should I be converting all of these different currencies to USD using the same methodology? And does anyone know if there are any special considerations for VAT that gets collected by Amazon on European sales - do I need to account for that differently on my Schedule C since it's not really "my" income?
Yes, you should convert all foreign currencies to USD using the same consistent methodology - either transaction-by-transaction conversion or the yearly average exchange rate method. The IRS requires consistency in your approach across all currencies. For VAT collected by Amazon in Europe, you're correct that this isn't your income - it's tax collected on behalf of the European tax authorities. Amazon should be reporting the VAT separately from your actual sales proceeds. Your Schedule C should only include the net amount you actually received after VAT was deducted. Make sure to review your Amazon settlement reports carefully to distinguish between your gross sales, VAT collected, and your net proceeds that you actually received. Keep detailed records of how you're handling each currency conversion and VAT calculation, especially given what @Ryan Vasquez mentioned about audit documentation requirements.
Has anyone used TurboTax to handle these TD Ameritrade wash sale situations? I'm wondering if importing my 1099-B directly will correctly account for everything or if I need to make manual adjustments.
I used TurboTax last year with TD Ameritrade and it handled the wash sales pretty well after direct import. Just make sure you select the option to import your 1099-B directly rather than manually entering. The import will bring in all the wash sale adjustments automatically.
I've been dealing with this exact issue! One thing that really helped me understand what was happening was creating a simple spreadsheet tracking all my MSFT trades with dates and amounts. When I mapped it out chronologically, it became clear where the 30-day overlaps were occurring. What I discovered is that TD Ameritrade's wash sale identification is actually quite accurate, but their 1099-B presentation can be confusing. The key is understanding that when they show a "W" code next to a transaction, they're not saying that specific sale created a wash sale - they're indicating that the loss from that sale is being disallowed because of a replacement purchase. Also, don't forget that if you have any mutual funds or ETFs that hold MSFT as a major position, purchases of those could potentially trigger wash sales too. It's not just direct stock purchases that count as "substantially identical" securities. The good news is that as long as you report exactly what's on your 1099-B, you should be fine tax-wise. The IRS expects you to use the broker's calculations unless you have a specific reason to believe they're wrong.
This is incredibly helpful advice! I never thought about creating a spreadsheet to map out the chronology. That makes so much sense for visualizing the 30-day windows. Your point about mutual funds and ETFs is eye-opening too - I do have some broad market ETFs that probably hold MSFT as a top holding. Could purchases of something like VTI or SPY potentially trigger wash sales if I'm trading MSFT individually? That seems like it would make the wash sale rules almost impossible to avoid for active traders. The "W" code explanation is also really clarifying. I was getting confused thinking each "W" transaction was a separate wash sale event, but you're saying it's more about which losses are being disallowed due to replacement purchases. That definitely matches what I'm seeing on my 1099-B now that I look at it with fresh eyes.
Something to consider - check if Box 12 on your W2 has any codes like D, E, F, G, H, S, or similar with amounts listed. These are retirement plan contributions which would reduce the amount shown in Box 1 (wages and compensation) without reducing what you were actually paid. Box 1 on the W2 doesn't show your total compensation - it shows your federally taxable wages after all pre-tax deductions. This is a super common misunderstanding about W2s that causes a lot of panic!
This is exactly right! Last year I freaked out because my W2 showed $11K less than my salary, but it turned out my 401k contributions, HSA, and health insurance premiums were all pre-tax and therefore not included in Box 1. Box 3 and 5 were higher amounts because Social Security and Medicare taxes are calculated differently.
Thanks for this suggestion. I double-checked my W2 and there is about $3,500 in Box 12 with code D (401k contributions), but that still leaves around $4,500 unaccounted for. Boxes 3 and 5 (Social Security and Medicare wages) are higher than Box 1 but still about $4K below my actual gross salary. The fact that multiple people at our company have almost identical discrepancies makes me think this isn't just about standard pre-tax deductions.
Given that you've ruled out pre-tax deductions and multiple employees have the same issue, this definitely sounds like a systematic payroll error that needs to be addressed. Here's my recommended approach: Document everything first - gather all your paystubs, bank statements showing deposits, and any employment agreements. Calculate the exact discrepancy after accounting for all legitimate pre-tax items. Since your boss is difficult to approach, consider sending a brief, professional email that focuses on the factual discrepancy rather than making accusations: "Hi [Boss], I'm preparing my taxes and noticed my W2 shows $X in Box 1, but my records show I received $Y in gross pay this year. Could you help me understand this difference or arrange for a corrected W2 if needed?" The fact that multiple employees have this issue actually works in your favor - it suggests this isn't about individual employee confusion but rather a processing error. If your employer won't cooperate, the IRS Form 4852 route is completely legitimate in this situation. Don't file with the incorrect amount - it will likely trigger correspondence from the IRS later when they match your employer's quarterly reports with your tax return. Better to resolve this upfront than deal with it during an audit.
This is really solid advice! I'm in a similar situation where my employer has been unresponsive about a W2 discrepancy. One thing I'd add - when you're documenting everything, make sure to keep copies of any communications with your employer about this issue. If you do end up needing to file Form 4852, the IRS will want to see that you made a good faith effort to get the corrected W2 first. Also, since multiple employees are affected, you might consider coordinating with your coworker. If you both submit similar requests at the same time, it might get taken more seriously by whoever handles payroll. Just a thought!
Miguel Ortiz
I recently went through this exact process and found out something important that hasn't been mentioned yet. If you use any accounting software for payroll (like QuickBooks, Gusto, etc.), they usually require your EIN and legal business name to match EXACTLY what the IRS has on file. So even if you decide to wait for the IRS to process your name change, you might run into issues with your payroll software rejecting submissions in the meantime. When I called my payroll provider, they suggested adding the LLC as a "DBA" of the sole proprietorship in their system as a temporary workaround.
0 coins
Zainab Khalil
ā¢This is a great point. I ran into this with ADP when I changed my business structure. Did your payroll company give you any grief about the EIN situation, or were they understanding?
0 coins
Luca Romano
One thing I learned the hard way when I went through a similar transition is to keep detailed records of EVERYTHING during this process. I recommend creating a folder with copies of all correspondence with the IRS, your original EIN confirmation letter, your LLC formation documents, and any letters you send regarding the name change. The reason this is so important is that if there are any discrepancies or issues down the road, you'll need to be able to prove the timeline of your business structure change and that you followed proper procedures. I had an issue 18 months later where the IRS questioned some of my filings, and having that paper trail saved me from potential penalties. Also, make sure you're consistent with how you sign all tax documents during this transition period. Use your legal name as the member-manager of the LLC, not your old sole proprietor signature, even though you're using the same EIN. This helps establish the proper chain of authority for your business entity.
0 coins
Brianna Muhammad
ā¢This is excellent advice about documentation! I'm just starting this process myself and hadn't thought about the signature consistency issue. When you say "sign as member-manager of the LLC," do you mean I should literally write "John Smith, Member-Manager of ABC Landscaping LLC" on tax forms, or just sign my name but in my capacity as the LLC manager? I want to make sure I get this right from the beginning.
0 coins