Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.
Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.
Using Claimyr will:
- Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
- Skip the long phone menu
- Call the correct department
- Redial until on hold
- Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
- Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call
If I could give 10 stars I would
If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!
Really made a difference
Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.
Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.
Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.
An incredibly helpful service
An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls ā which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!
Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.
Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.
IT WORKS!! Not a scam!
I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!
Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Zara Ahmed
This is a really helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a timeshare my parents left me in Hilton Head. I only rented it for 8 days last year but I'm worried because I already filed my taxes and reported the full rental income without knowing about the Augusta rule. Is it worth filing an amended return to claim this exclusion? The rental income was only about $2,100, so I'm not sure if the hassle and potential audit risk is worth it for the tax savings. Has anyone here had experience with amending returns specifically for Augusta rule exclusions? Also, for future reference, is there any benefit to intentionally keeping rentals under 14 days versus just reporting the income and taking deductions? It seems like with timeshare maintenance fees being so high, the deductions might actually save more than the exclusion in some cases.
Great questions! For your 2023 situation with the $2,100 rental income, filing an amended return (Form 1040X) could definitely be worth it depending on your tax bracket. If you're in the 22% bracket, you'd save around $460 in federal taxes - probably worth the effort for most people. The amended return process for Augusta rule exclusions is pretty straightforward and shouldn't increase audit risk since you're actually reducing your reported income with proper documentation. Regarding your future strategy question, you're absolutely right to think about this! With timeshare maintenance fees often running $1,000-$2,000+ annually, the math can definitely favor reporting income and taking deductions instead of using Augusta rule exclusion. Here's a quick way to think about it: If your timeshare maintenance fees are $1,500/year and you rent 10 days out of 365, you could potentially deduct about $41 in maintenance fees ($1,500 Ć 10/365). Add other potential deductions like management fees, advertising, etc. and you might come out ahead by reporting the income and claiming expenses, especially if you're in a lower tax bracket. I'd recommend calculating both scenarios each year to see which gives you the better tax outcome!
This is such a helpful discussion! I'm a CPA and see this confusion about timeshares and the Augusta rule come up frequently with clients. You're absolutely correct that your inherited timeshare qualifies - the IRS treats timeshares the same as any other dwelling unit for Section 280A(g) purposes. One additional point worth mentioning: since you inherited the timeshare, make sure you have documentation of its fair market value at the date of your grandmother's death. This becomes your new tax basis and could be important for future tax planning, especially if you decide to sell or convert it to more extensive rental use later. The advice about reporting the 1099 income on Schedule E and then excluding it is spot-on. I always recommend my clients do this to avoid any IRS matching issues. Also consider adding a brief statement like "Rental income excluded per IRC 280A(g) - dwelling unit rented less than 15 days" in the additional information section. Your situation is a textbook Augusta rule case, and with only 10 rental days, you have plenty of cushion under the 14-day limit. Just keep good records of the exact rental dates in case of future questions!
Carmen Lopez
ā¢Thank you so much for the professional perspective! As someone new to inheriting property, I really appreciate the CPA insight. The point about documenting the fair market value at the date of death is something I hadn't even considered - that could definitely be important down the road. I'm curious about the statement you mentioned adding to the additional information section. Is that something the IRS specifically looks for, or just a best practice to make the return clearer? I want to make sure I'm being as transparent as possible about using the Augusta rule exclusion, especially since this is my first time dealing with rental income from an inherited timeshare. Also, when you mention "converting it to more extensive rental use," what would be the tax implications if we decided to rent it out for more than 14 days in future years? Would we lose any benefits from having used the Augusta rule in previous years?
Join the conversation
Not sure if this helps, but the non-deductible traditional IRA contributions can still make sense in certain cases. If your income is too high for direct Roth contributions, you might be able to do what's called a "backdoor Roth" where you make non-deductible traditional IRA contributions and then immediately convert to Roth. The key is having no other pre-tax IRA money (including SEP, SIMPLE or rollover IRAs) to avoid the pro-rata rule. If you do have other pre-tax IRA money, you'd be taxed proportionally on any conversion. This is definitely where Form 8606 becomes critical, as it tracks your non-deductible basis. Worth looking into if you're above the Roth IRA income limits!
