IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Pro tip: you can add the virtual card to Apple/Google pay as soon as approved and start using it immediately instead of waiting for physical card

0 coins

omg thank you! This is actually helpful šŸ™

0 coins

Emma Johnson

•

Just went through this process last month. The Credit Karma requirement is definitely new this year and caught me off guard too. The good news is the account setup is pretty straightforward and only takes a few minutes online. I'd recommend applying for the virtual card first like Lucas mentioned - saved me from waiting around for the physical one. Just make sure your tax situation is clean before applying since any holds or issues will disqualify you from the advance anyway.

0 coins

Thanks for sharing your experience Emma! Super helpful to know it only takes a few minutes to set up. Did you end up getting approved for the advance or did you run into any issues? I'm a bit nervous about potential holds since I had some complications with my return last year šŸ˜…

0 coins

Paloma Clark

•

Anyone have experience with H&R Block's handling of Form 2210? TurboTax always seems to calculate a penalty for me even when I don't think I should have one, wondering if switching software would help.

0 coins

I've used both. H&R Block is better at explaining the underpayment calculation but honestly they both make the same calculation. The issue isn't really the software but understanding which method (Regular vs Annualized Income) works best for your situation.

0 coins

I had this exact same issue! The key thing to understand is that Line 8 on Form 2210 should be the SMALLER of two amounts, not necessarily your full 2023 tax liability. Since you mentioned having 110% of your 2023 tax withheld, you should definitely qualify for safe harbor protection. The problem might be that TurboTax isn't correctly applying the "deemed paid evenly" rule for W-2 withholding. Here's what worked for me: I manually calculated Form 2210 using both the regular method and the annualized income installment method to see which gave me a lower penalty (or no penalty). Sometimes the software defaults to one method when the other would be more favorable. Also, double-check that TurboTax is correctly pulling your 2023 tax amount. I've seen cases where the software uses the wrong line from the prior year return, especially if you had refundable credits that affected your actual tax liability vs. what you owed. If you're still getting a penalty calculation after verifying these details, you might want to file Form 2210 manually with your return to override the software's calculation.

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm new to dealing with underpayment penalties and didn't realize there were two different calculation methods. When you say "annualized income installment method" - is that something you can select in TurboTax or do you have to calculate it separately? I'm in a similar situation where most of my income was heavily weighted toward the end of the year due to a job change and some large capital gains, so this might be exactly what I need to look into.

0 coins

NeonNebula

•

One thing I learned the hard way - if this is your first time filing late, you can often get the penalties waived through First Time Penalty Abatement! Call the IRS and specifically request this if you've had a clean compliance history for the past 3 years. I filed my LLC taxes 2 months late last year and got hit with almost $800 in penalties, but they waived ALL of them when I requested abatement. You just need to have a "reasonable cause" explanation and be polite when you call.

0 coins

This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm in a similar situation with my single-member LLC and was panicking about missing the March 15th deadline. Finding out that I only need to file Schedule C with my personal taxes is such a relief. For anyone else reading this who might be confused like I was - it's worth double-checking whether your LLC is single-member or multi-member because the filing requirements are completely different. If you have any business partners or multiple owners, you DO need the 1065 and K-1 forms that the original poster was asking about. Also want to echo what others said about the First Time Penalty Abatement - I used this last year for a completely different tax issue and the IRS was actually pretty reasonable about it. Definitely worth asking for if you have a clean history!

0 coins

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I've been losing sleep over this thinking I was in major trouble with the IRS. The single-member vs multi-member distinction is so important and I wish someone had explained that to me when I first set up my LLC. I'm definitely going to look into the First Time Penalty Abatement too - even though I now know I might not need the 1065/K-1 forms, I'm still worried about other potential issues I might have missed. It's reassuring to know the IRS can be reasonable with first-time filers who made honest mistakes. Thanks to everyone in this thread for being so helpful! This community is amazing for getting real answers from people who've actually been through this stuff.

0 coins

One small additional tip - call your Secretary of State's office in MA to confirm your nonprofit corporation status is in good standing. Sometimes these IRS notices happen because there's a problem at the state level (like a missed annual report) that hasn't been communicated to you directly. Take photos of EVERYTHING you send to the IRS and keep detailed notes of every call (date, time, agent ID if they give one). You'll need this documentation if things get more complicated. Also, I'd seriously consider getting a consultation with a nonprofit tax attorney. Most will do a 30-minute consult for a reasonable fee, and having someone who can look at your specific situation could save you thousands in the long run.

0 coins

Norah Quay

•

Thank you, I'll definitely check with the MA Secretary of State tomorrow. Do you have any recommendations for finding a nonprofit tax attorney who won't charge a fortune? Our budget is already stretched thin with all this paperwork.

