IRS

CommunityGovernment Services

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr calls for you, so you don't have to wait on hold.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Do I need to give my tax person more than just the 1099-INT from my mortgage company when filing my return?

So I bought my first house last year and I'm getting ready for tax season. The mortgage company sent me a 1099-INT form, but I'm not sure if that's enough to give to my tax preparer. Should I also be including all my monthly mortgage payment statements? I've got a folder with all the receipts but don't know if they need to see those. I keep hearing from friends and family how homeownership is supposed to give you all these great tax breaks, but honestly last year I didn't see much difference in my refund compared to when I was renting. Am I missing something by only providing the 1099-INT? This whole mortgage interest deduction thing is confusing me!

Dont forget to check if you paid PMI (private mortgage insurance) as well. That used to be deductible too but I think that expired? Anyone know if Congress renewed that deduction for this year?

0 coins

PMI deduction expired after 2021 I believe. They keep threatening to bring it back but nothing yet. It's annoying because I'm paying $180/month for PMI that used to at least give me a tax break!

0 coins

You're right, unfortunately it hasn't been renewed. I just double-checked and the PMI deduction expired after 2021 tax year. Really hurts those of us who couldn't put 20% down. I was chatting with my lender last week about doing a reappraisal since home values in my area have gone up, which might get me over that 20% equity threshold and eliminate the PMI altogether. Might be worth looking into if you've been in your home a while or values have increased in your area.

0 coins

I was in same boat last year! Here's one thing nobody mentioned yet - keeping track of home office expenses if you work from home. That's been a game changer for me tax-wise since my mortgage interest alone wasn't enough to itemize.

0 coins

But isn't home office deduction only for self-employed people? I work remotely for a company and my tax person said employees can't deduct home office anymore after the Trump tax changes.

0 coins

You're absolutely right Katherine. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the home office deduction for employees starting in 2018. Only self-employed individuals, independent contractors, and business owners can still claim home office expenses. If you're a W-2 employee working from home, you can't deduct those expenses even if your employer requires you to work remotely. It's one of those frustrating changes that hit a lot of people who started working from home during the pandemic. The only exception would be if you're also doing freelance/contract work on the side from that same home office space.

0 coins

1120F - How to properly handle translation differences between foreign income statement and balance sheet?

I'm assisting a Canadian company with several years of Form 1120F filings they should have submitted due to their ECI in the US but never did. Their financial statements are all in Canadian dollars, and I'm converting using the average exchange rate for the income statement and year-end rates for the balance sheet. This naturally creates some unrealized gains/losses from the foreign currency translation. I'm stumped on how to properly account for this non-taxable item on the return. Initially thought about an M2 adjustment, but then considered an M-1 for income/loss on books not included on return, basically artificially adjusting the book income by the translation difference. Has anyone dealt with this specific issue on 1120F filings? What's the proper treatment for these translation differences?

Has anyone had experience dealing with functional currency elections under Section 985 in connection with this issue? Wondering if making that election would simplify the filing process for future years even though it wouldn't help with the past unfiled returns.

0 coins

Yes! This is actually really important to consider. If your client's activities in the US are significant enough, making a functional currency election under 985 can eliminate these translation headaches going forward. You'd still need to handle the historical unfiled returns with the M-1 adjustment approach, but future filings become much simpler. The downside is there's a fair amount of work in the transition year, and you need to get approval from the IRS via a method change. Form 3115 would be required.

0 coins

I've dealt with this exact situation multiple times with foreign clients who had unfiled 1120F returns. The M-1 adjustment approach is definitely the way to go for these currency translation differences. One thing I'd add is to be very careful about your exchange rate sources and document them thoroughly. I always use the Federal Reserve's daily exchange rates and create a detailed memo explaining the methodology - which rates were used for which items and why. This becomes crucial if you're ever questioned during an exam. Also, since you're dealing with multiple years of unfiled returns, consider whether you need to address any potential penalties under the reasonable cause provisions. The IRS tends to be more understanding when there's a legitimate business reason for the delay and you're making a good faith effort to comply correctly.

