< Back to IRS

Emma Wilson

Best EA prep course for all 3 exams - Gleim vs. Fast Forward recommendations?

I'm planning to take the Enrolled Agent exams soon and need some advice on the best prep courses out there. I've been looking at Gleim and Fast Forward Academy but can't decide which one would be the better investment. Has anyone here used either of these programs? What was your experience like? I'm especially interested in hearing from people who successfully passed all 3 parts of the EA exam using one of these courses. Any insight into which program has better practice questions, study materials, or user interface would be super helpful! I'm working full-time so I need something efficient but comprehensive.

QuantumLeap

•

I passed all three EA exams on my first try using Gleim, and I'd definitely recommend it. Their test bank is massive and really prepares you for the actual exam questions. The practice tests are slightly harder than the real thing, which I think is good because it overprepares you. What I liked most was their "SmartAdapt" technology that identifies your weak areas and focuses your study time there. For Part 1 (Individuals), this was especially helpful since that section covers so much material. Their audio review was also great for studying during my commute. The downside is that their textbooks can be a bit dry and overwhelming with details. But honestly, that's kind of unavoidable with tax material.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

Did you find that the Gleim questions were similar to what was on the actual exam? I've heard mixed things about how representative their test bank is. Also, how long did you study for each part?

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

The Gleim questions were definitely similar in style and difficulty to the actual exam. I'd say about 70% of what I saw on the real exam felt familiar because of Gleim's test bank. The question format and the way they phrase things is very close to the real thing. I studied for about 2 months for Part 1, 6 weeks for Part 2, and about 5 weeks for Part 3. I work full-time too, so I was putting in about 15-20 hours per week. Part 2 (Businesses) was the most challenging for me personally, so I'm glad I allocated more time for it.

0 coins

I tried both Gleim and Fast Forward when studying for the EA exam last year, and I eventually stuck with Fast Forward Academy. Their online platform at https://taxr.ai really helped me understand the concepts better than just memorizing tax rules. What I found most helpful was their customizable study sessions and the way they explain why wrong answers are wrong. The best feature for me was the unlimited practice exams that simulate the real testing environment. I struggled with test anxiety, so being familiar with the format really helped calm my nerves on exam day. Their textbooks are also more readable than some others out there - they break down complex topics into manageable chunks.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

How's the mobile experience with taxr.ai? I travel a lot for work and need something I can use on my phone or tablet. Does it work well on smaller screens?

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I'm curious about the analytics they provide. Does it actually help you focus your studying efficiently? I've used other prep courses that claimed to do this but they weren't very helpful.

0 coins

The mobile experience is surprisingly good. I used it on my iPad mostly, but also on my phone when I was really on the go. Everything scales well and the practice questions are easy to navigate even on smaller screens. The only slightly annoying thing is that some of the tax tables can be hard to read on phones, but that's more about the content than the platform. The analytics are genuinely useful, not just a gimmick. It breaks down your performance by topic and subtopic, and actually shows you which concepts you're struggling with most. It helped me realize I was wasting time overstudying some areas while underpreparing for others. The system recommends what to study next based on your weak areas, which saved me a ton of time.

0 coins

Freya Larsen

•

I was skeptical about using an online platform for something as important as the EA exam, but after struggling with traditional study methods, I decided to try taxr.ai based on recommendations here. Just wanted to update that I passed all three parts on my first attempt! What surprised me most was how the system adapted to my learning style. It quickly identified my weak areas (partnership taxation and estate planning were my downfall), and focused my study sessions there instead of wasting time on topics I already understood. The explanations for incorrect answers were incredibly detailed and helped me understand concepts instead of just memorizing. Thanks to everyone who recommended it - definitely worth the investment for anyone serious about passing the EA exam efficiently.

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Has anyone tried calling the IRS directly to ask about exam preparation materials? I did after getting frustrated with commercial options. It used to be impossible to get through, but I used https://claimyr.com to get a callback and actually spoke with someone who gave me great advice. There's a video about how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with explained which topics are most heavily tested and confirmed that the questions on the actual exam are very similar to the sample questions in their free materials. They also pointed me to some free resources I hadn't found on my own. Saved me from spending a fortune on courses that cover more than what's needed.