0 coins

Check with your local community foundation or nonprofit resource center - many offer free or low-cost legal referrals for new nonprofits. Also look into law schools in your area, as many have nonprofit law clinics where supervised students provide free assistance. Another option is Pro Bono Partnership or Lawyers Alliance if you're in an area they serve. They specifically match nonprofits with attorneys who volunteer their time. Just Google them plus your area to see if they operate near you.

0 coins

I'm going through the exact same nightmare right now! Got a $8,200 tax assessment letter last week even though we filed our 1023 three months ago and are clearly within the 27-month window. The stress is unreal. Reading through all these responses has been incredibly helpful. I'm definitely going to try the Taxpayer Advocate Service route first since that sounds like the most legitimate path, and then maybe look into those AI tools if that doesn't work quickly enough. One question for everyone - has anyone dealt with the IRS trying to assess penalties on top of the back taxes? Our letter mentions additional penalty fees that would kick in if we don't respond, but it seems completely unfair when we haven't done anything wrong in the first place. Also wondering if anyone knows whether these automated notices affect your actual 1023 application processing time? I'm terrified this mess is going to delay our determination letter even more.

0 coins

Mei Wong

•

This is such a common headache! I went through this exact situation last year. One thing that helped me was checking if TurboTax saved any "depreciation worksheets" or "asset detail reports" as separate PDFs when you originally filed. Sometimes these get saved as additional documents beyond just the main tax return. Also, if you're missing detailed records, you can reconstruct your depreciation history by looking at your business expense receipts and calculating what you should have claimed each year. For office equipment from 2022, if you used Section 179 expensing, you might have deducted the full amount in year one. If you used regular MACRS, it would be 5-year property (20%, 32%, 19.2%, 11.52%, 11.52%, 5.76% over 6 years due to half-year convention). For the vehicle from 2023, that gets trickier with the luxury auto limits and business use percentage. Keep detailed mileage logs going forward - the IRS loves those for vehicle depreciation audits!

0 coins

This is really helpful! I'm in a similar boat but with equipment from 2021. Quick question - when you say "reconstruct your depreciation history," how do you handle situations where you might have claimed bonus depreciation or Section 179 in the first year? I'm looking at some machinery purchases and I honestly can't remember if I took the full deduction upfront or spread it out over the recovery period. Is there a way to figure this out from the tax return itself, or do I need to dig into the detailed worksheets?

0 coins

@GalaxyGuardian Great question! You can usually tell from looking at your tax return whether you took Section 179 or bonus depreciation in the first year. Check Form 4562 - if you see amounts listed in Part I (Section 179) or Part II (Special Depreciation Allowance/Bonus), then you took the full deduction upfront for those items. If the machinery only shows up in Part III (MACRS depreciation), then you spread it over the normal recovery period. Also look at the totals - if your first-year depreciation was suspiciously high compared to what normal MACRS percentages would give you, that's another clue you used Section 179 or bonus depreciation. Another trick: look at your Schedule C line 13 (depreciation) for that tax year. If it's much higher than expected based on normal depreciation rates, you probably took advantage of the immediate expensing options. The detailed worksheets would confirm this, but the main forms usually give enough clues to piece it together.

0 coins

I've been through this exact situation and it's incredibly frustrating! One thing that worked for me was checking if TurboTax created any "carryforward files" or "prior year data files" when you filed your returns. These sometimes contain more detailed asset information than what appears on the actual tax forms. If you're still stuck, try this approach: log into your TurboTax account and look for a section called "Prior Year Summary" or "Tax History." Even if you can't see the detailed depreciation schedules, TurboTax usually shows a summary of assets being depreciated that carries forward year to year. This at least gives you the basic info (purchase date, original cost, method) that you can use to calculate where you should be now. For your office equipment from 2022, if it was under the Section 179 limit and you elected that method, you would have deducted the full $8,700 in 2022. If you used regular MACRS 5-year depreciation, you'd be looking at about $1,740 in 2022, $2,784 in 2023, and $1,670 in 2024, with more to come in future years. The vehicle situation is more complex due to luxury auto limits, but TurboTax should definitely have this tracked if you used the same account. Worst case, you might need to contact TurboTax support - they can sometimes help retrieve detailed depreciation information from prior year files.

0 coins

Carmen Reyes

•

This is exactly what I needed to hear! I had no idea about the "carryforward files" - I'll definitely check for those. Your breakdown of the MACRS percentages is super helpful too. I think I may have used Section 179 for the office equipment since the amount seems right, but I'm not 100% sure. One follow-up question - if I did use Section 179 for the full $8,700 in 2022, does that mean there's no more depreciation to claim on that equipment going forward? Or are there situations where you might have partial Section 179 and partial regular depreciation on the same assets? Also, regarding the TurboTax support option - do you know if they charge for helping retrieve old depreciation data, or is that typically covered under their standard support?

0 coins

Prev1...22022203220422052206...5645Next