IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Malik Thomas

•

As someone who works seasonal tax prep, the easiest way to find out if you're a dependent is to ask these questions: 1) Did you live with your mom for more than half the year? 2) Did she provide more than half your financial support? 3) Are you under 24 and a full-time student OR under 19? 4) Did you make less than $4,400 in 2023? If yes to all these, you're probably a dependent. If no to any, you might be able to file independently!

0 coins

Since you're 20 and not a student, you'd need to meet the "qualifying relative" test instead of the "qualifying child" test. The key factors are: 1) You made less than $4,400 (which you did at $8,500, so this might disqualify you as a dependent), 2) Your mom provided more than half your total support, and 3) You lived with her all year. Given that you earned $8,500, you might actually not qualify as a dependent anymore! This means you could potentially file as independent and get a larger standard deduction. Definitely worth having your mom double-check this with a tax professional before either of you files.

0 coins

Wait, I think there might be a mistake in the income threshold mentioned. For 2023, the gross income test for a qualifying relative dependent is actually $4,400, but @Keisha Jackson mentioned she made $8,500, which would exceed this limit. However, this doesn t'automatically disqualify her from being claimed as a dependent if she s'still a qualifying "child rather" than a qualifying "relative. Since" she s'20 and not a full-time student, she wouldn t'meet the qualifying child age test, so the qualifying relative rules would apply. With $8,500 in income, she likely cannot be claimed as a dependent, which means she should file independently and claim her full standard deduction!

0 coins

Oliver Cheng

•

Hey @Keisha Jackson! Based on what you've shared (20 years old, not in school, earned $8,500), you likely CAN'T be claimed as a dependent by your mom. The income limit for qualifying relatives is $4,400 for 2023, and you earned double that amount. This is actually GREAT news for you! Since you probably can't be claimed as a dependent, you should file as an independent taxpayer. This means you'll get the full standard deduction ($13,850 for single filers in 2023) instead of the reduced amount dependents get. With your $8,500 income, you'll likely get back most or all of the federal taxes withheld from your paychecks. Just make sure your mom understands she can't claim you with your income level - you don't want both of you filing incorrectly and dealing with IRS delays later. Definitely worth confirming this with a tax professional or using one of the tools mentioned here to double-check your specific situation!

0 coins

This is such valuable information! I had no idea about the $4,400 income limit for qualifying relatives. @Keisha Jackson, it sounds like you might actually be in a better financial position than you thought - being able to file independently and claim the full standard deduction could mean a much bigger refund! Just make sure to coordinate with your mom before filing so you're both on the same page about your status. It's really helpful seeing everyone break down these tax rules in plain English instead of the confusing IRS jargon.

0 coins

Has anyone tried negotiating an Offer in Compromise? I've heard mixed things about how difficult they are to get approved.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

I've helped clients with OICs, and they're definitely harder to get approved than regular payment plans. The IRS will only accept if they genuinely believe you cannot pay the full amount through any reasonable means. They look at your assets, income, expenses, and ability to pay. The process requires detailed financial documentation and can take 6+ months for a decision. The approval rate is only around 30-40%. Most people who think they qualify actually don't. Payment plans are approved much more easily and quickly. If you're considering an OIC, I'd recommend consulting with a tax professional first to assess your chances.

0 coins

I went through something very similar last year - owed about $6,200 in back taxes from miscalculating my freelance income. The panic you're feeling is totally normal, but I promise it's more manageable than it seems right now! Here's what I learned: Don't wait to take action. The longer you wait, the more interest and penalties pile up. I called the IRS directly (took forever to get through, but worth it) and set up a payment plan immediately. They were actually pretty reasonable to work with once I got someone on the phone. A few practical tips: - Gather all your tax documents before calling so you can answer questions quickly - If you can pay it off within 3-4 years, definitely go for the installment agreement - Ask about penalty abatement right away - they reduced about $400 in penalties for me since it was my first major issue - Consider having a tax pro review your situation to make sure there aren't any deductions you missed The payment plan I set up was $180/month for 3 years. Yes, there's interest (around 6% when I did it), but it made the whole thing bearable. The relief I felt after getting it sorted was incredible. You've got this! The hardest part is just taking that first step to address it.

0 coins

Just to add another perspective - I've been through this situation twice now (moved a lot for work). Always use your current address on the 1040-X, but here's something that might help: if you're worried about timing or want to be extra thorough, you can also call the IRS practitioner priority line if you have a tax professional help you, or use Form 8822 to officially change your address before filing the amendment. One thing I learned the hard way - if you're expecting any other IRS correspondence (like notices from your original return), make sure you set up mail forwarding with USPS from your old address. The IRS systems don't always update immediately across all departments, so you might still get some mail sent to your old address even after filing the 1040-X with your new one. Also, keep copies of everything! With the longer processing times for paper amendments, having your own records makes it much easier to track what's happening if you need to follow up later.