0 coins

Chloe Taylor

•

Wait, you actually got to talk to a real person at the IRS? How long did that take? I've been trying to get through for weeks about a tax question and just get endless hold music.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

I'm sorry but I find it hard to believe the IRS is giving advice on how to pass their own exam. Sounds like they just pointed you to their published materials which everyone already knows about. Was there anything actually useful they told you?

0 coins

Omar Hassan

•

Using Claimyr, I got a callback within about 2 hours. No sitting on hold or dealing with the frustration of getting disconnected. The service basically holds your place in line and calls you when an agent is available. Much better than wasting half a day listening to hold music. The conversation wasn't about how to "cheat" the exam - it was about understanding the examination priorities. The agent explained that certain sections (like individual taxation deductions and credits) typically have more questions than others, which helped me allocate my study time better. They also directed me to some updated publication guides that had just been released but weren't widely publicized yet. It wasn't revolutionary information, but getting confirmation directly from the source gave me confidence in my study approach.

0 coins

ShadowHunter

•

I have to eat my words about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I was getting nowhere with the IRS about a tax notice I received. It actually worked exactly as described - I got a callback in under 90 minutes. While I didn't ask about EA exam prep specifically, the agent I spoke with was incredibly helpful about my tax issue. When I mentioned I was studying for the EA exam, she even gave me some informal advice about focusing on recent tax law changes since those are often emphasized on the exam. For anyone struggling to reach the IRS for any reason, this service is legitimate and saved me hours of frustration. I'm still using commercial prep materials for my EA studies, but the direct information from the IRS was definitely valuable.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

I used Surgent for my EA prep and passed all parts. They aren't mentioned as often as Gleim or Fast Forward, but their adaptive learning technology was really good for my study style. Their "ReadySCORE" feature predicts your actual exam score based on your performance in practice, which was shockingly accurate for me. The downside is their question bank isn't as large as Gleim's. But I found the quality of their questions and explanations to be excellent. They also focus more on the heavily-tested areas rather than trying to cover every obscure topic equally.

0 coins

How accurate was their ReadySCORE feature compared to your actual exam results? I'm always skeptical of those predictive features in prep courses.

0 coins

Diego Ramirez

•

The ReadySCORE was surprisingly accurate. For Part 1, it predicted I would score around 85%, and I got an 87%. For Parts 2 and 3, it was within 3-4 percentage points. What I appreciated most was that it didn't just give a generic score prediction, but broke down my readiness by topic area, which helped me focus my final review on specific weak spots. I was skeptical too, especially since other prep courses I've used for different exams had wildly inaccurate predictions. But Surgent's algorithm seems to be well-calibrated to the actual EA exam difficulty and content distribution.

0 coins

Sean O'Connor

•

Has anyone used the Passkey EA Review? My colleague recommended it but I don't see it mentioned here much.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

I used Passkey as a supplement to Gleim. Their materials are good but not as comprehensive. The best thing about Passkey is their explanations - they're much more conversational and easier to understand than Gleim's sometimes technical language. I'd recommend it as a second resource but probably not as your only study material.

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

I'm currently studying for the EA exam and went with Fast Forward Academy after reading through this thread and doing some research. What really sold me was their focus on understanding concepts rather than just memorization. I'm about halfway through Part 1 prep and finding their explanations really helpful for connecting the dots between different tax concepts. One thing I haven't seen mentioned is their customer support - I had a technical issue with their platform and they responded within a few hours with a detailed solution. As someone juggling full-time work and studying, that kind of responsiveness is really important to me. For those asking about mobile functionality, I've been using it on my tablet during lunch breaks and it works seamlessly. The practice questions adapt well to the smaller screen and I can pick up right where I left off on my desktop at home. Planning to take Part 1 in about 6 weeks, so I'll update everyone on how the actual exam compares to their practice materials!