Ava Martinez
ā¢So I've been reading about this backdoor Roth thing and I think I'm starting to understand. But doesn't converting traditional to Roth trigger taxes? And would this even be worth it compared to just investing in a regular brokerage account at this point?
You would pay taxes on any pre-tax money you convert, but not on the non-deductible contributions (since you've already paid tax on those dollars). That's precisely why Form 8606 is so important - it establishes your "basis" so you don't get taxed twice. Regarding whether it's worth it compared to a brokerage account - absolutely yes for most people! The Roth grows completely tax-free and withdrawals in retirement are tax-free. With a brokerage account, you'd pay taxes on dividends and capital gains every year, plus capital gains tax when you sell. The tax-free growth in a Roth over decades can be significantly more advantageous than a taxable brokerage account, even if you're not getting the upfront deduction.
Quick question about Form 8606 - I've been doing non-deductible IRA contributions for 3 years but just learned I was supposed to be filing this form. Can I file it retroactively for previous years? Will I get penalized for not filing it before?
Yes, you can (and should) file Form 8606 retroactively! File a separate Form 8606 for each year you made non-deductible contributions. You don't need to amend your full returns - just submit the standalone 8606 forms. There's technically a $50 penalty for each year you failed to file Form 8606 when required, but the IRS rarely enforces this if you voluntarily correct the situation. The bigger risk is not having documentation of your non-deductible contributions, which could lead to double taxation later.
Thank you so much for that info! Do I need to include any kind of explanation letter with the retroactive forms? And how far back can I go if I've been missing these for a while?
Join the conversation
5 My dad started taking social security at 67 while still working part time as a consultant. His big mistake was not realizing how it would affect his tax bracket! He ended up in a higher bracket and actually netted less overall than if he'd waited till 70 when he fully retired. Sometimes the extra SS income can actually hurt you financially if you're not careful.
11 That's a really good point. Did your dad consider doing Roth conversions before claiming Social Security? I've heard that can be a good strategy to reduce RMDs later and minimize the tax hit when Social Security kicks in.
One thing I'd add to this great discussion - don't forget to consider the "do-over" rule if you change your mind. If you start collecting Social Security and later decide it wasn't the right choice, you have 12 months from your first benefit payment to withdraw your application and pay back everything you received (without interest). This essentially gives you a one-time reset. Also, if you're married, coordinate your claiming strategy with your spouse! The timing of when each spouse claims can significantly impact survivor benefits. Sometimes it makes sense for the higher earner to delay while the lower earner claims early, or vice versa. Given that you're an accountant, you probably already know this, but make sure you're factoring in the time value of money when comparing scenarios. A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in three years, so even though delaying increases your monthly benefit, the total lifetime value calculation can be tricky depending on your investment returns and life expectancy assumptions.
This is really helpful advice about the do-over rule - I had no idea that was even an option! The 12-month window gives some peace of mind when making this decision. As someone just starting to navigate this whole Social Security timing question myself, the coordination aspect with spouses is something I hadn't fully considered either. It sounds like there are so many variables to juggle - taxes, Medicare premiums, survivor benefits, investment returns. Do you happen to know if there are any good resources for running different scenarios with all these factors included? Some of the tools mentioned earlier in this thread sound interesting, but I'm wondering if there are other comprehensive planning resources people have found helpful for this kind of analysis.
Join the conversation
Isla Fischer
22 My cousin actually works for the IRS (not giving tax advice, just sharing what she's told me). She said they have internal thresholds for what they bother to pursue, and it's WAY higher than $45. They're looking for significant underreporting, not pocket change. Focus on bigger tax planning issues as your sister gets older and starts earning more substantial income!
