This is totally normal for multi-state employment situations! Your employer handled this correctly. The key thing to understand is that federal wages and state wages are reported differently on W-2s. What happened is your employer consolidated all your federal wage information ($70,000 total) onto your Connecticut W-2 in Box 1, while separately reporting the state-specific portions on each respective W-2. So your Connecticut W-2 shows the full $70,000 federal wages but only $50,000 Connecticut state wages, and your Delaware W-2 shows $0 federal wages (since it was already reported on the CT form) but $20,000 Delaware state wages. This is actually the standard way employers handle multi-state situations to avoid duplicate federal reporting while ensuring proper state tax allocation. When you file, you'll use the total federal wages from your Connecticut W-2 for your federal return, then file separate state returns for each state based on the income earned there. Don't stress - your employer did everything right! Just make sure when you're filing to enter both W-2s exactly as they appear, and your tax software will handle the rest.

As someone who went through this exact same situation when I started my career, I totally understand the confusion! Multi-state W-2s can be really intimidating when you're filing for the first time. Based on what you've described, everything sounds completely normal. Your employer is following standard practices by consolidating your federal wages on one W-2 while separating the state portions. The fact that your Connecticut W-2 shows $70,000 in federal wages (Box 1) confirms that all your income is properly accounted for at the federal level. For the Delaware W-2 showing no state tax withholding - this could be due to several factors. Some employers don't withhold state taxes for very short work periods, especially for remote work situations. You'll still need to determine if you owe Delaware taxes on that $20,000, but the lack of withholding doesn't necessarily indicate an error. My advice: proceed with filing using both W-2s exactly as they appear. Your tax software should handle the multi-state complexity automatically. And don't hesitate to reach out to your HR department if you want confirmation - they're usually happy to explain their payroll processes to new employees!

I ran into a similar TurboTax depreciation glitch last tax season! The issue you're describing sounds exactly like what happens when TurboTax's validation system can't properly reconcile mixed depreciation methods or business-use percentages during the Federal Review phase. One thing that helped me was clearing the browser cache and cookies if you're using the online version, or restarting the desktop software completely before trying again. Sometimes TurboTax gets stuck in a validation loop and needs a fresh start. Also, make sure you didn't accidentally enter any of your assets as "Listed Property" - that category has special rules that can cause unexpected validation errors. Both your laptop and printer should be treated as regular business equipment, not listed property, unless you're using them for entertainment purposes. If the manual entry approach others mentioned doesn't work, you might need to delete and re-enter your assets completely rather than just editing the existing entries. TurboTax sometimes holds onto calculation errors even after you fix the underlying data.

I've been dealing with TurboTax depreciation headaches for years as a small business owner, and you're definitely not alone with this issue! The error you're describing where Smart Check crashes mid-message is a known bug that seems to happen when TurboTax's validation system encounters certain combinations of depreciation methods and business-use percentages. From what I've learned through trial and error, the problem often stems from how TurboTax handles the calculation sequence. It calculates your depreciation correctly initially, but then during the Federal Review phase, it tries to re-validate those calculations and gets confused by its own math, especially with partial business use assets. A few things that have worked for me: First, make sure you're using the same depreciation method (MACRS) for both assets - mixing methods can trigger validation errors. Second, try entering your printer's business portion directly ($1,280) instead of the full cost with percentage. And if all else fails, sometimes you have to delete the problematic assets entirely and re-enter them fresh rather than editing existing entries. The good news is your depreciation amounts ($68 for the laptop and $293 for the printer) sound reasonable for those asset types and timing, so the actual tax calculation isn't the issue - it's just TurboTax's validation system being overly picky!

Has anyone used the automatic meal tracking in QuickBooks for S-Corps? I'm trying to figure out if it correctly handles the 50% deduction for meals or if I need to manually adjust things. Every time I categorize something as a meal expense it doesn't seem to be doing anything special with the 50% rule.

I've been handling S-Corp taxes for several small businesses and this meal deduction issue trips up almost everyone. Here's what I always tell my clients: The key thing to remember is that you're essentially doing two separate things: (1) recording the legitimate business expense, and (2) noting the tax limitation. So yes, report the full $6,300 on line 20 of the 1120-S, then add back the nondeductible $3,150 on Schedule K, Line 16c with code "C". One tip that might help - keep really detailed records of each meal including who attended, the business purpose, and the amount. The IRS is pretty strict about meal deductions and having good documentation will save you headaches if you ever get audited. Also make sure you're distinguishing between different types of meals since some have different rules (like meals during travel vs. office meals vs. client entertainment). The nondeductible portion will flow through to your brother's K-1 and effectively increase his taxable income from the S-Corp, but it's not like he pays "extra" tax on it - it's just that the business gets less of a deduction than the actual expense incurred.

5 Has anyone used an online tax program like TurboTax for reporting inheritance stuff like this? I'm wondering if they handle this situation correctly or if I need to see a professional.

Just want to add another perspective here - I went through something very similar when my grandmother passed and left her property to multiple heirs. The stepped-up basis rule that others mentioned is absolutely correct, but make sure you keep excellent records of everything. One thing I wish someone had told me: if there were any improvements or expenses related to settling the estate (like repairs needed before the sale, legal fees for the estate, etc.), those might affect your basis calculation. Also, if there was any time gap between your father's passing and when the property was actually distributed to you heirs, you might need to consider whether there was any appreciation or depreciation in that period. The 1099-S you received is just the IRS making sure they know money changed hands - it doesn't necessarily mean you owe taxes on it. But definitely report it properly on Schedule D and Form 8949 as others have mentioned. When in doubt, it's worth consulting with a tax professional who deals with estate issues regularly.

Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences! This is really helpful. I completed my phone verification yesterday, so I'm crossing my fingers it falls into that 2-4 week range most of you experienced rather than the full 9 weeks. @Diego Ramirez - I'll definitely keep an eye on my transcript for those codes you mentioned. I haven't seen any updates yet since verification was just completed, but I'll watch for the 571 code as a good sign things are moving. @Ethan Davis - You make a good point about planning for the worst-case scenario. I think I'll budget as if it won't come for 9 weeks, but keep checking my transcript weekly to see if there's movement. Better to be prepared than disappointed if it takes longer than expected. Does anyone know if there's a typical day of the week when refunds usually get deposited after verification? I've heard some people say Wednesdays or Fridays are common, but not sure if that's just coincidence.

I'm going through this exact situation right now too! Filed January 22nd, completed phone verification two days ago after getting the dreaded "still processing" message. The 9-week timeline they gave me had me panicking since I was counting on that refund for some upcoming expenses. Reading everyone's experiences here is so reassuring - it sounds like most people are getting their refunds in the 3-4 week range after verification, not the full 9 weeks. I'm definitely going to start checking my transcript on Fridays like several people suggested, and I'll watch for those specific codes @Diego Ramirez mentioned. Has anyone noticed if the time of year affects processing speed? I'm wondering if doing verification in March (like now) is faster or slower than earlier in the filing season when they're probably swamped with returns.