Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
I'm new to this community but currently facing the exact same EIN classification issue with my consulting LLC. We accidentally selected corporation instead of LLC with partnership taxation when applying for our EIN about 8 months ago, and just discovered the mistake while preparing our first year tax filings. This thread has been absolutely invaluable! The step-by-step guidance about Form 8832 and late election relief under Rev. Proc. 2009-41 has given me a clear path forward. I'm particularly thankful for the emphasis on documenting consistent partnership operations - we've been splitting profits according to our ownership percentages and making joint business decisions from day one, so I have solid evidence to support our case. I'm planning to follow the approach outlined by several members here: filing Form 8832 with the EIN issue date as the effective date, including a comprehensive reasonable cause statement, and attaching documentation of our consistent partnership behavior (operating agreement, distribution records, joint decision-making examples). One thing I wanted to add that might help others - when I called the IRS yesterday to check on processing times, the agent mentioned they're seeing fewer delays on Form 8832 submissions that include thorough documentation upfront. She emphasized that complete initial submissions with clear reasonable cause statements and supporting evidence tend to move through the system faster than those that require follow-up requests for additional information. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and success stories. It's reassuring to know this is a common, fixable mistake when you have the right documentation and approach!
Welcome to the community! I'm also new here and just starting to navigate a similar EIN classification mistake with my small business. That's really helpful information about the IRS agent mentioning fewer delays for thorough Form 8832 submissions. It reinforces what I've learned from reading through everyone's experiences here - taking the time to compile comprehensive documentation upfront seems to be key to getting this resolved efficiently. Your situation sounds very similar to mine - we've also been operating as a true partnership from the beginning with proportional profit distributions and shared decision-making. Reading about your approach of using the EIN issue date as the effective date and including detailed evidence of partnership operations gives me confidence in my own preparation strategy. I'm curious - when you spoke with the IRS agent about processing times, did they give you any sense of what the current timeframe looks like for Form 8832 corrections? Some earlier posts mentioned 3-4 months, but I'm wondering if that's still accurate given the backlogs everyone's been dealing with. Thanks for adding that insight about complete initial submissions moving faster. It's motivating me to be extra thorough in gathering all my supporting documentation before filing. This community discussion has been such a lifesaver for understanding the process!
I'm new to this community and dealing with almost the exact same situation! My business partner and I filed for our EIN about 6 months ago and accidentally selected "corporation" instead of "LLC with partnership taxation." We only caught the mistake recently when meeting with our accountant about upcoming tax filings. Reading through this entire thread has been such a relief - it's incredible to see how many others have faced this same issue and successfully resolved it. The detailed guidance about Form 8832 and Rev. Proc. 2009-41 has given me a clear roadmap that I didn't have before. What's particularly helpful is seeing the emphasis on documenting consistent partnership behavior from day one. We've been operating exactly like a partnership - making joint decisions, splitting profits based on our ownership percentages, taking draws instead of salaries, and our bank account is set up for partnership taxation. Now I understand how crucial it is to compile all this evidence to support our reasonable cause statement. I'm planning to follow the approach that's worked for so many here: file Form 8832 with our original EIN date as the effective date, include a comprehensive reasonable cause statement referencing our consistent partnership operations, and attach supporting documents like our operating agreement and distribution records. One thing I'm wondering - for those who successfully got their classification corrected, did you send your Form 8832 via regular mail or use a specific mailing method? I want to make sure it doesn't get lost in the system given all the IRS processing delays people have mentioned. Thanks to everyone who shared their experiences and advice. This community discussion has transformed what felt like an overwhelming problem into a manageable process with clear steps!
Join the conversation
You might want to check if your state return was accepted, even if the federal one is still pending. Sometimes, oddly enough, the state processes faster than federal. It could potentially indicate that your federal return is at least partially moving through the system, though I wouldn't take that as definitive proof of anything.
