IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Child Support Offset on Tax Refund - Will I Get the Remaining Balance?

Filed my taxes and i know i have back child support. My refund is supposed to be 7k but i only owe like 3k in support. Anyone know if ill get the remaining 4k or does the whole thing get eaten up? Been checking transcripts daily but cant make sense of the codes.

atleast ur helping ur kids out. had same situation last year, rest came like a month after offset

0 coins

facts ๐Ÿ’ฏ just hoping it comes before summer

0 coins

Been through this exact situation before. The offset process can be confusing but you'll definitely get your remaining $4k. Just keep monitoring your transcript for code 766 (credit to your account) and code 898 (offset). Once the offset processes, you should see the remainder deposit within 2-4 weeks. The wait is annoying but at least you know the money is coming!

0 coins

How to handle CP134R Refund of 941 taxes when you don't think it's correct

I'm completely confused about why the IRS sent me this refund check. My quarterly 941 for Q2 seems 100% accurate and perfectly matches all the deposits I made during that period. Their explanation makes zero sense to me: "We found the amount reported as total Federal Tax Deposits for the tax period shown above (April 30, 2023 Form 941) differs from the amount we have credited to your account. We've corrected this error. As a result, your refund is $2,483." The back of the form shows all my EFTPS payments, which appear correct. These payments also show up properly in my EFTPS payment history. I don't understand how they could "not credit my account" properly! Of course they provided a phone number to call for details, but surprise surprise, nobody's answering that line. Has anyone dealt with something like this before? Any insights on what could be happening here? I'm worried about cashing this check if it's a mistake. UPDATE: After calling for days, I finally got through to someone at the IRS. Turns out they entered my 941 incorrectly in their system. Instead of $48,500 in wages, they only recorded $4,850 which obviously messed up all the calculations on the form. Now I have to file a 941-X to correct their error and return the voided refund check with my 941-X. What a hassle!

Has anyone had success using the IRS Business Tax Account online portal to resolve these kinds of issues? I've been trying to set mine up but keep running into verification problems.

0 coins

I had good luck with it for checking payment status but for actual discrepancies like CP134R issues you still need to call or mail in corrections. Their online services for businesses are still pretty limited compared to individual accounts.

0 coins

I'm dealing with a similar CP134R situation right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! Just wanted to add that when you file the 941-X, make sure to check Box 1 on line 1 to indicate it's correcting an error on a previously filed return. Also, in Part 2 where you explain the corrections, be very specific about what the IRS entered incorrectly vs. what the correct amounts should be. One thing I learned from my tax preparer is to also include a copy of your original 941 along with the 941-X so they can easily see the discrepancy. It might seem redundant since they should have it on file, but given that they made the data entry error in the first place, having a clean copy attached can speed up the process. Also, don't forget to sign and date the 941-X - sounds obvious but it's easy to miss when you're stressed about the whole situation!

0 coins

Can reconstructive surgery to remove excess skin after massive weight loss be claimed as tax deductible?

I underwent bariatric surgery back in 2016 and have successfully maintained a weight loss of over 175 pounds since then. While I'm thrilled with the weight loss, I've been dealing with serious medical issues from the excess skin for years now. I constantly get painful rashes and infections where the skin folds, have caught my loose skin in zippers (excruciating!), and developed severe diastasis recti causing chronic back pain and urinary incontinence issues. My doctor recommended a circumferential abdominoplasty with abdominal plication to fix the diastasis recti and remove the problematic excess skin. But here's the frustrating part - my insurance is classifying these procedures as "cosmetic" and refusing coverage, even though they're to address legitimate medical complications. The surgery will cost around $24,000 out of pocket. Since these are to address actual medical problems resulting from my weight loss, would this qualify as a tax-deductible medical expense? Has anyone successfully claimed something similar on their taxes? I'm already gathering documentation from my doctors about medical necessity, but wondering if I need anything specific for tax purposes.

Has anyone considered getting the surgery done in another country? I had a full body lift in Mexico for less than half the US price after my 130lb weight loss, and the quality was excellent. Makes the tax deduction less critical when the base cost is so much lower.

0 coins

Medical tourism can be really risky for complex procedures! My cousin had complications from her overseas tummy tuck and ended up spending way more fixing everything back in the US. Plus those expenses definitely wouldn't be tax deductible.