0 coins

FreeTaxUSA Software not accounting for BackDoor Roth IRA conversion correctly

I'm so frustrated with FreeTaxUSA right now and hoping someone can help! I did a BackDoor Roth IRA contribution this year (put money in Traditional then converted to Roth), and now I'm trying to file my taxes but the software seems confused. When I enter my 1099-R with the amounts in Box 1 and 2a, my refund plummets because it's counting it as taxable income. Then when FreeTaxUSA asks if I converted any money to a Roth IRA and I click "yes", I expected it to automatically complete Form 8606 and adjust so the conversion isn't taxed (since I used post-tax dollars). But nothing changes! My tax bill is still huge! I've looked everywhere in the software for a way to manually complete Form 8606 but can't find it. This is driving me crazy because I know this conversion shouldn't be taxed again, but the software isn't fixing it. Has anyone else run into this? Am I missing some checkbox or section somewhere? Really appreciate any help because I'm about to throw my laptop out the window lol.

One thing nobody mentioned - did you check if you have any other Traditional IRA money from previous years? The Pro-Rata rule could be kicking in. If you had, say, a rollover IRA or any other traditional IRA money beyond what you contributed for the backdoor, you can't just convert the non-deductible portion tax-free. The conversion gets taxed proportionally. FreeTaxUSA might actually be calculating correctly if you have other IRA assets!

0 coins

This is an excellent point! The pro-rata rule is the downfall of many backdoor Roth attempts. If you have ANY other money in ANY traditional IRA accounts (including SEP IRAs and SIMPLE IRAs), the backdoor strategy gets complicated fast.

0 coins

I went through this exact same frustration last year! Here's what finally worked for me with FreeTaxUSA: The key is making sure you complete these steps in order: 1. Enter your Traditional IRA contribution first and explicitly mark it as NON-DEDUCTIBLE (this is crucial) 2. Enter your 1099-R information for the conversion 3. Don't panic when your refund drops initially - this is normal 4. Complete your ENTIRE return before checking the final numbers The software doesn't update the backdoor Roth calculation until you reach the review stage. I know it's counterintuitive, but Form 8606 gets generated at the very end of the process. Also double-check that you don't have any other Traditional IRA balances from previous years (like old 401k rollovers) because the pro-rata rule would make part of your conversion taxable even if you used post-tax dollars. If you're still having issues after trying this sequence, you can always use the "Forms" view in FreeTaxUSA to manually review Form 8606 and make sure line 14 shows your non-deductible contribution amount. That's what prevents double taxation. Hang in there - the software does work correctly for backdoor Roths, it's just not very user-friendly about showing the calculations in real-time!

0 coins

Standard Deduction for First Year Immigrants - Found a Loophole in IRS Rules?

I'm a bit confused about a weird situation with standard deductions for new immigrants like me and my wife. We got our green cards when we arrived in the US in February 2023 and became residents immediately upon entry. Looking at the IRS rules, I noticed they state: "Certain taxpayers aren't entitled to the standard deduction: 1. ... 2. An individual who was a nonresident alien or dual status alien during the year (see below for certain exceptions)" This seems to suggest we can't claim the standard deduction since we weren't residents at the beginning of 2023. But then I found this exception: "However, certain individuals who were nonresident aliens or dual status aliens during the year may take the standard deduction in the following cases: 1. ... 2. A nonresident alien at the beginning of the tax year who is a U.S. citizen or resident by the end of the tax year, is married to a U.S. citizen or resident at the end of such tax year, and makes a joint election with his or her spouse to be treated as a U.S. resident for the entire tax year;" If I read this literally, we might qualify because: - We were nonresident aliens at the beginning but residents by the end of 2023 βœ“ - We're married to residents (each other) at the end of the tax year βœ“ Did the IRS accidentally create a loophole for married immigrant couples? The rule seems designed to prevent us from claiming the standard deduction, but the wording might actually allow it? Should we go ahead and claim the standard deduction on our 2023 taxes or am I missing something?

Has anyone used TurboTax for this dual-status election situation? Their support chat keeps giving me contradictory answers and I'm not sure if their software can handle this correctly.