0 coins

This is really solid advice! I'm dealing with a similar situation right now and the mail forwarding tip is golden. I almost missed an important notice from the IRS because it went to my old place even though I had already filed paperwork with my new address. USPS forwarding saved me from a potential headache. One question though - you mentioned the practitioner priority line. Do you know if there's a way for regular taxpayers to get faster phone support, or is that only available if you're working with a CPA or tax attorney? The regular IRS phone lines are absolutely brutal to get through.

0 coins

Isla Fischer

•

Great question about the practitioner priority line! Unfortunately, that's only available to enrolled agents, CPAs, and attorneys representing clients - not for individual taxpayers calling about their own returns. The regular taxpayer lines are definitely a pain. However, I've had some luck calling early in the morning (right when they open at 7 AM) or later in the afternoon around 4-5 PM. The hold times seem shorter then compared to the middle of the day. Also, if you're calling about a specific notice or letter, have the notice number ready - that sometimes gets you to a more specialized department with shorter wait times. Another tip: if you're calling about an amended return specifically, try the dedicated amended return line at 866-464-2050. It's still a wait, but in my experience it's been faster than the general taxpayer line. They can also tell you exactly where your 1040-X is in the processing queue, which helps with planning. The mail forwarding really is crucial though - I learned that lesson the hard way too when I almost missed a deadline because a notice went to my old address!

0 coins

Thanks for the specific phone number and timing tips! I had no idea there was a dedicated amended return line. I've been dreading having to call the IRS about my 1040-X status, but knowing there's a more targeted line makes it feel less overwhelming. The early morning calling strategy makes total sense - I imagine most people try calling during lunch or mid-afternoon when they have a break from work. I'll definitely try the 7 AM approach, especially since I'm usually up early anyway. Quick question about the mail forwarding - how long did you keep it active? I set mine up for 6 months but wasn't sure if that would be long enough to catch any stragglers from the IRS system updates.

0 coins

Miguel Silva

•

Has anyone actually done this successfully? I started something similar last year and ended up with a donor-advised fund instead because the legal and compliance requirements for a private foundation were too intense. The annual reporting alone was going to cost me thousands in accounting fees.

0 coins

I actually set up a private foundation successfully about 3 years ago. The key is having good advisors from the start. Yes, there are compliance requirements, but they're manageable if you set up good systems. The 990-PF filing is complex but not impossible.

0 coins

I've been through this exact process and can share some practical insights. You're right that this sounds like a private foundation structure, and yes, it's absolutely doable with proper planning. A few key things I learned during my setup: 1. The "sole member" aspect is perfectly legal, but you'll still need independent directors on your board to satisfy IRS requirements. I structured mine with me as the sole voting member, but with 3 independent directors who handle day-to-day operations and conflict of interest oversight. 2. For the investment growth strategy - this works, but be very careful about the types of investments you choose. The "jeopardizing investments" rules are stricter than most people realize. Stick to conservative, diversified portfolios initially. 3. Your 5% annual distribution plan is solid, but make sure you're calculating it correctly. It's based on the fair market value of your non-charitable use assets, averaged over the prior 3 years. The IRS has specific rules about what counts toward this requirement. 4. Documentation is crucial. Keep detailed records showing that all decisions benefit the charitable purpose, not personal interests. The IRS will scrutinize transactions between you and the foundation very closely. One unexpected benefit: having this structure has actually made my charitable giving more strategic and impactful. The multi-year planning horizon lets you tackle bigger projects than you could with annual donations. Happy to answer specific questions about the setup process if helpful.

0 coins

This is incredibly helpful, thank you! I'm particularly interested in the independent directors requirement you mentioned. How did you find directors who were truly independent but also understood your charitable vision? And did you compensate them for their service, or are they volunteers? I'm worried about finding people who can provide proper oversight without interfering with the long-term strategy I have in mind.

0 coins

I went through almost the exact same situation last year with a $340 difference between my TP TAX FIGURES and IMF TOTAL TAX. After panicking and spending way too much time trying to figure it out on my own, I learned that the IRS has a specific form (Form 8857) you can use to request an abatement if you believe their math error determination is wrong. In my case, it turned out the IRS system had automatically calculated a different amount for the Additional Child Tax Credit because one of my qualifying children had aged out during the tax year, but I hadn't updated my calculations properly. The TP figure showed what I calculated, while the IMF figure reflected the correct age-based eligibility. What really helped me was calling the Practitioner Priority Service line (if you can get a tax professional to call for you) or using the math error procedures outlined in Publication 536. The key is documenting everything and being prepared to explain your position clearly if you do decide to contest it. Don't feel bad about the confusion - the IRS transcript terminology is deliberately cryptic, and the difference between these two figures trips up a lot of people!