I'm experiencing the exact same issue! Filed Thursday morning with investment income from some stock sales and it's still showing "transmitted" in my software. This is definitely unusual - in previous years my returns were always accepted within 24 hours. Based on what others are saying about the enhanced validation for Schedule D forms, it sounds like we just need to wait it out. The IRS seems to be taking extra time to cross-reference our reported gains with the 1099-B forms they received from brokerages. Frustrating when you're used to quick processing, but at least it doesn't seem to be an error on our end.
I'm in the same boat! Filed Friday with some dividend income and it's been radio silence since then. Really reassuring to hear from others that this seems to be the new normal for investment returns. @Sebastian Scott - did your software give you any indication of where it might be stuck, or just the generic transmitted "status?" I m'trying to figure out if there s'any way to tell the difference between normal delay versus an actual problem.
Join the conversation
Don't forget to check state tax rules for clergy housing allowances! Federal excludes it from income tax but includes it for SE tax. But states vary wildly - some follow federal exclusion, others tax it fully, and some have special clergy provisions. In my state of California, the housing allowance is excluded from income for state tax purposes if it qualifies for federal exclusion. But I have a clergy client who moved from Pennsylvania where they DO tax housing allowances. Make sure you know your state rules!
Good point about state variations! Do you know if there's a good resource that lists how each state handles clergy housing allowances? I've looked around but haven't found a comprehensive guide.
I don't know of a single comprehensive guide for all states. Your best bet is to check with your specific state's department of revenue or taxation. Most have publications or sections of their tax guides dedicated to clergy income. For the most complex states, denominational offices often provide state-specific guidance for their ministers. The Church Law & Tax organization also has some good state-by-state resources, though you might need a subscription to access the detailed information.
Paolo Marino
One thing nobody mentioned - make sure your clergy client is aware of the Parsonage Allowance Lawsuit situation. Some court cases have challenged the constitutionality of the housing allowance exclusion as a violation of separation of church and state. The latest case (Gaylor v. Mnuchin) upheld the allowance, but it's been challenged multiple times. Just something to be aware of since this area of tax law could potentially change in future years.
Amina Bah
ā¢Is there actually any real chance of this benefit going away? My pastor client is planning his finances around this exclusion for years to come. Should I be warning him that this might not be something he can count on long-term?
The housing allowance has survived multiple constitutional challenges over the decades, so I wouldn't panic about it disappearing overnight. The most recent decision in Gaylor v. Mnuchin actually strengthened the precedent by ruling it doesn't violate the Establishment Clause. That said, it's always wise to diversify tax planning strategies. I tell my clergy clients to take advantage of the exclusion while it exists, but also build other tax-advantaged savings like maximizing retirement contributions. The benefit has been around since 1954 and has strong support from religious organizations across all denominations, so any change would likely be gradual with plenty of advance notice. Your pastor should definitely use the exclusion for current planning, but having backup strategies isn't a bad idea for long-term financial planning.
Join the conversation
Dana Doyle
I'm dealing with a similar situation but with a twist - my vehicle was damaged in an accident and the insurance payout is higher than what I would have gotten in a trade. Does anyone know if insurance payouts for Section 179 vehicles are treated the same way as trade-ins for recapture purposes? I took the full deduction on a $60k truck in 2022, and now insurance is paying out $38k after it was totaled. I'm assuming I'll need to report that $38k as ordinary income, but I'm not sure if there are any special rules for involuntary conversions versus voluntary trades. Also planning to use the insurance money plus additional funds to buy a replacement truck - can I still take Section 179 on the new one even though this wasn't technically a trade-in situation?
