IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

PST and GST requirements for small business owners in BC, Canada - charging US customers?

Hey everyone, I recently started up a small business in British Columbia and I'm really confused about the whole tax situation. Most of my customers (like 90-95%) are from the United States, but I do have some Canadian customers scattered across different provinces. I'm trying to figure out if I need to charge GST and PST to my American customers? And what about PST for customers in other Canadian provinces outside of BC? I've been looking this up online but there's so much information and it's getting overwhelming. Would really appreciate if someone could break this down for me in simple terms! This whole tax thing is giving me a headache lol.

One thing to watch out for with BC PST - if you're providing digital products or services, the rules can be different than for physical goods. I learned this the hard way last year. For digital services sold to BC customers, you generally need to charge PST. But the same digital service sold to customers outside BC (including US) is PST-exempt. Check out the BC gov website's bulletin PST 107 for the specific rules on telecommunications services which includes digital products. Don't make the same mistake I did and assume digital = exempt!

0 coins

Does software-as-a-service (SaaS) count as a digital service for PST purposes? I offer a monthly subscription to my web application and wasn't sure if I should be charging PST to my BC customers.

0 coins

Yes, SaaS definitely counts as a taxable service for BC PST purposes. You should be charging 7% PST to all your BC-based customers for your web application subscriptions. The province considers software accessed through an online portal to be the same as software purchased and downloaded. The provincial government has been increasingly focused on digital service taxation in recent years, so this is definitely an area where you want to be compliant. If you haven't been collecting PST on these transactions, you might want to look into voluntary disclosure before they catch it in an audit.

0 coins

Quick heads up for anyone with BC small businesses - make sure you're also keeping track of where YOUR suppliers are located. If you're buying stuff from other provinces or internationally, different input tax rules apply. For example, I was buying software from an Ontario company and they were charging me HST, which affects how I claim input tax credits compared to GST. And when I buy from US suppliers, there's no GST/HST charged but I might pay duties or import taxes depending on what I'm buying. Tracking this stuff from day one saves massive headaches at tax time!!

0 coins

Super helpful! Do you use any specific software to track all of this? I'm still using spreadsheets and it's getting messy with customers in different provinces and countries.

0 coins

I switched from spreadsheets to Wave Accounting (it's free!) and it's been a game changer for tracking multi-jurisdictional sales and purchases. You can set up different tax codes for each province/country combo and it automatically calculates what taxes should be applied based on customer location. It also generates reports that break down your sales by jurisdiction which makes filing so much easier. The mobile app lets you snap photos of receipts from US suppliers too, so you don't lose track of import documentation.

0 coins

Can I still submit Form 2553 under Rev. Proc. 2013-30 or wait to elect S-corp for 2024?

I'm really hitting a wall with all the conflicting advice I'm getting about my small business tax situation. Would appreciate any insight from folks who've been through this! Background: My single-member LLC has been operating since 2015, but this year things really took off. I'm projecting to end 2023 with about $230k in net revenue, which is WAY above what I expected. Up until now, I've just been taking owner's draws by transferring money from my business account to my personal account as needed. It's just me running the show - no employees. My big question is: Is it too late to elect S-corp status for the 2023 tax year using Form 2553 and Rev. Proc. 2013-30? If I still can, how would I handle the payroll requirements retroactively? And honestly, with only a month left in the year, would the tax savings even be worth the hassle of setting all this up for 2023, or should I just wait and make the election for 2024? Some tax advisors are telling me to just wait until next year, others say I can still use the relief provisions in Rev. Proc. 2013-30. I'm losing sleep over this - help!

My accountant specifically advised AGAINST filing an S-corp election now for 2023. His reasoning: if your income has just spiked this year, you're better off waiting to implement proper payroll and planning for 2024. We worked out that with only one month left in the year, the compliance cost of retroactive payroll setup, catch-up tax deposits, and amended filings would eat up most of the tax savings. Plus, rushing into it increases the risk of errors that could invalidate your election anyway. For 2024, we're setting up a proper system with quarterly salary payments, regular tax deposits, and everything properly documented from day one. Much cleaner approach.

0 coins

But doesn't Rev. Proc. 2013-30 let you make the election with your tax return next year without having to do retroactive payroll? That's what my tax guy told me, but now I'm confused.

0 coins

You can make the election with your tax return, but you still have to have complied with all S-corporation requirements during the year, including reasonable compensation paid through payroll. Rev. Proc. 2013-30 forgives the late filing of the election form, but not the actual operational requirements of an S-corporation. If you haven't been running payroll all year, you'd need to retroactively set that up, which means filing late payroll tax returns and potentially paying penalties. Your tax person might be confusing the late election relief with relief from the other S-corporation requirements, which is not what the revenue procedure does.

0 coins

Just wanted to share my experience - I was in almost identical situation last year. $198k net revenue, single-member LLC, found out about S corps in October. I filed Form 2553 under Rev. Proc. 2013-30 with my tax return for last year. My strategy was setting up payroll for Nov and Dec only, took reasonable salary for those months ($15k total), and documented why this was appropriate given the timing of my election. My S election was accepted without issues. Saved about $4k in taxes even with just 2 months of S-corp status, and now I'm fully set up for this year too. The key was solid documentation explaining the timing of my reasonable compensation decisions.