0 coins

Nolan Carter

•

Thanks for sharing your experience, Ian! This is really reassuring to hear from someone who went through something so similar. I'm curious about the Practitioner Priority Service line you mentioned - do you need to actually hire a tax professional to access that, or can any licensed professional call on your behalf? I'm trying to weigh the cost of getting professional help versus just dealing with the regular IRS phone lines. Also, did you end up accepting their calculation in the end, or were you able to successfully contest it? The Additional Child Tax Credit issue you described sounds like it could be tricky to argue against if the age eligibility rules are clear-cut, but I'm wondering if there are situations where the IRS automated system gets these calculations wrong.

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

You need an actual licensed tax professional (CPA, EA, or attorney) to access the Practitioner Priority Service line - they have to provide their credentials when calling. It's not something you can use directly as a taxpayer. However, many tax pros will make a quick call like this for a reasonable fee, especially if you're a client or if it's a straightforward inquiry. In my case, I ended up accepting their calculation because they were right - my kid had indeed aged out of eligibility for the full credit amount during that tax year, and I had miscalculated. The IRS automated system was actually correct, which was frustrating but ultimately fair. That said, the system isn't infallible. I've heard of cases where it miscalculates things like filing status changes, applies wrong tax brackets, or misinterprets complex situations like multiple income sources or unusual deductions. The key is getting enough information from your transcripts to determine whether their calculation makes sense for your specific situation. If you're still unsure after reviewing your transcripts, even a one-hour consultation with a tax professional might be worth it to get a second opinion before the 60-day deadline passes.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful for understanding these transcript differences! As someone who just received a similar notice with a $180 discrepancy, I wanted to add one more potential cause that hasn't been mentioned yet. In my case, the difference between TP TAX FIGURES and IMF TOTAL TAX was due to backup withholding that I wasn't aware of. Apparently, one of my financial institutions had applied backup withholding to some interest payments because of a TIN (Taxpayer Identification Number) mismatch in their system, but I never received notification of this. The IRS system automatically factored in this additional withholding when calculating the IMF TOTAL TAX, which affected my overall tax liability calculation. I only discovered this when I requested my Wage and Income Transcript as suggested by others here. So for anyone else dealing with unexpected differences, it might be worth checking if there's any backup withholding reported that you weren't aware of. It's not as common as the other issues mentioned, but it can definitely cause these kinds of discrepancies between your calculations and the IRS's automated system. The good news is that backup withholding usually works in your favor since it means you've already had additional tax withheld, but it can throw off your refund calculations if you weren't expecting it.

0 coins

Ayla Kumar

•

That's a really interesting point about backup withholding! I had no idea that could cause these kinds of discrepancies. How did you find out that there was a TIN mismatch at your financial institution? Did they eventually send you a corrected form, or did you have to contact them directly once you discovered the backup withholding on your transcript? I'm wondering if this is something that happens frequently with banks and investment accounts, especially if people have moved or changed names. It sounds like it could be a hidden issue that many taxpayers might not even realize is affecting their returns until they get an adjustment notice like this. Also, were you able to get the TIN mismatch corrected with the financial institution to prevent it from happening again next year?

0 coins

I discovered the TIN mismatch completely by accident when I called my bank to ask about some interest reporting discrepancies I noticed on my Wage and Income Transcript. The customer service rep mentioned that their system had been applying backup withholding to my account for several months due to a "name/SSN verification issue." Turns out when I got married and changed my name, I updated it with the bank but they never updated it properly in their tax reporting system. So while my account showed my married name, their 1099-INT forms were still going out with my maiden name but married SSN, which triggered the IRS backup withholding protocols. The bank sent me a corrected 1099-INT and filed the correction with the IRS, but it took about 6 weeks to process. For next year, I made sure to bring my Social Security card and marriage certificate to the bank to get everything properly updated in all their systems - apparently there are multiple databases that need to be synchronized. It's definitely more common than you'd think, especially with name changes, recent moves, or even simple data entry errors. The frustrating part is that financial institutions often don't notify you when backup withholding starts, so you only find out when you get your tax documents or run into issues like this.

0 coins

Prev1...22172218221922202221...5644Next