0 coins

I tried using TurboTax last year for our dual-status return and it was a NIGHTMARE. The software isn't really built for it. It kept rejecting our foreign addresses and wouldn't let me properly document the election statement. Ended up having to use a specialized tax preparer who knew international tax issues. Cost more but saved us from a potential mess.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of complex tax situation that mainstream software struggles with! I went through something very similar when I got my green card mid-year in 2022. The dual-status election is definitely legitimate and designed for cases like yours, but you're right to be cautious about the worldwide income reporting requirement. One thing I learned the hard way is that you need to be extra careful about foreign bank account reporting (FBAR) if you still have accounts overseas - even if they're being closed out. Also, make sure you understand the implications for future years. Once you make this election, you're committing to being treated as a full-year resident, which can affect things like the foreign earned income exclusion if you travel back to your home country for work in future tax years. I'd strongly recommend getting at least a consultation with a CPA who specializes in international taxation before filing, even if you use software to prepare the return. The peace of mind is worth it for something this complex, especially in your first year as residents.

0 coins

Who is responsible when employees are "paid under the table" and the IRS audits?

I need some clarity on a situation that's been bothering me. A friend of mine has been working for the same small business for about 4 years now. The owner pays them with personal checks and has never provided any tax forms like W-2s or 1099s. Nothing official. The owner keeps promising year after year that they'll "get things straight" and start using a proper payroll system with direct deposits and tax withholding, but it never happens. They've even told my friend to either report the income as self-employment or just not report it at all (yikes). I'm worried about what might happen if the IRS notices this unreported income flowing into my friend's bank account. Who would be held responsible in this scenario? Would the IRS come after the employer, the employee, or both of them? How much trouble could each party be in? This is happening in North Carolina, if that makes any difference with state tax implications. I'd really appreciate some insight on how liability works in these "under the table" payment situations.

Just to add another perspective - I used to work in payroll and saw this situation a lot. The employer is playing with fire here. Not only could they face tax fraud charges, but in North Carolina specifically, they could also be violating state labor laws. If your friend is injured on the job, they'd have no workers' comp protection. They're not building up unemployment benefits either. And the employer is likely pocketing the 7.65% FICA contribution they should be paying on your friend's behalf. Your friend should also know that if they report this income now (which they absolutely should), they can request something called Section 3509 relief, which could reduce their tax liability since the employer failed in their obligations. But they need to clearly show they were misclassified as an independent contractor rather than an employee.

0 coins

Thanks for mentioning the Section 3509 relief - I hadn't heard of that! Would my friend need to prove they were actually an employee vs contractor to qualify? And how would they do that without any official paperwork from the employer?

0 coins

Yes, your friend would need to establish that they were truly an employee rather than an independent contractor. The IRS looks at several factors to determine this classification, primarily centered around behavior control, financial control, and relationship type. Evidence can include things like set working hours, using the employer's equipment, receiving training, being told how to do the work, being paid by the hour rather than by project, working exclusively for this employer, and any written communications that indicate an employer-employee relationship. Text messages, emails, or witness statements from coworkers can help establish these facts. They can file Form SS-8 (Determination of Worker Status) to have the IRS make an official determination of their worker classification, which can support their claim for Section 3509 relief.

0 coins

Something nobody's mentioned yet - if your friend decides to start reporting this income now (which they should), they need to be prepared for potential fallout with their employer. Some employers get really defensive when workers start properly reporting income because it can trigger investigations. I've seen cases where the employee files taxes properly, then the IRS contacts the employer about missing payroll taxes, and suddenly the employee faces retaliation or even gets fired. It sucks, but it happens.

0 coins

That's an excellent point. There are whistleblower protections for tax issues though, right? Would those apply in this situation?

0 coins

There are some protections, but they're limited in this context. The main whistleblower protections for tax issues typically apply when someone reports tax fraud by their employer to the IRS for potential rewards. In this case, your friend would be correcting their own tax situation rather than actively reporting the employer. However, if the employer retaliates by firing them for properly reporting income, that could potentially violate labor laws depending on the circumstances. North Carolina is an at-will employment state, but there are still some protections against retaliatory discharge for exercising legal rights. The reality is that your friend is in a tough spot - continuing to not report income is illegal and risky, but properly reporting it might create workplace tension. That said, the legal and financial risks of continuing to hide income from the IRS far outweigh the employment risks. Better to deal with a difficult employer than face potential tax evasion charges down the road.

0 coins

Prev1...23042305230623072308...5645Next