0 coins

Wouldn't the IRS question why you only started payroll for 2 months though? I'm worried they'd see that as trying to avoid paying yourself properly for the whole year.

0 coins

That's a valid concern, but the IRS actually understands that S-corp elections can happen mid-year. The key is having proper documentation explaining your decision-making process. I included a letter with my Form 2553 explaining that I only learned about S-corp benefits in October and immediately began taking reasonable compensation once I decided to make the election. The IRS looks for consistent treatment - if you're making the election partway through the year under Rev. Proc. 2013-30, they expect you to start proper payroll from that point forward, not necessarily retroactively for the entire year. What matters is that the compensation you do take is truly "reasonable" for the work performed during that period. I worked with my accountant to benchmark my $15k/2 months against industry standards and documented that reasoning. No issues during processing.

0 coins

Tax write-offs for business vehicles - How do Section 179 deductions work for company cars?

I've recently started my own catering business and I'm trying to wrap my head around some of the tax benefits, particularly with vehicle expenses and Section 179 deductions. From what I've researched online, it seems I can purchase a vehicle as a business expense if I track the mileage used for business purposes. I'm particularly interested in the heavy vehicles category - like trucks over 6000lbs GVW with a 6-foot bed - where it looks like I might be able to deduct 100% of the value in the first year through depreciation. I'm trying to understand this in terms of "after-tax" dollars. My accountant mentioned my marginal tax rate is approximately 42%. So if I'm understanding correctly: if the purchase is a business write-off, that effectively reduces the cost by 42%, and with the 100% depreciation write-off, that reduces it another 42%? So a $65K truck would effectively cost me only about $13K after tax benefits? This sounds too good to be true. Also, several blogs mentioned that leasing or financing provides even better benefits than buying outright, but they didn't explain why. Can someone clarify why financing or leasing would be advantageous from a tax perspective? Thanks for helping a tax newbie figure this out!

Slightly off-topic, but make sure you're looking at Total Cost of Ownership, not just the tax benefits. I got excited about the Section 179 deduction last year and bought a $65K truck for my real estate business, thinking I was "saving" a ton on taxes. What I didn't fully account for was: 1) Higher insurance costs (almost $200/month more than my previous vehicle) 2) Terrible fuel economy (I'm spending about $350 more per month on gas) 3) Higher maintenance costs 4) More expensive parking due to the larger size Yes, I got a nice tax deduction, but over 5 years, my TCO is WAY higher than if I'd bought something more modest. The tax tail shouldn't wag the business dog.

0 coins

That's a really good point! I hadn't considered the ongoing costs being so much higher for these larger vehicles. Would you say the Section 179 benefit was still worth it despite these higher costs, or do you regret the purchase?

0 coins

Honestly, I regret it. If I had it to do over, I'd buy a vehicle that actually matched my NEEDS rather than maximizing the tax deduction. The one-time tax savings of about $25K (in my tax bracket) will be completely wiped out by the higher operating costs within about 3 years. Unless you truly NEED a large, heavy vehicle for your business operations, I'd recommend focusing on efficiency and appropriate sizing rather than tax benefits. A smaller, more efficient vehicle might offer fewer tax advantages upfront, but the long-term math often works out better.

0 coins

Great discussion here! As someone who works in tax preparation, I wanted to add a few practical points that might help Miguel and others considering this decision: First, timing matters more than people realize. Section 179 deductions must be taken in the year the vehicle is "placed in service" - meaning when you start using it for business. If you buy in December but don't start using it until January, you might miss out on a full year of deduction benefits. Second, there are income limitations on Section 179. If your business income is below the deduction amount, you can't create a loss with Section 179 (though you can carry forward unused amounts). This is different from bonus depreciation, which can create losses. Third, for catering specifically, consider whether you actually need a 6,000+ lb vehicle. A well-equipped cargo van might serve your business better and still qualify for significant deductions, while being much more practical for navigating to catering venues and customer locations. Finally, remember that business use percentage applies to EVERYTHING - not just the purchase price, but insurance, fuel, maintenance, etc. If you're honest about your usage being 70% business, that percentage applies to all vehicle-related deductions going forward. The tax benefits are real, but make sure the vehicle choice makes business sense first!

0 coins

Should I offset my 401(k) hardship withdrawal penalty for home purchase?

So I'm planning to buy my first home soon and I'm considering using my 401(k) for a hardship withdrawal to cover the down payment. From what I understand, the IRS is going to hit me with a 30% penalty for doing this. I've been thinking about ways to minimize this hit and had an idea - what if I max out my 401(k) contributions this year up to the $23,000 limit and put it all in traditional 401(k)? Would this actually help offset that 30% penalty on the withdrawal or am I completely misunderstanding how this works? Not sure if the tax deduction from maxing out contributions would somehow balance out the penalty or if they're completely separate issues. Anyone have experience with this?