Isla Fischer
ā¢15 This makes me feel better! I've been paranoid about every little thing on my taxes since my friend got audited, but he had failed to report like $20k from crypto trading. Very different than forgetting a tiny jury duty payment.
Derek Olson
Your sister is absolutely fine! As a 16-year-old dependent with only $45 in jury duty income, she's nowhere near the filing threshold. The standard deduction for 2024 is $13,850 for single filers, and even for dependents, the threshold for earned income is much higher than $45. You don't need to amend your parents' return or file anything for your sister. The IRS has much bigger fish to fry than pursuing a teenager over $45 in jury duty pay. This amount is so small it's considered administratively insignificant. Keep the documentation for your records, but don't stress about it. Focus your energy on teaching her good financial habits as she starts earning more substantial income in the future!
Amara Okafor
ā¢Thanks Derek! This is exactly what I needed to hear. I'm new to all this tax stuff and was really worried we'd made some huge mistake by not including her jury duty pay. It's reassuring to know that such a small amount isn't even on the IRS's radar. I'll definitely keep the documentation just in case, and you're right about focusing on teaching her good financial habits going forward. Really appreciate the clear explanation!
Oliver Alexander
This is a great question that trips up a lot of people! The SALT deduction cap is one of the most confusing parts of the current tax code. Just to add some context to the excellent explanations already given - the reason you're seeing such a dramatic difference between 2024 and 2025 is likely because: 1. You mentioned buying a house in late 2024, so 2025 is your first full year of property tax payments 2. Property taxes can easily be $15k-25k+ annually depending on your location and home value 3. Combined with state income taxes, this quickly pushes you over the $10k cap One thing to keep in mind is that this SALT cap is currently set to expire after 2025, so it may not be a permanent limitation. However, nothing is guaranteed until Congress acts. Also, make sure you're not double-counting any property taxes that might have been prorated at closing - those should only be deducted once, in the year you actually paid them to the tax authority (not necessarily when they were due).
0 coins
Harper Thompson
ā¢This is really helpful context! I hadn't thought about the timing aspect with the property tax proration at closing. When I bought my house in December 2024, there were some property tax adjustments on the closing statement - should I be looking at what I actually paid to the county versus what was shown on the closing docs? Also, it's good to know the SALT cap might expire after 2025. Do you know if there's any indication from Congress about whether they'll extend it or let it expire? This would make a huge difference for my tax planning going forward, especially since I'm probably going to be hitting this cap every year now as a homeowner.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
ā¢For the property tax proration question - you should deduct what you actually paid to the taxing authority (county/municipality), not what appeared as adjustments on your closing statement. At closing, you and the seller typically split the annual property tax bill based on how many days each of you owned the property that year. The closing statement shows this proration, but only the amounts you actually paid to the tax collector are deductible. As for the SALT cap expiration, Congress hasn't made any definitive moves yet, but there's been discussion from both parties about addressing it. Some want to eliminate the cap entirely, others want to raise it, and some want to extend it as-is. With it expiring after 2025, we'll likely see more concrete proposals as we get closer to the deadline. For planning purposes, I'd prepare for both scenarios - having the cap continue and having it expire - since the political winds can change quickly on tax policy.
0 coins
GalaxyGazer
One thing that might help clarify the SALT situation is understanding that the $10,000 cap is per tax return, not per person. So if you're single, you get $10,000. If you're married filing jointly, you still only get $10,000 total (not $10,000 each). This is why some married couples consider filing separately - each spouse could potentially claim up to $10,000 in SALT deductions on their separate returns. Also, since you mentioned using FreeTax USA, make sure you're looking at the right forms. Your total SALT taxes paid will show up on the detailed worksheets, but only up to $10,000 will actually flow through to your Schedule A as a deduction. The software should clearly show both numbers - what you paid versus what you can deduct. Given that you bought a house in late 2024, you're probably going to be dealing with this cap for the foreseeable future. It might be worth tracking your quarterly estimated state tax payments and property tax payments throughout the year so you can plan ahead for next year's filing.
0 coins