0 coins

I went through this exact situation two years ago after losing 200+ pounds. The key is having rock-solid medical documentation that clearly establishes the procedures as treating medical conditions, not cosmetic enhancement. Make sure your doctors explicitly document the infections, rashes, hygiene issues, and functional problems caused by the excess skin. For the diastasis recti, get documentation of the back pain, posture problems, and incontinence issues. The IRS wants to see that you're treating medical conditions that existed before you decided on surgery. I successfully deducted my panniculectomy and hernia repair as medical expenses. The total was around $19,000, and since it exceeded 7.5% of my AGI, I got a significant deduction. Just be prepared - the IRS may scrutinize these claims more carefully, so having thorough documentation from multiple healthcare providers really helps your case. Also consider timing - if you can bunch other medical expenses into the same tax year (like related medications, follow-up treatments, compression garments), it helps you reach that 7.5% threshold more easily.

0 coins

Is an Irrevocable Trust required to pay taxes on investments that are reinvested back into the accounts?

I'm trying to figure out the tax situation with my father's trust for my children (his grandchildren). I'm currently serving as the trustee. My dad passed away in 2022, which converted the living trust to irrevocable. The trust isn't supposed to be distributed until my kids are older. The investments are in 2 different accounts which makes tracking easier, but I'm confused about the taxes. When I entered the investment income (about $12k) into TaxAct, it's saying the trust owes approximately $1500 federal and $180 state. It also shows around $2600 as "distributed" even though I never indicated that - the money was actually reinvested back into the trust accounts. I thought that since no money was actually distributed to beneficiaries, it would just roll back into the trust without tax liability. As the trustee, am I responsible for paying these taxes? This was straightforward before, but dealing with the investment side is confusing me. Any insights would be appreciated!

I went through this exact situation when my mom's trust became irrevocable. The key thing to understand is that the trust's tax obligation exists regardless of whether you actually distribute the money or reinvest it. What helped me was getting a clear picture of the trust's "accounting income" versus "taxable income" - they're not always the same thing. The IRS looks at what the trust earned, not what you did with those earnings afterward. One strategy that worked for my situation was making small distributions to the beneficiaries (my siblings' kids) and having those funds go directly into 529 education savings accounts in their names. This way the income got taxed at their lower rates instead of the trust's compressed brackets, but the money was still being saved for their future benefit. You'd need to check if your trust document allows this kind of arrangement and whether it makes sense for your family's situation. Also, don't forget that the trust can deduct certain administrative expenses like trustee fees, accounting costs, and investment management fees. These deductions can help offset some of the tax burden.

0 coins

This is a common confusion that many new trustees face! The key insight here is that irrevocable trusts are separate tax entities, so they owe taxes on income they retain regardless of whether that income is reinvested or sits in cash. The $2600 "distributed" amount you're seeing in TaxAct might be a software quirk or it could be related to how the program is calculating potential distributions under the trust's terms. I'd double-check your entries to make sure you haven't accidentally indicated any actual distributions. A few practical suggestions: 1. Consider consulting with a tax professional who specializes in trusts - the compressed tax brackets make this worth the investment 2. Review your trust document carefully to see if you have authority to make distributions now, as this could shift tax burden to your children at lower rates 3. Keep detailed records of all trust income and expenses, as the trust can deduct legitimate administrative costs Remember, as trustee you're responsible for ensuring the trust pays its taxes, but those taxes come from trust assets, not your personal funds. The trust should have its own bank account and tax ID number for this purpose.

0 coins

This is really helpful, especially the point about the $2600 "distributed" amount potentially being a software issue. I'm definitely going to double-check my entries in TaxAct to make sure I didn't accidentally indicate distributions when I meant reinvestments. The idea about consulting with a trust tax specialist makes a lot of sense given how different these tax rules are from regular individual returns. The compressed tax brackets alone seem like they could cost more than a professional's fee if I get something wrong. One question - when you mention the trust should have its own bank account and tax ID number, I do have separate accounts for the trust, but I've been using my own SSN for some of the investment accounts. Should I be getting a separate EIN for the trust now that it's irrevocable?

0 coins

Yes, you absolutely need to get a separate EIN (Employer Identification Number) for the irrevocable trust! This is actually a critical step that many new trustees miss. When your father's living trust became irrevocable upon his death, it became a separate tax entity that must have its own tax identification number. Using your SSN for trust accounts can create serious compliance issues and make tax filing much more complicated. You can apply for an EIN online at the IRS website (irs.gov) - it's free and usually takes just a few minutes. You'll need this EIN to: - Open proper trust bank/investment accounts - File the annual Form 1041 trust tax return - Issue any K-1s to beneficiaries if you make distributions Once you have the EIN, you'll need to update all the trust's financial accounts to use the new tax ID number instead of your SSN. Most banks and investment companies can help you with this transition - just bring a copy of the trust document and the EIN confirmation letter. Getting this sorted out should also help clarify some of the tax software confusion you're experiencing, since the accounts will be properly separated from your personal finances.