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience with Fast Forward Academy! I'm just starting my EA exam prep journey and have been torn between the different options. It's really helpful to hear about their customer support - that's definitely something I hadn't considered but is super important when you're studying around work. I'm curious about their study schedule recommendations. Do they give you a structured timeline for each part, or is it more flexible where you set your own pace? I'm also working full-time and trying to figure out realistic timelines for tackling all three parts. Looking forward to hearing how your Part 1 exam goes! Good luck with your studies.

0 coins

NebulaNinja

•

I've been following this thread closely as I'm also preparing for the EA exam while working full-time. Based on all the experiences shared here, it seems like both Gleim and Fast Forward Academy have their strengths. What's really helping me decide is thinking about my learning style. I tend to learn better with interactive explanations rather than just drilling practice questions, so Fast Forward's approach of focusing on understanding concepts really appeals to me. The positive feedback about their mobile platform is also a huge plus since I commute by train and could use that time effectively. That said, Gleim's massive test bank that @QuantumLeap mentioned is tempting, especially since they said the questions were very similar to the actual exam. Has anyone tried combining approaches - maybe using one platform as primary and another for supplemental practice questions? Also really intrigued by @Omar Hassan's experience with getting direct advice from the IRS using Claimyr. I might try that approach to get some insider perspective on what topics to prioritize. Thanks everyone for sharing such detailed experiences - this thread has been incredibly helpful!

0 coins

PixelPrincess

•

I'm in a similar situation and have been weighing the same options! From everything I've read here, it sounds like combining approaches might actually be the sweet spot. Maybe starting with Fast Forward Academy for the conceptual understanding and then supplementing with Gleim's practice questions closer to exam time? @NebulaNinja I'm definitely going to look into that Claimyr service too - getting direct insights from the IRS about what they emphasize sounds incredibly valuable. Even if it's just confirmation of what the prep courses are teaching, having that confidence boost could be worth it. One question for everyone who's passed - did you find it helpful to take practice exams from multiple sources, or does that just create confusion with different question styles? I'm worried about overthinking this decision when I should probably just pick one and start studying consistently.

0 coins

PrinceJoe

•

Just wanted to jump in here as someone who recently completed all three EA exams using a combination approach. I started with Fast Forward Academy for my foundational learning and then added Gleim's practice questions about 3 weeks before each exam. What worked really well for me was using Fast Forward's conceptual explanations to build understanding, then testing that knowledge with Gleim's extensive question bank. The different question styles actually helped rather than confused me - it made me more adaptable to whatever format the actual exam threw at me. One tip I'd add: don't underestimate the importance of timing practice. Both platforms offer timed exams, but I found Fast Forward's interface closer to the actual Prometric testing environment. The real exam felt very familiar because of this. For anyone considering the IRS contact route that @Omar Hassan mentioned, I'd recommend doing it after you've studied for a few weeks. That way you can ask more informed questions about specific topics rather than general advice. The agent I spoke with was actually quite helpful in clarifying some recent regulation changes that weren't fully covered in my study materials yet. Budget-wise, using both platforms was definitely more expensive, but it was worth it for the peace of mind and comprehensive preparation. Passed all three parts on first attempt with scores in the mid-80s.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of insight I was hoping to find! Your combination approach makes a lot of sense - using Fast Forward for building that solid conceptual foundation and then reinforcing with Gleim's practice questions sounds like the best of both worlds. I'm really glad you mentioned the timing practice and interface similarity. That's something I hadn't thought much about, but you're absolutely right that familiarity with the testing environment could make a huge difference on exam day when nerves are already running high. Your point about waiting a few weeks before contacting the IRS is smart too. I was thinking about calling right away, but having some foundational knowledge first would definitely help me ask better, more targeted questions. The budget consideration is real, but like you said, if it increases the chances of passing all three parts on the first try, it's probably worth the investment. Retaking exams would cost more in the long run, not to mention the time and stress. Thanks for sharing your scores too - mid-80s gives me a good target to aim for! Did you find any particular topics that both platforms didn't cover well, or were there any gaps you had to fill with additional resources?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
23,018 users helped today