Something nobody's mentioned yet - if you do go with the hardship withdrawal, make sure you understand EXACTLY how much to withhold for taxes. I did this last year and only withheld 20%, thinking that would cover it. BIG mistake. I ended up owing a bunch more at tax time because: 1) the withdrawal pushed me into a higher tax bracket, 2) I still had to pay the 10% penalty separately, and 3) I also owed state taxes on the withdrawal. If I could do it over, I'd have withheld at least 35% to cover federal, state, and the penalty. Or better yet, gone with a 401k loan as others have suggested.

0 coins

Does your 401k provider let you choose how much to withhold? Mine only gave me the option for the standard 20% withholding and said I'd need to deal with the rest at tax time.

0 coins

Yes, most 401k providers allow you to choose a higher withholding rate than the mandatory 20% federal withholding. My provider (Fidelity) allowed me to specify any percentage I wanted above 20%, but I foolishly stuck with the minimum. If your provider only allows 20%, you can mitigate the tax hit by making estimated quarterly tax payments to the IRS to cover the additional taxes and penalty. That way you won't face a huge bill (and possibly underpayment penalties) when you file your return. I learned this the hard way!

0 coins

Have you looked into whether your 401k plan allows for loans instead of hardship withdrawals? Many plans let you borrow up to 50% of your balance (max $50,000) for a primary residence purchase. The huge advantage is there's NO tax penalty since it's not a withdrawal - you're borrowing from yourself. You do pay interest, but you're paying it to your own 401k account. Usually you have to repay within 5 years, but some plans extend this to 15-30 years for home purchases. My wife and I did this for our down payment and it worked great. Just be aware that if you leave your job, you'll typically need to repay the full loan quickly or it converts to a distribution with all the penalties.

0 coins

Do you still get charged that interest if you pay it off early? And does taking a loan affect your ability to make new contributions?

0 coins

Good question! Most 401k loans allow early repayment without prepayment penalties, so you only pay interest for the time you actually have the loan outstanding. The interest rates are typically pretty reasonable too - usually prime rate plus 1-2%. As for contributions, taking a loan generally doesn't affect your ability to make new contributions to your 401k. However, some plans do have restrictions like limiting you to one outstanding loan at a time or requiring you to wait a certain period before taking another loan. You'll want to check with your specific plan administrator about their rules. One thing to watch out for - while you're repaying the loan, you're missing out on potential investment growth on that borrowed amount, since the money isn't invested in the market. But for a home purchase, the benefits often outweigh this opportunity cost.

0 coins

Understanding Dependency Status for Tax Filing - Who Can Claim You on Their Taxes?

I've been noticing tons of confusion around dependency status for taxes lately, so I wanted to share what I've learned to help others out. There are two really important things that trip people up: First, being a dependent for taxes is NOT the same as being a dependent for other stuff like health insurance or college financial aid. The IRS has its own specific rules. Second (and this is super important) - if someone CAN claim you as their dependent, you HAVE TO check that box on your tax return saying you can be claimed - even if they choose not to claim you! This catches so many people off guard. I was helping my sister figure this out since she moved back home after college but has a full-time job now. She thought she could file as independent since she pays for most of her own stuff, but turns out our parents could still technically claim her because of the residence test. Can anyone share their experiences with dependency status or add anything I missed? I feel like this topic is way more complicated than it should be!

Does anyone know how the 5 dependency tests work for parents living with adult children? My mom moved in with me last year after Dad passed away. She gets about $1800/month from Social Security but I pay for housing, utilities, groceries, and most of her medical bills not covered by Medicare. Her annual income is about $21,600 which seems high, but I'm definitely providing more than half of her total support when you count everything.

0 coins

For parents, you'd use the qualifying relative tests, not the qualifying child tests. The four main qualifying relative tests are: 1. Relationship test - Parent automatically meets this 2. Gross income test - Their income must be less than $5,000 (for 2025) 3. Support test - You must provide more than half their support 4. Not a qualifying child test - They can't be someone else's qualifying child Unfortunately, with $21,600 in Social Security income, your mother's income exceeds the gross income limit for a qualifying relative. Even though you provide more than half her support, she wouldn't qualify as your dependent because of the income test.

0 coins

This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with my own dependency confusion right now. My 22-year-old brother lives with me and my spouse while he's finishing his master's degree. He works part-time and made about $12,000 last year, but we pay for his housing, utilities, food, and help with tuition costs. The tricky part is he's not a full-time student anymore since he's only taking thesis credits this semester. Does that affect whether I can claim him? I know the age test for qualifying child requires being under 24 AND a full-time student, but I'm not sure how "full-time" is defined when you're just doing research/thesis work. Also, since he's my brother (not my child), would I need to look at the qualifying relative tests instead? The relationship test should be fine since he's my sibling, and I'm pretty sure we provide way more than half his support. Just trying to figure out which set of rules applies here!

0 coins

Prev1...23192320232123222323...5645Next