0 coins

When to Issue 1099 to Vendors for Tax Reporting - Rules & Requirements

Hey everyone, I could really use some advice from those who know tax stuff better than me. I recently started a job as a finance manager at a medium-sized manufacturing company (about 60 employees) and I'm reviewing our vendor payments for the year. I noticed that a bunch of our contractors who clearly provided services over $600 weren't flagged in our system for 1099 reporting. I'm pretty sure we need to issue 1099s to any vendor providing services (not goods) who we've paid more than $600 to during the tax year, unless they're a corporation. But my predecessor had a really inconsistent approach. I found plumbers, consultants, and even our landscaping company with no 1099 flags in our system. When I asked our AP clerk about it, she said she only marks vendors for 1099s if they specifically mention they need one when they submit their W-9. That doesn't sound right to me at all! I've got about 30 vendors I'm pretty sure should be getting 1099s that aren't currently flagged. What's the correct approach here? Do I need to go back and fix all these vendor setups? And more importantly, what's our potential exposure if we've been doing this wrong for years before I got here? Thanks for any help you can provide!

Is anyone using QuickBooks for their 1099 reporting? I'm wondering if it's worth switching to. Our current accounting software makes the 1099 process really cumbersome.

0 coins

We use QuickBooks and while it's decent for basic 1099 tracking, it has limitations. You have to be very careful with how vendors are set up initially, and the reporting isn't very flexible. We actually export the data and use a separate 1099 filing service because QB's built-in e-filing was glitchy for us last year.

0 coins

We switched from QuickBooks to Xero last year and it handles 1099s much better in my opinion. The vendor management is more intuitive and it integrates with several 1099 e-filing services. Worth looking into if you're considering a change anyway.

0 coins

This is such a common issue - you're definitely not alone! I went through something similar when I took over our AP process. One thing that helped me was creating a simple vendor audit spreadsheet to track everything systematically. I listed all vendors who received over $600, their entity type from W-9s, service vs. goods classification, and payment methods. What really surprised me was how many "corporations" in our system were actually LLCs or sole proprietorships when I actually looked at their W-9s. The previous person had just assumed anything with "Inc." in the name was a corporation, but several were actually LLCs doing business as something else. For your immediate situation, I'd prioritize getting current year compliance right first, then work backwards on previous years. The IRS is generally more understanding when you're proactively fixing mistakes rather than waiting for them to find them during an audit. Document everything you're doing to correct the process - it shows good faith effort if questions come up later. Also, don't forget about the de minimis threshold - it's $600 per year, not per payment. So if you paid a vendor $400 in March and $300 in October, they still need a 1099 even though each individual payment was under $600.

0 coins

Yes, the $600 threshold applies to the total payments to that vendor regardless of what services they provided - so your plumbing/electrical example would definitely trigger a 1099 requirement since it's $700 total to the same vendor. Regarding how far back to go, I only went back three years since that's typically the IRS audit window for most issues. Going back further felt like unnecessary risk exposure. I focused on the most recent years where we had the biggest dollar amounts and clearest documentation. The key is being systematic about it - don't just randomly fix things here and there. Create a remediation plan, document your process, and if you do need to file corrected forms, include a cover letter explaining you discovered the errors during an internal compliance review. This shows good faith effort which the IRS appreciates. One more tip: consider getting a tax professional involved if you find significant issues going back multiple years. The penalty relief options and voluntary disclosure procedures can be complex, and it's worth getting expert guidance to minimize your exposure.

0 coins

Yes, the $600 threshold applies to the total payments to that vendor for the entire tax year, regardless of whether they were for different types of services. So in your example with $400 for plumbing and $300 for electrical from the same contractor, that's $700 total and would definitely require a 1099-NEC. Regarding how far back to go - I ended up reviewing three years because that's typically the statute of limitations for most tax issues. Beyond that, the risk/benefit didn't make sense unless there were really egregious errors. The key is being able to show you made a reasonable effort once you discovered the problem. I'd suggest starting with the most recent complete tax year and the current year first. Get those sorted, then work backwards if you have time and resources. Document your process and decision-making - it really does help if you ever need to explain your approach to the IRS. One more tip: when I found vendors who should have gotten 1099s in previous years, I sent them copies anyway (marked as "corrected") even though the deadline had passed. Most of them appreciated having the forms for their own tax filing purposes, and it showed good faith on our part.

0 coins

Prev1...23172318231923202321...5645Next