Insurance payouts for totaled vehicles are generally treated similarly to trade-ins for Section 179 recapture purposes, but there are some important differences since this is an involuntary conversion. You'll likely need to report the $38k insurance payout as ordinary income since your truck's adjusted basis was reduced to zero (or near zero) when you took the full Section 179 deduction. However, involuntary conversions have special rules under Section 1033 that might give you some options. If you replace the vehicle with similar business property within a certain timeframe (usually 2-3 years), you may be able to defer some of the gain recognition. This gets complex though, especially when combined with Section 179 recapture. And yes, you can absolutely take Section 179 on your replacement truck - the insurance payout and new purchase are separate transactions for tax purposes. Just make sure the new vehicle meets all the Section 179 requirements. Given the complexity of involuntary conversion rules combined with Section 179 recapture, I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice on your specific situation. The timing and amount of income recognition could vary significantly depending on how you structure the replacement purchase.
I've been following this thread because I'm in a nearly identical situation with my work truck. One thing that hasn't been mentioned yet is the importance of documenting your business use percentage if your vehicle wasn't used 100% for business. The IRS requires you to recapture based on the actual business use portion. So if you used your truck 80% for business and took a partial Section 179 deduction based on that percentage, your recapture calculation should also reflect that same 80% business use ratio. Also, keep in mind that if you're financing the new vehicle, the Section 179 deduction applies to the full purchase price, not just your down payment or trade equity. This is different from some other business deductions where financed amounts might be treated differently. Make sure you have good records showing the business use of both the old and new vehicles - mileage logs, business trip documentation, etc. The IRS can be pretty strict about this during audits, especially when large Section 179 deductions are involved.
Lilah Brooks
ā¢This is really helpful information about business use percentage - I hadn't thought about how that affects the recapture calculation. I've been using my truck about 75% for business, so I'm assuming I'll only need to recapture 75% of the trade-in value? Also, your point about financing is interesting. So if I'm buying a $50k truck but only putting $15k down (using my trade-in value), I can still deduct the full $50k under Section 179 as long as the truck qualifies? That seems almost too good to be true given all the recapture headaches I'm dealing with on the old vehicle. Do you happen to know if there are any restrictions on taking Section 179 again if you've just had to recapture a previous deduction in the same tax year?
Sofia Price
Has anyone handled the situation where an employee makes an 83(b) election but then leaves before the shares fully vest? Our standard RSA agreement has a clawback provision for unvested shares, but I'm unclear on the tax implications for the employee and our reporting requirements in that scenario.
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
ā¢This is actually a common scenario with some tricky implications. When an employee makes an 83(b) election and then forfeits unvested shares upon departure, they've essentially paid taxes on income they never fully received. The employee can claim a capital loss (not an ordinary income deduction) when they forfeit the shares. However, this loss is limited to the amount they actually paid for the shares, not including any taxes they paid on the phantom income through the 83(b) election. From the employer reporting perspective, you don't need to issue any corrected tax forms. The original income reporting was correct at the time of the 83(b) election. The employee's capital loss is handled on their personal tax return in the year of forfeiture.
0 coins
Sofia Price
ā¢Thanks for the clarification! That makes sense but feels a bit unfair to the employee. Sounds like they're basically stuck with having paid taxes on income they ultimately never received, since a capital loss deduction is typically less valuable than an ordinary income deduction. Is there any way to structure our RSA program to mitigate this risk for employees, or is this just an inherent downside of making the 83(b) election?
0 coins
Alice Coleman
Quick question about RSA tax reporting - which tax forms need to be filed with the IRS when RSAs are initially granted? Is there something similar to the 3921 for ISOs?
0 coins
Owen Jenkins
ā¢Unlike ISOs (which require Form 3921) or ESPPs (which require Form 3922), there's no special information return required for RSA grants. The income is simply reported on Form W-2 when the tax event occurs (either at grant with an 83(b) election or at vesting without one). However, if the RSAs are being granted to non-employees like consultants or board members, you would report the income on Form 1099-NEC rather than a W-2.
0 coins
Alice Coleman
ā¢Thanks! That's actually simpler than I expected. So just to be crystal clear - for a standard employee RSA grant with no 83(b) election, we just add the value of the vested shares to their W-2 as they vest, and there's no additional filing required?
0 coins